|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
4 |
ITEM 2.
|
|
4 |
ITEM 3.
|
|
4 |
|
A.
|
|
4 |
|
B.
|
|
4 |
|
C.
|
|
4 |
|
D.
|
|
4 |
ITEM 4.
|
|
72 |
|
A.
|
|
72 |
|
B.
|
|
73 |
|
C.
|
|
100 |
|
D.
|
|
100 |
ITEM 4A.
|
|
100 |
ITEM 5.
|
|
100 |
|
A.
|
|
101 |
|
B.
|
|
110 |
|
C.
|
|
115 |
|
D.
|
|
115 |
|
E.
|
|
115 |
ITEM 6.
|
|
116 |
|
A.
|
|
116 |
|
B.
|
|
119 |
|
C.
|
|
122 |
|
D.
|
|
125 |
|
E.
|
|
125 |
ITEM 7.
|
|
125 |
|
A.
|
|
125 |
|
B.
|
|
127 |
|
C.
|
|
128 |
ITEM 8.
|
|
128 |
|
A.
|
|
128 |
|
B.
|
|
129 |
ITEM 9.
|
|
129
|
|
A.
|
|
129
|
|
B.
|
|
129
|
|
C.
|
|
129
|
|
D.
|
|
129
|
|
E.
|
|
129
|
|
F.
|
|
130 |
ITEM 10.
|
|
130 |
|
A.
|
|
130 |
|
B.
|
|
130 |
|
C.
|
|
130 |
|
D.
|
|
130 |
|
E.
|
|
130 |
|
F.
|
|
137 |
|
G.
|
|
137 |
|
H.
|
|
137 |
|
I.
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
|
138 |
ITEM 12.
|
|
139 |
|
A.
|
|
139 |
|
B.
|
|
139 |
|
C.
|
|
139 |
|
D.
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
140 |
ITEM 13.
|
|
140 |
ITEM 14.
|
|
140 |
ITEM 15.
|
|
140 |
|
A.
|
|
141 |
|
B.
|
|
141 |
|
C.
|
|
141 |
|
D.
|
|
141 |
ITEM 16
|
|
141 |
|
A.
|
|
141 |
|
B.
|
|
141 |
|
C.
|
|
142 |
|
D.
|
|
142 |
|
E.
|
|
142 |
|
F.
|
|
142 |
|
G.
|
|
142 |
|
H.
|
|
143 |
|
I.
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
144 |
ITEM 17.
|
|
144 |
ITEM 18.
|
|
144 |
ITEM 19.
|
|
144 |
GENERAL INFORMATION
Unless context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, or Annual Report, to “Immunocore,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to
Immunocore Holdings plc and, where appropriate, its consolidated subsidiaries.
KIMMTRAK® is our registered trademark. This Annual Report includes trademarks, tradenames and service marks, certain of which belong to us and others that are the property of
other organizations. Solely for convenience, trademarks, tradenames and service marks referred to in this Annual Report appear without the ®, ™ and SM symbols, but the absence of those symbols is not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will
not assert our rights or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights to these trademarks, tradenames and service marks to the fullest extent under applicable law. We do not intend our use or display of other parties’ trademarks, trade
names or service marks to imply, and such use or display should not be construed to imply, a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, these other parties.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Our financial statements in this Annual Report were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board, or IASB. None of our financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Our
financial information is presented in pounds sterling. For the convenience of the reader, in this Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated, translations from pounds sterling into U.S. dollars were made at the rate of £1.00 to $1.3500 on December
31, 2021. Such U.S. dollar amounts are not necessarily indicative of the amounts of U.S. dollars that could actually have been purchased upon exchange of pounds sterling at the dates indicated or any other date. All references in this Annual
Report to “$” mean U.S. dollars and all references to “£” and “GBP” mean pounds sterling.
We have historically conducted our business through Immunocore Limited, and therefore, our historical consolidated statements present the consolidated results of operations
of Immunocore Limited. Following the completion of our corporate reorganization and initial public offering in February 2021, our consolidated financial statements present the consolidated financial results of operations of Immunocore Holdings
plc.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the
words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “objective,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” and “ongoing,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable
terminology intended to identify statements about the future. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be
materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and opinions contained in this Annual Report are based upon information available to us as of the date of this
Annual Report and, while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into,
or review of, all potentially available relevant information. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
|
• |
our ability to maintain regulatory approval of KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn) for metastatic uveal melanoma, or mUM, in the United States;
|
|
• |
the timing of, and our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of, KIMMTRAK in the European Union and respective European countries;
|
|
• |
our expectations regarding the potential commercialization of, the marketing and therapeutic potential of KIMMTRAK for mUM;
|
|
• |
our ability to build a sustainable pipeline of new medicine candidates, including but not limited to future generations of KIMMTRAK;
|
|
• |
the expected clinical benefits of KIMMTRAK including extended overall survival benefit;
|
|
• |
expectations regarding the timing of the commercial launch of KIMMTRAK, the timing of commercial availability and the ability to reach patients in a timely manner;
|
|
• |
the value proposition of KIMMTRAK in mUM and benefit as an orphan indication including expectations regarding the potential market size opportunity;
|
|
• |
our ability to successfully executed our sales and marketing strategy of KIMMTRAK in the United States, including continuing to successfully recruit and retain sales and marketing personnel and to
successfully build the market for our medicines;
|
|
• |
our expectations about the willingness of healthcare providers to recommend KIMMTRAK to people with mUM;
|
|
• |
the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates among physicians, patients, patient advocacy groups, third-party payors and the medical community and our ability and our distribution and
marketing partners’ ability to obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement and pricing for, our medicines from government and third-party payers and risks relating to the success of our patient assistance programs;
|
|
• |
the market opportunities for our product candidates may be smaller than we estimate and any approval that we obtain may be based on a narrower definition of the patient population;
|
|
• |
the initiation, timing, progress and results of our current and future preclinical studies and clinical trials and related preparatory work and the period during which the results of
the trials will become available, as well as our research and development programs;
|
|
• |
our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;
|
|
• |
our expectations regarding timing of regulatory filings for, or our ability to obtain regulatory approval of, tebentafusp in additional jurisdictions, or any of our other product
candidates;
|
|
• |
our ability to obtain accelerated approval for current and future product candidates from the FDA and the EMA;
|
|
• |
our ability to identify and develop additional product candidates using our ImmTAX platform;
|
|
• |
business disruptions affecting the initiation, patient enrollment, clinical trial site monitoring, development and operation of our current and proposed clinical trials, including a
public health emergency, such as the ongoing coronavirus 2019, or COVID-19, pandemic;
|
|
• |
the potential benefits of our product candidates;
|
|
• |
our business strategies and goals;
|
|
• |
our plans to collaborate, or statements regarding our current collaborations;
|
|
• |
our ability to find future partners and collaborators;
|
|
• |
the performance of our third-party suppliers and manufacturers,
|
|
• |
our expectations regarding our ability to obtain, maintain and enforce intellectual property protection for our product candidates and our ability to operate our business without
infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of others;
|
|
• |
the effects of competition with respect to KIMMTRAK or any of our other current or future product candidates, as well as innovations by current and future competitors in our industry;
|
|
• |
regulatory developments in the United States and other countries, including potential changes in healthcare laws and regulations;
|
|
• |
our financial performance and our ability to effectively manage our anticipated growth;
|
|
• |
our ability to identify, recruit and retain qualified employees;
|
|
• |
the loss of key commercial or management personnel;
|
|
• |
whether we are classified as a PFIC for current and future periods;
|
|
• |
our ability to raise additional capital; and
|
|
• |
our estimates regarding the period of time for which our current capital resources will be sufficient to fund our
continued operations, future expenses, revenues and needs for additional financing and the accuracy thereof.
|
You should refer to the section titled “Item 3.D Risk Factors” for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove
to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve
our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You
should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Annual Report.
PART I
Item 1. |
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers.
|
Not applicable.
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable.
|
Not applicable.
B. |
Capitalization and indebtedness.
|
Not applicable.
C. |
Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds.
|
Not applicable.
An investment in our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, and all
other information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes hereto, before making an investment decision regarding our securities. The occurrence of any of the events or
developments described below could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us may also adversely affect our business.
Summary Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. If any of the following risks are realized, our business, financial condition and results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected. You should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors in the section titled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 3.D. of this Annual Report. Set forth below is a
summary list of the principal risk factors as of the date of the filing this Annual Report:
|
• |
The COVID-19 global pandemic has and may continue to adversely impact our business, including the commercialization of KIMMTRAK, our supply chain, our pre-clinical studies and our clinical trials, our
liquidity and access to capital markets and our business development activities.
|
|
• |
We have incurred significant losses in every year since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses over the next several years and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
|
|
• |
Our ability to generate revenues from KIMMTRAK is subject to attaining significant market acceptance among physicians, patients and healthcare payers.
|
|
• |
Our future prospects are highly dependent on our ability to successfully develop and execute a commercialization strategy for KIMMTRAK. Failure to do so would adversely impact our financial condition and
prospects.
|
|
• |
We will require substantial additional funding to achieve our business goals. If we are unable to obtain this funding when needed and on acceptable terms, we could be forced to delay,
limit or terminate our product development efforts.
|
|
• |
We are heavily dependent on the success of our ImmTAX platform to identify and develop product candidates. If we or our collaborators are unable to successfully develop and
commercialize our platforms or experience significant delays in doing so, our business may be harmed.
|
|
• |
We may be unable to successfully complete additional large-scale, pivotal clinical trials for any product candidates we develop after KIMMTRAK.
|
|
• |
Our product candidates utilize a novel mechanism of action and involve novel targets which may result in greater research and development expenses, regulatory issues that could delay or
prevent approval, or discovery of unknown or unanticipated adverse effects.
|
|
• |
Clinical product development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome.
|
|
• |
The effects of health epidemics, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, in regions where we, or the third parties on which we rely, have business operations could adversely impact our
business, including our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, as well as the business or operations of our CROs or other third parties with whom we conduct business.
|
|
• |
Reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving KIMMTRAK or our product candidates could delay or prevent us from obtaining or maintaining regulatory approvals or could
negatively impact sales of our products or the prospects for our product candidates.
|
|
• |
Even if we obtain regulatory approvals to market our current and any future approved products, we will remain subject to extensive ongoing regulatory obligations and oversight,
including post-approval requirements, that could result in significant additional expense and could negatively impact our ability to commercialize our current and any future approved products.
|
|
• |
We are subject to manufacturing risks that could substantially increase our costs and limit supply of our products.
|
|
• |
We face substantial competition, which may result in others developing or commercializing drugs before or more successfully than us.
|
|
• |
Our existing collaborations are important to our business, and future collaborations may also be important to us. If we are unable to maintain any of these collaborations, or if these
collaborations are not successful, our business could be adversely affected.
|
|
• |
If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology or obtain, maintain, protect and enforce patent and other intellectual property protection for our technology and
products or if the scope of the protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors and other third parties could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully
commercialize our technology and products may be impaired.
|
|
• |
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating their intellectual property or proprietary rights, the outcome of
which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
|
|
• |
The FDA regulatory pathways can be difficult to predict and whether, for example, further unanticipated clinical trials are required, will depend on the data obtained in our ongoing
clinical trials.
|
|
• |
Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives and experienced scientists and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
|
|
• |
As a company based outside of the United States, we are subject to economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with international operations.
|
|
• |
Failure or perceived failure to comply with existing or future laws, regulations, contracts, self-regulatory schemes, industry standards and other obligations related to data privacy and security (including
security incidents) could harm our business. Compliance or the actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could negatively affect our operating results and business.
|
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Capital
We have incurred significant losses in every year since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses over the next several years and may never
achieve or maintain profitability.
We
only recently reached our commercial stage as a biotechnology company and have incurred net losses in each year since our inception. Our losses were £131.5 million, £74.1 million and £103.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and
2019, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of £481.4 million as of December 31, 2021. We have funded our operations to date primarily with proceeds from private placements of our ordinary and preferred shares, payments from our
collaboration partners, debt financing and most recently, our initial public offering.
In January 2022, we received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, for KIMMTRAK
(tebentafusp-tebn) for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma, or mUM. We are also pursuing regulatory approval of KIMMTAK for the treatment of mUM in other countries including, but not limited to, the European Union, Canada
and Australia. We recently began to generate product revenue for KIMMTRAK, reflecting initial sales since we launched KIMMTRAK in the United States in January 2022. We have initiated initial sales efforts during 2022 focused on ensuring market
access to enable healthcare providers to purchase KIMMTRAK including obtaining payor coverage and securing contracts with distributors, group purchasing organizations, physician buying groups and federal government entities. We have not
received regulatory approval for tebentafusp in any jurisdictions other than the United States, or regulatory approval for any of our other product candidates. Biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and
involves a substantial degree of risk. Since inception, we have focused substantially all of our efforts and financial resources on developing our drug discovery platform and research and development of our product candidates. We have not
obtained regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates other than KIMMTRAK, and there is no assurance that we will obtain further approvals in the future. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses over
the next several years and for the foreseeable future.
These losses will adversely impact our shareholders’ equity and net assets and may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our
expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:
|
• |
continue to establish a sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution capability to commercialize KIMMTRAK and any future product candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval
in the United States and expanded territories and countries;
|
|
• |
continue our ongoing and planned development of our five clinical stage programs, including our Phase 1/2 clinical trial of IMC-F106C (PRAME) and our Phase 1/2 clinical trial of
IMC-C103C (MAGE-A4) in multiple solid tumors; and our ImmTAV molecules targeting Hepatitis B Virus, or HBV, or HIV;
|
|
• |
initiate pre-clinical studies and clinical trials for any additional product candidates that we may pursue in the future;
|
|
• |
seek regulatory approvals for tebentafusp in other jurisdictions, and any future product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;
|
|
• |
build a portfolio of product candidates through the discovery, development, or acquisition or in-license of drugs, product candidates or technologies;
|
|
• |
maintain, protect, enforce and expand our intellectual property portfolio;
|
|
• |
acquire or in-license other product candidates, intellectual property and technologies;
|
|
• |
hire additional clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel;
|
|
• |
add operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support commercial development of KIMMTRAK, our product development and planned
future commercialization efforts of existing and future product candidates; and
|
|
• |
incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses associated with operating as a public company.
|
To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing and eventually commercializing products that generate significant revenue. This will require us to be
successful in a range of challenging activities, including marketing and selling KIMMTRAK and any future products for which we may obtain regulatory approval, our global regulatory submissions for tebentafusp and any future product candidates
that we may pursue, obtaining regulatory approval, procuring commercial-scale manufacturing, as well as discovering or acquiring and then developing additional product candidates. We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we do, may
never generate revenues that are significant enough to achieve profitability.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with drug development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of expenses or when, or if, we will
be able to achieve profitability. Our expenses could increase beyond our expectations if we are required by the FDA, the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or other regulatory authorities to perform studies in addition to those we currently
expect, if issues associated with KIMMTRAK arise following FDA approval, or if there are any delays in the initiation and completion of our clinical trials or the development of tebentafusp or any future product candidates.
Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would
decrease the value of our ADSs and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our ADSs could also cause you to lose all or
part of your investment.
Our future prospects are highly dependent on our ability to successfully develop and execute commercialization strategies for KIMMTRAK and any future
products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. Failure to do so would adversely impact our financial condition and prospects.
Substantial resources are focused on the commercialization of KIMMTRAK and any future products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. Our ability to generate
significant medicine revenues and to achieve commercial success in the near-term will initially depend on our ability to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK in the United States. With respect to KIMMTRAK, our commercial strategy includes
launching KIMMTRAK globally for HLA-A*02:01 metastatic uveal melanoma patients in the United States, and then expanding into Europe, the United Kingdom, and select other markets.
We are focusing a significant portion of our commercial activities and resources on KIMMTRAK, and we believe our ability to grow our long-term revenues, and a significant
portion of the value of our company, relates to our ability to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK in the United States. As a newly launched medicine for a disease that had no previously-approved treatments, successful commercialization of
KIMMTRAK is subject to many risks. There are numerous examples of unsuccessful product launches and failures to meet high expectations of market potential, including by pharmaceutical companies with more experience and resources than us. While
we have established our commercial team and U.S. field force, we expect to develop the team further in order to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK. There are many factors that could cause commercialization of KIMMTRAK to be unsuccessful,
including a number of factors that are outside our control. Because no medicine has previously been approved by the FDA for the treatment of mUM it is especially difficult to estimate KIMMTRAK’s market potential or the time it will take to
increase patient and physician awareness and change current treatment paradigms. The commercial success of KIMMTRAK depends on the extent to which patients and physicians accept and adopt KIMMTRAK as a treatment for mUM. For example, if the mUM
patient population is smaller than we estimate, if it proves difficult to identify mUM patients or educate physicians as to the availability and potential benefits of KIMMTRAK, or if physicians are unwilling to prescribe or patients are
unwilling to take KIMMTRAK, the commercial potential of KIMMTRAK will be limited. We also have limited information regarding how physicians, patients and payers will respond to the pricing of KIMMTRAK. Physicians may not prescribe KIMMTRAK and
patients may be unwilling to use KIMMTRAK if coverage is not provided or reimbursement is inadequate to cover a significant portion of the cost. Thus, significant uncertainty remains regarding the commercial potential of KIMMTRAK. If the
continued commercialization of KIMMTRAK becomes unsuccessful or perceived as disappointing, the price of our ADSs could decline significantly and long-term success of the medicine and our company could be harmed.
Our ability to generate revenues from KIMMTRAK is subject to attaining significant market acceptance among physicians, patients and healthcare payers.
KIMMTRAK, and other product candidates that we may develop or acquire, may not attain market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payers or the medical
community. We believe that the degree of market acceptance and our ability to generate revenues from KIMMTRAK will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
• |
timing of market introduction of KIMMTRAK as well as competitive medicines;
|
|
• |
efficacy and safety of KIMMTRAK;
|
|
• |
continued projected growth of the markets in which KIMMTRAK competes;
|
|
• |
the extent to which physicians diagnose and treat the conditions that KIMMTRAK is approved to treat;
|
|
• |
prevalence and severity of any side effects;
|
|
• |
if and when we are able to obtain regulatory approvals for additional indications for KIMMTRAK;
|
|
• |
acceptance by patients, physicians and applicable specialists;
|
|
• |
availability of, and ability to maintain, coverage and adequate reimbursement and pricing from government and other third-party payers;
|
|
• |
potential or perceived advantages or disadvantages of KIMMTRAK over alternative treatments, including cost of treatment and relative convenience and ease of administration;
|
|
• |
strength of sales, marketing and distribution support;
|
|
• |
the price of KIMMTRAK, both in absolute terms and relative to alternative treatments;
|
|
• |
impact of past and limitation of future medicine price increases;
|
|
• |
our ability to maintain a continuous supply of KIMMTRAK for commercial sale;
|
|
• |
the effect of current and future healthcare laws;
|
|
• |
the extent and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the extent to which physicians and patients delay visits or writing or filling prescriptions for KIMMTRAK;
|
|
• |
the performance of third-party distribution partners, over which we have limited control; and
|
|
• |
medicine labeling or medicine insert requirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities.
|
With respect to KIMMTRAK, our ability to grow sales will be affected by the success of our sales, access, marketing and medical strategies. If KIMMTRAK or any other
products that we may seek approval for, or acquire, fail to attain market acceptance, we may not be able to generate significant revenue to sustain profitability, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and prospects (including, possibly, the value of our ADSs).
We will require substantial additional funding to achieve our business goals. If we are unable to obtain this funding when needed and on acceptable terms,
we could be forced to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts.
Developing biopharmaceutical products is expensive and time-consuming, and we expect to require substantial additional capital to conduct research, pre-clinical testing and
human studies, may establish pilot scale and commercial scale manufacturing processes and facilities, and establish and develop quality control, regulatory, marketing, sales and administrative capabilities to support our existing programs and
pursue potential additional programs. We are also responsible for the payments to third parties of expenses that may include milestone payments, license maintenance fees and royalties, including in the case of certain of our agreements with
academic institutions or other companies from whom intellectual property rights underlying their respective programs have been in-licensed or acquired. Because the outcome of any pre-clinical or clinical development and regulatory approval
process is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development, regulatory approval process and commercialization of any future product candidates we may identify.
As
of December 31, 2021, we had working capital (defined as total current assets less total current liabilities) of £201.5 million ($272.0 million) and cash and cash equivalents of £237.9 million ($321.2 million). We expect that our existing cash
and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations until at least the third quarter of 2023. With the inclusion of expected product revenue for KIMMTRAK in the United States reflecting initial sales in 2022 and pre-product revenue in
France as a result of our early access program, we estimate we will have sufficient funds to continue to meet its liabilities as they fall due into the second half of 2024. However, while we have received marketing approval for KIMMTRAK to treat
mUM patients in the United States, our efforts to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK could materially differ from our estimates, and it is possible that we may not successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK in the United States or in other countries,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. In addition, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or
private equity or debt financings or other sources, such as strategic collaborations or license and development agreements. Any additional fundraising efforts for us may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely
affect our ability to develop and commercialize product candidates that we may identify and pursue. Moreover, such financing may result in dilution to our shareholders, imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations, or other restrictions
that may affect our business. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. Our future funding
requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:
|
• |
our ability to successfully execute our commercialization strategies for KIMMTRAK and, if approved, our other product candidates;
|
|
• |
progress, timing, scope and costs of our clinical trials, including the ability to timely initiate clinical sites, enroll subjects and manufacture soluble bispecific TCR product
candidates for our ongoing, planned and potential future clinical trials, including our clinical trials of IMC-F106C (PRAME) and IMC-C103C (MAGE-A4) in multiple solid tumors, and IMC-I109V targeting HBV;
|
|
• |
time and costs required to perform research and development to identify and characterize new product candidates from our research programs;
|
|
• |
the time and cost necessary to pursue regulatory authorizations and approvals that may be required by regulatory authorities to execute clinical trials or commercialize our products;
|
|
• |
our ability to have clinical and commercial products successfully manufactured consistent with FDA, EMA and other authorities’ regulations;
|
|
• |
amount of sales and other revenues from product candidates that we may commercialize, if any, including the selling prices for such potential products and the availability of adequate
third-party coverage and reimbursement for patients;
|
|
• |
sales and marketing costs associated with commercializing our products, if approved, including the cost and timing of building our marketing and sales capabilities;
|
|
• |
cost of building, staffing and validating our manufacturing processes, which may include capital expenditure;
|
|
• |
terms and timing of any revenue from our existing collaborations;
|
|
• |
costs of operating as a public company;
|
|
• |
time and cost necessary to respond to technological, regulatory, political and market developments;
|
|
• |
costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
|
|
• |
costs, associated with, and terms and timing of, any future any potential acquisitions, strategic collaborations, licensing agreements or other arrangements that we may establish; and
|
|
• |
inability of clinical sites to enroll patients as healthcare capacities are required to cope with natural disasters, epidemics or other health system emergencies, such as the COVID-19
pandemic.
|
A change in the outcome of any of these or other variables with respect to the development of any of our current and future product candidates could significantly change the
costs and timing associated with the development and commercialization of that product candidate. Furthermore, our operating plans may change in the future, and we may need additional funds to meet operational needs and capital requirements
associated with such operating plans.
Additional funds may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable, or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, we may be
required to delay, limit or terminate one or more research or development programs or the commercialization of any product candidates or be unable to expand operations or otherwise capitalize on business opportunities, as desired, which could
materially affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing shareholders, restrict our operations or cause us to relinquish valuable rights.
We may seek additional capital through a combination of public and private equity offerings, debt financings, strategic partnerships and alliances and licensing arrangements.
To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity, convertible debt securities or other equity-based derivative securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other
preferences that adversely affect your rights as holder of ADSs. Any indebtedness we incur would result in increased fixed payment obligations and could involve restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt,
limitations on our ability to acquire or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. Any debt or additional equity financing that we raise may contain
terms that are not favorable to us or our shareholders. Furthermore, the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our ADSs to decline and existing
shareholders may not agree with our financing plans or the terms of such financings. If we raise additional funds through strategic partnerships, collaborations, and alliances and licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to
relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property, technologies or our product candidates, or grant licenses on terms unfavorable to us.
The elimination of LIBOR could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We are subject to risks related to uncertainty regarding the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. LIBOR is the subject of recent national, international, and other
regulatory guidance and proposals for reform, which may cause LIBOR to cease to exist after 2021 or to perform differently than in the past. The current administrator of LIBOR will cease to publish the settings relevant to our agreements on June
30, 2023. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, a new index
calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. At this time, it is not possible to predict how markets will respond to SOFR or other alternative reference rates as the
transition away from LIBOR is anticipated in coming years. There is currently no definitive information regarding the future utilization of LIBOR or of any particular replacement rate. A transition away from LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing
the applicable interest rate may adversely affect our outstanding variable-rate indebtedness.
Risks Related to KIMMTRAK and the Development of Our Product Candidates
In order to increase adoption and sales of KIMMTRAK, we will need to continue developing our commercial organization as well as recruit and retain
qualified field representatives.
In order to commercialize KIMMTRAK, we must continue to build our sales, marketing, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities. As of December 31, 2021, we
have over 20 sales and market access employees in the United States. We currently have limited resources compared to some of our competitors, and the continued development of our own commercial organization to market our medicines and any
additional medicines we may acquire will be expensive and time-consuming. We also cannot be certain that we will be able to continue to successfully develop this capability.
In addition, none of the members of our sales force have promoted any medicine for the treatment of mUM prior to the launch of KIMMTRAK. We are required to expend significant
time and resources to train our sales force to be credible and able to educate physicians on the benefits of prescribing and pharmacists dispensing KIMMTRAK. In addition, we must train our sales force to ensure that a consistent and appropriate
message about KIMMTRAK is being delivered to our potential customers. We may experience turnover of the sales representatives that we hired or will hire, requiring us to train new sales representatives. If we are unable to effectively train our
sales force and equip them with effective materials, including medical and sales literature to help them inform and educate physicians about the benefits of KIMMTRAK and their proper administration and label indication, as well as our patient
assistance programs, our efforts to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK could be put in jeopardy, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, share price and operations.
The incidence and prevalence for target patient populations for some of our product candidates have not been established with precision. If the market
opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we estimate, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability will be adversely affected, possibly materially.
In January 2022, we received approval from the FDA for KIMMTRAK for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or mUM. In February 2022, we
received notification that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, of the EMA has adopted a positive opinion recommending the approval of KIMMTRAKfor the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or
mUM. The CHMP positive opinion is one of the final steps before marketing authorisation is granted by the European Commission, which has the authority to approve medicines for use throughout the European Union. We estimate that there are
approximately 1,000 mUM patients per annum in the United States and Western Europe who test positive for HLA-A*02:01 and might benefit from KIMMTRAK as a monotherapy.
We are evaluating the safety and tolerability of IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C in Phase 1 dose escalation trials in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who express
MAGE-A4 and PRAME and test positive for HLA-A*02:01. We estimate that, across all solid tumors, the annual number of patients worldwide who test positive for HLA-A*02:01 and can potentially benefit from our IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C programs is
approximately 100,000 and 200,000, respectively. There is no assurance, however, as to what percentage of this population might benefit from these monotherapies.
We will soon be evaluating the safety and tolerability of I109V/HBV in a Phase 1 dose escalation clinical trial in patients with chronic HBV who test positive for
HLA-A*02:01. We estimate that there are approximately 16 to 24 million chronic HBV patients who test positive for HLA-A*02:01. There is no assurance, however, as to what percentage of this population might benefit from this monotherapy.
The total addressable market opportunity for KIMMTRAK and our programs will ultimately depend upon, among other things, the diagnosis criteria included in the final label, if
our product candidates are approved for sale for these indications, acceptance by the medical community and patient access, product pricing and reimbursement as well as expansion into additional markets. The number of patients with cancers, solid
tumors and chronic HBV and test positive for HLA-A*02:01 may turn out to be lower than expected, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our products, or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access
to, all of which would adversely affect our results of operations and our business. We may not be successful in our efforts to identify additional product candidates. Due to our limited resources and access to capital, we must prioritize
development of certain product candidates, which may prove to be the wrong choice and may adversely affect our business.
We are heavily dependent on the success of our ImmTAX platform to identify and develop product candidates. If we or our collaborators are unable to
successfully develop and commercialize our platforms or experience significant delays in doing so, our business may be harmed.
We are heavily dependent on the success of our ImmTAX platform technology, KIMMTRAK and the product candidates currently in our core programs. Our ImmTAC, ImmTAV and ImmTAAI
platforms were developed from the foundation of our ImmTAX platform and are our primary platform technologies. Our commercial prospects will be heavily dependent on product candidates identified and developed using our ImmTAX platform. To date,
we have invested substantially all of our efforts and financial resources to identify, acquire intellectual property for, and develop our ImmTAX platform technology and our programs, including conducting pre-clinical studies and early-stage
clinical trials, and providing general and administrative support for these operations.
We may not be successful in our efforts to further develop our ImmTAX platform technology and current product candidates. With the exception of KIMMTRAK, which has been
approved by the FDA, we are not permitted to market or promote any of our product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such regulatory approval
for any of our product candidates. Each of our product candidates will require significant additional clinical development, management of preclinical, clinical, and manufacturing activities, regulatory approval, adequate manufacturing supply, a
commercial organization, and significant marketing efforts before we generate any revenue from product sales, if at all.
While we have recently developed sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, we may not be able to effectively market, sell and distribute KIMMTRAK or
any of other product candidates, if approved.
We recently obtained marketing
approval for KIMMTRAK in the United States. We have applied for marketing approval of tebentafusp in Europe and other territories. We have developed, and continue to develop, arrangements to sell, market and distribute KIMMTRAK and
tebentafusp. We may not be able to effectively market and distribute tebentafusp. We have invested, and expect to continue to invest, significant amounts of financial and management resources to further develop internal and contracted sales,
distribution and marketing capabilities, some of which will be committed prior to any confirmation that tebentafusp will be approved in a territory. We have engaged third parties and may also engage additional third parties to provide these services. In addition, third parties can terminate our agreement under certain circumstances. If third parties fail to hire, train, and retain
qualified field personnel, market our product successfully or on a cost-effective basis or otherwise terminates our relationship, our ability to generate revenue will be limited and we will need to identify and retain an alternative
organization, or develop our own sales and marketing capability. This could involve significant delays and costs, including the diversion of our management’s attention from other activities. We will also need to retain additional consultants
or external service providers to assist us in sales, marketing and distribution functions, and may be unsuccessful in retaining such services on acceptable financial terms or at all.
For our other product candidates, there are risks involved with both establishing our own sales and marketing capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties
to perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a commercial organization is expensive and time consuming and could delay any product launch. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and
establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or
reposition our sales and marketing personnel.
Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our product candidates on our own include:
|
• |
the inability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;
|
|
• |
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to physicians or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe any future product that we may develop;
|
|
• |
the lack of complementary treatments to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and
|
|
• |
unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization.
|
If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenue or the profitability to us from these revenue
streams is likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any product candidates that we develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates or
may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We likely will have little control over such third parties and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our product candidates effectively.
If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we may not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.
The COVID-19 global pandemic has and may continue to adversely impact our business, including the commercialization of KIMMTRAK, our supply chain, our
pre-clinical studies and our clinical trials, our liquidity and access to capital markets and our business development activities, as well as the business or operations of our CROs or other third parties with whom we conduct business.
Our business could be adversely affected by health epidemics in regions where we have concentrations of clinical trial sites or other business operations, and could cause
significant disruption in the operations of third-party manufacturers and CROs upon whom we rely. Since December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, has spread to multiple countries. Our company headquarters is located in Oxfordshire,
United Kingdom, we have U.S. offices in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania and Rockville, Maryland, and our CROs and contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, are operating in Europe, United States and Asia. In March 2020, the World Health
Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic, and the U.S. Government-imposed travel restrictions on travel between the United States, Europe and certain other countries. Further, the President of the United States declared the COVID-19
pandemic a national emergency, invoking powers under the Stafford Act, the legislation that directs federal emergency disaster response.
In response to these public health directives and orders, we have implemented work-from-home policies to support the community efforts to reduce the transmission of COVID-19
and protect employees, complying with guidance from federal, state/provincial or municipal government and health authorities. We implemented a number of measures to ensure employee safety and business continuity. Employees who can work from home
have been doing so, while those needing to work in laboratory facilities are divided into shifts to reduce the number of people gathered together at one time. Business travel has been suspended, and online and teleconference technology is used to
meet virtually rather than in person. We have taken measures to secure our research and development project activities, while work in laboratories and facilities has been organized to reduce risk of COVID-19 transmission.
The effects of the executive orders and our work-from-home policies may negatively impact productivity, disrupt our business and delay our clinical programs and timelines
(for example, our timeline for tebentafusp), the magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and other limitations on our ability to conduct our business in the ordinary course. These and similar, and
perhaps more severe, disruptions in our operations could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
Quarantines, shelter-in-place and similar government orders, or the perception that such orders, shutdowns or other restrictions on the conduct of business operations could
occur, related to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases could impact personnel at third-party manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom, United States and other countries, or the availability or cost of materials, which would disrupt our
supply chain.
To date, the COVID-19 pandemic and its related variants have resulted in periodic short-term delays in progressing our early-stage pipeline programs. Our current and planned
clinical trials have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including (i) patients becoming exposed to COVID-19 or having to interrupt treatment, (ii) delays in accessing patients during surges of the COVID-19 pandemic or variants, which can
adversely impact enrollment, ongoing treatment, dosing, and protocol-mandated assessments and other procedures, and (iii) CRO and trial site staffing shortages due to illness, isolation and hiring challenges, which can impact data enrollment,
data entry, timely response to queries, study timelines and operational milestones.
The continued effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may also further negatively impact our clinical trials in the future, including potential longer delays and restrictions on our
ability to recruit and retain patients, principal investigators and healthcare employees. The COVID-19 pandemic could also affect the operations of our CROs or CMOs, which may result in delays or disruptions in our clinical trials or in the
supply of product candidates.
In addition, our planned clinical trials may be further affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including:
|
• |
delays or difficulties in enrolling and retaining patients in our clinical trials, including patients that may not be able or willing to comply with clinical trial protocols such as weekly dosing regimens
if quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services;
|
|
• |
delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical site investigators and clinical site staff;
|
|
• |
increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of risks of exposure to COVID-19, being forced to quarantine or being unable to visit clinical trial
locations or otherwise comply with clinical trial protocols;
|
|
• |
diversion or prioritization of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials and towards the COVID-19 pandemic, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and
hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials, and because, who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to COVID-19 and adversely impact our clinical trial operations;
|
|
• |
interruption of our clinical supply chain or key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel imposed or recommended by federal, state/provincial or
municipal governments, employers and others; and
|
|
• |
limitations in employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our clinical trials, including because of sickness of employees or their families or the desire of employees to avoid
contact with large groups of people.
|
For our clinical trials that we expect to conduct at sites outside the United States, particularly in countries which are experiencing heightened impact from the COVID-19
coronavirus, in addition to the risks listed above, we may also experience the following adverse impacts:
|
• |
delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials;
|
|
• |
delays in clinical sites receiving the supplies and materials needed to conduct our clinical trials;
|
|
• |
interruption in global shipping that may affect the transport of clinical trial materials, such as investigational drug product and comparator drugs used in our clinical trials;
|
|
• |
changes in federal, state/provincial or municipal regulations as part of a response to the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak which may require us to change the ways in which our clinical trials are conducted,
which may result in unexpected costs, or to discontinue the clinical trials altogether;
|
|
• |
delays in necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees and other important agencies and contractors due to limitations in employee resources or forced furlough of government employees;
and
|
|
• |
the refusal of the FDA to accept data from clinical trials in these affected geographies.
|
The spread of COVID-19, which has caused a broad impact globally, may materially affect us economically. While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of,
COVID-19 may be difficult to assess or predict, a widespread pandemic could result in significant disruption of global financial markets, reducing our ability to access capital, which could in the future negatively affect our liquidity. In
addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our ordinary shares.
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted, and may in the future, impact our business and clinical trials, and such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be
predicted with confidence, such as the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United Kingdom, United States, and other countries, business closures or business disruptions and the effectiveness of actions taken
in the United Kingdom, United States, and other countries to contain and treat the disease. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar epidemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. We may experience a material impact on our
operations, and we continue to monitor the COVID-19 situation closely
Even though KIMMTRAK has received FDA approval, and even if tebentafusp receives approval in other countries, or any of our other product candidates
receives marketing approval, these may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.
Even though KIMMTRAK has received FDA approval and a positive CHMP opinion, and even if we obtain approvals from the FDA, the EMA or other comparable regulatory agencies and
are able to initiate commercialization of our other clinical stage product candidates or any other product candidates we develop, the product candidate may not achieve market acceptance among physicians, patients, hospitals, including pharmacy
directors, and third-party payors and, ultimately, may not be commercially successful. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
• |
the clinical indications for which our product candidates are approved;
|
|
• |
physicians, hospitals, cancer treatment centers, and patients considering our product candidates as a safe and effective treatment;
|
|
• |
hospitals and cancer treatment centers establishing the infrastructure required for the administration of the product candidate;
|
|
• |
the potential and perceived advantages of our product candidates over alternative treatments;
|
|
• |
the prevalence and severity of any side effects, including CRS, for which KIMMTRAK has a boxed warning recommending at least 16 hours of patient monitoring after each of the first three infusions, and as
clinically indicated thereafter;
|
|
• |
product labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities;
|
|
• |
limitations or warnings contained in the labeling approved by the FDA or the EMA;
|
|
• |
the timing of market introduction of our product candidates as well as competitive products;
|
|
• |
the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;
|
|
• |
the amount of upfront costs or training required for physicians to administer our product candidates;
|
|
• |
the pricing of our products and the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors and government authorities;
|
|
• |
the willingness of patients to pay out-of-pocket in the absence of comprehensive coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors and government authorities;
|
|
• |
relative convenience and ease of administration, including as compared to alternative treatments and competitive therapies; and
|
|
• |
the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and distribution support.
|
Our efforts to educate physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community on the benefits of our products, if approved, may require significant
resources and may never be successful. Such efforts may require more resources than are typically required due to the complexity and uniqueness of our product candidates. Because we expect sales of our product candidates, if approved, to generate
substantially all of our product revenue for the foreseeable future, the failure of our product candidates to find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing.
Even if our products achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to maintain that market acceptance over time if new products or technologies are introduced that are more
favorably received than our products, are more cost effective or render our products obsolete.
We may be unable to successfully complete additional large-scale, pivotal clinical trials for any product candidates we develop after tebentafusp.
We may be unable to successfully complete additional large-scale, pivotal clinical trials for any product candidates we develop after tebentafusp. In addition, we may be
unable to obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. We have two programs,
IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C, in Phase 1 clinical development and, in the case of IMC-I109V, we have received clearance to begin a Phase 1 clinical trial in Australia, Belgium, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Poland, South Korea, Spain and the United Kingdom
and submitted for Health Authority approvals to begin clinical development in Romania. We cannot be sure that issues will not arise that require us to suspend or terminate our Phase 1 clinical trials. Guidance we have received from the FDA or
other regulatory authorities on clinical trial design is subject to change. These regulatory authorities could change their position, including, on the acceptability of our trial designs or the clinical endpoints selected, which may require us to
complete additional clinical trials or impose stricter approval conditions than we currently expect. Successful completion of our clinical trials is a prerequisite to submitting a Biologics License Application, or BLA, to the FDA and a Marketing
Authorization Application, or MAA, to the EMA, for each product candidate and, consequently, the ultimate approval and commercial marketing of each product candidate. We do not know whether any of our future clinical trials will begin on time or
ever be completed on schedule, if at all.
If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to
successfully complete clinical trials of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may:
|
• |
be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates;
|
|
• |
not obtain marketing approval at all;
|
|
• |
obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired;
|
|
• |
be subject to post-marketing testing requirements; or
|
|
• |
have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval.
|
Our product candidates utilize a novel mechanism of action and involve novel targets which may result in greater research and development expenses,
regulatory issues that could delay or prevent approval, or discovery of unknown or unanticipated adverse effects.
Our product candidates utilize novel mechanisms of action and involve novel targets which may result in greater research and development expenses, regulatory issues that
could delay or prevent approval, or discovery of unknown or unanticipated adverse effects. Our ImmTAX platform uses advanced computational models in tight integration with our structural biology, protein engineering, affinity maturation and
binding efficacy capabilities to predict and design the compounds that will achieve the most desirable characteristics, including potency, selectivity, bioavailability, and drug-like properties. A disruption in any of these capabilities may have
significant adverse effects in our abilities to expand our ImmTAX platform, and we cannot predict whether we will continue to have access to these capabilities in the future to support our ImmTAX platform. In addition, there can be no assurance
that we will be able to rapidly identify, design and synthesize the necessary compounds or that these or other problems related to the development of this novel mechanism will not arise in the future, which may cause significant delays or we
raise problems we may not be able to resolve.
Regulatory approval of novel product candidates such as ours can be more expensive, riskier and take longer than for other, more well-known or extensively studied
pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical product candidates due to our and regulatory agencies’ lack of experience with them. The novelty of our mechanism of action may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to conduct additional studies
or clinical trials, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates or lead to significant post-approval limitations or
restrictions. The novel mechanism of action also means that fewer people are trained in or experienced with product candidates of this type, which may make it more difficult to find, hire and retain personnel for research, development and
manufacturing positions. Because our soluble bispecific T cell receptors, or TCRs utilize a novel mechanism of action and involve novel targets, there is also an increased risk that we may discover previously unknown or unanticipated adverse
effects during our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. Any such events could adversely impact our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Although we intend to explore other therapeutic opportunities, in addition to the product candidates that we are currently developing, we may fail to
identify viable new product candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons. If we fail to identify additional potential product candidates, our business could be materially harmed.
Research programs to pursue the development of our existing and planned product candidates for additional indications and to identify new product candidates and disease
targets require substantial technical, financial and human resources whether or not they are ultimately successful. For example, we develop various protein models and make predictions as to how molecules might target antigens, with subsequent
validation efforts in our labs and labs of our contract research organizations, or CROs. There can be no assurance that we will find potential additional targets using this approach, that any such targets will be tractable, or that such clinical
validations will be successful. Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential indications and/or product candidates, yet fail to yield results for clinical development for a number of reasons, including:
|
• |
the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential indications and/or product candidates;
|
|
• |
potential product candidates may, after further study, be shown to have harmful adverse effects or other characteristics that indicate they are unlikely to be effective products; or
|
|
• |
it may take greater human and financial resources than we will possess to identify additional therapeutic opportunities for our product candidates or to develop suitable potential product candidates through
internal research programs, thereby limiting our ability to develop, diversify and expand our product portfolio.
|
Because we have limited financial and human resources, we intend to initially focus on research programs and product candidates for a limited set of indications. As a result,
we may forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential or a greater likelihood of success. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail
to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will ever be able to identify additional therapeutic opportunities for our product candidates or to develop suitable potential
product candidates through internal research programs, which could materially adversely affect our future growth and prospects. We may focus our efforts and resources on potential product candidates or other potential programs that ultimately
prove to be unsuccessful.
Clinical product development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome.
While we plan to pursue additional regulatory approvals, it is uncertain whether tebentafusp will receive further marketing approval beyond the approval which KIMMTRAK has
received in the United States. Furthermore, it is impossible to predict when or if IMC-C103C, IMC-F106C and IMCI109V or any of our future product candidates will prove effective and safe in humans or will receive regulatory approval. Before
obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate, we must complete pre-clinical studies and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in
humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of pre-clinical
development testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Moreover, pre-clinical and clinical data are often
susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in pre-clinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their
product candidates. Our pre-clinical studies and future clinical trials may not be successful. From time to time, we may publish interim top-line or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials are subject to the
risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary or top-line data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in
the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse differences between preliminary or
interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.
We also expect to rely on outside vendors (for example, independent contractors and CROs) to conduct, supervise or monitor some or all aspects of clinical trials involving
our products. We will have less control over the timing and other aspects of these clinical trials than if we conducted them entirely on our own. If we fail to commence or complete, or experience delays in, any of our planned clinical trials, our
stock price and our ability to conduct our business as currently planned could be harmed.
We currently anticipate that we will have to rely on CMOs to manufacture our products for clinical trials. If they fail to commence or complete, or experiences delays in,
manufacturing our products and product candidates, our planned clinical trials will be delayed, which will adversely affect our stock price and our ability to conduct our business as currently planned.
If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals for our product candidates, we will not be able to
commercialize, or will be delayed in commercializing, our product candidates, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.
Our product candidates and the activities associated with their development and commercialization, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy,
recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution, import and export are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States and by comparable authorities in other
countries. Before we can commercialize further product candidates, we must obtain marketing approval. Currently, the majority of our product candidates are in development, and we have not received approval to market any of our product candidates
from regulatory authorities, with the exception of KIMMTRAK in the United States. It is possible that our product candidates, including any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future, will never obtain regulatory approval. We have
only limited experience in filing and supporting the applications necessary to gain regulatory approvals and expect to rely on third-party CROs and/or regulatory consultants to assist us in this process. Securing regulatory approval requires the
submission of extensive pre-clinical and clinical data and supporting information to the various regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy. Securing regulatory approval also
requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the relevant regulatory authority. Our product candidates may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or
may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use. In addition, regulatory authorities may find fault with our
manufacturing process or facilities or that of third-party contract manufacturers. We may also face greater than expected difficulty in manufacturing our product candidates.
The process of obtaining regulatory approvals, both in the United States and abroad, is expensive and often takes many years. If the FDA, EMA or a comparable foreign
regulatory authority requires that we perform additional pre-clinical or clinical trials, approval, if obtained at all, may be delayed. The length of such a delay varies substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type,
complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in regulatory review for each submitted
application, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. The FDA and comparable authorities in other countries have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that
our data are insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. Furthermore, our ability to enroll patients may continue to be delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic and it is not possible to know the extent and
scope of such delays at this point.
|
• |
the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;
|
|
• |
the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;
|
|
• |
we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication or a related
companion diagnostic is suitable to identify appropriate patient populations;
|
|
• |
the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval;
|
|
• |
we may be unable to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;
|
|
• |
the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from pre-clinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
• |
the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to support the submission a BLA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or
elsewhere;
|
|
• |
the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may find deficiencies with or fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for
clinical and commercial supplies; and
|
|
• |
the approval policies or regulations of the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change such that our clinical data are insufficient for approval.
|
Even if we were to obtain approval for further product candidates, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than
we request, thereby narrowing the commercial potential of the product candidate. In addition, regulatory authorities may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate
with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product
candidates.
If we experience delays in obtaining approval or if we fail to obtain approval of our product candidates, the commercial prospects for our product candidates may be harmed
and our ability to generate revenues will be materially impaired.
Positive results from early pre-clinical studies of our product candidates are not necessarily predictive of the results of later pre-clinical studies and
any future clinical trials of our product candidates. If we cannot replicate the positive results from our earlier pre-clinical studies of our product candidates in our later pre-clinical studies and future clinical trials, we may be unable to
successfully develop, obtain regulatory for and commercialize our product candidates.
Any positive results from our pre-clinical studies of our product candidates may not necessarily be predictive of the results from required later pre-clinical studies and
clinical trials. Similarly, even if we are able to complete our planned pre-clinical studies or any future clinical trials of our product candidates according to our current development timeline, the positive results from such pre-clinical
studies and clinical trials of our product candidates may not be replicated in subsequent pre-clinical studies or clinical trial results. In addition, positive results in later stage clinical trials of one of our product candidates in an
indication may not be predictive of the safety or efficacy of our other product candidates in other indications, even if they employ a similar mechanism of action.
Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials after achieving positive results in
early-stage development and we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. These setbacks have been caused by, among other things, pre-clinical and other nonclinical findings made while clinical trials were underway, or safety or
efficacy observations made in pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, including previously unreported adverse events. Moreover, preclinical, nonclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses and many
companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in pre-clinical studies and clinical trials nonetheless failed to obtain FDA or EMA approval.
Interim, “top-line” and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become
available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
From time to time, we may publish interim, “top-line” or preliminary data from our planned clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject
to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary or “top-line” data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may
result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Differences between preliminary or
interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects and may cause the trading price of our ADSs to fluctuate significantly.
We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our product candidates.
We may experience delays in completing our pre-clinical studies and initiating or completing clinical trials, and we may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a
result of, any future clinical trials that we could conduct that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:
|
• |
regulators or institutional review boards, or IRBs, or ethics committees may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;
|
|
• |
we may experience delays in reaching, or fail to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and prospective CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may
vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
|
|
• |
clinical trials of our product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional pre-clinical studies or clinical trials or we
may decide to abandon product development programs;
|
|
• |
the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate or participants may drop
out of these clinical trials or fail to return for post-treatment follow-up at a higher rate than we anticipate;
|
|
• |
our third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all, or may deviate from the clinical trial protocol or
drop out of the trial, which may require that we add new clinical trial sites or investigators;
|
|
• |
we may elect to, or regulators or IRBs or ethics committees may require us or our investigators to, suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory
requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;
|
|
• |
the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;
|
|
• |
the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of our product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate; and
|
|
• |
our product candidates may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics, causing us or our investigators, regulators or IRBs or ethics committees to suspend or terminate the trials, or
reports may arise from pre-clinical or clinical testing of other cancer therapies that raise safety or efficacy concerns about our product candidates.
|
We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions at which such trials are being conducted, by the Data Safety
Monitoring Board, or DSMB, for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination or clinical hold due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in
accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a
benefit from using a product, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of
clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. Further, the FDA may disagree with our clinical trial design and our interpretation of data from clinical trials, or may change the
requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical trials.
Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or regulatory approvals. We do not know whether any of our future clinical trials will
begin as planned, or whether any of our current or future clinical trials will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Significant delays in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials, including those caused by the
COVID-19 pandemic, also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully
commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations. Any delays in our pre-clinical or future clinical development programs may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.
If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed
or prevented.
We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to
participate in these trials as required by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. In particular, because we will be deploying our drug discovery platform across a broad target space, our ability to enroll eligible
patients may be limited or may result in slower enrollment than we anticipate. In addition, some of our competitors have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that treat the same indications as our product candidates, and patients who
would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead enroll in clinical trials of our competitors’ product candidates. Furthermore, our ability to enroll patients may be significantly delayed by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and we do
not know the extent and scope of such delays at this point.
In addition to the competitive trial environment, the eligibility criteria of our planned clinical trials will further limit the pool of available study participants as we
will require that patients have specific characteristics that we can measure to assure their cancer is either severe enough or not too advanced to include them in a study. Additionally, the process of finding patients may prove costly. We also
may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient number of patients to complete our clinical studies because of the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidates under study, the availability and efficacy of competing
therapies and clinical trials, the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients, and the patient referral practices of physicians. If patients are unwilling to participate in our studies for any reason, the timeline
for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining regulatory approval of potential products may be delayed.
We may also engage third parties to develop companion diagnostics for use in our clinical trials, but such third parties may not be successful in developing such companion
diagnostics, furthering the difficulty in identifying patients with the targeted genetic mutations for our clinical trials. Further, if we are required to develop companion diagnostics and are unable to include patients with the targeted genetic
mutations, this could compromise our ability to seek participation in the FDA’s expedited review and development programs, including Breakthrough Therapy Designation and Fast Track Designation, or otherwise to seek to accelerate clinical
development and regulatory timelines. Patient enrollment may be affected by other factors including:
|
• |
the severity of the disease under investigation;
|
|
• |
the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial in question;
|
|
• |
the availability of an appropriate genomic screening test;
|
|
• |
the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;
|
|
• |
the efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;
|
|
• |
the patient referral practices of physicians;
|
|
• |
the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment;
|
|
• |
the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients; and
|
|
• |
factors we may not be able to control, such as current or potential pandemics that may limit patients, principal investigators or staff or clinical site availability (e.g.,
of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic).
|
Our planned clinical trials or those of our future collaborators may reveal significant adverse events not seen in our pre-clinical or nonclinical studies
and may result in a safety profile that could inhibit regulatory approval or market acceptance of any of our product candidates.
Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any products, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive pre-clinical studies and clinical
trials that our product candidates are both safe and effective for use in each target indication. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the
clinical trial process. The results of pre-clinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. In addition, initial success in clinical trials may not be
indicative of results obtained when such trials are completed. There is typically an extremely high rate of attrition from the failure of product candidates proceeding through clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials
also may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy profile despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in
advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or unacceptable safety issues, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. Most product candidates that commence clinical trials are never approved as products and there can be no
assurance that any of our current or future clinical trials will ultimately be successful or support further clinical development of any of our product candidates.
We may develop future product candidates, in combination with one or more cancer therapies. The uncertainty resulting from the use of our product candidates in combination
with other cancer therapies may make it difficult to accurately predict side effects in future clinical trials.
As is the case with many treatments for cancer, infectious diseases and autoimmune diseases, it is likely that there may be side effects associated with the use of our
product candidates. If significant adverse events or other side effects are observed in any of our current or future clinical trials, we may have difficulty recruiting patients to our clinical trials, patients may drop out of our trials, or we
may be required to abandon the trials or our development efforts of one or more product candidates altogether. We, the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities, or an IRB may suspend or terminate clinical trials of a product candidate at
any time for various reasons, including a belief that subjects in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or adverse side effects. Some potential therapeutics developed in the biotechnology industry that initially showed
therapeutic promise in early-stage trials have later been found to cause side effects that prevented their further development. Even if the side effects do not preclude the product from obtaining or maintaining marketing approval, undesirable
side effects may inhibit market acceptance of the approved product due to its tolerability versus other therapies. Any of these developments could materially harm our business, financial condition and prospects.
We are at risk of a clinical hold at any time based on the evaluation of the data and information submitted to the governing regulatory authorities.
For example, in 2020, we received notice from the FDA of a partial clinical hold on our IMC-F106C clinical trial after the second patient (with baseline elevated risk factors
for pulmonary embolus) experienced a fatal adverse event of respiratory failure due to multiple pulmonary emboli 24 hours after receiving the first dose (0.3 mcg). In accordance with our own internal guidelines, we put our clinical trial on hold
to investigate this unexplained death and informed the FDA. The FDA subsequently put our clinical trial on a partial clinical hold and allowed us the option to continue dosing the first patient. After autopsy, including expert review, and other
investigations, the primary investigator concluded that the cause of death was respiratory failure and not related to study drug. We modified the trial protocol to add a lower dose cohort and additional screening and on-treatment precautions. The
FDA has accepted our changes and removed the partial clinical hold enabling the trial to continue. However, if in the future we are delayed in addressing, or unable to address, any FDA concerns, we could be delayed, or prevented, from conducting
our clinical trials.
Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could halt their clinical development, prevent their regulatory
approval, require expansion of the trial size, limit their commercial potential, or result in significant negative consequences.
Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities, including IRBs, to interrupt, delay, or halt clinical trials and could
result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA, EMA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Further, clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population.
With a limited number of subjects and limited duration of exposure, rare and severe side effects of our product candidates may only be uncovered with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to the drug. Because of our planned dose
escalation design for our clinical trials, undesirable side effects could also result in an expansion in the size of our clinical trials, increasing the expected costs and timeline of our clinical trials. Additionally, results of our clinical
trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects or unexpected characteristics, which may stem from our therapies specifically or may be due to an illness from which the clinical trial subject is suffering.
For example, our oncology clinical trials include cancer patients who are very sick and whose health is deteriorating, and we expect that additional clinical trials of our
other product candidates will include similar patients with deteriorating health. In clinical trials conducted by other companies involving CAR T cells, TCR T or T cell redirecting bispecifics, the most prominent acute toxicities included
symptoms thought to be associated with cytokine release syndrome, or CRS, such as fever, low blood pressure and kidney dysfunction. KIMMTRAK has a boxed warning regarding CRS, recommending patient monitoring for at least 16 hours following the
first three infusions, and as clinically indicated thereafter. It is possible that some of these patients may experience similar adverse side effects as were observed in clinical trials conducted by other companies and academic institutions, and
that additional patients may die during our clinical trials for various reasons, including as a result of receiving our product candidates, because the patient’s disease is too advanced, or because the patient experiences medical problems that
may not be related to our product candidate. Even if the deaths are not related to our product candidate, the deaths could affect perceptions regarding the safety of our product candidate.
Patient deaths and severe side effects caused by our product candidates, or by products or product candidates of other companies that are thought to have similarities with
our therapeutic candidates, could result in the delay, suspension, clinical hold or termination of clinical trials by us, the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities for a number of reasons. If we elect or are required to delay, suspend or
terminate any clinical trial of any product candidates that we develop, the commercial prospects of such product candidates will be harmed and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates would be delayed or
eliminated. Serious adverse events observed in clinical trials could hinder or prevent market acceptance of the product candidate at issue. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations
significantly.
Our product candidates may have serious and potentially fatal cross-reactivity to other peptides or protein sequences within the body.
Our product candidates may recognize and bind to a peptide unrelated to the target antigen to which it is designed to bind. If this peptide is expressed within normal
tissues, our product candidates may target and kill the normal tissue in a patient, leading to serious and potentially fatal adverse effects. Detection of any cross-reactivity may halt or delay any ongoing clinical trials for any TCR-based
product candidate and prevent or delay regulatory approval. Unknown cross-reactivity of the TCR binding domain to related proteins could also occur. We have also developed a pre-clinical screening process to identify cross-reactivity of the TCR
binders. Any cross-reactivity that impacts patient safety could materially impact our ability to advance our product candidates into clinical trials or to proceed to marketing approval and commercialization.
We intend to develop our IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C programs, and potentially future product candidates, in combination with other therapies, which exposes
us to additional risks.
We intend to develop our IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C programs, and may develop future product candidates, for use in combination with one or more currently approved cancer
therapies. Even if any product candidate we develop was to receive marketing approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, we would continue to bear the risks that the FDA or similar foreign regulatory
authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with our product candidate or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. Combination therapies are commonly used for the
treatment of cancer, and we would be subject to similar risks if we develop any of our product candidates for use in combination with other drugs or for indications other than cancer. This could result in our own products being removed from the
market or being less successful commercially.
We may also evaluate our IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C programs, or any other future product candidates, in combination with one or more other cancer, infectious disease or
autoimmune disease therapies that have not yet been approved for marketing by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities. We will not be able to market and sell our IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C programs, or any product candidate we develop in
combination with any such unapproved cancer, infectious disease or autoimmune therapies, that do not ultimately obtain marketing approval.
If the FDA, EMA or similar foreign regulatory authorities do not approve these other drugs or revoke their approval of, or if safety, efficacy, manufacturing, or supply
issues arise with, the drugs we choose to evaluate in combination with our or any product candidate we develop, we may be unable to obtain approval of or market our IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C programs, or any product candidate we develop.
If we do not achieve our projected development and commercialization goals in the timeframes we announce and expect, the commercialization of our product
candidates or any future product candidates may be delayed, and our business will be harmed.
For planning purposes, we estimate the timing of achieving various scientific, clinical, regulatory, and other product development objectives. These milestones may include
our expectations regarding the commencement or completion of scientific studies and clinical trials, regulatory submissions or commercialization objectives. From time to time, we may publicly announce the expected timing of some of these
milestones, such as the completion of an ongoing clinical trial, the initiation of clinical trials, receipt of regulatory approval, or the commercial launch of a product. The achievement of many of these milestones may be outside of our control.
All of these milestones are based on a variety of assumptions, which may cause the timing of achieving the milestones to vary considerably from our estimates, including:
|
• |
our available capital resources or capital constraints we experience;
|
|
• |
the rate of progress, costs, and results of our clinical trials and research and development activities, including the extent of scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians and collaborators;
|
|
• |
our ability to identify and enroll patients who meet clinical trial eligibility criteria;
|
|
• |
our receipt of approvals by the FDA, EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and the timing thereof;
|
|
• |
other actions, decisions, or rules issued by regulators;
|
|
• |
our ability to access sufficient, reliable, and affordable supplies of materials used in the manufacture of our product candidates;
|
|
• |
our ability to manufacture and supply clinical trial materials to our clinical sites on a timely basis;
|
|
• |
the efforts of our collaborators with respect to the commercialization of our approved products, if any; and
|
|
• |
the securing of, costs related to, and timing issues associated with, commercial product manufacturing, as well as sales and marketing activities.
|
If we fail to achieve announced milestones in the timeframes we expect, the commercialization of our lead product candidate and any other current or future product
candidates may be delayed, and our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects may be adversely affected.
Due to our limited resources and access to capital, we must, and have in the past decided to, prioritize development of certain product candidates over
other potential product candidates. These decisions may prove to have been wrong and may adversely affect our ability to develop our own programs, our attractiveness as a commercial partner and may ultimately have an impact on our commercial
success.
Because we have limited resources and access to capital to fund our operations, we must decide which product candidates to pursue and the amount of resources to allocate to
each. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, collaboration, management and financial resources toward particular proprietary molecules in our library, product candidates or therapeutic areas may not lead to the development of viable
commercial products and may divert resources away from better opportunities. Similarly, our decisions to delay, terminate or collaborate with third parties in respect of certain product development programs may also prove not to be optimal and
could cause us to miss valuable opportunities. If we make incorrect determinations regarding the market potential of our product candidates or misread trends in the biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for our lead product candidate, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We conduct clinical trials for our product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and similar foreign regulatory authorities may not accept
data from such trials.
We conduct clinical trials outside the United States including in Australia, New Zealand, Europe and Asia and are likely to continue to do so in these or other foreign
jurisdictions. The acceptance of trial data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States by the FDA may be subject to certain conditions. In cases where data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States are intended to
serve as the sole basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the United States population and United States
medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be
necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met.
Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA
or any similar foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any similar foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in
the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable
jurisdiction.
A variety of risks associated with conducting research and clinical trials in multiple countries and marketing our product candidates internationally
could materially adversely affect our business.
Clinical trials are currently being conducted in multiple countries throughout the world, and we plan to globally develop our current and future product candidates.
Accordingly, we expect that we will be subject to additional risks related to operating in foreign countries, including:
|
• |
differing regulatory requirements in foreign countries;
|
|
• |
unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers, price and exchange controls and other regulatory requirements;
|
|
• |
differing standards for the conduct of clinical trials;
|
|
• |
increased difficulties in managing the logistics and transportation of storing and shipping product candidates produced in the United States or elsewhere and shipping the product candidate to patients in
other countries;
|
|
• |
import and export requirements and restrictions;
|
|
• |
economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in foreign economies and markets;
|
|
• |
compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;
|
|
• |
foreign taxes, including withholding of payroll taxes;
|
|
• |
foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenue, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country;
|
|
• |
difficulties staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
• |
workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United Kingdom or the United States;
|
|
• |
differing payor reimbursement regimes, governmental payors or patient self-pay systems, and price controls;
|
|
• |
potential liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or comparable foreign regulations;
|
|
• |
challenges enforcing or protecting our contractual and intellectual property rights, especially in those foreign countries that do not respect and protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as
the United States or the United Kingdom;
|
|
• |
the impacts Brexit may have with respect to the cross-border acknowledgment of clinical trial results and marketing authorizations as well as recruitment of scientific personnel;
|
|
• |
production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and
|
|
• |
business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism.
|
These and other risks associated with our international operations may materially adversely affect our ability to attain or maintain profitable operations.
Risks Related to the Commercialization of Our Product Candidates
We are subject to manufacturing risks that could substantially increase our costs and limit supply of our products.
Our product candidates are biologics and the process of manufacturing our products is complex, highly regulated and subject to multiple risks. We may encounter difficulties
in production, particularly with respect to process development, quality control, upscaling or scaling-out of our manufacturing capabilities. If we or any of our third-party manufacturers encounter such difficulties, our ability to provide supply
of our product candidates for clinical trials or our products for patients, if approved, could be delayed or stopped, or we may be unable to maintain a commercially viable cost structure.
Any failure to follow current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, or other regulatory requirements or any delay, interruption or other issues that arise in the manufacture,
fill and finish, packaging, or storage of our product candidates as a result of a failure of our facilities or the facilities or operations of third parties to comply with regulatory requirements or pass any regulatory authority inspection could
significantly impair our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates, including leading to significant delays in the availability of drug product for our clinical trials or the termination of or hold on a clinical trial, or the
delay or prevention of a filing or approval of marketing applications for our product candidates.
Our TCR bispecific product candidates that have been produced and are stored for later use may degrade, become contaminated or suffer other quality defects, which may cause
the affected product candidates to no longer be suitable for their intended use in clinical trials or other development activities. If the defective product candidates cannot be replaced in a timely fashion, we may incur significant delays in our
development programs that could adversely affect the value of such product candidates.
Even to the extent we use and continue to use CMOs, we are ultimately responsible for the manufacture of our products and product candidates. A failure to comply with these
requirements may result in regulatory enforcement actions against our manufacturers or us, including fines and civil and criminal penalties, which could result in imprisonment, suspension or restrictions of production, suspension, injunctions,
delay or denial of product approval or supplements to approved products, clinical holds or termination of clinical trials, warning or untitled letters, regulatory authority communications warning the public about safety issues with the biologic,
refusal to permit the import or export of the products, product seizure, detention, or recall, operating restrictions, suits under the civil False Claims Act, or FCA, corporate integrity agreements, consent decrees, or withdrawal of product
approval. For example, our IMC-C103C program was placed on partial clinical hold in 2020 due to insufficient specifications on a drug release assay in the corresponding IND. The partial clinical hold was later lifted and the trial has resumed.
Challenges we may face could delay completion of clinical trials, require bridging clinical trials or the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical trial
costs, delay approval of our product candidates, impair commercialization efforts, increase our cost of goods, cause a lack of patient participation in clinical trials and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and growth prospects.
Even though KIMMTRAK has received FDA approval, and even if tebentafusp receives approval in other countries, or any of our other product candidates
receives marketing approval, these may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.
Even though KIMMTRAK has received FDA approval, and even if we obtain approvals from the FDA, the EMA or other comparable regulatory agencies and are able to initiate
commercialization of our other clinical stage product candidates or any other product candidates we develop, the product candidate may not achieve market acceptance among physicians, patients, hospitals, including pharmacy directors, and
third-party payors and, ultimately, may not be commercially successful. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
• |
the clinical indications for which our product candidates are approved;
|
|
• |
physicians, hospitals, cancer treatment centers, and patients considering our product candidates as a safe and effective treatment;
|
|
• |
hospitals and cancer treatment centers establishing the infrastructure required for the administration of the product candidate;
|
|
• |
the potential and perceived advantages of our product candidates over alternative treatments;
|
|
• |
the prevalence and severity of any side effects, including CRS, for which KIMMTRAK has a boxed warning recommending at least 16 hours of patient monitoring after each of the first three infusions, and as
clinically indicated thereafter;
|
|
• |
product labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities;
|
|
• |
limitations or warnings contained in the labeling approved by the FDA or the EMA;
|
|
• |
the timing of market introduction of our product candidates as well as competitive products;
|
|
• |
the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;
|
|
• |
the amount of upfront costs or training required for physicians to administer our product candidates;
|
|
• |
the pricing of our products and the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors and government authorities;
|
|
• |
the willingness of patients to pay out-of-pocket in the absence of comprehensive coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors and government authorities;
|
|
• |
relative convenience and ease of administration, including as compared to alternative treatments and competitive therapies; and
|
|
• |
the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and distribution support.
|
Our efforts to educate physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community on the benefits of our products, if approved, may require significant
resources and may never be successful. Such efforts may require more resources than are typically required due to the complexity and uniqueness of our product candidates. Because we expect sales of our product candidates, if approved, to generate
substantially all of our product revenue for the foreseeable future, the failure of our product candidates to find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing.
Even if our products achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to maintain that market acceptance over time if new products or technologies are introduced that are more
favorably received than our products, are more cost effective or render our products obsolete.
We face substantial competition, which may result in others developing or commercializing drugs before or more successfully than us.
The biotechnology industry is characterized by intense competition and rapid innovation. Our competitors may be able to develop other compounds or drugs that are able to
achieve similar or better results. Our potential competitors include major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and universities and other research institutions. Many of
our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, such as larger research and development staff and experienced marketing and manufacturing organizations and well-established sales forces. Smaller or early-stage
companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly as they develop novel approaches to treating disease indications that our product candidates are also focused on treating. Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest
heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to acquire or in-license novel therapeutics that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in
these industries. Our competitors, either alone or with collaborative partners, may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis drug or biologic products that are more effective, safer, more easily commercialized or less
costly than our product candidates or may develop proprietary technologies or secure patent or other proprietary protection that we may need for the development of our technologies and products. We believe the key competitive factors that will
affect the development and commercial success of our product candidates are efficacy, safety, tolerability, reliability, convenience of use, price and reimbursement.
We face competition from segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that pursue the development of therapeutics to address unmet needs in cancer including:
Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, or Adaptimmune, Gritstone Oncology, Inc., Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, or Immatics (alone and in collaboration with Bristol Myers Squibb), Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, or Adaptive, pure MHC, LLC, BioNTech
SE, Genentech, Matterhorn, Anocca, Enara Bio and Regeneron, who are also seeking to identify peptide HLA targets and develop product candidates; Adaptimmune, T-Knife GmbH, Adaptive, 3T Biosciences, Inc., MediGene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
or Regeneron, Gilead Sciences, Inc., bluebird Bio, Inc., or bluebird bio, AgenTus Therapeutics, Inc., Takara Bio Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, GSK, Kite Pharma, Lion TCR, TCR Cure, CBMG, Eureka and Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. who are
developing TCR-based cell therapies; Immatics, AbbVie, Inc, Regeneron, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Amgen, Inc., Genmab, Inc., Molecular Partners and MorphoSys AG are developing CD3-based TCR bispecific compounds or TCR mimetic antibodies.
We are aware of various companies and academic institutions that are developing TCR transduced cell therapies against a range of pHLA targets, some of which may overlap with product candidates in
our pipeline such as MAGE-A4 and PRAME, including Adaptimmune, who is developing a MAGE-A4 directed cellular therapy, which has entered pivotal testing for various forms of sarcoma and has initiated Phase 2 trials for other solid tumors.
Specifically in regards to PRAME, we are aware that Immatics and Medigene are both conducting Phase 1 clinical trials of PRAME-directed cellular therapies and Immatics also have communicated plans for Phase 1 development of a PRAME TCRxCD3
approach.
We anticipate that we will continue to face intense and increasing competition as new treatments enter the market and advanced technologies become available. There can be no
assurance that our competitors are not currently developing, or will not in the future develop, products that are equally or more effective or are more economically attractive than any of our current or future product candidates. Competing
products may gain faster or greater market acceptance than our products, if any, and medical advances or rapid technological development by competitors may result in our product candidates becoming non-competitive or obsolete before we are able
to recover our research and development and commercialization expenses. If we or our product candidates do not compete effectively, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Coverage and adequate reimbursement may not be available for KIMMTRAK, our current or any future product candidates, which could make it difficult for us
to sell profitably, if approved.
Market acceptance and sales of KIMMTRAK or any product candidates that we commercialize, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for these
products and related treatments will be available from third-party payors, including government health administration authorities, managed care organizations and private health insurers. Third-party payors decide which therapies they will pay for
and establish reimbursement levels. Third-party payors in the United States often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own coverage and reimbursement policies. However, decisions regarding the extent of
coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any product candidates that we develop will be made on a payor-by-payor basis. One payor’s determination to provide coverage for a drug does not assure that other payors will also provide
coverage for the drug. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a therapy does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price, examining the
medical necessity and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products, therapies and services, in addition to questioning their safety and efficacy. We may incur significant costs to conduct expensive pharmaco-economic studies in order to
demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of our product candidates, in addition to the costs required to obtain FDA approvals. Our product candidates may not be considered medically necessary or cost-effective.
Each payor determines whether or not it will provide coverage for a therapy, what amount it will pay the manufacturer for the therapy, and on what tier of its list of covered
drugs, or formulary, it will be placed. The position on a payor’s formulary, generally determines the co-payment that a patient will need to make to obtain the therapy and can strongly influence the adoption of such therapy by patients and
physicians. Patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers prescribing such services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Patients are unlikely to use our
products, and providers are unlikely to prescribe our products, unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to cover a significant portion of the cost of our products and their administration. Therefore, coverage and adequate
reimbursement is critical to new medical product acceptance.
A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of
reimbursement for particular medications. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any drug that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Even if favorable
coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more product candidates for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future. Inadequate coverage and
reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any drug for which we obtain marketing approval. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully
commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop. Coverage policies and third party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and adequate reimbursement status is attained for one or more
products for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
Additionally, we may use or develop a proprietary diagnostic test for use with certain of our product candidates. We will be required to obtain coverage and reimbursement for
this test separate and apart from the coverage and reimbursement we seek for our product candidates, if approved. There is significant uncertainty regarding our ability to obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement for this proprietary diagnostic
test for reasons similar to those applicable to our product candidates.
We face potential product liability, and, if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability and costs. If
the use of our product candidates harms patients, or is perceived to harm patients even when such harm is unrelated to our product candidates, our regulatory approvals could be revoked or otherwise negatively impacted and we could be subject to
costly and damaging product liability claims.
The use of our product candidates in clinical trials and the sale of any products for which we obtain marketing approval exposes us to the risk of product liability claims.
Product liability claims might be brought against us by consumers, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling or otherwise coming into contact with our products. There is a risk that our product candidates may induce adverse
events. If we cannot successfully defend against product liability claims, we could incur substantial liability and costs. In addition, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:
|
• |
the impairment of our business reputation;
|
|
• |
the withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
|
|
• |
costs due to related litigation;
|
|
• |
the distraction of management’s attention from our primary business;
|
|
• |
substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;
|
|
• |
the inability to commercialize our product candidates; and
|
|
• |
decreased demand for our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale.
|
We believe our product liability insurance coverage is sufficient in light of our current commercial and clinical programs; however, we may not be able to maintain insurance
coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to liability. We intend to expand our insurance coverage each time we commercialize an additional product; however, we may be unable to obtain product
liability insurance on commercially reasonable terms or in adequate amounts. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs or medical treatments that had unanticipated adverse effects. A successful product
liability claim or series of claims brought against us could adversely affect our results of operations and business.
Patients with the diseases targeted by certain of our product candidates are often already in severe and advanced stages of disease and have both known and unknown
significant pre-existing and potentially life-threatening health risks. During the course of treatment, patients may suffer adverse events, including death, for reasons that may be related to our product candidates. Such events could subject us
to costly litigation, require us to pay substantial amounts of money to injured patients, delay, negatively impact or end our opportunity to receive or maintain regulatory approval to market our products, or require us to suspend or abandon our
commercialization efforts. Even in a circumstance in which we do not believe that an adverse event is related to our products, the investigation into the circumstance may be time-consuming or inconclusive. These investigations may interrupt our
sales efforts, delay our regulatory approval process in other countries, or impact and limit the type of regulatory approvals our product candidates receive or maintain. As a result of these factors, a product liability claim, even if
successfully defended, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
Our existing therapeutic collaborations are important to our business, and future collaborations may also be important to us. If we are unable to maintain
any of these collaborations, or if these collaborations are not successful, our business could be adversely affected.
We have limited capabilities for drug development and do not yet have any capability for sales, marketing or distribution. We have entered into collaborations with other
companies that we believe can provide such capabilities, including for example with Genentech and Eli Lilly and Company, or Lilly. These collaborations have also provided us with important funding for our development programs and technology
platforms, and we expect to receive additional funding under these collaborations in the future. Our existing therapeutic collaborations, and any future collaborations we enter into, may pose a number of risks, including the following:
|
• |
collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations;
|
|
• |
collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected;
|
|
• |
collaborators may not pursue development and commercialization of any product candidates that achieve regulatory approval or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs
based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus or available funding, or external factors, such as an acquisition, that divert resources or create competing priorities;
|
|
• |
collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a
new formulation of a product candidate for clinical testing;
|
|
• |
collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our products or product candidates if the collaborators believe that competitive
products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours; this may also happen if the collaborators’ development of competing products is substantially
faster than our development timelines;
|
|
• |
collaborators may not further develop product candidates developed by us or co-developed with us under the collaboration;
|
|
• |
product candidates discovered in collaboration with us may be viewed by our collaborators as competitive with their own product candidates or products, which may cause collaborators to cease to devote
resources to the commercialization of our product candidates;
|
|
• |
a collaborator with marketing and distribution rights to one or more of our product candidates that achieve regulatory approval may not commit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of such
product or products;
|
|
• |
disagreements with collaborators, including disagreements over proprietary rights, contract interpretation or the preferred course of development, might cause delays or termination of the research,
development or commercialization of product candidates, might lead to additional responsibilities for us with respect to product candidates, or might result in litigation or arbitration, any of which would be time-consuming and expensive;
|
|
• |
collaborators have certain defined rights to change or expand the scope of development programs during the course of the collaboration. This may lead to additional research work for us that may be
time-consuming and expensive. Such work may compete with our own development programs and may delay timelines to market or proof-of-concept for our product candidates. If development programs under the collaboration turn out to be more
costly and time-consuming, such unanticipated costs and work could likewise compete with our internal development programs;
|
|
• |
collaborators may not properly maintain, enforce or defend our intellectual property or proprietary information or may use them in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our
intellectual property or proprietary information or expose us to potential litigation;
|
|
• |
collaborators may infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property or proprietary rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation and potential liability, and
collaborators may also allege that we are liable for potential infringement, misappropriation or other violations of third-party intellectual property or proprietary rights during the research and development work for the collaboration;
|
|
• |
certain collaborations may be terminated for the convenience of the collaborator and, if terminated, we could be required to raise additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of
the applicable product candidates. For example, certain of our collaboration and license agreements may be terminated for convenience upon the completion of a specified notice period; and
|
|
• |
collaborators may discontinue the development of product candidates within the collaboration, for example if they consider the results achieved so far or the product candidates not promising enough or if
their development strategies change.
|
If our therapeutic collaborations do not result in the successful development and commercialization of products or if one of our collaborators terminates its agreement with
us, we may not receive any future research funding or milestone or royalty payments under the collaboration. All of the risks relating to product development, regulatory approval and commercialization described in this Annual Report also apply to
the activities of our program collaborators.
Additionally, subject to its contractual obligations to us, if one of our collaborators is involved in a business combination, the collaborator might deemphasize or terminate
the development or commercialization of any product candidate licensed to it by us. If one of our collaborators terminates its agreement with us, it may find it more difficult to attract new collaborators.
For some of our product candidates, we may in the future determine to collaborate with additional pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for development and potential
commercialization of therapeutic products. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Our ability to reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the
collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. These factors may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood
of approval by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the
potential of competing products, and the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market
conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us
for our product candidate.
Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large
pharmaceutical companies that reduced the number of potential future collaborators. If we are unable to reach agreements with suitable collaborators on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all, we may have to curtail the development of a
product candidate, reduce or delay one or more of our other development programs, delay our potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or
commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to fund and undertake development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional expertise and additional capital, which may not be available to us on
acceptable terms or at all. If we fail to enter into collaborations and do not have sufficient funds or expertise to undertake the necessary development and commercialization activities, we may not be able to further develop our product
candidates or bring them to market or continue to develop our technology platforms and our business may be materially and adversely affected.
We may also be restricted under existing collaboration agreements from entering into future agreements on certain terms with potential collaborators. Subject to certain
specified exceptions, each of our existing therapeutic collaborations contains an exclusivity restriction on our engaging in activities that are the subject of the collaboration with third parties for specified periods of time.
We rely on CROs and other third parties to conduct our Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials and expect to rely on CROs and other third
parties to conduct future clinical trials, as well as investigator-sponsored clinical trials of our product candidates. If these CROs and other third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, comply with regulatory
requirements or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates and our business could be substantially harmed.
We rely and expect to continue to rely on CROs, medical institutions, clinical investigators, contract laboratories and other third parties to conduct or otherwise support
clinical trials for our product candidates, including our Phase 2 and Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials of tebentafusp, our Phase 1 clinical trials of IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C, and our imminent Phase1 clinical trial of IMC-I109V. We may also rely on
academic and private non-academic institutions to conduct and sponsor clinical trials relating to our product candidates. We will not control the design or conduct of the investigator-sponsored trials, and it is possible that the FDA or non-U.S.
regulatory authorities will not view these investigator-sponsored trials as providing adequate support for future clinical trials, whether controlled by us or third parties, for any one or more reasons, including elements of the design or
execution of the trials or safety concerns or other trial results.
Such arrangements will likely provide us certain information rights with respect to the investigator-sponsored trials, including access to and the ability to use and
reference the data, including for our own regulatory filings, resulting from the investigator-sponsored trials. However, we would not have control over the timing and reporting of the data from investigator-sponsored trials, nor would we own the
data from the investigator-sponsored trials. If we are unable to confirm or replicate the results from the investigator-sponsored trials or if negative results are obtained, we would likely be further delayed or prevented from advancing further
clinical development of our product candidates. Further, if investigators or institutions breach their obligations with respect to the clinical development of our product candidates, or if the data proves to be inadequate compared to the
first-hand knowledge we might have gained had the investigator-sponsored trials been sponsored and conducted by us, then our ability to design and conduct any future clinical trials ourselves may be adversely affected.
We rely and expect to continue to rely heavily on CROs, medical institutions, clinical investigators, contract laboratories and other third parties for execution of clinical
trials for our product candidates and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory
requirements and scientific standards, and our reliance on CROs will not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. For any violations of laws and regulations during the conduct of our clinical trials, we could be subject to warning letters
or enforcement action that may include civil penalties up to and including criminal prosecution.
We, our principal investigators and our CROs are required to comply with regulations, including Good Clinical Practices, or GCPs, for conducting, monitoring, recording and
reporting the results of clinical trials to ensure that the data and results are scientifically credible and accurate, and that the trial patients are adequately informed of the potential risks of participating in clinical trials and their rights
are protected. These regulations are enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Economic Area and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for any products in clinical development. The FDA enforces GCP
regulations through periodic inspections of clinical trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we, our principal investigators or our CROs fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials
may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that, upon inspection, the FDA will determine
that any of our future clinical trials will comply with GCPs. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product candidates produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure or the failure of our principal investigators or CROs to comply
with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process and could also subject us to enforcement action. We also are required to register ongoing clinical trials and post the results of
completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, ClinicalTrials.gov, within certain timeframes. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.
Although we designed our Phase 2 and Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials of tebentafusp, our Phase 1 clinical trials of IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C, our imminent Phase 1 clinical
trial of IMC-I109V and intend to design the future clinical trials for our product candidates, we expect that CROs will conduct all of our clinical trials. As a result, many important aspects of our development programs, including their conduct
and timing, are outside of our direct control. Our reliance on third parties to conduct future clinical trials also results in less direct control over the management of data developed through clinical trials than would be the case if we were
relying entirely upon our own staff. Communicating with outside parties can also be challenging, potentially leading to mistakes as well as difficulties in coordinating activities. Outside parties may:
|
• |
have staffing difficulties;
|
|
• |
fail to comply with contractual obligations;
|
|
• |
experience regulatory compliance issues;
|
|
• |
undergo changes in priorities or become financially distressed; or
|
|
• |
form relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors.
|
These factors may materially adversely affect the willingness or ability of third parties to conduct our clinical trials and may subject us to unexpected cost increases that
are beyond our control. If the principal investigators or CROs do not perform clinical trials in a satisfactory manner, breach their obligations to us or fail to comply with regulatory requirements, the development, regulatory approval and
commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize our product candidates, or our development program materially and irreversibly harmed. If we are unable to rely on
clinical data collected by our principal investigators or CROs, we could be required to repeat, extend the duration of, or increase the size of any clinical trials we conduct and this could significantly delay commercialization and require
significantly greater expenditures.
If any of our relationships with these third-party principal investigators or CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs. If
principal investigators or CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the
failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, any clinical trials such principal investigators or CROs are associated with may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain
regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, we believe that our financial results and the commercial prospects for our product candidates in the subject indication would be harmed, our costs could
increase and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.
We contract with third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for pre-clinical development, clinical testing, and expect to continue to do
so for commercialization. This reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our
development or commercialization efforts.
We do not currently own or operate, nor do we have any plans to establish in the future, any manufacturing facilities or personnel. We rely, and expect to continue to rely,
on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for pre-clinical development and clinical testing, as well as for the commercial manufacture of our products if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval. This reliance
on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization
efforts.
The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be inspected by the FDA pursuant to pre-approval inspections that will be
conducted after we submit our marketing applications to the FDA. We do not control the manufacturing process of, and will be completely dependent on, our contract manufacturers for compliance with cGMPs in connection with the manufacture of our
product candidates. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to pass regulatory inspections
and/or maintain regulatory compliance for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA
or a comparable foreign regulatory authority finds deficiencies with or does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it finds deficiencies or withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find
alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. Further, our failure, or the failure of our third-party manufacturers, to
comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including clinical holds, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product
candidates or products, if approved, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect our business and supplies of our product candidates.
We may be unable to establish any agreements with third-party manufacturers or to do so on acceptable terms. Even if we are able to establish agreements with third-party
manufacturers, reliance on third -party manufacturers entails additional risks, including:
|
• |
reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance;
|
|
• |
the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;
|
|
• |
the possible misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how; and
|
|
• |
the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us.
|
Our product candidates and any products that we may develop may compete with other product candidates and approved products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are
a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us.
Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers could delay clinical development or marketing approval. If our current contract manufacturers
cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace such manufacturers. We may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement.
Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates or products may adversely affect our future profit margins and our
ability to commercialize any products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.
The third parties upon whom we rely for the supply of the active pharmaceutical ingredient used in our product candidates are our sole source of supply,
and the loss of any of these suppliers could significantly harm our business.
The active pharmaceutical ingredients, or API, used in our product candidates are supplied to us from single-source suppliers. Our ability to successfully develop our product
candidates, and to ultimately supply our commercial products in quantities sufficient to meet the market demand, depends in part on our ability to obtain the API for these products in accordance with regulatory requirements and in sufficient
quantities for clinical testing and commercialization. We do not currently have arrangements in place for a redundant or second-source supply of any such API in the event any of our current suppliers of such API cease their operations for any
reason. We are also unable to predict how changing global economic conditions or potential global health concerns such as the COVID-19 pandemic will affect our third-party suppliers and manufacturers. Any negative impact of such matters on our
third-party suppliers and manufacturers may also have an adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
For all of our product candidates, we intend to identify and qualify additional manufacturers to provide such API prior to submission of a BLA to the FDA and/or an MAA to the
EMA. We are not certain, however, that our single-source suppliers will be able to meet our demand for their products, either because of the nature of our agreements with those suppliers, our limited experience with those suppliers or our
relative importance as a customer to those suppliers. It may be difficult for us to assess their ability to timely meet our demand in the future based on past performance. While our suppliers have generally met our demand for their products on a
timely basis in the past, they may subordinate our needs in the future to their other customers.
Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for the API used in our product candidates, if required, may not be accomplished quickly. If we are able to find a
replacement supplier, such replacement supplier would need to be qualified and may require additional regulatory inspection or approval, which could result in further delay. While we seek to maintain adequate inventory of the API used in our
product candidates, any interruption or delay in the supply of components or materials, or our inability to obtain such API from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner could impede, delay, limit or prevent our development
efforts, which could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
We may seek to establish additional collaborations, and, if we are not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we may have to
alter our development and commercialization plans.
Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For some of our
product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with additional pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates.
We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our
assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include the design or results of clinical
trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate
to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and
market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one
with us for our product candidate. The terms of any additional collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.
We may also be restricted under collaboration agreements from entering into future agreements on certain terms with potential collaborators. Collaborations are complex and
time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators.
We may not be able to negotiate additional collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development
of the product candidate for which we are seeking to collaborate, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing
activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain
additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.
In addition, any future collaborations that we enter into may not be successful. The success of our collaboration arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and
activities of our collaborators. Collaborators generally have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations. Disagreements between parties to a collaboration arrangement regarding
clinical development and commercialization matters can lead to delays in the development process or commercializing the applicable product candidate and, in some cases, termination of the collaboration arrangement. These disagreements can be
difficult to resolve if neither of the parties has final decision-making authority. Collaborations with pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies and other third parties often are terminated or allowed to expire by the other party. Any such
termination or expiration would adversely affect us financially and could harm our business reputation.
Where we license technology from a third party, the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense of the patent or other intellectual property or
proprietary rights licensed from such third party may be controlled by the third party, which may impact the scope of patent or other protection.
Where we license patent rights, technology or other intellectual property or proprietary rights from a third party, control of such third-party rights may vest in the
licensor, particularly where the license is non-exclusive or field-restricted. This may mean that we are not able to control or affect the scope of the claims of any relevant third-party patent or other intellectual property protection or have
control over the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense of such patents and patent applications. Therefore, we cannot be certain that such patents and patent applications will be prepared, filed, prosecuted,
maintained, enforced, and defended in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If our licensors fail to prosecute, maintain, enforce, and defend such patents, or lose rights to those patents or patent applications, the rights
we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated, and our right to develop and commercialize any of our products that are subject to such licensed rights could be adversely affected. Where a licensor brings an enforcement action with respect to
licensed patents or other intellectual property, this could negatively impact our business or result in additional restrictions being imposed on the license we have and the scope of such license, or result in invalidation or limitation of the
scope of the licensed patents or other intellectual property rights. In addition, should we wish to enforce the relevant patent or other intellectual property rights against a third person, we may be reliant on consent from the relevant licensor
or the cooperation of the licensor. The licensor may refuse to bring such action and leave us unable to restrict competitor entry into the market. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and prospects.
If we or our third-party suppliers use hazardous, non-hazardous, biological or other materials in a manner that causes injury or violates applicable law,
we may be liable for damages.
Our research and development activities involve the controlled use of potentially hazardous substances, including chemical and biological materials, potentially infectious
material and genetically modified cells. We and our suppliers are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United Kingdom and United States governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of such hazardous
materials. Although we believe that we and our suppliers’ procedures for using, handling, storing and disposing of these materials comply with legally prescribed standards, and that we and our suppliers have all necessary permits, we and our
suppliers cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from hazardous chemical or biological materials. As a result of any such contamination or injury, we may incur liability or local, city, state or federal
authorities may curtail the use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines, and the liability could exceed our resources. We have insurance in
place for liabilities arising from handling biological and hazardous substances, but it may not or may not fully cover all costs from such accidents. Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations is expensive, and current or
future environmental regulations may impair our research, development and production efforts, which could impact our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology or obtain, maintain, protect and enforce patent and other intellectual property
protection for our technology and products or if the scope of the protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors and other third parties could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our
ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may be impaired.
Our commercial success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary or intellectual property protection in the United States and other countries for
our product candidates and our core technologies, including our novel target discovery technology, our proprietary compound library and other know-how. We seek to protect our proprietary and intellectual property position by, among other methods,
filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development and implementation of our business. We also rely on trade secrets, know-how and
continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our proprietary and intellectual property position.
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the
subject of much litigation. The degree of patent protection we require to successfully commercialize our product candidates may be unavailable or severely limited in some cases and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or
keep any competitive advantage. We cannot provide any assurances that any of our current or future pending patent applications will issue or will mature into issued patents that include claims with a scope sufficient to protect tebentafusp,
IMC-C103C, IMC-F106C, IMC-I109V, GSK01 or any other current or future product candidates or technologies, in whole or in part, or effectively prevent others from commercializing competing product candidates and technologies. While we own issued
patents relating to tebentafusp and pending patent applications relating to our other product candidates, including IMC-C103C, IMC-F106C, GSK01 and IMC-I109V, we do not own or in-license any issued patents relating to such other product
candidates, and we can provide no assurance that any of our current or future patent applications will result in issued patents or that any issued patents will provide us with any competitive advantage. In addition, the laws of foreign
jurisdictions may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Furthermore, patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States and countries of the European Union, the natural expiration of a patent is generally
twenty years after it is filed. Various extensions may be available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product
candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide us with adequate and continuing patent protection sufficient to exclude
others from commercializing products similar or identical to our product candidates, including generic versions of such products.
Furthermore, certain of our patents and technology were funded in part by investments from nonprofit third parties, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, or the
Gates Foundation. We are required to fulfill certain contractual obligations with respect to products created using such grant funding, including making certain products available at an affordable price in a list of clearly defined low and
lower-middle income countries. For more information, see “Item 4B. Business overview—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—Gates Collaboration.”
Other parties may have developed technologies that are related or competitive to our own, and such parties may have filed or may file patent applications, or may have
received or may receive issued patents, claiming inventions that may overlap or conflict with those claimed in our own patent applications or issued patents, with respect to either the same methods or formulations or the same subject matter.
Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not
at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our pending patent applications or any patent application we may license, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such
inventions. In addition, although we enter into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to confidential or patentable aspects of our research and development output, such as our employees, corporate
collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, CROs, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors, and other third parties, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose such output before a patent application is filed, thereby
jeopardizing our ability to seek patent protection. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights cannot be predicted with any certainty.
In addition, the patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a
reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Further, with respect to most of the pending patent applications covering our product candidates, prosecution has yet to commence. Patent prosecution is a lengthy process, during which the scope of the
claims initially submitted for examination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, or its global equivalents, are often significantly narrowed by the time they issue, if they issue at all. It is also possible that we will fail to
identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection.
Moreover, in some circumstances, we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering
technology that we may license from third parties. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.
Even if we acquire patent protection that we expect should enable us to maintain a competitive advantage, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope
thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our patents or any patent we may license may be
challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. For example, we may be subject to a third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO challenging the priority of an invention claimed within one of our patents, which
submissions may also be made prior to a patent’s issuance, precluding the granting of any of our pending patent applications. We may become involved in opposition, derivation, re-examination, revocation, inter
partes review, post-grant review, interference or other proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others from whom we have obtained licenses to such rights.
Competitors or other third parties may claim that they invented the inventions claimed in our issued patents or patent applications prior to us, or may file patent
applications before we do. Third parties may also claim that we are infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating their patents or other intellectual property rights and that we therefore cannot practice our technology as claimed under our
patents, if issued. Competitors and other third parties may also contest our patents, if issued, by showing the patent examiner that the invention was not original, was not novel or was obvious. In litigation, a competitor or other third party
could claim that our patents, if issued, are not valid for a number of reasons. If a patent office or court agrees, we would lose our rights to those challenged patents, in whole or in part.
In addition, we may in the future be subject to claims by our former employees or consultants asserting an ownership right in our patents or patent applications, as a result
of the work they performed on our behalf. Although we generally require all of our employees, consultants and advisors and any other third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to assign or grant similar
rights to their inventions to us, we cannot be certain that we have executed such agreements with all parties who may have contributed to our intellectual property, nor can we be certain that our agreements with such parties will be upheld in the
face of a potential challenge, or that they will not be breached, for which we may not have an adequate remedy.
An adverse determination in any such submission or proceeding may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held
unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, without payment to us, or could limit the duration of the patent protection covering our
technology and product candidates. Such challenges may also result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize our product candidates without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection
provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates. Such proceedings also may result in substantial cost
and require significant time and attention from our scientists and management.
In addition, given the amount of time required for the development, testing, and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire
before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our intellectual property may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products or technology similar or identical to ours. Moreover,
some of our patents and patent applications are, and may in the future be, co-owned with third parties. In-licensed patents and patent applications may also be co-owned with third parties. If we are unable to obtain an exclusive license to any
such third-party co-owners’ interest in such patents or patent applications, such co-owners may be able to license their interest to other parties, including our competitors, who could market competing products and technology. In addition, we may
need the cooperation of any such co-owners of our patents in order to enforce such patents against third parties, and such cooperation may not be provided to us.
Even if unchallenged, our patent portfolio may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims to circumvent our
patents or any patents we may license by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner. For example, a third party may develop a competitive product that provides benefits similar to one or more of our
product candidates but that has a different composition that falls outside the scope of our patent protection. If the patent protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to our product candidates is
not sufficiently broad to impede such competition, our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates could be negatively affected. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business,
financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.
Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed
by patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
The USPTO and various foreign patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent
application process. In addition, periodic maintenance and renewal fees on issued patents often must be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies over the lifetime of the patent. While an unintentional lapse can in many cases be cured by
payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which non-compliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent
rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits,
non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents within prescribed time limits. If we or our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates and technologies, we may
not be able to stop a competitor from marketing products that are the same as or similar to our product candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position may be harmed.
In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely upon unpatented trade secret protection, unpatented know-how, proprietary information and continuing technological
innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. With respect to the building of our ImmTAX platform, we consider trade secrets and know-how to be our primary intellectual property. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and
processes, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, scientific advisors, employees, CROs and consultants, and invention assignment agreements with our consultants and employees. We may not be able to prevent
the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical know-how or other trade secrets by the parties to these agreements, however, despite the existence generally of confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions. Monitoring
unauthorized uses and disclosures of trade secrets and other confidential information is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary technologies will be effective. If any of the collaborators,
scientific advisors, employees, CROs and consultants who are parties to these agreements breaches or violates the terms of any of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation, and we could lose our trade
secret protection as a result. In addition, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or proprietary technology and processes. Enforcing a claim that a
third party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent litigation, is expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts, especially outside the United States, are sometimes less willing
to protect trade secrets. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. While
we have confidence in these individuals, organizations and systems, agreements or security measures may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach.
Our trade secrets could otherwise become known, obtained or independently discovered by our competitors or other third parties, who could purchase our products and product
candidates and attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, willfully infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property rights, design around our protected technology
or develop their own competitive technologies that fall outside of our intellectual property rights. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right
to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate such information, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If our trade secrets are not adequately protected so as to protect our market against competitors’ products, our
competitive position could be adversely affected, as could our business. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating our trade
secrets. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating their intellectual property or
proprietary rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary
technologies without infringing, misappropriating, or otherwise violating the intellectual property and proprietary rights of third parties. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by extensive and frequent litigation
regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. We are subject to, and may in the future become party to or threatened with, adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our product
candidates and technology, including interference, post-grant review, inter partes review and derivation proceedings before the USPTO and similar proceedings in foreign jurisdictions, such as oppositions
before the European Patent Office, or EPO. Our competitors or other third parties may assert infringement claims against us, alleging that our products or technologies are covered by their patents. Given the vast number of patents in our field of
technology, we cannot be certain that we do not infringe existing patents or that we will not infringe patents that may be granted in the future. Many companies have filed, and continue to file, patent applications related to soluble, bispecific
TCRs. Some of these patent applications have already been allowed or issued, and others may issue in the future. Since these areas are competitive and of strong interest to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, there will likely be
additional patent applications filed and additional patents granted in the future, as well as additional research and development programs expected in the future. Furthermore, because patent applications can take many years to issue and may be
confidential for 18 months or more after filing, and because pending patent claims can be revised before issuance, there may be applications now pending which may later result in issued patents that may be infringed by the manufacture, use or
sale of our product candidates, or the practice of our technology. If a patent holder believes our product or product candidate infringes on its patent, the patent holder may sue us even if we have received patent protection for our technology.
Moreover, we may face patent infringement claims from non-practicing entities that have no relevant product revenue and against whom our own patent portfolio may thus have no deterrent effect.
Even if we believe that such claims are without merit, there is no assurance that a court or patent office would find in our favor on questions of infringement, validity,
enforceability, or priority. A court of competent jurisdiction could hold that third-party patents are valid, enforceable, and infringed, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to commercialize any product candidates we may
develop and any other product candidates or technologies covered by the asserted third-party patents. In order to successfully challenge the validity of a U.S. patent in federal court, we would need to overcome a presumption of validity. As this
burden is a high one requiring us to present clear and convincing evidence as to the invalidity of any such U.S. patent claim, there is no assurance that a court of competent jurisdiction would invalidate the claims of any such U.S. patent. If we
are found to infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our product candidates and technology. We
may also attempt to obtain a license even in the absence of an action or finding of infringement. In either case, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain such a
license, it could be granted on non-exclusive terms, thereby providing our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and royalty payments. Without
such a license, we could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing and commercializing the infringing technology or product candidates. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and
attorneys’ fees if we are found to have wilfully infringed such third-party patent rights. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could
materially harm our business. If we lose a foreign lawsuit alleging our infringement, misappropriation of other violation of a competitor’s patents or other intellectual property or proprietary rights, we could be prevented from marketing our
products in one or more foreign countries. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other confidential
information of our competitors or other third parties or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors or other third parties, or claims asserting ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual
property.
We could in the future be subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information
of former employers or competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the intellectual property, proprietary information, know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us, we may in the future be
subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, or that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other
proprietary information of a former employer or competitor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and could be a
distraction to management. If our defenses to these claims fail, in addition to requiring us to pay monetary damages, a court could prohibit us from using technologies or features that are essential to our product candidates, if such technologies
or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. An inability to incorporate such technologies or features would have a material adverse effect on our business,
and may prevent us from successfully commercializing our product candidates. In addition, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel as a result of such claims. Moreover, any such litigation or the threat thereof may adversely
affect our ability to hire employees or contract with independent sales representatives. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our product candidates.
In addition, while it is our policy to require our employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute
agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. The assignment of intellectual
property rights may not be self-executing, or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as
our intellectual property. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time consuming and
unsuccessful.
Competitors and other third parties may infringe, misappropriate, challenge the validity of or otherwise violate our patents and other intellectual property rights. We may
become involved in opposition, derivation, re-examination, revocation, inter partes review, post-grant review, interference or other proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of
others from whom we have obtained licenses to such rights. For example, our European patents may be involved in opposition proceedings at the European Patent Office, challenging the validity of those patents. Opposition proceedings may involve
issues including, but not limited to, priority, patentability of the claims involved, and certain procedural formalities. As a result of the opposition proceedings, the European Patent Office’s Opposition Division, or the Opposition Division, can
revoke a patent, maintain the patent as granted, or maintain the patent in an amended form. Decisions made by the Opposition Division can be appealed to the European Patent Office’s Appeal Board. Challenges to our patents, including in such
opposition proceedings, may result in loss of patent rights, exclusivity, or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing
similar or identical technology and products, or limit the scope and duration of the patent protection of our ImmTAX platform technology and product candidates. For more information, see “Item 8.A Consolidated Statements and Other Financial
Information—Legal Proceedings.”
Additionally, our patents or the patents of our licensing or collaboration partners may in the future become, involved in inventorship or priority disputes, and our ability
to commercialize our product candidates could be adversely affected if we do not obtain a license to any patents material to the development of our product candidates. We may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable
terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be nonexclusive, thereby giving our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and
royalty payments. If we are unable to obtain a necessary license to a third-party patent on commercially reasonable terms, we may be unable to commercialize our platform technology or product candidates or such commercialization efforts may be
significantly delayed, which could in turn significantly harm our business.
The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect
our business or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. For example:
|
• |
others may be able to make products that are similar to our product candidates or utilize similar technology but that are not covered by the claims of the patents that we own or license now or in the
future;
|
|
• |
we or our licensors or collaborators might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by the issued patents or pending patent applications that we own or license now or in the future;
|
|
• |
we or our licensors or collaborators might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our or their inventions;
|
|
• |
others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our intellectual property rights or any intellectual property rights we may
license;
|
|
• |
it is possible that our present or future pending patent applications (whether owned or licensed) will not lead to issued patents;
|
|
• |
it is possible that there are or will be prior public disclosures that could invalidate our or our licensors’ or collaboration partners’ patents;
|
|
• |
issued patents that we hold rights to may fail to provide us with any competitive advantage, or may be held invalid or unenforceable, including as a result of legal challenges by our competitors or other
third parties;
|
|
• |
our competitors or other third parties might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights or in countries where research and development safe harbor laws
exist, and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets;
|
|
• |
we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;
|
|
• |
the ownership, validity or enforceability of our patents or patent applications may be challenged by third parties;
|
|
• |
the patents or pending or future applications of others, if issued, may harm our business; and
|
|
• |
we may choose not to file a patent in order to maintain certain trade secrets or know-how, and a third party may subsequently file a patent covering such intellectual property.
|
Should any of these events occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Issued patents covering our product candidates or technologies could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court or in administrative
proceedings.
If we initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates or technologies, should such a patent issue, the defendant
could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity
challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, written description or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone
connected with prosecution of the patent withheld information material to patentability from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties also may raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the United
States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination, post grant review, inter partes review and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). An adverse determination in any of the foregoing proceedings could result in the revocation or cancellation of, or amendment to, our patents in such a way that they no longer
cover our product candidates or technology. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior
art, of which the patent examiner and we or our licensing partners were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant or third party were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we could lose at least part, and perhaps
all, of the patent protection on one or more of our product candidates or technologies. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.
If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then this may impede our ability to build and sustain name recognition in our markets of
interest and our business may be adversely affected.
We may rely on trademarks and trade names to protect our business. If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, this may impede our ability to build and
sustain name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely affected. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to support name recognition among potential partners or
customers in our markets of interest. At times, competitors may adopt trade names or trademarks similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. In addition, there could be potential
trade name or trademark oppositions or infringement claims brought by owners of other registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names that incorporate elements which are identical or similar to our trademarks or trade names. For example, our
U.S. trademark application for IMMTAX is currently subject to an opposition filed by Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, or Immatics, and we have brought counterclaims against three of Immatics’s U.S. registered trademarks for IMMATICS. In addition,
Immatics have filed invalidation actions against UK and EU trademark registration for IMMTAX. If we are unsuccessful in defending this opposition, we may be required to change our branding for our ImmTAX platform which could cause us to incur
substantial costs and impede our ability to build and sustain name recognition for such platform. For more information on the opposition proceeding see “Item 8.A Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.” Over the long term, if we
are unable to successfully register our trademarks and trade names and establish name recognition based on effective use of our trademarks and trade names, then we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected.
Our efforts to enforce or protect our proprietary rights related to trademarks, trade secrets, domain names, copyrights or other intellectual property may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could
adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
The FDA regulatory pathways can be difficult to predict and whether, for example, further unanticipated clinical trials are required, will depend on the
data obtained in our ongoing clinical trials.
The regulatory approval pathway and the amount of time it takes us to obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates will depend on the data that are obtained in our
ongoing clinical trials and any future clinical trials, including future registrational or pivotal clinical trials. We may attempt to seek approval on a per indication basis for our product candidates on the basis of a single pivotal trial or on
the basis of data from one or more uncontrolled trials. While the FDA requires in most cases two adequate and well-controlled pivotal clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of a product candidate, a single trial with strong confirmatory
evidence may be sufficient in instances where the trial is a large multicenter trial demonstrating internal consistency and a statistically very persuasive finding of a clinically meaningful effect on mortality, irreversible morbidity or
prevention of a disease with a potentially serious outcome and if confirmation of the result in a second trial would be practically or ethically impossible. In rare cancer indications with very limited treatment options, a large and/or controlled
trial is often not feasible and thus data from smaller and even uncontrolled trials may be sufficient for regulatory approval. Depending on the data we obtain, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may require additional clinical trials to be
carried out or further patients to be treated prior to the granting of any regulatory approval for marketing of our product candidates. It is difficult for us to predict with such a novel technology exactly what will be required by the regulatory
authorities in order to take our product candidates to market or the timeframes under which the relevant regulatory approvals can be obtained.
The process of obtaining marketing approvals, both in the United States and abroad, is expensive, may take many years if additional clinical trials are required, if approval
is obtained at all, and can vary substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. For example, clinical trials may be required in pediatric populations before any
marketing approval can be obtained, which can be time-consuming and costly. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in regulatory review
for each submitted product application, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. The FDA and foreign regulatory authorities also have substantial discretion in the drug and biologics approval processes. The number and
types of pre-clinical programs and clinical trials that will be required for regulatory approval varies depending on the product candidate, the disease or condition that the product candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable
to any particular product candidate. Approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions,
and there may be varying interpretations of data obtained from pre-clinical programs or clinical trials, either of which may cause delays or limitations in the approval or the decision not to approve an application. In addition, approval of our
product candidates could be delayed or refused for many reasons, including the following:
|
• |
the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our or our collaborators’ clinical trials;
|
|
• |
we or our collaborators may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that our product candidates are safe, pure, potent and have a favorable
risk/benefit profile for any of their proposed indications;
|
|
• |
the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval;
|
|
• |
the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from pre-clinical programs or clinical trials;
|
|
• |
data collected from clinical trials of product candidates may not be sufficient to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to support the submission of a BLA or other
comparable submission in foreign jurisdictions or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere;
|
|
• |
manufacturing processes or facilities or those of the third-party manufacturers we use may not be adequate to support approval of our product candidates; and
|
|
• |
the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.
|
It is possible that no product candidates will ever obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals necessary to be commercialized. Any delay in obtaining, or failure to obtain,
required approvals would materially adversely affect our ability to generate revenue from the particular product candidate, which would result in significant harm to our business.
Even though we have received regulatory approval for KIMMTRAK, and even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our other product candidates, we will
be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to post-market study requirements, marketing and
labeling restrictions, and even recall or market withdrawal if unanticipated safety issues are discovered following approval. In addition, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement action if we fail to comply with regulatory
requirements.
We are subject to extensive ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review with respect to KIMMTRAK, such as continued adverse event reporting requirements. Any problems
with a product or any violation of ongoing regulatory obligations could result in restrictions on the applicable product, including the withdrawal of the applicable product from the market.
If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event
reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports,
establishment registration and listing, as well as continued compliance with cGMPs and GCPs for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to
limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to
monitor the safety and efficacy of the product. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or
failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, regulatory action, delays in regulatory timelines and additional costs to us.
Failure to comply with applicable FDA and other regulatory requirements may subject us to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions, including:
|
• |
issuance of Form FDA 483 notices or Warning Letters by the FDA or other regulatory agencies;
|
|
• |
imposition of fines and other civil penalties;
|
|
• |
injunctions, suspensions or revocations of regulatory approvals;
|
|
• |
suspension of any ongoing clinical trials;
|
|
• |
total or partial suspension of manufacturing;
|
|
• |
delays in commercialization;
|
|
• |
refusal by the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us;
|
|
• |
refusals to permit drugs to be imported into or exported from the United States;
|
|
• |
restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements;
|
|
• |
product recalls or seizures; and
|
|
• |
requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials.
|
The policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our
product candidates or of KIMMTRAK in any additional indications or territories, or further restrict or regulate post-approval activities. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse government regulation that may arise from
future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we or our collaborators might not be permitted to market our current or any future approved products and our
business would suffer.
Reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving KIMMTRAK or our product candidates could delay or prevent us from obtaining or maintaining regulatory approvals or could
negatively impact sales of our products or the prospects for our product candidates.
Reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving our products could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials of our products. In addition, reports of adverse events or
safety concerns involving our products could result in regulatory authorities requiring that we update the applicable product’s prescribing information, or limiting, denying or withdrawing approval of our products for any or all indications,
including previously approved indications. There are no assurances that patients receiving our products will not experience serious adverse events, including fatal events, in the future, whether the serious adverse events are disclosed in the
prescribing information or are newly reported. Further, there are no assurances that patients receiving our products with co-morbid diseases not previously studied, will not experience new or different serious adverse events in the future.
The prescribing information for KIMMTRAK includes warnings and precautions for various toxicities, as well as a boxed warning related to the risk of cytokine release
syndrome, or CRS. We may be required to update the prescribing information for our products, including boxed warnings, limitations of use, contraindications, warnings and precautions, and adverse reactions, based on reports of adverse events or
safety concerns, or implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS. Side effects and toxicities associated with our products could affect the willingness of physicians to prescribe, and patients to utilize, our products and thus
harm commercial sales of our products. Implementation of a REMS could advantage products that compete with ours or make it more difficult or expensive for us to distribute our products.
Likewise, reports of adverse events or safety concerns involving our product candidates could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials of our product candidates, or could
result in our or our collaborators’ inability to obtain regulatory approvals of our product candidates. Additional and/or unexpected safety events could be observed in these or other trials that could delay or prevent us from advancing the
clinical development of, or obtaining regulatory approvals for, our products and product candidates or require us to alter the approved labeling of our products, and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and prospects.
Concerns regarding the safety of our products or product candidates as a result of undesirable side effects identified during clinical testing or otherwise could cause the
FDA to order us to cease further development or commercialization of our products or the product candidates. Undesirable side effects caused by our products or product candidates could also result in denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or
other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications, the requirement of additional trials, implementation of a REMS or the inclusion of unfavorable information in our product labeling, and in turn delay or prevent us from
commercializing the applicable product or product candidate. In addition, actual or potential drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete a trial for our products or product
candidates or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these events could prevent us from developing or commercializing the applicable product or product candidate, and could significantly harm our business, results of operations and
prospects.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses.
If any of our product candidates are approved and we are found to have improperly promoted off-label uses of those products, we may become subject to significant liability.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate the promotional claims that may be made about approved prescription drug products. In particular, while the FDA permits the dissemination of truthful and non-misleading information about an
approved product, a manufacturer may not promote a product for uses that are not approved by the FDA. If we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability. Physicians, on the other hand, may
prescribe products for off-label uses. Although the FDA and other regulatory agencies do not regulate a physician’s choice of drug treatment made in the physician’s independent medical judgment, they do restrict promotional communications from
companies or their sales force with respect to off-label uses of products for which marketing clearance has not been issued. However, companies may share truthful and not misleading information that is otherwise consistent with a product’s FDA
approved labeling. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion of regulated products for off-label uses and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion.
The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct must be changed or curtailed. If we cannot successfully manage the promotion
of our product candidates, if approved, we could become subject to significant liability, which would materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We are subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations
could lead to regulatory investigations and actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions to our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue and profits; loss of customers and sales; and otherwise adversely affect our business
and prospects.
In the ordinary course of business, we process personal data and other sensitive information (including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets,
intellectual property, clinical trial participant data, and sensitive third-party data). We are subject to data privacy and security obligations such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal policies,
contracts and other obligations that govern the processing of personal data by us and on our behalf. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve in jurisdictions worldwide, and there has been an
increasing focus on privacy and data protection issues with the potential to affect our business. Our obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing in an increasingly stringent fashion, creating some uncertainty as to the
effective legal frameworks. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or in conflict among jurisdictions. Preparation for and compliance with these obligations requires
us to devote significant resources (including, without limitation, financial and time-related resources). These obligations may necessitate changes to our business including our information technologies, systems and practices and to those of any
third parties that process personal data on our behalf. Although we strive to comply with all applicable data privacy and security obligations, we may at times fail (or be perceived to have failed) to do so. Moreover, despite our efforts, our
personnel or third parties upon whom we rely may fail to comply with such obligations. If we (or third parties upon we rely) fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address and comply with data privacy and security obligations, we could face
significant consequences. These consequences may include but are not limited to: government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections and similar consequences); litigation (including class-related claims);
additional reporting requirements and oversight; bans on processing personal data; orders to destroy and not to use personal data; and imprisonment of company officials. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation
and our business and financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations (including, our clinical trial activities); inability to process personal data; inability to operate
in specific jurisdictions; limitations in our ability to develop and commercialize our products; time and other resource expenditures; adverse publicity; and revisions to our operations.
Globally, virtually every jurisdiction in which we operate has established its own data privacy and security frameworks. For example, the European Union General Data
Protection Regulation, or the EU GDPR, and the United Kingdom equivalent to the EU GDPR (“UK GDPR”), and other similar laws and regulations impose strict requirements for processing personal data. These laws and regulations also provide for
monetary fines and processing penalties. For example, under the UK GDPR, the government may impose temporary and definitive bans on personal data processing as well as fines of up to £17.5 million or 4% of the total annual worldwide turnover in
the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Further, relevant stakeholders may initiate litigation related to our processing of personal data.
The UK’s decision to leave the European Union, often referred to as Brexit, and ongoing developments in the UK have created uncertainty with regard to data protection
regulation in the UK. Going forward, there may be an increasing scope of divergence in application, interpretation and enforcement of data protection laws as between the UK and EU. In addition to the parallel UK and EU regimes, following the
expiry of the post-Brexit transitional arrangements agreed between the UK and EU, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office is not able to be our ‘‘lead supervisory authority’’ in respect of any ‘cross-border personal data processing’ for the
purposes of the EU GDPR. Because we did not designate a lead supervisory authority in an EU member state with effect from January 1, 2021, we are not able to benefit from the EU GDPR’s ‘‘one stop shop’’ mechanism. Among other things, this means
that, in the event of a violation of the applicable data protection laws affecting data subjects across the UK and the EU, we could be investigated, and ultimately fined by, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office and the supervisory authority
in each and every EU member state where data subjects have been affected by such violation.
In addition, certain jurisdictions have enacted data localization laws and cross-border personal data transfer laws. For example, absent appropriate safeguards, the EU GDPR
and UK GDPR generally restrict the transfer of personal data to countries outside of the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and UK, such as to the United States, which government regulators have respectively found not to provide an adequate level of
data privacy and security protection. Although there are legal mechanisms to allow for the transfer of personal data from the EEA and United Kingdom to the United States, uncertainty remains about compliance with such data protection laws and
such mechanisms may not be available or applicable with respect to our personal data processing activities. For example, the “Standard Contractual Clauses” that are designed to be a valid mechanism by which parties can transfer personal data out
of the EEA and UK to jurisdictions that are not found to provide an adequate level of protection, must be assessed on a case-by-case basis taking into account the legal regime applicable in the destination country. Specifically, the parties to
the cross-border personal data transfer must evaluate the importing jurisdiction’s laws and implement supplemental security measures as necessary to protect the at-issue personal data. It is likely that there will continue to be some uncertainty
regarding the mechanisms by which parties transfer personal data out of the EEA and UK to jurisdictions such as the United States. If we cannot implement and maintain a valid mechanism for cross-border personal data transfers, we may face
increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines and injunctions against processing (including prohibitions on transferring personal data out of the UK and EEA). The inability to export personal data personal data to other
jurisdictions could negatively impact our business operations (including by limiting our ability to conduct clinical trial activities globally); and limit our ability to collaborate with parties that operate in foreign jurisdictions.
In the United States, federal, state and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws (including data breach notification laws,
personal data privacy laws and consumer protection laws). For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) imposes obligations on businesses to which it applies. These obligations include but are not limited to providing
specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording California residents with certain rights related to their personal data. The CCPA allows for statutory fines for non-compliance (up to $7,500 per violation). Other states have similarly
enacted data privacy laws. If we become subject to new data privacy or security laws, at the state level, the risk of enforcement action against us could increase because we may become subject to additional obligations, and the number
of individuals or entities that can initiate actions against us may increase (including individuals, via a private right of action, and state actors).
Additionally, regulations promulgated pursuant to the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as amended, establish privacy and
security standards that limit the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information and protected health information, and require the implementation of administrative, physical and technological safeguards to protect the privacy
of such information and ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information. These provisions may apply to our business or that of third parties upon whom we rely (such as our clinical trial sites,
collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants). Determining whether such health information has been handled in compliance with applicable obligations can be complex and may be subject to changing interpretation. If we are unable
to protect properly the privacy and security of such information, we could be found to have violated our statutory, contractual and other obligations.
Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining
regulatory approval of our product candidates in other jurisdictions.
Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in
those jurisdictions. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in
certain countries. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product
candidates will be harmed.
Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain regulatory approval
in any other jurisdiction, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. For example, even if the FDA grants marketing approval of a product
candidate, comparable regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion of the product candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve
requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by
regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In short, the foreign regulatory approval process involves all of the risks associated with FDA approval. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for
reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we may intend to charge for our products will also be subject to approval.
If we are unable to successfully validate, develop and obtain regulatory approval for companion diagnostic tests for our product candidates that require
or would commercially benefit from such tests, or experience significant delays in doing so, we may not realize the full commercial potential of these product candidates.
In connection with the clinical development of our product candidates for certain indications, we may engage third parties to develop or obtain access to in vitro companion diagnostic tests to identify patient subsets within a disease category who may derive selective and meaningful benefit from our product candidates. Such companion diagnostics would be used
during our clinical trials as well as in connection with the commercialization of our product candidates. To be successful, we or our collaborators will need to address a number of scientific, technical, regulatory and logistical challenges. The
FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities regulate in vitro companion diagnostics as medical devices and, under that regulatory framework, will likely require the conduct of clinical trials to
demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of any diagnostics we may develop, which we expect will require separate regulatory clearance or approval prior to commercialization.
We intend to rely on third parties for the design, development and manufacture of companion diagnostic tests for our therapeutic product candidates that may require such
tests. If we enter into such collaborative agreements, we will be dependent on the sustained cooperation and effort of our future collaborators in developing and obtaining approval for these companion diagnostics. It may be necessary to resolve
issues such as selectivity/specificity, analytical validation, reproducibility, or clinical validation of companion diagnostics during the development and regulatory approval processes. Moreover, even if data from pre-clinical studies and early
clinical trials appear to support development of a companion diagnostic for a product candidate, data generated in later clinical trials may fail to support the analytical and clinical validation of the companion diagnostic. We and our future
collaborators may encounter difficulties in developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, manufacturing and commercializing companion diagnostics similar to those we face with respect to our therapeutic candidates themselves, including issues
with achieving regulatory clearance or approval, production of sufficient quantities at commercial scale and with appropriate quality standards, and in gaining market acceptance. If we are unable to successfully develop companion diagnostics for
these therapeutic product candidates, or experience delays in doing so, the development of these therapeutic product candidates may be adversely affected, these therapeutic product candidates may not obtain marketing approval, and we may not
realize the full commercial potential of any of these therapeutics that obtain marketing approval. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially harmed. In addition, a diagnostic company with whom we
contract may decide to discontinue selling or manufacturing the companion diagnostic test that we anticipate using in connection with development and commercialization of our product candidates or our relationship with such diagnostic company may
otherwise terminate. We may not be able to enter into arrangements with another diagnostic company to obtain supplies of an alternative diagnostic test for use in connection with the development and commercialization of our product candidates or
do so on commercially reasonable terms, which could adversely affect and/or delay the development or commercialization of our therapeutic candidates.
We are subject to the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or the Bribery Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the FCPA, and other
anti-corruption laws, as well as export control laws, import and customs laws, trade and economic sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations. Violations of such laws and regulations could subject us to liability.
Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the Bribery Act, the FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. §201, the U.S. Travel Act,
and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where we do business. The Bribery Act, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws generally prohibit us and our employees and intermediaries from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing,
directly or indirectly, improper or prohibited payments, or anything else of value, to government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. Under the Bribery Act, we may also be liable for
failing to prevent a person associated with us from committing a bribery offense. In addition, the FCPA requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to
devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. We and our commercial partners operate in a number of jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential Bribery Act or FCPA violations, and we participate in collaborations
and relationships with third parties whose corrupt or illegal activities could potentially subject us to liability under the Bribery Act, FCPA or local anti-corruption laws, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such
activities. In addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.
We are also subject to other laws and regulations administered by the governments of the United Kingdom and the United States, and authorities in the European Union governing
our international operations, including applicable export control regulations, economic sanctions and embargoes on certain countries and persons, anti-money laundering laws, import and customs requirements and currency exchange regulations,
collectively referred to as the Trade Control laws.
As disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we conducted an internal investigation in the summer and fall of 2020 as a result of receiving a whistleblower complaint
alleging employee misconduct and other improper activities related to a kickback scheme involving an employee and two third-party vendors between 2018 and 2020. Our audit committee led the investigation utilizing outside counsel, during which the
named employee resigned. After the investigation, we terminated the one remaining open contract with the third-party vendors and issued proceedings in October 2020 against the involved parties. The amount in question was estimated to be in the
range of £1.1 million to £1.8 million, and we recovered our estimated losses of £1.8 million from the employee and third-party vendors in December 2020. In the course of auditing our 2019 financial statements for our initial public offering, we
and our independent registered public accounting firm identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to our procurement processes and application of delegation of authority approval limits due to
insufficient risk assessment procedures. Since then, we enhanced our overall control environment, including adding finance and accounting personnel to drive and implement required additional processes and procurement controls, implementing
improvements in software relating to approvals of purchase orders and contracts, adding additional layers of review of contracts and journal entries and delegation of contract authority limits. We also further developed and documented our
accounting policies and financial reporting procedures, including ongoing executive management review and audit committee oversight. We remediated the material weakness as of December 31, 2020. However, we cannot assure you that these measures
will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance in the future with all applicable anti-corruption laws, including the Bribery Act, the FCPA or other legal requirements, including Trade Control laws, or prevent future material weaknesses
or deficiencies. If we are not in compliance with the Bribery Act, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal
expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the Bribery Act, the FCPA, other anti-corruption laws or Trade
Control laws by United Kingdom, United States or other authorities could also have an adverse impact on our reputation, our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Because we are organized under the laws of England and Wales with principal executive offices in the United Kingdom and have a U.S. subsidiary and operations in the United
States, we are subject to U.S. laws that regulate foreign investments in U.S. businesses and real estate as well as those that regulate access by foreign persons to technology developed and produced in the United States. These laws include
section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and its implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Parts 800 and 802, administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States; and the Export Control Reform Act of 2018,
as implemented by the Export Administration Regulations, and through additional U.S. Commerce Department rulemakings to impose new export control restrictions on “emerging and foundational technologies”, yet to be fully identified. Application of
these laws, including as they are implemented through regulations being developed, may negatively impact our business in various ways, including by restricting our access to capital and markets; limiting the collaborations we may pursue;
regulating the export, re-export, or transfer of our products, services, and technology from the United States and abroad; increasing our costs and the time necessary to obtain required authorizations and to ensure compliance with U.S. law; and
threatening monetary fines and other penalties if we do not.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could
have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment
and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with
third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held
liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties. Furthermore, environmental laws and regulations are complex, change
frequently and have tended to become more stringent. We cannot predict the impact of such changes and cannot be certain of our future compliance. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental,
health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or
other sanctions.
Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous
materials or other work-related injuries, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws
and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions or
liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We may seek priority review designation for one or more of our other product candidates, but we might not receive such designation, and even if we do,
such designation may not lead to a faster regulatory review or approval process.
If the FDA determines that a product candidate offers a treatment for a serious condition and, if approved, the product would provide a significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness, the FDA may designate the product candidate for priority review. A priority review designation means that the goal for the FDA to review an application is six months, rather than the standard review period of ten months. We may
request priority review for our product candidates. The FDA has broad discretion with respect to whether or not to grant priority review status to a product candidate, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for such
designation or status, the FDA may decide not to grant it. Moreover, a priority review designation does not necessarily result in an expedited regulatory review or approval process or necessarily confer any advantage with respect to approval
compared to conventional FDA procedures. Receiving priority review from the FDA does not guarantee approval within the six-month review cycle or at all.
We may seek Orphan Drug Designation for certain of our product candidates, and we may be unsuccessful or may be unable to maintain the benefits associated
with Orphan Drug Designation, including the potential for market exclusivity.
As part of our business strategy, we have obtained Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for tebentafusp in uveal melanoma, and we may also seek Orphan Drug Designation for
certain of our other product candidates in the future which could be unsuccessful. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and the European Union, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as
orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually
in the United States, or a patient population of 200,000 or more in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, Orphan
Drug Designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers.
As part of our business strategy, in Europe, the European Commission, upon the recommendation of the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, granted Orphan Drug
Designation for tebentafusp in uveal melanoma. We may also seek Orphan Drug Designation for certain of our other product candidates in the future to promote the development of drugs that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of
life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting not more than 5 in 10,000 persons in the European Union and for which no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment has been authorized (or the product would be a
significant benefit to those affected). Additionally, designation is granted for drugs intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition and when, without
incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the drug in European Union would be sufficient to justify the necessary investment in developing the drug. In the European Union, Orphan Drug Designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as
reduction of fees or fee waivers.
Generally, if a drug with an Orphan Drug Designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the drug is
entitled to a period of marketing exclusivity, which precludes the FDA or the EMA from approving another marketing application for the same drug and indication for that time period, except in limited circumstances. The applicable period is seven
years in the United States and ten years in the European Union. The European Union exclusivity period can be reduced to six years if a drug no longer meets the criteria for Orphan Drug Designation or if the drug is sufficiently profitable so that
market exclusivity is no longer justified.
Even when and if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a drug, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the drug from competition because different drugs can be approved
for the same condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective
or makes a major contribution to patient care. In addition, a designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. Moreover,
orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug to meet the
needs of patients with the rare disease or condition or if another drug with the same active moiety is determined to be safer, more effective, or represents a major contribution to patient care. Orphan Drug Designation neither shortens the
development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process. While we may seek Orphan Drug Designation for our product candidates, we may never receive such designations. Even
if we do receive such designations, there is no guarantee that we will enjoy the benefits of those designations.
A breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA, even if granted for any of our product candidates, may not lead to a faster development, regulatory review
or approval process, and each designation does not increase the likelihood that any of our product candidates will receive marketing approval in the United States.
Tebentafusp was granted breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA for unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. We may seek a breakthrough therapy designation for some of
our future product candidates. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence
indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For drugs that have been
designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective
control regimens. Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA may also be eligible for priority review and accelerated approval.
Designation as a breakthrough therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the criteria for designation as
a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a breakthrough therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or
approval compared to therapies considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates qualify as breakthrough therapies, the FDA may
later decide that such product candidates no longer meet the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.
The FDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities may implement additional regulations or restrictions, and legislative bodies may enact new policies,
including unfavorable pricing restrictions, that may adversely affect the development and commercialization of our product candidates, and such changes can be difficult to predict.
The FDA, the EMA and regulatory authorities in other countries have each expressed interest in further regulating biotechnology products. Agencies at both the federal and
state level in the United States, as well as the U.S. Congressional committees and other governments or governing agencies, have also expressed interest in further regulating the biotechnology industry. Such action may delay or prevent
commercialization of some or all of our product candidates. Adverse developments in clinical trials of products conducted by others may cause the FDA or other oversight bodies to change the requirements for approval of any of our product
candidates. These regulatory review agencies and committees and the new requirements or guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studies or trials, increase our development costs,
lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. As we advance our product candidates, we will
be required to consult with these regulatory agencies and comply with applicable requirements and guidelines. If we fail to do so, we may be required to delay or discontinue development of such product candidates. These additional processes may
result in a review and approval process that is longer than we otherwise would have expected. Delays as a result of an increased or lengthier regulatory approval process or further restrictions on the development of our product candidates can be
costly and could negatively impact our ability to complete clinical trials and commercialize our current and future product candidates in a timely manner, if at all.
The United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system that could prevent or delay
marketing approval of our current or future product candidates or any future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell a product for which we obtain marketing approval. Changes in
regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements, (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling, (iii) the
recall or discontinuation of our products or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business. In the United States, there have been and continue to be
a number of legislative initiatives to contain healthcare costs. For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively the ACA, was
passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacted the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. The ACA, among other things, subjects biological products to potential
competition by lower-cost biosimilars, addresses a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, increases the
minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations, establishes annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain
branded prescription drugs, and creates a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 70% (increased pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, effective as of 2019) point-of-sale discounts
off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.
There have been executive, judicial and congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. While Congress has not passed repeal legislation to date, the TCJA, repealed,
effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.”
On June 17, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Thus, the ACA will remain in effect in its
current form. Further, prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order to initiate a special enrollment for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The
executive order also instructs certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, re-examining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that
include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. It is unclear what effect any such challenges or the healthcare reform measures of the Biden
administration will have on the status of the ACA. Litigation and legislation over the ACA are likely to continue, with unpredictable and uncertain results.
Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things,
created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required
goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers up to 2% per fiscal year, and, due to subsequent legislative amendments, will
remain in effect through 2031, unless additional Congressional action is taken. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, and other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation suspended the 2% Medicare sequester from May 1,
2020 through March 31, 2022. Under current legislation, the actual reduction in Medicare payments will vary from 1% in 2022 to up to 3% in the final fiscal year of this sequester. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 among other things,
reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
There has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically, there have been several
recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing
and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. At the federal level, the Trump administration used several means to propose or implement drug pricing reform, including through federal
budget proposals, executive orders and policy initiatives. For example, on July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of
the administration’s proposals. As a result, the FDA released a final rule and guidance on September 24, 2020 providing pathways for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020, the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Medicare Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers,
unless the price reduction is required by law. The implementation of the rule has been delayed by the Biden administration from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 in response to ongoing litigation. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for
price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a new safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers, the implementation of which have also been delayed pending review by the Biden
administration until January 1, 2023. On November 20, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued an interim final rule implementing the Trump administration’s Most Favored Nation executive order, which would tie
Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered drugs to the lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries, effective January 1, 2021. As a result of litigation challenging the Most Favored Nation model, on December 27,
2021, CMS published a final rule that rescinded the Most Favored Nation model interim final rule. In July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed
at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential
legislative policies that Congress could pursue to advance these principles. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles. In addition, Congress is considering drug pricing as part of other reform
initiatives.
At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological
product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other
countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription
drug and other healthcare programs. These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products, once approved, or put pressure on our product pricing.
We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments
will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our current or future product candidates or additional pricing pressures. Further, it is possible that additional governmental action is taken in response to
the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our revenue prospects could be affected by changes in healthcare spending and policy in the United States and abroad. We operate in a highly regulated industry and new laws,
regulations or judicial decisions, or new interpretations of existing laws, regulations or decisions, related to healthcare availability, the method of delivery or payment for healthcare products and services could negatively impact our business,
operations and financial condition.
There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of
healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We cannot predict the initiatives that may be adopted in the future, including repeal, replacement or significant revisions to the ACA. The continuing efforts of the government,
insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls may adversely affect:
|
• |
the demand for our current or future product candidates, if we obtain regulatory approval;
|
|
• |
our ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our products;
|
|
• |
our ability to obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement for a product;
|
|
• |
our ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability;
|
|
• |
the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and
|
|
• |
the availability of capital.
|
Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors, which may adversely affect our
future profitability.
Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and
regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion from government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.
Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing
approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships
through which we market, sell and distribute our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:
|
• |
the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind,
to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under federal and state healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. A
person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
|
|
• |
the federal civil and criminal false claims and civil monetary penalties laws, including the federal False Claims Act, or FCA, imposes criminal and civil penalties, including through civil whistleblower or
qui tam actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an
obligation to pay money to the federal government. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false of fraudulent claim
for purposes of the False Claims Act;
|
|
• |
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and
willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback
Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
|
|
• |
the federal physician payment transparency requirements, sometimes referred to as the “Sunshine Act” under the Affordable Care Act, require manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies
that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report to CMS information related to transfers of value made to physicians (currently defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists,
podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests of such physicians and their immediate family
members;
|
|
• |
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 and its implementing regulations, impose obligations on certain covered entity healthcare providers,
health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information and their subcontractors that use, disclose or
otherwise process individually identifiable health information, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; and
|
|
• |
analogous state laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by
non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers. Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance
promulgated by the federal government in addition to requiring drug manufacturers to report information related to payments to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures. Further, many state laws governing the
privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
|
Ensuring that our future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations could involve substantial costs. It is possible that
governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations, including
anticipated activities to be conducted by our sales team, were to be found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative
penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the
physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded
healthcare programs.
We may not be able to file applications to commence additional clinical trials on the timelines we expect, and even if we are able to, the FDA or
applicable competent authorities may not permit us to proceed.
We plan to submit investigational new drug applications, or INDs, for additional product candidates to the FDA in the future. We also plan to submit applications to start
clinical trials of additional product candidates outside the United States to the national competent authorities (for example, a clinical trial authorization, or CTA, to Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, in the United
Kingdom).
The filing of INDs to the FDA and the filing of applications outside the United States is dependent on additional data that have to be generated to support such regulatory
filings. Hence, these filings may be delayed if the tests to generate those data show unexpected results or if technical issues arise in generating those data in the first place.
We cannot be sure that submission of an IND, IND amendment or CTA will result in the FDA or any other competent authority outside the United States allowing testing and
clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that suspend or terminate such clinical trials. The manufacturing and pre-clinical safety and efficacy testing requirements of both ImmTAC® and ImmTAAI® remain emerging and
evolving fields. Accordingly, we expect chemistry, manufacturing and control related topics, including product specification, as well as pre-clinical safety testing, will be a focus of IND reviews, which may delay the allowance of INDs by the FDA
or CTA approval by other competent authorities outside the United States.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could
have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment
and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally
contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we
could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.
Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous
materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of
biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.
Changes in funding for the FDA, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and
retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal functions on which the operation of our business may
rely, which could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain
key personnel and accept payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the FDA and other government agencies
on which our operations may rely are subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would
adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA and other government
employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our
operations due to insufficient funding of the SEC and other government agencies or due to a government shutdown that affects the SEC.
Our failure to obtain regulatory approval in international jurisdictions would prevent us from marketing our lead product candidate or any other current
or future product candidates outside the United States.
If we succeed in developing any products, we intend to market them in non-U.S. jurisdictions in addition to the United States or we may also apply for non-U.S. regulatory
approval at the same time as we apply for U.S. regulatory approval. For example, KIMMTRAK recently received marketing approval from the FDA, and we are currently seeking further approval of tebentafusp in Europe following our MAA submission to
the EMA. In order to market and sell our products in other jurisdictions, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. We may not obtain non-U.S. regulatory approvals on a timely basis,
if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions. Approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other
countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. If we fail to obtain approval of any of our product candidates by regulatory authorities in another country we will be unable to commercialize our product in that country, and the commercial prospects of
that product candidate and our business prospects could decline. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA
approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, we must secure product reimbursement
approvals before regulatory authorities will approve the product for sale in that country. Obtaining non-U.S. regulatory approvals and compliance with non-U.S. regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for
us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. Further, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries and regulatory approval in one country does
not ensure approval in any other country, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. Also, regulatory approval for any of our product
candidates may be withdrawn if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements, if problems occur after the product candidate reaches the market or for other reasons. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets
and fail to receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed and our business will be negatively affected.
Risks Relating to our Business Operations, Employee Matters and Managing Growth
Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives and experienced scientists and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent on the research and development, clinical and business development expertise of Dr. Bahija Jallal, Chief Executive Officer, Brian Di Donato, our Chief
Financial Officer, and Dr. David Berman, our Head of Research and Development, as well as the other principal members of our management, scientific, clinical and commercial team. Although we have entered into employment letter agreements with our
executive officers, each of them may terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not maintain “key person” insurance for any of our executives or other employees. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific
and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisory
contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, our ability to pursue our growth strategy will be limited.
Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, clinical, manufacturing and sales and marketing personnel will also be critical to our success. The loss of the services of our
executive officers or other key employees, including temporary loss due to illness, could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives and seriously harm our ability to successfully implement our business
strategy. Furthermore, replacing executive officers and key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to
successfully develop, gain regulatory approval of and commercialize products. Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire, train, retain or motivate these key personnel on acceptable terms given the
competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions. Failure to succeed in
clinical trials may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified scientific personnel.
In particular, we have experienced competitive hiring environments in our three locations: Oxfordshire, England where we are headquartered, Pennsylvania and Maryland. We may
also experience further competition as a result of Brexit. Many of the other pharmaceutical companies that we compete against for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the
industry than we do. They also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than what we have to offer. If we are unable to
continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate and success with which we can discover and develop product candidates and our business will be limited.
We expect to continue to expand our development, commercial and regulatory capabilities and have recently developed sales, marketing and distribution
capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.
As of December 31, 2021, we had 324 full-time employees. We expect to experience significant growth in the number
of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly as we continue to function and grow as a public company and in the areas of product development, regulatory affairs and, if any of our product candidates receives marketing approval,
sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified
personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train
additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or
disrupt our operations.
We may acquire additional businesses or products, form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing
business. If we acquire businesses with promising markets or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We
may encounter numerous difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new products resulting from a strategic alliance or acquisition that delay or prevent us from realizing their expected benefits or enhancing our business. We
cannot assure you that, following any such acquisition, we will achieve the expected synergies to justify the transaction.
Our employees, principal investigators, CROs, partners, vendors and consultants may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including
non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.
We are exposed to the risk that our employees, principal investigators, CROs, partners, vendors and consultants may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activity.
Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to us that violate the regulations of the FDA and other regulatory authorities, including those laws requiring the
reporting of true, complete and accurate information to such authorities; healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations in the United States and abroad; or laws that require the reporting of financial information or data accurately. In
particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations
may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Activities subject to these laws also involve the improper use of information
obtained in the course of clinical trials or creating fraudulent data in our pre-clinical studies or clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation.
For example, in the summer and fall of 2020, we conducted an internal investigation as a result of receiving a whistleblower complaint alleging employee misconduct and other
improper activities related to a kickback scheme involving an employee and two third-party vendors between 2018 and 2020. Our audit committee led the investigation utilizing outside counsel, during which the named employee resigned. After the
investigation, we terminated the one remaining open contract with the third-party vendors and issued proceedings in October 2020 against the involved parties. We recovered our estimated losses of £1.8 million from the employee and third-party
vendors in December 2020. In the course of auditing our 2019 financial statements for our initial public offering, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting, relating to our procurement processes and application of delegation of authority approval limits due to insufficient risk assessment procedures. Since then, we enhanced our overall control environment, including adding finance and
accounting personnel to drive and implement required additional processed and procurement controls, implementing improvements in software relating to approvals of purchase orders and contracts, adding additional layers of review of contracts and
journal entries and delegation of contract authority limits. We also further developed and documented our accounting policies and financial reporting procedures, including ongoing executive management review and audit committee oversight. We
remediated the material weakness as of December 31, 2020.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our employees, but it is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct by employees and
other third parties, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits
stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are
not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines,
imprisonment, disgorgement, additional reporting obligations and oversight, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future
earnings, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.
Our indebtedness may limit our flexibility in operating our business and adversely affect our financial health and competitive position.
We have a $100.0 million loan and security agreement with Oxford Finance, or the Loan Agreement, that is secured by a lien covering substantially all of our assets, including
intellectual property. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding principal balance under the Loan Agreement was $50.0 million. An additional $25.0 million is available to us at our option
following BLA approval for tebentafusp, and a further $25.0 million is available at our option and at the discretion of Oxford Finance. The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants and events of default applicable to us.
In addition, the agreement governing the Loan Agreement contains, and any agreements evidencing or governing other future indebtedness may contain, certain covenants that
limit our ability to engage in certain transactions that may be in our long-term best interests. Subject to certain limited exceptions, these covenants limit our ability to, among other things:
|
• |
convey, sell, lease, transfer, assign, dispose of or otherwise make cash payments consisting of all or any part of our business or property;
|
|
• |
effect certain changes in our business, management, ownership or business locations;
|
|
• |
merge or consolidate with, or acquire all or substantially all of the capital stock or assets of, any other company;
|
|
• |
create, incur, assume or be liable for any additional indebtedness, or create, incur, allow or permit to exist any additional liens;
|
|
• |
pay cash dividends on, make any other distributions in respect of, or redeem, retire or repurchase, any shares of our capital stock;
|
|
• |
make certain investments; and
|
|
• |
enter into transactions with our affiliates.
|
While we have not previously breached and are not currently in breach of these or any of the other covenants contained in our credit agreement, there can be no guarantee that
we will not breach these covenants in the future. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events and factors beyond our control. In the event that we breach one or more covenants, our lender may choose to declare an event of
default and require that we immediately repay all amounts outstanding, terminate any commitment to extend further credit and foreclose on the collateral granted to it to collateralize such indebtedness. The occurrence of any of these events could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase costs and expenses.
Our operations and those of our third-party suppliers and collaborators could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages,
telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, hurricanes or other extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, labor disputes, war or other business interruptions. Although we have limited business interruption insurance policies in
place, any interruption could come with high costs for us, as salaries and loan payments would usually continue. Moreover, any interruption could seriously harm our ability to timely proceed with any clinical programs or to supply product
candidates for use in our clinical programs or during commercialization. For example, the current COVID-19 pandemic has, at points, caused an interruption in our clinical trial activities. Specifically, we had to reduce our business activities
including those in the laboratory according to governmental orders in the United States as well as in the United Kingdom. Additionally, supply chains disruptions impact and may continue to impact our research activities. Moreover, at the end of
2021 and into 2022, tensions between the United States and Russia escalated when Russia amassed large numbers of military ground forces and support personnel on the Ukraine-Russia border and, in February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. In
response, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO has deployed additional military forces to Eastern Europe, including to Lithuania, and the Biden administration announced certain sanctions against Russia. The invasion of Ukraine and the
retaliatory measures that have been taken, or could be taken in the future, by the United States, NATO, and other countries have created global security concerns that could result in a regional conflict and otherwise have a lasting impact on
regional and global economies, any or all of which could disrupt our supply chain, adversely affect our ability to conduct ongoing and future clinical trials of our product candidates, and adversely affect our ability to commercialise our
products (subject to regulatory approval) in this region. For example, our ongoing IMCgp100-202 trial currently includes trial sites located in Ukraine and Russia and we are currently treating one patient in Russia. Currently, we have plans in
place to continue study treatment for this individual; however, the invasion of Ukraine will likely impact our ability to conduct the trial in Ukraine, Russia and potentially in other Eastern European countries, and may prevent us from
continuing treatment or follow-up for patients currently enrolled or enrolling future patients at sites in these countries, and may also prevent us from commercialising our products (subject to regulatory approval) in this region. This could
negatively impact the anticipated timing and completion of our clinical trials and/or analyses of clinical results, including our IMCgp100-202 Trial, and negatively impact our plans to commercialise our product (subject to regulatory approval)
in this region, which could harm our business.
Clinical sites involved may not be able to enroll patients into our trials as they have to keep free or use capacities for the treatment of COVID-19
patients. Any of the sites where we conduct clinical trials may announce that they will not enroll further patients into clinical trials until further notice. We currently do not know, how substantial the delay for the development of our
product candidates will be. Even if the situation improves in the United States and/or Europe, the impact on supply chains and patient recruitment may last longer.
If our information technology systems or data, or those of third parties upon which we rely, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse
consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations and actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions to our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue and profits; loss of
customers and sales; and other adverse consequences
In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store, use, transmit, disclose and otherwise process proprietary, confidential and sensitive data (including personal data
such as health-related data), intellectual property and trade secrets. We may rely upon third-party service providers and technologies to operate critical business systems to process such information in a variety of contexts (including, without
limitation, third-party providers of cloud-based infrastructure, personnel email and other functions). Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited and these third parties may not have adequate information
security measures in place.
We and the third parties upon whom we rely face a variety of evolving threats including but not limited to breakdown; breach; interruption or damage from computer viruses;
computer hackers; malicious code (such as worms); social-engineering attacks (including phishing attacks); personnel error or malfeasance; theft or misuse; denial-of-service attacks; sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors;
malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions); denial-of-service attacks (such as credential stuffing); ransomware attacks; software bugs; server malfunctions; software and hardware failures; natural disasters; fires;
floods; terrorism; war; telecommunication and electrical failures; and other compromise. Despite our security practices, there is a risk that we may be subject to phishing and other cyberattacks in the future. Ransomware attacks, including those
perpetrated by organized criminal threat actors, nation-states, and nation-state-supported actors, are becoming increasingly prevalent and severe and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of data and income, reputational
harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments. The
COVID-19 pandemic and our remote workforce increases risks to our information technology systems and data as more of our personnel work from remote locations and use network connections outside of our control. Any of the previously identified or
similar threats could cause a security breach or other interruption. A security breach or other interruption could result in unauthorized, unlawful or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of,
or access to data. A security breach or other interruption could disrupt our ability (and that of third parties upon whom we rely) to provide our goods and otherwise operate our business. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from
completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Likewise, we may rely on third parties for the manufacturing of our product
candidates and any future product candidates and to conduct clinical trials, and similar events relating to their computer systems could also have a material adverse effect on our business.
The risk of security breaches has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. We
may not be able to anticipate all types of security threats, and we may not be able to implement preventive measures effective against all such security threats. The techniques used by threat actors change frequently, may not be recognized until
launched, and can originate from a wide variety of sources. While we have implemented security measures designed to protect our information technology systems and data, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We have not
always been able in the past to protect against security breaches (for example, we incurred two minor phishing attacks in 2018 and 2019).We may expend significant resources and modify our business activities (including our clinical trial
activities) in an effort to protect against security breaches. Certain data privacy and security obligations may require us to implement and maintain specific security measures (including industry-standard or reasonable security measures) to
protect our information technology systems and data.
To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to occur (or be perceived to have occurred), we may experience adverse consequences. These consequences may include:
government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing data (including personal data); litigation (including class
claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary expenditures; financial loss; harm to our competitive position; delays to the further development and commercialization of our product candidates or any future
product candidates; and other similar harms. Security breaches and attendant consequences may cause customers to stop using our goods; limit our ability to conduct clinical trials; and otherwise negatively impact our business. If we were to
experience a significant cybersecurity breach of our information systems or data, the costs associated with the investigation, remediation and potential notification of the breach (under applicable privacy and security obligations) to
counterparties, data subjects, regulators or others could be material. The failure to comply with such notification obligations could lead to adverse consequences.
The financial exposure from the events referenced above could either not be insured against or not be fully covered through any insurance that we maintain. There can be no
assurance that the limitations of liability in our contracts would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages as a result of the events referenced above.
If we engage in future acquisitions or strategic partnerships, this may increase our capital requirements, dilute our shareholders, cause us to incur debt
or assume contingent liabilities, and subject us to other risks.
We may evaluate various acquisitions and strategic partnerships, including licensing or acquiring complementary products, intellectual property rights, technologies, or
businesses. Any potential acquisition or strategic partnership may entail numerous risks, including:
|
• |
increased operating expenses and cash requirements;
|
|
• |
the assumption of additional indebtedness or contingent liabilities;
|
|
• |
assimilation of operations, intellectual property and products of an acquired company or product, including difficulties associated with integrating new personnel;
|
|
• |
the diversion of our management’s attention from our existing product programs and initiatives in pursuing such a strategic merger or acquisition;
|
|
• |
retention of key employees, the loss of key personnel, and uncertainties in our ability to maintain key business relationships;
|
|
• |
risks and uncertainties associated with the other party to such a transaction, including the prospects of that party and their existing products or product candidates and regulatory approvals; and
|
|
• |
our inability to generate revenue from acquired technology and/or products sufficient to meet our objectives in undertaking the acquisition or even to offset the associated acquisition and maintenance
costs.
|
Depending on the size and nature of future strategic acquisitions, we may acquire assets or businesses that require us to raise additional capital or to operate or manage
businesses in which we have limited experience. Making larger acquisitions that require us to raise additional capital to fund the acquisition will expose us to the risks associated with capital raising activities. Acquiring and thereafter
operating larger new businesses will also increase our management, operating and reporting costs and burdens. In addition, if we undertake acquisitions, we may issue dilutive securities, assume or incur debt obligations, incur large one-time
expenses and acquire intangible assets that could result in significant future amortization expense. Moreover, we may not be able to locate suitable acquisition opportunities and this inability could impair our ability to grow or obtain access to
technology or products that may be important to the development of our business.
Our insurance policies are expensive and protect only from some business risks, which leaves us exposed to significant uninsured liabilities.
We do not carry insurance for all categories of risks that our business may encounter, and insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive. We do not know if we will be
able to maintain existing insurance with adequate levels of coverage, and any liability insurance coverage we acquire in the future may not be sufficient to reimburse us for any expenses or losses we may suffer. If we obtain marketing approval
for any product candidates that we or our collaborators may develop, we intend to acquire insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products, but we may be unable to obtain such insurance on commercially reasonable terms or in adequate
amounts. Required coverage limits for such insurances are difficult to predict and may not be sufficient. If potential losses exceed our insurance coverage, our financial condition would be adversely affected. In the event of contamination or
injury, we could be held liable for damages or be penalized with fines in an amount exceeding our resources. Clinical trials or regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates could be suspended, which could adversely affect our results of
operations and business, including by preventing or limiting the development and commercialization of any product candidates that we or our collaborators may develop. Additionally, operating as a public company will make it more expensive for us
to obtain director and officer liability insurance. As a result, it may be more difficult to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or the board committees.
Our current operations are located in Oxfordshire, England, Pennsylvania and Maryland and we or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely
affected by natural disasters and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.
Our current operations are located in Oxfordshire, England, Pennsylvania and Maryland. Any unplanned event, such as flood, fire, explosion, earthquake, extreme weather
condition, medical epidemics, including any potential effects from the current global spread of COVID-19, power shortage, telecommunication failure or other natural or man-made accidents or incidents that result in us being unable to fully
utilize our facilities, or the manufacturing facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers, may have a material and adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative
consequences on our financial and operating conditions. Loss of access to these facilities may result in increased costs, delays in the development of our product candidates or interruption of our business operations. Natural disasters or
pandemics such as the COVID-19 outbreak could further disrupt our operations, and have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. For example, certain staff members presently work from
home on a part- or full-time basis and it is possible that this could have a negative impact on the execution of our business plans and operations. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a
significant portion of our headquarters, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as our research facilities or the manufacturing facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult
or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place may prove inadequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We
may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance
coverage at levels that we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident or incident at these facilities, we cannot assure our investors that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and
losses. If our facilities or the manufacturing facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers are unable to operate because of an accident or incident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our research and
development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Risks Related to Our International Operations
As a company based outside of the United States, we are subject to economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with international
operations.
As a company based in the United Kingdom, our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business outside of the United States. Many of our suppliers and
clinical trial relationships are located outside the United States. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:
|
• |
economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular non-U.S. economies and markets;
|
|
• |
differing and changing regulatory requirements for product approvals;
|
|
• |
differing jurisdictions could present different issues for securing, maintaining or obtaining freedom to operate in such jurisdictions;
|
|
• |
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property and proprietary rights;
|
|
• |
difficulties in compliance with different, complex and changing laws, regulations and court systems of multiple jurisdictions and compliance with a wide variety of foreign laws, treaties and regulations;
|
|
• |
changes in non-U.S. regulations and customs, tariffs and trade barriers;
|
|
• |
changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates of the pound sterling, U.S. dollar, euro and currency controls;
|
|
• |
changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic environment, including the longer-term implications of Brexit;
|
|
• |
trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements or other restrictive actions by governments;
|
|
• |
differing reimbursement regimes and price controls in certain non-U.S. markets;
|
|
• |
negative consequences from changes in tax laws;
|
|
• |
compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad, including, for example, the variable tax treatment in different jurisdictions of options granted under
our share option schemes or equity incentive plans;
|
|
• |
workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;
|
|
• |
litigation or administrative actions resulting from claims against us by current or former employees or consultants individually or as part of class actions, including claims of wrongful terminations,
discrimination, misclassification or other violations of labor law or other alleged conduct;
|
|
• |
difficulties associated with staffing and managing international operations, including differing labor relations;
|
|
• |
production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and
|
|
• |
business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires.
|
Moreover, at the end of 2021 and into
2022, tensions between the United States and Russia escalated when Russia amassed large numbers of military ground forces and support personnel on the Ukraine-Russia border and, in February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. In response, NATO has
deployed additional military forces to Eastern Europe, including to Lithuania, and the Biden administration announced certain sanctions against Russia. The invasion of Ukraine and the retaliatory measures that have been taken, or could be taken
in the future, by the United States, NATO, and other countries have created global security concerns that could result in a regional conflict and otherwise have a lasting impact on regional and global economies, any or all of which could
disrupt our supply chain, adversely affect our ability to conduct ongoing and future clinical trials of our product candidates, and adversely affect our ability to commercialise our products (subject to regulatory approval) in this region. For
example, our ongoing IMCgp100-202 trial currently includes trial sites located in Ukraine and Russia and we are currently treating one patient in Russia. Currently, we have plans in place to continue study treatment for this individual;
however, the invasion of Ukraine will likely impact our ability to conduct the trial in Ukraine, Russia and potentially in other Eastern European countries, and may prevent us from continuing treatment or follow-up for patients currently
enrolled or enrolling future patients at sites in these countries, and may also prevent us from commercialising our products (subject to regulatory approval) in this region. This could negatively impact the anticipated timing and completion of
our clinical trials and/or analyses of clinical results, including our IMCgp100-202 Trial, and negatively impact our plans to commercialise our product (subject to regulatory approval) in this region, which could harm our business.
The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union may adversely impact our ability to obtain regulatory approvals of our product candidates in the
European Union and may require us to incur additional expenses in order to develop, manufacture and commercialize our product candidates in the European Union.
Our principal office space is located in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom formally exited the European Union, commonly referred to as Brexit, on January 31, 2020. Under
the terms of its departure, the United Kingdom entered a transition period, or the Transition Period, during which it continued to follow all European Union rules. The Transition Period ended on December 31, 2020. On December 30, 2020, the United
Kingdom and European Union signed the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which includes an agreement on free trade between the two parties, which provisionally applied from January 1, 2021, and formally entered into force on May 1, 2021.
Since a significant proportion of the regulatory framework in the United Kingdom applicable to our business and our product candidates is derived from EU directives and
regulations, Brexit has had, and will continue to have, a material impact upon the regulatory regime with respect to the development, manufacture, importation, approval and commercialization of our product candidates in the United Kingdom and the
European Union. For example, following the Transition Period, Great Britain is no longer covered by the centralized procedures for obtaining EU-wide marketing authorizations and our products will therefore require a separate marketing
authorization to allow us to market such products in Great Britain. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any marketing approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, would prevent us from or delay us commercializing our product
candidates in the United Kingdom and/or the EEA and restrict our ability to generate revenue and achieve and sustain profitability. In the short term, there is ongoing disruption to import and export processes due to a lack of administrative
processing capacity by the respective United Kingdom and EU customs agencies that may delay time-sensitive shipments and may negatively impact our product supply chain. In addition, there are non-tariff costs to such trade that did not exist
prior to the expiry of the Transition Period. Orphan designation in Great Britain following Brexit is, unlike in the EU, not available pre-marketing authorization. Applications for orphan designation in Great Britain (or the United Kingdom, if
there is not a prior centralized marketing authorisation in the EU) are now made at the same time as an application for marketing authorization. The criteria to be granted orphan designation are essentially identical to those in the EU but based
on the prevalence of the condition in Great Britain as opposed to prevalence in the EU. It is therefore possible that conditions that were or would have been designated as orphan conditions in Great Britain prior to the end of the Transition
Period are or would no longer be and that conditions that were not currently designated as orphan conditions in the European Union will be designated as such in Great Britain.
As a result of Brexit or otherwise, other European countries may seek to conduct referenda with respect to their continuing membership with the European Union. Given these
possibilities and others we may not anticipate, as well as the absence of comparable precedent, it is unclear what financial, regulatory and legal implications the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union will have and how such
withdrawal will affect us, and the full extent to which our business could be adversely affected.
Exchange rate fluctuations may materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Owing to the international scope of our operations, fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly between the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar, may adversely affect us.
Although we are based in the United Kingdom, we source research and development, manufacturing, consulting and other services from the United States and the European Union. Further, potential future revenue may be derived from abroad,
particularly from the United States. As a result, our business and the price of our ADSs may be affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates not only between the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar, but also the euro, which may have a
significant impact on our results of operations and cash flows from period to period. Currently, we do not have any exchange rate hedging arrangements in place.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities and Our Status as a Public Company
An active trading market for our ADSs may not continue to develop or be sustained.
Prior to our initial public offering in February 2021, there was no public trading market for our ordinary shares or ADSs. Although our ADSs are listed on The Nasdaq Global
Select Market, we cannot assure you that an active trading market for our ADSs will continue to develop or be sustained. If an active market for our ADSs does not continue to develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult to for investors to
sell ADSs without depressing the market price for the ADSs or to sell the ADSs at all. You may not be able to sell your ADSs quickly or at the market price if trading in our ADSs is not active.
The trading price of our ADSs has been and may continue to be highly volatile and may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control.
We completed our initial public offering in February 2021. From February 4, 2021 to January 31, 2021, the closing price of our ADSs ranged from a high of $56.34 to a low of
$18.94 per ADS. The trading price of our ADSs has and is likely to continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including limited trading volume. In addition to the factors
discussed in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report, these factors include but not limited to:
|
• |
our failure to successfully execute our commercialization strategy with respect to KIMMTRAK;
|
|
• |
actions or announcements by third-party or government payers with respect to coverage and reimbursement of KIMMTRAK;
|
|
• |
adverse regulatory decisions,, or our ability to obtain regulatory approval of, tebentafusp in other jurisdictions, or any of our other product candidates;
|
|
• |
adverse results or delays in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
• |
reports of adverse events in products similar or perceived to be similar to those we are developing or clinical trials of such products;
|
|
• |
an inability to obtain additional funding;
|
|
• |
failure by us to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates;
|
|
• |
failure by us to maintain our existing strategic collaborations or enter into new collaborations;
|
|
• |
failure by us to identify additional product candidates for our pipeline;
|
|
• |
failure by us or our licensors and strategic partners to prosecute, maintain, protect or enforce our intellectual property and proprietary rights;
|
|
• |
disputes or other developments relating to intellectual and other proprietary rights, including litigation
|
|
• |
matters and our ability to obtain patent and other intellectual property protection for our technologies;
|
|
• |
changes in laws or regulations applicable to future products;
|
|
• |
an inability to obtain adequate product supply for our product candidates or the inability to do so at acceptable prices;
|
|
• |
the introduction of new products, services or technologies by our competitors;
|
|
• |
failure by us to meet or exceed financial projections we may provide to the public;
|
|
• |
failure by us to meet or exceed the financial projections of the investment community;
|
|
• |
the perception of the pharmaceutical industry by the public, legislatures, regulators and the investment community;
|
|
• |
changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;
|
|
• |
inability to obtain adequate commercial supply for any approved product or inability to do so at acceptable prices;
|
|
• |
announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by us, our strategic partner or our competitors;
|
|
• |
inability to comply with our debt covenants and to make payments as they become due;
|
|
• |
additions or departures of key scientific or management personnel;
|
|
• |
significant lawsuits, including patent or shareholder litigation;
|
|
• |
changes in the market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
• |
general economic, industry, political and market conditions, including, but not limited to, the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;
|
|
• |
sales of our ADSs or ordinary shares by us or our shareholders in the future; and
|
|
• |
the trading volume of our ADSs; and
|
|
• |
other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.
|
These and other market and industry factors may cause the market price and demand for our ADSs to fluctuate substantially, regardless of our actual operating performance,
which may limit or prevent investors from selling their ADSs and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our ADSs. In addition, the stock market in general, and the securities of biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies.
Broad market and industry factors, including the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy, may negatively affect the market price of our ADSs,
regardless of our actual operating performance. Further, a decline in the financial markets and related factors beyond our control may cause the price of our ADSs to decline rapidly and unexpectedly. For example, negative publicity regarding drug
pricing and price increases by pharmaceutical companies has negatively impacted, and may continue to negatively impact, the markets for biotechnology and pharmaceutical stocks. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market,
securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our ADS price and trading
volume could decline.
The trading market for our ADSs is influenced, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. As a newly public
company, we have only limited research coverage by equity research analysts. Securities or industry analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our ADSs, and such lack of research coverage may adversely impact the market price of our
ADSs. Even if we have equity research analyst coverage, we will not have any control over the analysts, or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our ADSs could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade
our ADSs or issue other unfavorable commentary or research about us. If one or more equity research analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our ADSs could decrease, which in turn could cause the
trading price or trading volume of our ADSs to decline.
Our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders, if they choose to act together, have the ability to control or significantly influence all
matters submitted to our shareholders for approval.
As of December 31, 2021, our executive officers, directors and current beneficial owners of five percent or more of our ordinary shares and their respective affiliates
beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 43% of our outstanding ordinary shares (including ordinary shares in the form of ADSs). The voting power of this group may increase to the extent any shareholders holding non-voting ordinary
shares convert their non-voting ordinary shares into ordinary shares.
As a result, depending on the level of attendance at our general meetings of shareholders, these persons, acting together, would be able to significantly influence all
matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election, re-election and removal of directors, any merger, scheme of arrangement, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other significant corporate transactions, and
amendments to our articles of association.
In addition, these persons, acting together, may have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may harm
the market price of our ADSs by:
|
• |
delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control;
|
|
• |
entrenching our management and/or the board of directors;
|
|
• |
impeding a merger, scheme of arrangement, takeover, or other business combination involving us; or
|
|
• |
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a takeover offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
|
In addition, some of these persons or entities may have interests different than yours. For example, because many of these shareholders purchased their ordinary shares at
prices substantially below our current trading price and have held their ordinary shares for a longer period, they may be more interested in selling our company to an acquirer than other investors or they may want us to pursue strategies that
deviate from the interests of other shareholders.
We may be required to repurchase for cash all, or to facilitate the purchase by a third party of all, the shares of our company held by the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation if we default under the global access commitments agreement, which could have an adverse impact on us and limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
We entered into a global access commitments agreement with our shareholder, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, or the Gates Foundation, in September 2017, which was
amended and restated in March 2020 and February 2021, pursuant to which we are required to take certain actions to support the Gates Foundation’s mission. In the event that we are in breach of certain provisions of the global access commitments
agreement, following a cure period, we may be required to repurchase for cash all, or to facilitate the purchase by a third party of all, the securities of our company held by the Gates Foundation at certain terms that may not be favorable to us.
This would also include the ADSs acquired in the concurrent private placement, if any. If this occurs, cash used for this purpose may, adversely affect our liquidity, cause us to reduce expenditures in other areas of our business, or curtail our
growth plans. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand to purchase the securities, we could have to seek financing alternatives in order to meet our obligations, and there is no certainty that financing would be available on reasonable terms or
at all. For the period that we are unable to repurchase the securities held by the Gates Foundation or arrange for a third party to purchase such securities, we would not likely be allowed to pay dividends, repurchase the securities of any other
shareholder or otherwise make any other distribution to any of our shareholders in connection with their securities. Therefore, meeting this purchase obligation, if necessary, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
results. For more information on the Gates Foundation’s withdrawal rights, see “Item 4B. Business overview—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—Gates Collaboration.”
The sale of a substantial number of our ADSs in the public market could cause the market price of our ADSs to drop significantly, even if our business is
doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our ADSs and could
impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities
We have filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register ordinary shares subject to options or other equity awards issued or reserved for
future issuance under our equity incentive plans. Shares registered under this registration statement on Form S-8 will be available for sale in the public market subject to vesting arrangements and exercise of options, as well as, in the case of
our affiliates, the restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
Additionally, the holders of an aggregate of approximately 43 million of our ordinary shares, or their transferees, have rights, subject to conditions, to require us to file
one or more registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other shareholders following the expiration of the initial public offering lock-up period, as well
as to cooperate in certain public offerings of such ordinary shares. If we were to register the resale of these shares, they could be freely sold in the public market. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be
sold, in the public market, the trading price of our ADSs could decline.
Holders of our ADSs do not have the same voting rights as the holders of our ordinary shares and may not receive voting materials in time to be able to
exercise their right to vote.
Holders of the ADSs do not have the same rights as our shareholders and in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement, will not be able to exercise voting rights
attaching to the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs on an individual basis. The depositary or its nominee will act as the representative for the holders of the ADSs and will exercise the voting rights attached to the ordinary shares
represented by the ADSs. Holders of our ADSs may not receive voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote, and it is possible that they, or persons who hold their ADSs through brokers, dealers or other third parties, will not have
the opportunity to exercise a right to vote. Furthermore, the depositary will not be liable for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, holders
of our ADSs may not be able to exercise voting rights and may lack recourse if their ADSs are not voted as requested. In addition, holders of our ADSs will not be able to call a shareholders’ meeting. See “Item 12.D American Depositary Shares.”
Holders of ADSs may be subject to limitations on the transfer of their ADSs and the withdrawal of the underlying ordinary shares.
ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with
the performance of its duties. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary think it is advisable to do so
because of any requirement of law, government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason, subject to the right of ADS holders to cancel their ADSs and withdraw the underlying ordinary shares.
Temporary delays in the cancellation of your ADSs and withdrawal of the underlying ordinary shares may arise because the depositary has closed its transfer books or we have closed our transfer books, the transfer of ordinary shares is blocked to
permit voting at a shareholders’ meeting or we are paying a dividend on our ordinary shares. In addition, ADS holders may not be able to cancel their ADSs and withdraw the underlying ordinary shares when they owe money for fees, taxes and similar
charges and when it is necessary to prohibit withdrawals in order to comply with any laws or governmental regulations that apply to ADSs or to the withdrawal of ordinary shares or other deposited securities. See “Item 12.D American Depositary
Shares.”
We are entitled to amend the deposit agreement and to change the rights of ADS holders under the terms of such agreement, or to terminate the deposit
agreement, without the prior consent of the ADS holders.
We are entitled to amend the deposit agreement and to change the rights of the ADS holders under the terms of such agreement, without the prior consent of the ADS holders. We
and the depositary may agree to amend the deposit agreement in any way we decide is necessary or advantageous to us or to the depositary. Amendments may reflect, among other things, operational changes in the ADS program, legal developments
affecting ADSs or changes in the terms of our business relationship with the depositary. In the event that the terms of an amendment are materially disadvantageous to ADS holders, ADS holders will only receive 30 days’ advance notice of the
amendment, and no prior consent of the ADS holders is required under the deposit agreement. Furthermore, we may decide to direct the depositary to terminate the ADS facility at any time for any reason. For example, terminations may occur when we
decide to list our ordinary shares on a non-U.S. securities exchange and determine not to continue to sponsor an ADS facility or when we become the subject of a takeover or a going-private transaction. If the ADS facility will terminate, ADS
holders will receive at least 30 days’ prior notice, but no prior consent is required from them. Under the circumstances that we decide to make an amendment to the deposit agreement that is disadvantageous to ADS holders or terminate the deposit
agreement, the ADS holders may choose to sell their ADSs or surrender their ADSs and become direct holders of the underlying ordinary shares, but will have no right to any compensation whatsoever.
ADSs holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes
to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.
The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our ordinary shares provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, holders and beneficial owners of ADSs
irrevocably waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to the ADSs or the deposit agreement.
If this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. If we or the
depositary opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge,
the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual
pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, by a federal or state court in the City of New York, which has non-exclusive jurisdiction
over matters arising under the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to
a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before entering into the deposit agreement.
If you or any other holders or beneficial owners of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the
ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and/or
the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us and/or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and
may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action, depending on, among other things, the nature of the claims, the judge or justice hearing
such claims, and the venue of the hearing.
No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance
with any substantive provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Moreover, as the jury trial waiver relates to claims arising out of or relating to the ADSs or the deposit agreement, we believe that, as a matter of construction of the
clause, the waiver would likely to continue to apply to ADS holders who withdraw the ordinary shares from the ADS facility with respect to claims arising before the cancellation of the ADSs and the withdrawal of the ordinary shares, and the
waiver would most likely not apply to ADS holders who subsequently withdraw the ordinary shares represented by ADSs from the ADS facility with respect to claims arising after the withdrawal. However, to our knowledge, there has been no case law
on the applicability of the jury trial waiver to ADS holders who withdraw the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs from the ADS facility.
Holders of our ADSs may not receive distributions on our ordinary shares represented by the ADSs or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical to
make them available to holders of ADSs.
The depositary for the ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our ordinary shares or other deposited
securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of our ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the deposit agreement, it may
be unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to holders of ADSs. We have no obligation to take any other action to permit distribution on the ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of the ADSs. This means that
you may not receive the distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value from them if it is unlawful or impractical to make them available to you. These restrictions may have an adverse effect on the value of your ADSs.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our ADSs in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of
gains and you may never receive a return on your investment.
Under current English law, a company’s accumulated realized profits must exceed its accumulated realized losses (on a non-consolidated basis) before dividends can be declared
and paid. Therefore, we must have distributable profits before declaring and paying a dividend. In addition, as a public limited company incorporated in England and Wales, we will only be able to make a distribution if the amount of our net
assets is not less than the aggregate of our called-up share capital and undistributable reserves and if, and to the extent that, the distribution does not reduce the amount of those assets to less than that aggregate.
Although we do not have any present plans to declare or pay any dividends, in the event we declare and pay any dividend, the depositary for the ADSs has agreed to pay to
holders of our ADSs the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our ordinary shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses and applicable taxes required to be withheld in connection with
any such dividend distribution. Holders of our ADSs will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of our ordinary shares their ADSs represent. However, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the deposit agreement, it may
be unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to holders of the ADSs. We have no obligation to take any other action to permit distribution on the ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of the ADSs. This means
that holders of our ADSs may not receive the distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value from them if it is unlawful or impractical to make them available to you. These restrictions may have an adverse effect on the value of the
ADSs.
Claims of U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us.
We are incorporated under English law and have our registered office in England. Certain members of our board of directors and senior management are non-residents of the
United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible to serve process on such persons or us in the United States or to enforce
judgments obtained in U.S. courts against them or us based on civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States.
The United States and the United Kingdom do not currently have a treaty providing for recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and
commercial matters. Consequently, a final judgment for payment given by a court in the United States, whether or not predicated solely upon U.S. securities laws, would not automatically be recognized or enforceable in the United Kingdom. In
addition, uncertainty exists as to whether U.K. courts would entertain original actions brought in the United Kingdom against us or our directors or senior management predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the
United States. Any final and conclusive monetary judgment for a definite sum obtained against us in U.S. courts would be treated by the courts of the United Kingdom as a cause of action in itself and sued upon as a debt at common law so that no
retrial of the issues would be necessary, provided that certain requirements are met. Whether these requirements are met in respect of a judgment based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws, including whether the award
of monetary damages under such laws would constitute a penalty, is an issue for the court making such decision. If an English court gives judgment for the sum payable under a U.S. judgment, the English judgment will be enforceable by methods
generally available for this purpose. These methods generally permit the English court discretion to prescribe the manner of enforcement.
As a result, U.S. investors may not be able to enforce against us or our senior management, board of directors or certain experts named herein who are residents of the United
Kingdom or countries other than the United States any judgments obtained in U.S. courts in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the U.S. federal securities laws.
Your right to participate in any future rights offerings may be limited, which may cause dilution to your holdings.
We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make rights available to you in the United
States unless we register the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. Also, under the deposit agreement, the depositary bank will not make
rights available to you unless either both the rights and any related securities are registered under the Securities Act, or the distribution of them to ADS holders is exempted from registration under the Securities Act. We are under no
obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective. Moreover, we may not be able to establish an exemption from registration
under the Securities Act. If the depositary does not distribute the rights, it may, under the deposit agreement, either sell them, if possible, or allow them to lapse. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may
experience dilution in your holdings.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of rules under the U.S. securities laws and are permitted to file less information with the SEC
than U.S. public companies.
We are a “foreign private issuer,” as defined in the SEC rules and regulations and, consequently, we are not subject to all of the disclosure requirements applicable to
companies organized within the United States. For example, we are exempt from certain rules under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that regulate disclosure obligations and procedural requirements related
to the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations applicable to a security registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers and directors are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section
16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our securities. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. public
companies. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available information concerning our company than there is for U.S. public companies.
As a foreign private issuer, we will file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the close of each fiscal year ended December 31 and reports on Form 6-K relating
to certain material events promptly after we publicly announce these events. However, because of the above exemptions for foreign private issuers, our shareholders will not be afforded the same protections or information generally available to
investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States.
While we are a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to certain Nasdaq corporate governance rules applicable to public companies organized in the
United States.
We are entitled to rely on a provision in Nasdaq’s corporate governance rules that allows us to follow English corporate law with regard to certain aspects of corporate
governance. This allows us to follow certain corporate governance practices that differ in significant respects from the corporate governance requirements applicable to domestic issuers listed on Nasdaq.
We are not subject to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(b)(2) because English law does not require that independent directors regularly have scheduled meetings at which only
independent directors are present. Similarly, we have adopted a compensation committee, but English law does not require that we adopt a compensation committee or that such committee be fully independent. As a result, our practice varies from the
requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(d), which sets forth certain requirements as to the responsibilities, composition and independence of compensation committees. English law requires that we disclose information regarding compensation of
our directors for services as a director of an undertaking that is our subsidiary undertaking and as a director of any other undertaking of which a director is appointed by virtue of our nomination (directly or indirectly) but not other
third-party compensation of our directors or director nominees. As a result, our practice varies from the third-party compensation disclosure requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(b)(3). Additionally, we are not subject to Nasdaq Listing Rule
5605(e) because, under English law, director nominees are not required to be selected or recommended for selection by either a majority of the independent directors or a nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors.
Furthermore, English law does not have a regulatory regime for the solicitation of proxies applicable to us, thus our practice varies from the requirement of Nasdaq Listing
Rule 5620(b), which sets forth certain requirements regarding the solicitation of proxies. In addition, we have opted out of shareholder approval requirements for the issuance of securities in connection with certain events such as the
acquisition of stock or assets of another company, the establishment of or amendments to equity-based compensation plans for employees, a change of control of us and certain private placements. To this extent, our practice will vary from the
requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635, which generally requires an issuer to obtain shareholder approval for the issuance of securities in connection with such events. In addition, while we have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics,
English law does not require us to publicly disclose waivers from this code that have been approved by our board within four business days. We expect to report any such waivers in the subsequent Annual Report on Form 20-F. Moreover, we are not
required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information, although we have voluntarily adopted a corporate disclosure policy substantially similar to Regulation FD. These exemptions and leniencies
will reduce the frequency and scope of information and protections to which you may otherwise have been eligible in relation to a U.S. domestic issuer.
As a result, our practice varies from the requirements for domestic issuers pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5610.
In accordance with our Nasdaq listing, our audit committee is required to comply with the provisions of Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, both of which are also applicable to Nasdaq listed U.S. companies. Because we are a foreign private issuer, however, our audit committee is not subject to additional requirements applicable to Nasdaq
listed U.S. companies, including an affirmative determination that all members of the audit committee are “independent,” using more stringent criteria than those applicable to us as a foreign private issuer, subject to certain phase-in
requirements permitted by Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our ADSs less attractive to
investors.
We are an emerging growth company, or EGC, and we will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier to occur of (1) December 31, 2026, (2) the last day of the fiscal
year in which we have total annual gross revenues of at least $1.07 billion, (3) the last day of the fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
which means the market value of our equity securities that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (4) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior
three-year period. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, or EGC, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth
companies. These exemptions include:
|
• |
not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404;
|
|
• |
not being required to comply with any requirement that has or may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report
providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements;
|
|
• |
reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and
|
|
• |
an exemption from the requirement to seek nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements.
|
We may choose to take advantage of some, but not all, of the available exemptions. We have taken advantage of reduced reporting burdens in this Annual Report. In particular,
we have not included all of the executive compensation information that would be required if we were not an EGC. We cannot predict whether investors will find our ADSs less attractive if we rely on certain or all of these exemptions. If some
investors find our ADSs less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our ADSs and our ADS price may be more volatile.
In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an EGC may take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an EGC
to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this extended transition period and, as a result, we will adopt new or
revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies.
Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company” if the market value of our ordinary shares held by
non-affiliates is below $250 million (or $700 million if our annual revenue is less than $100 million) as of June 30 in any given year, which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including
exemption from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements.
We have incurred, and will continue to incur, increased costs, and we will continue to place increasing demands upon management as a result of being a
public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a public company listed in the United States, we have and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private
company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq have imposed various requirements on publicly traded companies of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance
practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some
activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.
We previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which has since been remediated. We may discover additional
material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, which may impair our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or prevent fraud. If we fail to maintain an effective system
of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, shareholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our
business and the trading price of our ADSs
Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, requires that beginning with this Annual Report, management assess and report
annually on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Although Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires our independent
registered public accounting firm to issue an annual report that addresses the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we have opted to rely on the exemptions provided in the JOBS Act, and consequently, will not be
required to comply with SEC rules that implement Section 404(b) until such time as we are no longer an emerging growth company.
In the course of auditing our 2019 financial statements for our initial public offering, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified a material
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by a company’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with IFRS. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In the summer and fall of 2020, we conducted an internal investigation as a result of receiving a whistleblower complaint alleging employee misconduct and other improper
activities related to a kickback scheme involving an employee and two third-party vendors between 2018 and 2020. Our audit committee led the investigation utilizing outside counsel, during which the named employee resigned. After the
investigation, we terminated the one remaining open contract with the third-party vendors and issued proceedings in October 2020 against the involved parties. We recovered our estimated losses of £1.8 million from the employee and the third-party
vendors in December 2020. In the course of auditing our 2019 financial statements for our initial public offering, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified a material weakness relating to our procurement processes and
application of delegation of authority approval limits due to insufficient risk assessment procedures. We determined that our internal controls did not operate effectively to prevent or timely detect unauthorized contracts and purchase orders.
This resulted in the inability to prevent and timely detect these fraudulent activities.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, we enhanced our overall control environment, including adding finance, accounting and procurement personnel to drive and implement required
additional processes and procurement controls, implementing improvements in software relating to approvals of purchase orders and contracts, adding additional layers of review of contracts and journal entries and delegation of contract authority
limits. We also further developed and documented our accounting policies and financial reporting procedures, including ongoing executive management review and audit committee oversight. We remediated the material weakness as of December 31, 2020.
Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and
procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us
conducted in connection with Section 404, or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that
may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial
information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our ADSs.
If we are a controlled foreign corporation, there could be adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to certain U.S. holders.
If a U.S. holder is treated as owning, directly, indirectly or constructively, at least 10% of the value or voting power of our ordinary shares or ADSs, such U.S. holder may
be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group, if any. Because our group includes U.S. subsidiaries, our current non-U.S. subsidiaries and any future newly formed or acquired
non-U.S. subsidiaries will be treated as controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we are treated as a controlled foreign corporation. A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to annually report
and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we make any distributions. An
individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S.
corporation. Failure to comply with controlled foreign corporation reporting obligations may subject a United States shareholder to significant monetary penalties. We cannot provide any assurances that we will furnish to any United States
shareholder information that may be necessary to comply with the reporting and tax paying obligations applicable under the controlled foreign corporation rules of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. U.S. holders should
consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to their investment in our ordinary shares or ADSs.
If we are a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for any taxable year, there could be adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S.
investors.
Under the Code, we will be a PFIC, for any taxable year in which (1) 75% or more of our gross income consists of passive income or (2) 50% or more of the value of our assets
(generally determined in the basis of a weighted quarterly average) consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income (including cash). For purposes of these tests, passive income includes dividends, interest,
gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and certain rents and royalties. Cash and cash-equivalents are passive assets for these purposes. In addition, for purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or
indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as holding and receiving directly its proportionate share of assets and income of such corporation. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S.
investor holds our shares, the U.S. investor may be subject to adverse tax consequences regardless of whether we continue to qualify as a PFIC, including ineligibility for any preferred tax rates on capital gains or on actual or deemed dividends,
interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred and additional reporting requirements.
Based on our analysis of our activities and the composition of our income and assets, we believe that we were not a PFIC for our taxable year ending December 31, 2021.
However, the determination of whether we are a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis applying principles and methodologies that in some circumstances are unclear and subject to varying interpretation. As a result, there
can be no assurance that we will not be treated as a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. In addition, for our current and future taxable years, the total value of our assets (including goodwill) for PFIC testing purposes may be
determined in part by reference to the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs from time to time, which may fluctuate considerably. Accordingly, if our market capitalization declines while we hold a substantial amount of cash and
cash-equivalents for any taxable year we may be a PFIC for that taxable year. Under the income test, our status as a PFIC depends on the composition of our income for the relevant taxable year which will depend on the transactions we enter into
in the future and our corporate structure. The composition of our income and assets is also affected by how we spend the cash we raise in any offering. We have only recently begun to generate product revenues and therefore we may be a PFIC for
any taxable year in which we do not generate sufficient amounts of active income to offset our passive financing income. Therefore, we cannot express an expectation regarding our PFIC status for the current or any future taxable year. Even if we
determine that we are not a PFIC for a taxable year, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will agree with our conclusion and that the IRS would not successfully challenge our position. Accordingly, our U.S. counsel
expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status for any prior, current or future taxable year.
For further discussion of the PFIC rules and the adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences in the event we are classified as a PFIC, as well as certain elections that may
be available to U.S. investors, see “Item 10.E Taxation—Material United States Federal Income Considerations for U.S. Holders.”
We may be unable to use net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certain built-in losses to reduce future tax payments or benefit from
favorable U.K. tax legislation.
As a U.K. incorporated and tax resident entity, we are subject to U.K. corporate taxation. Due to the nature of our business, we have generated losses since inception and
therefore have not paid any U.K. corporation tax. As of December 31, 2021, we had cumulative carryforward tax losses of £234.2 million. Subject to any relevant utilization criteria and restrictions (including for example, the use of loss
carryforwards in relation to U.K. profits incurred on or after April 1, 2017 will be limited each year to £5.0 million per group plus, broadly, an incremental 50% of U.K. taxable profits), we expect these to be eligible for carry forward and
utilization against future operating profits.
As a company that carries out extensive research and development activities, we seek to benefit from the U.K. research and development tax relief programs, being the Small
and Medium-sized Enterprises R&D tax relief program, or SME Program, and, to the extent that our projects are grant funded or relate to work subcontracted to the company by third parties, the Research and Development Expenditure Credit
program, or RDEC Program. The tax reliefs we have obtained under these programs have generated a meaningful proportion of our cash flow, amounting to £38.9 million and £12.3 million in the accounting periods ending December 31, 2020 and December
31, 2021, respectively. Under the SME Program, we may be able to surrender the trading losses that arise from our qualifying research and development activities for a cash rebate of up to 33.35% of such qualifying research and development
expenditures. The majority of our pipeline research, clinical trials management and manufacturing development activities are eligible for inclusion within these tax credit cash rebate claims. We may not be able to continue to claim payable
research and development tax credits, under the SME Program in the future, if we cease to qualify as an SME, based on size criteria concerning employee headcount, turnover and gross assets. Where we cease to qualify as an SME and whilst we
continue to generate losses and do not pay any U.K. corporation tax, we may be able to generate a cash rebate under the RDEC Program. The cash rebate under the RDEC Program is up to 10.53% of such qualifying research and development expenditures.
The U.K. Finance Act 2021 introduced Finance Bill currently progressing through the U.K. Parliament introduces a cap on payable credit claims under the SME Program in excess of £20,000 with effect from April 2021 by reference to, broadly, three
times the total PAYE and NICs liability of the company, subject to an exception. which prevents the cap from applying. That exception requires the company to be creating, taking steps to create or managing intellectual property, as well as having
qualifying research and development expenditure in respect of connected parties which does not exceed 15% of the total claimed. If such cap comes into force, and such exception does not apply, this could restrict the amount of payable credit that
we claim under the SME Program. Additionally, on 27 October 2021, the U.K. Government announced its intention to introduce (following consultation) further restrictions to the U.K. research and development relief programs, refocusing such
programs towards innovation in the U.K. A subsequent U.K. Government report proposed restrictions which (if enacted) could, in particular, limit our ability to make claims under the existing relief programs in respect of: (i) research and
development subcontracted to a third party (and, in the case of the RDEC Program, in respect of contributions made to a qualifying body) where such third party (or qualifying body) performs the work outside of the U.K., and (ii) expenditure
incurred on externally provided workers that are not paid through UK payroll. These and other potential future changes to the U.K. research and development tax relief programs may mean we no longer qualify or may impact on the extent to which we
can make claims. Future changes to the R&D tax relief programs may be made which mean we no longer qualify or which impact on the extent to which we can make claims.
We may benefit in the future from the United Kingdom’s “patent box” regime, which allows certain profits attributable to revenues from patented products (and other
qualifying income) to be taxed at an effective rate of 10% by giving an additional tax deduction. We are the exclusive licensee or owner of several patent applications which, if issued, would cover our product candidates, and accordingly, future
upfront fees, milestone fees, product revenues and royalties could be eligible for this deduction. When taken in combination with the enhanced relief available on our research and development expenditures, we expect a long-term rate of
corporation tax lower than the statutory to apply to us. If, however, there are unexpected adverse changes to the U.K. research and development tax credit regime or the “patent box” regime, or for any reason we are unable to qualify for such
advantageous tax legislation, or we are unable to use net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certain built-in losses to reduce future tax payments then our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely
affected. This may impact our ongoing requirement for investment and the timeframes within which additional investment is required.
Changes and uncertainties in the tax system in the countries in which we have operations, could materially adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations, and reduce net returns to our shareholders.
We conduct business globally and file income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. Our consolidated effective income tax rate, and the tax treatment of our ADSs and
ordinary shares, could be materially adversely affected by several factors, including: changing tax laws, regulations and treaties, or the interpretation thereof; tax policy initiatives and reforms under consideration or being implemented at
national or international level (such as those related to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development’s, or OECD, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, or BEPS, Project (including “BEPS 2.0”), the European Commission’s state aid
investigations and other initiatives); the practices of tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we operate; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits or examinations and any related interest or penalties. Such changes may include (but
are not limited to) the taxation of operating income, investment income, dividends received or (in the specific context of withholding tax) dividends paid, or the stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax treatment of our ADSs or ordinary shares.
We are unable to predict what tax reform may be proposed or enacted in the future or what effect such changes would have on our business, but such changes, to the extent they
are brought into tax legislation, regulations, policies or practices in jurisdictions in which we operate, could increase the estimated tax liability that we have expensed to date and paid or accrued on our statement of financial position, and
otherwise affect our financial position, future results of operations, cash flows in a particular period and overall or effective tax rates in the future in countries where we have operations, reduce post-tax returns to our shareholders and
increase the complexity, burden and cost of tax compliance.
Tax authorities may disagree with our positions and conclusions regarding certain tax positions, or may apply existing rules in an unforeseen manner,
resulting in unanticipated costs, taxes or non-realization of expected benefits.
A tax authority may disagree with tax positions that we have taken, which could result in increased tax liabilities. For example, Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, or
HMRC, the IRS or another tax authority could challenge our allocation of income by tax jurisdiction and the amounts paid between our affiliated companies pursuant to our intercompany arrangements and transfer pricing policies, including amounts
paid with respect to our intellectual property development. Similarly, a tax authority could assert that we are subject to tax in a jurisdiction where we believe we have not established a taxable connection, often referred to as a “permanent
establishment” under international tax treaties, and such an assertion, if successful, could increase our expected tax liability in one or more jurisdictions.
A tax authority may take the position that material income tax liabilities, interest and penalties are payable by us, for example where there has been a technical violation
of contradictory laws and regulations that are relatively new and have not been subject to extensive review or interpretation, in which case we expect that we might contest such assessment. High-profile companies can be particularly vulnerable to
aggressive application of unclear requirements. Many companies must negotiate their tax bills with tax inspectors who may demand higher taxes than applicable law appears to provide. Contesting such an assessment may be lengthy and costly and if
we were unsuccessful in disputing the assessment, the implications could increase our anticipated effective tax rate, where applicable.
Shareholder protections found in provisions under the U.K. City Code on Takeovers and Mergers, or the Takeover Code, will not apply if our place of
management and control remains outside the United Kingdom.
On February 1, 2021, Immunocore Holdings Limited was re-registered as a public limited company with the name Immunocore Holdings plc. Depending on meeting the jurisdictional
criteria, the Takeover Code can be applicable to public limited companies incorporated in England and Wales. We believe that, as of the date of this Annual Report, our place of central management and control is not in the United Kingdom (or the
Channel Islands or the Isle of Man) for the purposes of the jurisdictional criteria of the Takeover Code. Accordingly, we believe that we are currently not subject to the Takeover Code and, as a result, our shareholders are not currently entitled
to the benefit of certain takeover offer protections provided under the Takeover Code, including the rules regarding mandatory takeover bids.
In the event that this changes, or if the interpretation and application of the Takeover Code by the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, or Takeover Panel, changes (including
changes to the way in which the Takeover Panel assesses the application of the Takeover Code to English companies whose shares are listed outside of the United Kingdom), the Takeover Code may apply to us in the future.
The Takeover Code provides a framework within which takeovers of companies are regulated and conducted. The following is a brief summary of some of the most important rules
of the Takeover Code:
|
• |
In connection with a potential offer, if following an approach by or on behalf of a potential bidder, the company is “the subject of rumor or speculation” or there is an “untoward movement” in the
company’s share price, there is a requirement for the potential bidder to make a public announcement about a potential offer for the company, or for the company to make a public announcement about its review of a potential offer.
|
|
• |
When a person or group of persons acting in concert (a) acquires, whether by a series of transactions over a period of time or not, interests in shares carrying 30% or more of the voting rights of a
company (which percentage is treated by the Takeover Code as the level at which effective control is obtained) or (b) acquires an interest in any other shares which increases the percentage of shares carrying voting rights in which they
are interested when they are already interested in shares which carry not less than 30% of the voting rights but do not hold shares carrying more than 50% of such voting rights, they must make a cash offer to all other shareholders at the
highest price paid by them or any person acting in concert with them in the 12 months before the offer was announced.
|
|
• |
When interests in shares carrying 10% or more of the voting rights of a class have been acquired by an offeror (i.e., a bidder) and any person acting in concert with it in the offer period (i.e., before
the shares subject to the offer have been acquired) or within the previous 12 months, the offer must be in cash or be accompanied by a cash alternative for all shareholders of that class at the highest price paid by the offeror or any
person acting in concert with them in that period. Further, if an offeror or any person acting in concert with them acquires any interest in shares during the offer period, the offer for the shares must be in cash or accompanied by a cash
alternative at a price at least equal to the price paid for such shares during the offer period.
|
|
• |
If after an announcement is made, the offeror or any person acting in concert with them acquires an interest in shares in an offeree company (i.e., a target) at a price higher than the value of the offer,
the offer must be increased to not less than the highest price paid for the interest in shares so acquired.
|
|
• |
The board of directors of the offeree company must appoint a competent independent adviser whose advice on the financial terms of the offer must be made known to all the shareholders, together with the
opinion of the board of directors of the offeree company.
|
|
• |
Special or favorable deals for selected shareholders are not permitted, except in certain circumstances where independent shareholder approval is given and the arrangements are regarded as fair and
reasonable in the opinion of the financial adviser to the offeree.
|
|
• |
All shareholders must be given the same information.
|
|
• |
Each document published in connection with an offer by or on behalf of the offeror or offeree must state that the directors of the offeror or the offeree, as the case may be, accept responsibility for the
information contained therein.
|
|
• |
Profit forecasts, quantified financial benefits statements and asset valuations must be made to specified standards and must be reported on by professional advisers.
|
|
• |
Misleading, inaccurate or unsubstantiated statements made in documents or to the media must be publicly corrected immediately.
|
|
• |
Actions during the course of an offer by the offeree company, which might frustrate the offer are generally prohibited unless shareholders approve these plans. Frustrating actions would include, for
example, lengthening the notice period for directors under their service contract or agreeing to sell off material parts of the target group.
|
|
• |
Stringent and detailed requirements are laid down for the disclosure of dealings in relevant securities during an offer, including the prompt disclosure of positions and dealing in relevant securities by
the parties to an offer and any person who is interested (directly or indirectly) in 1% or more of any class of relevant securities.
|
|
• |
Employees of both the offeror and the offeree company and the trustees of the offeree company’s pension scheme must be informed about an offer. In addition, the offeree company’s employee representatives
and pension scheme trustees have the right to have a separate opinion on the effects of the offer on employment appended to the offeree board of directors’ circular or published on a website.
|
The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights typically offered to shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
We are incorporated under English law. The rights of holders of ordinary shares and, therefore, certain of the rights of holders of ADSs, are governed by English law,
including the provisions of the U.K. Companies Act, or the Companies Act, and by our articles of association. These rights differ in certain respects from the rights of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. See “Item 10.B Memorandum and
Articles of Association—Differences in Corporate Law” in this Annual Report for a description of the principal differences between the provisions of the Companies Act applicable to us and, for example, the Delaware General Corporation Law
relating to shareholders’ rights and protections.
The principal differences include the following:
|
• |
under our articles of association, any resolution put to the vote of a general meeting must be decided exclusively on a poll. Under English law, it would be possible for our articles of association to be
amended such that each shareholder present at a meeting has only one vote unless demand is made for a vote on a poll, in which case each holder gets one vote per share owned. Under U.S. law, each shareholder typically is entitled to one
vote per share at all meetings;
|
|
• |
under English law, subject to certain exceptions and disapplications, each shareholder generally has preemptive rights to subscribe on a proportionate basis to any issuance of ordinary shares or rights to
subscribe for, or to convert securities into, ordinary shares for cash. Under U.S. law, shareholders generally do not have preemptive rights unless specifically granted in the certificate of incorporation or otherwise;
|
|
• |
under English law and our articles of association, certain matters require the approval of 75% of the shareholders who vote (in person or by proxy) on the relevant resolution (or on a poll of shareholders
representing 75% of the ordinary shares voting (in person or by proxy)), including amendments to the articles of association. This may make it more difficult for us to complete corporate transactions deemed advisable by our board of
directors. Under U.S. law, generally only majority shareholder approval is required to amend the certificate of incorporation or to approve other significant transactions;
|
|
• |
in the United Kingdom, takeovers may be structured as takeover offers or as schemes of arrangement. Under English law, a bidder seeking to acquire us by means of a takeover offer would need to make an
offer for all of our outstanding ordinary shares/ADSs. If acceptances are not received for 90% or more of the ordinary shares/ADSs under the offer, under English law, the bidder cannot complete a “squeeze out” to obtain 100% control of
us. Accordingly, acceptances of 90% of our outstanding ordinary shares/ADSs will likely be a condition in any takeover offer to acquire us, not 50% as is more common in tender offers for corporations organized under Delaware law. By
contrast, a scheme of arrangement, the successful completion of which would result in a bidder obtaining 100% control of us, requires the approval of a majority of shareholders voting at the meeting and representing 75% of the ordinary
shares voting for approval;
|
|
• |
under English law and our articles of association, shareholders and other persons whom we know or have reasonable cause to believe are, or have been, interested in our shares may be required to disclose
information regarding their interests in our shares upon our request, and the failure to provide the required information could result in the loss or restriction of rights attaching to the shares, including prohibitions on certain
transfers of the shares, withholding of dividends and loss of voting rights. Comparable provisions generally do not exist under U.S. law; and
|
|
• |
the quorum requirement for a shareholders’ meeting is a minimum of two shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting and present in person or by proxy or, in the case of a shareholder which is a
corporation, represented by a duly authorized representative. Under U.S. law, a majority of the shares eligible to vote must generally be present (in person or by proxy) at a shareholders’ meeting in order to constitute a quorum. The
minimum number of shares required for a quorum can be reduced pursuant to a provision in a company’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws, but typically not below one-third of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting.
|
As an English public limited company, certain capital structure decisions will require shareholder approval, which may limit our flexibility to manage our
capital structure.
On February 1, 2021, Immunocore Holdings Limited was re-registered as a public limited company with the name Immunocore Holdings plc. English law provides that a board of
directors may only allot shares (or rights to subscribe for or convert any security into shares) with the prior authorization of shareholders, such authorization stating the aggregate nominal amount of shares that it covers and being valid for a
maximum period of five years, each as specified in the articles of association or relevant shareholder resolution. At a general meeting of shareholders held on February 3, 2021, we obtained authority from our shareholders to allot new shares or
to grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares in the company up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of £150,000 for a period of five years from the date of such general meeting of shareholders, which authorization will
need to be renewed upon expiration (i.e., at least every five years) but may be sought more frequently for additional five-year terms (or any shorter period).
English law also generally provides shareholders with preemptive rights when new shares are issued for cash. However, it is possible for the articles of association, or for
shareholders to pass a special resolution at a general meeting, being a resolution passed by at least 75% of the votes cast, to disapply preemptive rights. Such a disapplication of preemptive rights may be for a maximum period of up to five years
from the date of adoption of the articles of association, if the disapplication is contained in the articles of association, or from the date of the shareholder special resolution, if the disapplication is by shareholder special resolution but
not longer than the duration of the authority to allot shares to which the disapplication relates. In either case, this disapplication would need to be renewed by our shareholders upon its expiration (i.e., at least every five years). At a
general meeting of shareholders held on February 3, 2021, we obtained authority from our shareholders to disapply preemptive rights for a period of five years from the date of such general meeting of shareholders which disapplication will need to
be renewed upon expiration (i.e., at least every five years), but may be sought more frequently for additional five-year terms (or any shorter period).
English law also generally prohibits a public company from repurchasing its own shares without the prior approval of shareholders by ordinary resolution, being a resolution
passed by a simple majority of votes cast, and other formalities. Such approval may be for a maximum period of up to five years. See “Item 10.B Memorandum and Articles of Association.”
Our articles of association provide that the courts of England and Wales are the exclusive forum for the resolution of all shareholder complaints other
than complaints asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any shareholder complaint
asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
Our articles of association provide that the courts of England and Wales are to be the exclusive forum for resolving all shareholder complaints (i.e., any derivative action
or proceeding brought on behalf of us, any action or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees, any action or proceeding asserting a claim arising out of any provision of
the Companies Act or our articles of association or any action or proceeding asserting a claim or otherwise related to the affairs of our company) other than shareholder complaints asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act, and that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York will be the exclusive forum for resolving any shareholder complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. In
addition, our articles of association provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our shares is deemed to have notice of and consented to these provisions.
This choice of forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees,
which may discourage such lawsuits. The enforceability of similar exclusive forum provisions (including exclusive federal forum provisions for actions, suits or proceedings asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act) in other
companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and there is uncertainty as to whether courts would enforce the exclusive forum provisions in our articles of association. Additionally, our shareholders cannot waive
compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find either choice of forum provision contained in our articles of association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur
additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 4. |
Information on the Company.
|
A. |
History and development of the company.
|
Immunocore Holdings plc was incorporated on January 7, 2021. On February 9, 2021, we completed our IPO, and we have been a publicly listed company for over a year.
We were originally incorporated under the laws of England and Wales in December 2007 as a private company with limited liability called Immunocore Limited. Immunocore
Holdings Limited was incorporated on January 7, 2021 as a private limited company under the laws of England and Wales with nominal assets and liabilities for the purpose of becoming the holding company of Immunocore Limited and consummating the
corporate reorganization. On January 22, 2021, each holder of series A preferred shares, series B preferred shares, series C preferred shares, G1 shares, G2 shares and ordinary shares in Immunocore Limited sold and transferred their shares to
Immunocore Holdings Limited (now Immunocore Holdings plc) in exchange for receiving 100 shares of the same class in Immunocore Holdings Limited. We refer to this as our “Share Exchange”. Immediately following the Share Exchange, the holders of
shares in Immunocore Limited held shares in Immunocore Holdings plc of the same class and in the same proportions as their holding in Immunocore Limited, except for that they each held 100 times as many shares. Immunocore Limited became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Immunocore Holdings plc as a result of the Share Exchange. Following the Share Exchange, Immunocore Limited undertook a reorganization of its share capital to re-designate its series A preferred shares, series B
preferred shares, series C preferred shares, G1 shares and G2 shares into a single class of ordinary shares. Subsequent to the Share Exchange, Immunocore Limited reduced its share capital by way of the cancellation of all amounts standing to the
credit of Immunocore Limited’s share premium account and the cancellation of 6,414,412 ordinary shares resulting from the reorganization of capital referred to above pursuant to Part 17 of the Companies Act in order to create distributable
reserves. On February 1, 2021, Immunocore Holdings Limited re-registered as a public limited company and was re-named Immunocore Holdings plc.
On February 9, 2021, immediately prior to the completion of our initial public offering, the different classes of our issued share capital were converted into a single class
of ordinary shares (and a class of deferred shares and a class of non-voting ordinary shares) on a 20 to 1 basis, and we completed our initial public offering on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Our ADSs are traded under the symbol IMCR. Our
ordinary shares are not listed. Our registered office in the United Kingdom is located at 92 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 4RY, United Kingdom, and the telephone number of our registered office is +44 (0)1235 438600.
Our agent for service of process in the United States is Immunocore, LLC, Six Tower Bridge, Suite 500, 181 Washington Street, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428.
Our actual capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 amounted to £1.0 million, £3.1 million and £4.3 million, respectively. These capital
expenditures primarily consisted of property, plant and equipment, leasehold improvements, lab equipment and computer equipment and software in the United Kingdom.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The
address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. Our website address is www.immunocore.com. Information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of, and shall not be incorporated by reference into, this document. We
have included our website address in this document solely as an inactive textual reference.
We are a commercial-stage biotechnology company pioneering the development of a novel class of TCR bispecific immunotherapies called ImmTAX – Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against
X disease – designed to treat a broad range of diseases, including cancer, infectious and autoimmune. Leveraging our proprietary, flexible, off-the-shelf ImmTAX platform, we are developing a deep
pipeline in multiple therapeutic areas, including five clinical stage programs in oncology and infectious disease, advanced pre-clinical programs in autoimmune disease and multiple earlier pre-clinical programs.
On January 26, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, approved KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic
uveal melanoma, or mUM. KIMMTRAK is the first TCR therapeutic to receive regulatory approval from the FDA, the first bispecific T cell engager to receive regulatory approval from the FDA to treat a solid tumor, and the first and only therapy for
the treatment of unresectable or mUM to be approved by the FDA.
In February 2022, we announced that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, of the European Medicines Agency, or the EMA, has adopted a positive opinion
recommending the approval of KIMMTRAK for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or mUM. The CHMP positive opinion is one of the final steps before marketing authorisation is granted by the European Commission,
which has the authority to approve medicines for use throughout the European Union. Subject to regulatory approval from the European Commission, we anticipate launching KIMMTRAK in Europe in the second quarter of 2022. We plan to pursue
regulatory approval for the marketing authorization of KIMMTRAK in all 28-member states of the European Union.
The United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Health Canada, and the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration
(TGA) have each accepted the submission of the Company’s Marketing Authorisation Application.
KIMMTRAK is manufactured at facilities located in Denmark and Germany. We are supporting the appropriate use of KIMMTRAK in the
United States through a well-equipped and fit-for-purpose commercial team that includes medical, sales, and value access team members. We utilize a hybrid model that includes in-house and contracted resources in the United States and Europe. To
support our commercial efforts, we have entered into an exclusive multi-regional agreement with Medison Pharma to help seek regulatory authorization and commercialize Immunocore’s KIMMTRAK in Canada, twenty markets across Central Eastern Europe
and Israel. After FDA approval in the United States on January 26, 2021, KIMMTRAK commercial supply was made available shortly after the FDA approval for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. KIMMTRAKConnect
was launched within three days of FDA approval with the goal to help ensure patients in the United States have access to KIMMTRAK, including financial assistance, personalized support and education, and site of care coordination for eligible
patients.
As of December 31, 2021, we have dosed over 700 cancer patients with our ImmTAX product candidates, which we believe is the largest clinical data set of any bispecific in a
solid tumor and any TCR therapeutic. Our clinical programs are being conducted with patients with a broad range of cancers including melanoma, lung, gastric, head and neck and ovarian, among others. We have [three] clinical stage programs within
our ImmTAC (Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against
Cancer) platform, including KIMMTRAK. Our other ImmTAX product candidates have the potential to address other tumor types with larger addressable patient populations and significant unmet need, and we are
studying the application of our ImmTAX platform to infectious diseases and autoimmune conditions.
Unlike antibody targeted immunotherapies that have a relatively small target pool, our approach relies on the power of T cell receptors, or TCRs, which are naturally
occurring receptors found on the surface of T cells that have the ability to target nearly all of the human proteome. Natural TCRs give T cells the ability to scan for abnormalities in nearly any cell in the body that are presented as protein
fragments, or antigens, by human leukocyte antigen, or HLA, on the cell surface. Our ImmTAX platform builds upon these natural TCRs to engineer soluble targeted and high-affinity TCRs. By engineering these TCRs, using our ImmTAX platform, we are
developing off-the-shelf, bispecific therapeutics, which are able to precisely target a wide range of proteins uniquely expressed by unhealthy and abnormal cells that cannot be targeted by current antibody-based immunotherapies.
Our ImmTAX bispecific therapeutics couple the targeting power of these engineered TCRs on one end with the other end displaying pre-optimized effector functions, which have
the ability to drive a desired immune response at the site of the disease. This combination is designed to provide us with significant flexibility as we are able to engineer and tailor our ImmTAX therapeutics to target proteins that are specific
to the disease we are trying to treat and then modulate the corresponding immune response by either boosting or inhibiting the immune system.
Our Pipeline
We are currently leveraging our ImmTAX platform within three therapeutic areas: oncology, infectious, and autoimmune disease. We have named each of these platforms according
to their therapeutic area to distinguish the type of target recognized by the TCR targeting system and the selected effector function. We have five clinical stage assets as well as numerous pre-clinical programs. While our most advanced clinical
programs are focused on developing treatments for oncology, we believe our ImmTAX platform is versatile, and will also allow us to develop therapeutics with significant advantages in the treatment of infectious and autoimmune diseases. Our
current pipeline is represented in the diagram below.
Our ImmTAC Platform (Oncology)
Within our ImmTAC platform, we have three clinical stage programs and additional pre-clinical programs (two of which are shown in the diagram above), focusing on the
treatment of solid tumors with high unmet medical needs. Our ImmTAC product candidates are bispecific, soluble TCR molecules featuring an antigen-specific targeting module based on our high-affinity, highly specific TCR system and our proprietary
cluster of differentiation 3 effector module for T cell recruitment, engagement and activation.
Our ImmTAC programs include:
|
• |
KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn), our ImmTAC molecule targeting an HLA-A*02:01 gp100 antigen, is our first approved product. KIMMTRAK was approved by the FDA on January
26, 2022 for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or mUM. KIMMTRAK demonstrated monotherapy activity and recently achieved the primary endpoint of superior overall survival in a randomized Phase 3
clinical trial in patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma against the investigator’s choice of treatment. The OS hazard ratio in the intent-to-treat population favored tebentafusp, HR=0.51 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.71); p<
0.0001, over investigator’s choice (82% pembrolizumab; 13% ipilimumab; 6% dacarbazine). The FDA reviewed KIMMTRAK under the Real-Time Oncology Review pilot program, an initiative of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence designed to
expedite the delivery of safe and effective cancer treatments to patients, and the FDA’s Project Orbis initiative, which enables concurrent review by the health authorities in partner countries that have requested participation.
|
|
• |
Tebentafusp regulatory submissions have been submitted to additional regulatory agencies outside the United States requesting marketing authorization of tebentafusp
for the treatment of mUM. The EMA, the United Kingdom’s MHRA, Health Canada, and the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration have each accepted the submission of our MAA. In February 2022, we announced
that the CHMP, of the EMA has adopted a positive opinion recommending the approval of KIMMTRAK for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or mUM. The CHMP positive opinion is one of the final steps before
marketing authorisation is granted by the European Commission, which has the authority to approve medicines for use throughout the European Union. Subject to regulatory approval from the European Commission, we anticipate launching
KIMMTRAK in Europe in the second quarter of 2022. We plan to pursue regulatory approval for the marketing authorization of KIMMTRAK in all 28-member states of the European Union.
|
|
• |
Continue to promote our global early access program to make KIMMTRAK readily available to mUM patients. We are focused on continuing to treat these patients with KIMMTRAK as regulatory approval is sought in
the European Union and their respective European countries. There are currently over 200 patients in 13 countries enrolled in our global early access program.
|
|
• |
Tebentafusp is also being developed in metastatic cutaneous melanoma (mCM). In 2021, Immunocore presented data from Phase 1b trial in metastatic cutaneous melanoma
(mCM) at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) 36th Annual Meeting. Preliminary evidence of KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn) clinical activity in mCM patients who had prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy, currently an unmet medical need,
included 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 76%. We anticipate initiating a mCM Phase 2 randomized trial with and without PD(L)1 therapies in the fourth quarter of 2022.
|
|
• |
IMC-C103C, our ImmTAC molecule targeting an HLA-A*02:01 MAGE-A4 antigen, is currently being evaluated in a first-in-human, Phase 1/2 dose escalation trial in patients
with solid tumor cancers including non-small-cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, gastric, head and neck, ovarian and synovial sarcoma. In December, we reported initial Phase 1 data from the trial at the European Society of Medical Oncology
Immuno-Oncology Congress. IMC-C103C demonstrated a manageable safety profile and clinical activity with confirmed durable responses in ovarian cancer and a confirmed durable response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or HNSCC. We
initiated an expansion arm in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma at 140 micrograms/week. We anticipate reporting additional data from the Phase 1 trial in the fourth quarter of 2022.
|
|
• |
IMC-F106C, our ImmTAC molecule targeting an optimal HLA-A*02:01 PRAME antigen is currently being evaluated in a first-in-human, Phase 1/2 dose escalation trial in
patients with multiple solid tumor cancers including NSCLC, SCLC, endometrial, ovarian, cutaneous melanoma, and breast cancers. As of December 31, 2021, we enrolled 39 patients in the Phase 1 clinical trial. Early pharmacodynamic data
indicate that IMC-F106C monotherapy is demonstrating biological activity at the doses currently under evaluation. We anticipate reporting Phase 1 initial data from the trial in the third quarter of 2022.
|
Our ImmTAV Platform (Infectious Diseases)
Using our ImmTAV (Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against Virus) platform, we have advanced our first program into the clinic. Our ImmTAV product candidates are bispecific
soluble TCR molecules featuring our ImmTAX TCR-based targeting system with high specificity for low-expression viral antigens, combined with the proprietary anti-CD3 effector module for T cell engagement and activation that has been evidenced by
our clinical oncology pipeline. We are seeking to develop therapeutics that can provide a functional cure to chronic viral disease and are focusing initially on hepatitis B virus, or HBV, and human immunosuppression virus, or HIV.
Our ImmTAV programs include:
|
• |
IMC-I109V, our ImmTAV molecule targeting a conserved hepatitis B virus, or HBV, envelope antigen, is our most advanced ImmTAV program and is
currently being evaluated in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial in patients with chronic HBV who are non-cirrhotic, hepatitis B e-Antigen negative, and virally suppressed on chronic nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy. Our goal is to develop a
functional cure for HBV and we initiated dosing the first patient in our Phase 1 single ascending dose, or SAD, trial in the second quarter of 2021.
|
|
• |
IMC-M113V, our ImmTAV
molecule targeting the human immunosuppression virus, or HIV, gag antigen bispecific TCR molecule, is currently in pre-clinical development. Our goal is to develop a functional cure for HIV and we expect to begin dosing patients in the
UK and Europe in 2022. Our clinical trial application in the United Kingdom was accepted in December of 2021, and we anticipate dosing the first patient in this trial during the second quarter of 2022.
|
Our ImmTAAI Platform (Autoimmune Diseases)
While our ImmTAC and ImmTAV platforms attempt to provide therapeutic benefit by driving an immune response against targeted cells, our ImmTAAI (Immune modulating monoclonal TCRs Against AutoImmune disease) platform leverages our ImmTAX platform to generate product candidates designed to provide precision targeted immunosuppression for the treatment of
autoimmune diseases. Our ImmTAAI product candidates are designed to target organs, tissues or immune cells and deliver an immune suppressive effector function. We have optimized two immune system modulating effector functions to provide local T
cell inhibition, which we believe may limit any adverse effects originating from systemic immune suppression. We believe we can use our ImmTAAI platform to develop a portfolio of product candidates to treat autoimmune indications with a high
unmet medical need and provide significant benefit to patients.
Our 2022 Strategy and Planned Portfolio Milestones
Our vision is to build a global immuno-therapy business with a portfolio of therapeutics that have the potential to beneficially impact the clinical outcomes of patients across a broad range of
diseases, with a near-term focus on the treatment of cancer, infectious and autoimmune diseases. We are pioneering the field of TCR bispecifics by leveraging the power of TCRs to recognize nearly any cellular protein with targeted precision and
convert them into potent ImmTAX therapies that can either boost or inhibit the immune system to treat the disease. In order to execute our strategy, we are pursuing the following near-term milestones:
KIMMTRAK® (tebentafusp-tebn)
|
• |
The US commercial launch of KIMMTRAK in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM).
|
|
• |
The European commercial launch of KIMMTRAK in mUM subject to regulatory approval.
|
|
• |
The initiation of a randomized trial in metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
|
ImmTAC Clinical Candidates targeting oncology targets PRAME and MAGE-A4
|
• |
Phase 1 data from IMC-F106C targeting PRAME in multiple solid tumors.
|
|
• |
Phase 1 data from IMC-C103C targeting MAGE-A4 in multiple solid tumors, and expansion arm in ovarian carcinoma.
|
ImmTAV Clinical Candidates for infectious disease
|
• |
First patient dosed in IMC-M113V Phase 1 study in HIV.
|
Overview of ImmTAX Platform
Our therapeutic platform takes advantage of human TCRs through engineering of novel therapies known as Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against X disease, or ImmTAX. Our
ImmTAX product candidates are bispecific therapies that are comprised of two key elements—a TCR targeting system and an effector function—that, when combined, are designed to give our platform significant flexibility to treat a range of diseases.
Specifically, our optimized ImmTAX bispecifics couple a high-affinity TCR targeting system with a range of effector functions tailored for the specific disease being
addressed. TCRs are naturally found on the surface of T cells and are programmed to scan for abnormalities in the body through binding protein fragments presented by HLA on the surface of other cells. We have been able to build upon the activity
of natural TCRs to develop high-affinity TCRs, which allow for a precise targeting by our therapeutics of unhealthy and abnormal cells. Our TCR targeting system can be customized to target almost any protein within the human proteome, thereby
increasing the potential for an on-target immune response. We accomplish this by identifying proteins that are specific to a disease, and customizing the TCR domain of our ImmTAX molecules to target the HLA fragment presented by that specific
protein. Below is a depiction of how our ImmTAX molecules combine a TCR targeting domain with a range of effector functions that can either activate or turn off the immune system (e.g., anti-CD3 or PD1 agonist).
The non-targeting component of our ImmTAX molecules is an effector antibody fragment designed to mimic the body’s natural mechanisms for modulating the immune system, thereby
allowing us to develop product candidates which are designed to generate a range of immune responses depending on the disease that is being treated. For example, for diseases such as cancer or infectious disease where an enhanced immune response
is required, certain effectors can be applied to drive a potent immune response recruiting any T cell to attack the targeted cell. Alternatively, for certain autoimmune disorders where establishing control of an aberrant immune response is
required, certain other effectors can be used to mimic the body’s natural control mechanisms.
We believe the flexibility of our approach will allow us to develop therapeutics designed to treat a broad range of diseases. While we have focused our initial efforts on
oncology, we are broadening our development efforts to infectious and autoimmune diseases. We have named each of these platforms according to their therapeutic area to distinguish the type of target recognized by the TCR targeting system and the
selected effector function:
|
• |
ImmTAC - Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against Cancer
|
|
• |
ImmTAV - Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against Viruses
|
|
• |
ImmTAAI - Immune modulating monoclonal TCRs Against AutoImmune disease
|
Advantages of our ImmTAX Platform
Our ImmTAX platform enables us to combine a high-affinity TCR targeting system with a range of immune-activating effector domains resulting in what we believe is a highly
tailored and flexible approach to treat a broad range of diseases with a number of potential advantages, which are described below:
Ability to access significantly larger pool of cellular targets compared to currently approved therapies. Currently approved
antibody-targeted therapies are limited to cell surface protein targets, a subset that makes up approximately 10% of the human proteome. Our ImmTAX platform has the potential to access a significantly larger pool of cellular targets when compared
to antibody-targeted therapies, given their ability to target intracellular proteins, thereby expanding the total addressable therapeutic landscape. By using TCRs specific to HLA complexes, our ImmTAX platform allows for the selection of targets
expressed by indications for which there are no currently effective antibody targets. Additionally, our platform benefits from the ability to select targets with very high levels of differential expression between healthy and diseased cells,
thereby allowing clinical doses to be increased with manageable toxicity. The targeting advantage of our platform versus antibody-targeted therapies is shown below.
Ability to engineer ImmTAX with million-fold greater affinity and enhanced specificity allows for precise cellular targeting. Natural
TCRs have binding half-lives measured in seconds and broad specificity profiles. Our processes are unique in our ability to consistently engineer TCRs with million-fold improvements in affinity over natural TCRs while simultaneously improving
specificity. We believe this proprietary engineering technology will allow us to develop therapeutics that have antibody-like binding properties with high specificity and target binding half-lives measured in hours to days. These properties are
designed to enable low doses of drug required and prolonged binding to cell targets. Additionally, the high specificity and affinity of ImmTAX give them the ability to bind to targets that are present with extremely low density across the cell
surface.
Ability to address a broad range of disease types by leveraging a variety of precise effector domains to drive a specific immune response.
Affinity enhanced TCRs are coupled in a modular fashion to one of our pre-optimized immune-modulatory effectors to fine tune the characteristics of the therapy specific to the biology factors for a disease indication. By optimizing factors such
as potency, therapeutic index and clearance characteristics, we aim to maximize potential clinical benefit. Using this modular approach, we are developing immune activating therapies for both cancer and infectious diseases which are designed to
potently and specifically eliminate TCR targeted cells through redirection of non-exhausted polyclonal T cells. For autoimmune diseases, we employ an effector function that provides potent immunosuppression at the tissue or cellular level, with
the goal of minimizing harmful systemic immunosuppression.
Sales and Marketing
We are in the early commercialization stages of KIMMTRAK and are focused on driving awareness and adoption of
KIMMTRAK as a treatment for mUM amongst mUM patients and their healthcare providers. During the first quarter of 2022, our first quarter of commercial launch, our initial focus is to utilize our commercial capabilities to meet patient demand in
the United States.
We utilize a hybrid model that includes in-house and contracted resources in the United States and Europe. We
have entered into a strategic partnership with Syneos Health, Inc., or Syneos and an exclusive multi-regional agreement with Medison Pharma to help seek regulatory authorization and commercialize Immunocore’s KIMMTRAK in Canada, twenty markets
across Central Eastern Europe and Israel.
Reimbursement
Coverage in the United States
In the United States, it is essential to obtain third-party payor coverage policies, coding mechanisms, and adequate payment to expand market acceptance and adoption of
KIMMTRAK as a treatment for mUM. We are currently approaching the U.S. commercial third-party payor community in efforts to establish coverage for KIMMTRAK.
Manufacturing and Drug Supply
Our Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls, or CMC, group conducts studies in molecular bioengineering, process development, analytical assay development, product
characterization, formulation development and stability studies in support of Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, -compliant manufacturing.
We do not currently own or operate cGMP-compliant manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or commercial ImmTAX product candidates; however, we extensively
outsource to microbial contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, for both drug substance and drug product production and have a successful cGMP-compliant manufacturing history of production of cGMP batches. We develop the upstream
fermentation and downstream purification processes, as well as developing the analytical assays for quality control batch release testing and stability studies in-house and then transfer the technology and know-how to the CMOs to establish,
scale-up, validation and manufacturing. This outsourced approach to manufacturing requires the CMOs to establish master and working cell banks, ImmTAX reference standards and produce the cGMP-compliant drug substance, and/or cGMP-compliant drug
product. We conduct quality and technical audits of the CMOs to monitor the manufacturing operations and ensure compliance with the mutually agreed process operations and cGMP-regulations.
For KIMMTRAK, we currently contract with the following well-established third-party manufacturers:
|
•
|
AGC Biologics A/S, headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
•
|
Baxter Oncology GmbH, headquartered in Halle/Westfalen, Germany
|
Our manufacturers have recently manufactured triplicate Process Performance Qualification, or PPQ, batches, commercial large-scale manufacturing consistency batches of drug substance and drug
product of KIMMTRAK, and we believe the quantities will be sufficient for commercial launch and initial commercial supply. AGC Biologics A/S and Baxter Oncology GmbH are positioned to provide longer term commercial manufacture of KIMMTRAK, with
the storage, global distribution, packaging and labeling operations being provided by Deutsche Post DHL Group, or DHL and Integrated Commercialization Solutions, LLC, a division of AmerisourceBergen Corporation in the United States.
Competition
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies and intense competition. We believe that our approach, strategy, TCR
experience and ultimately, our ImmTAX platform provide us with competitive advantages. However, we expect substantial competition from multiple sources, including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical, and existing or emerging
biotechnology companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions worldwide. Many of our competitors, either alone or with their collaborations, have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be
significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing
clinical trial sites and patient enrollment in clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. As a result, our competitors may discover, develop, license or commercialize products before or
more successfully than we do.
We face competition from segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that pursue the development of therapeutics to address unmet needs in cancer including:
Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, or Adaptimmune, Gritstone Oncology, Inc., Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, or Immatics (alone and in collaboration with Bristol Myers Squibb), Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, or Adaptive, pure MHC, LLC, BioNTech
SE, Genentech, Matterhorn, Anocca, Enara Bio and Regeneron, who are also seeking to identify peptide HLA targets and develop product candidates; Adaptimmune, T-Knife GmbH, Adaptive, 3T Biosciences, Inc., MediGene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
or Regeneron, Gilead Sciences, Inc., bluebird Bio, Inc., or bluebird bio, AgenTus Therapeutics, Inc., Takara Bio Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, GSK, Kite Pharma, Lion TCR, TCR Cure, CBMG, Eureka and Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. who are
developing TCR-based cell therapies; Immatics, AbbVie, Inc, Regeneron, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Amgen, Inc., Genmab, Inc., Molecular Partners and MorphoSys AG are developing CD3-based TCR bispecific compounds or TCR mimetic antibodies.
We are aware of various companies and academic institutions that are developing TCR transduced cell therapies against a range of pHLA targets, some of which may overlap with product candidates in
our pipeline such as MAGE-A4 and PRAME, including Adaptimmune, who is developing a MAGE-A4 directed cellular therapy, which has entered pivotal testing for various forms of sarcoma and has initiated Phase 2 trials for other solid tumors.
Specifically in regards to PRAME, we are aware that Immatics and Medigene are both conducting Phase 1 clinical trials of PRAME-directed cellular therapies and Immatics also have communicated plans for Phase 1 development of a PRAME TCRxCD3
approach.
Oncology
Any ImmTAC product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize for oncology indications may compete with existing products and new products that may become
available in the future. There is intense competition in the field of oncology from multiple different treatment modalities and new approaches are continually emerging.
While KIMMTRAK recently received regulatory approval from the FDA and our MAA has been accepted for review by the EMA, Delcath Systems, Inc. is conducting a single-arm
pivotal trial in metastatic uveal melanoma to evaluate a procedure that delivers a high dose of melphalan to the liver via percutaneous hepatic perfusion. This system is currently marketed in Europe as a CE Marked device under the trade name
Delcath Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System for Melphalan (CHEMOSAT). We are aware of several other companies with product candidates in clinical development for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma, none of which have yet progressed to
pivotal trial testing.
Chronic HBV
There are numerous antiviral therapies approved by the FDA for the treatment of chronic HBV infections. These treatments consist of life-long antiviral therapy to suppress
virus replication. This can slow the progression of liver cirrhosis and reduce the incidence of liver cancer, but most patients do not achieve functional cure. There are also FDA-approved vaccinations that provide effective prophylaxis against
HBV, although they do not reverse or cure the disease in people who have already contracted the virus.
HIV
There are now over 30 antiretroviral medications in six drug classes approved for the treatment of HIV.
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) consists of treatment with a combination of two or three agents targeting different stages of the virus life cycle. If started early, ART provides a normal lifespan, prevents immunodeficiency and stops the spread of
HIV. However, treatment does not provide a cure and must be taken continuously for life to prevent relapse. Furthermore, there is no effective vaccine to prevent HIV.
Intellectual Property
We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technologies, inventions and improvements that we believe are important to our business, including by seeking, maintaining,
enforcing and defending patent rights for our therapeutics and processes, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties. Our success will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other protection including data/market
exclusivity for our soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates and platform technology, preserve the confidentiality of our know-how and operate without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the valid and enforceable patents and
proprietary rights of third parties. For more information, please see “Item 3.D Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in territories that are commercially important for our soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates
and technology platform, generally including but not limited to the United States, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa and South Korea. We also intend to rely on data
exclusivity, market exclusivity and patent term extensions when available, including any relevant exclusivity through supplementary protection certificates and orphan or pediatric drug designation.
As of December 31, 2021, we solely own seven issued U.S. patents, 75 issued foreign patents, 14 pending U.S.
patent applications, 153 pending foreign patent applications and five pending Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, patent applications. We also co-own with Adaptimmune 16 issued U.S. patents, 155 issued foreign patents, 31 pending U.S. patent
applications, and 36 pending foreign patent applications. These patents and patent applications include claims directed to our soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates, required intermediates in the preparation of our soluble TCR bispecific
therapeutic candidates, our platform technology used to identify and generate soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates, targets, formulations and methods of treatment.
While we own issued composition of matter patents relating to tebentafusp and pending patent applications relating to our other product candidates, including IMC-C103C
(MAGE-A4), IMC-F106C (PRAME), GSK01 and IMC-I109V (HBV), we do not own or in-license any issued patents relating to such other product candidates and we can provide no assurance that any of our current or future patent applications will result in
issued patents or that any issued patents will provide us with any competitive advantage.
ImmTAC platform
Tebentafusp, our ImmTAC product candidate
As of December 31, 2021, we own granted patents and patent applications covering the composition of matter of our
lead ImmTAC, tebentafusp, and required intermediates in the preparation of tebentafusp. The patent claims extend to cover additional TCR variants with similar biological properties in addition to the specific candidate sequence. Granted patents
have been obtained in major territories including two in the United States and 28 in foreign jurisdictions, including Europe (including United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Denmark and the Netherlands), Australia, Canada,
China, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Eurasia and South Africa. These granted patents are expected to expire in 2030, subject to further patent term adjustments, patent term extensions and/or supplementary protection certificates. Further protection
may be achieved if further pending patent applications covering the expected label dosing regimen and formulation of tebentafusp are granted. The dosing regimen patents and patent applications include one granted in South Africa, one pending in
the United States and nine pending in foreign jurisdictions, including Europe, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Hong Kong, Mexico, Russia and South Africa. The formulation patent family currently includes pending patent applications in
the United States, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia and South Africa. The issued South African dosing regimen patent is expected to expire in 2037, and, if granted, the
pending patent applications in the dosing regimen family would expire in 2037 and the formulation patent application family would expire in 2040, each excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions.
Further soluble TCR bispecific candidates
As of December 31, 2021, we own issued composition of matter patents and pending composition of matter patent
applications, including four pending U.S. patent applications, two issued foreign patents in Colombia and Indonesia, 50 pending foreign patent applications and three PCT applications, covering further clinical and pre-clinical stage soluble TCR
bispecific therapeutic candidates for oncology, including IMC-C103C, IMC-F106C, and GSK01 targeting MAGE-A4, PRAME and NY-ESO. In each case, claims of the patent or patent application are directed to the engineered soluble TCR bispecific
therapeutic candidate and to TCR variants with similar biological properties. The issued Colombian and Indonesia patents are expected to expire in 2037 and, if granted, patents derived from these applications or applications that claim priority
from these applications would expire in 2036 for GSK01, 2037 for IMC-C103C, 2038 for IMC-F106C and 2041 for IMC-J110C, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions. National patent applications for GSK-01,
IMC-C103C and IMC-F106C have been filed in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, including Europe, Australia, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Russia.
ImmTAV platform
IMC-I109V clinical program
As of December 31, 2021, we own 19 pending composition of matter PCT patent application relating to our IMC-I109V
clinical program. The IMC-I109V patent family currently includes pending patent applications in the United States, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Russia,
Singapore, Thailand and South Africa. Such pending patent applications, if granted, are expected to expire in 2040, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions.
Our ImmTAX platform
As of December 31, 2021, we own a number of patents and patent applications related to our ImmTAX platform. These
include platform technology composition-of-matter patents and patent applications that aim to cover a disulphide bond stabilization approach for obtaining soluble TCRs, phage display methodology for the production of TCRs with supraphysiological
affinity and specificity for target antigen, and a TCR bispecific format with potent T cell redirection activity. Granted patents for these core platform technologies have been obtained in major territories including nine issued patents in the
United States and 124 patents in a mixture of foreign jurisdictions, including Europe, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Hong Kong, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Norway, New Zealand, Mexico, Russia, Singapore and South Africa. The
earliest of these patents will begin to expire in 2022 and 2023, for soluble TCRs with disulphide bond stabilization and phage display technology, respectively, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions.
Patents relating to the TCR bispecific format required for enhanced potency will expire starting in 2030, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions.
As of December 31, 2021, we own 28 pending composition-of-matter platform technology patent applications relating
to TCR bispecifics with improved therapeutic properties, including formats with extended in vivo half-life and improved anti-CD3 effector functions. Each patent family currently includes pending applications in the United States, Europe,
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia and South Africa. We also own 14 pending composition-of-matter patent applications relating to a TCR-PD1 agonist bispecific platform for tissue/organ
specific immunosuppression for the treatment of autoimmune and autoimmune indications. Such pending patent applications, if granted, are expected to expire between 2039 and 2040, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent
term extensions.
The platform patents and patent applications relating to soluble TCRs with disulphide bond stabilization and phage display methodology, as well as certain other technology
patents, are jointly owned in 50% equal share with Adaptimmune. We control the prosecution of these jointly owned patents and patent applications. A field restricted cross license limits each company’s exploitation of the technology to their
respective fields. For more information on our assignment and exclusive license agreement with Adaptimmune, see “Item 4.B Business overview—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—Assignment and Exclusive License Agreement with Adaptimmune
Limited.”
Target patent applications
As of December 31, 2021, we own, in equal share with Adaptimmune, four issued U.S. patent, 28 pending U.S. patent
applications, eight issued foreign patents and 25 pending foreign patent applications relating to novel HLA-restricted peptide targets and their use. Such patents and pending patent applications, if granted, are expected to expire between 2036
and 2037, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions. In addition, we also own one pending PCT patent application relating to non-classical HLA antigens suitable for the isolation and affinity maturation
of non-classically HLA restricted TCRs and methods for production of such antigens. If granted, national applications derived from the PCT application are expected to expire in 2040, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or
patent term extensions.
Patent term
Typically, we submit an initial priority application at the U.K. Intellectual Property Office, or UKIPO, and/or at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO. This is
followed 12 months later by the filing of a patent application under the PCT claiming priority from the initial application(s). Further data can be added to the application during the priority year and the resulting patent term is calculated from
the PCT filing date. This strategy allows us to obtain an early priority date while additional experimental data are generated. At the end of the PCT period, generally two and a half years from the priority date, separate patent applications can
be pursued in any of the 154 PCT member states. Our PCT patent applications are not eligible to become issued patents until, among other things, we file national stage patent applications within such PCT period in the countries in which we seek
patent protection. If we do not timely file any national stage patent applications, we may lose any patent protection on the inventions disclosed in such PCT patent applications. For all patent applications, we determine claiming strategy and
territory coverage on a case-by-case basis. Advice of counsel and alignment with overarching business objectives is always considered. We regularly reassess the value of the patents and patent applications in our portfolio.
The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term for patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we have filed patent
applications, including the United States, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest filing date of a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, a patent’s term may be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a
patentee for administrative delays by the USPTO in examining and granting a patent, or may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier filed patent. The term of a patent that covers a drug or biological product may also be
eligible for patent term extension when FDA approval is granted for a portion of the term effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory review period, subject to certain limitations and provided statutory and regulatory requirements are met.
For more information on patent term extension, see “Item 4.B Business overview—Government Regulation—Patent Term Restoration and Extension.” As with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, our ability to maintain and solidify our
proprietary and intellectual property position for our product candidates will depend on our success in obtaining effective patent claims and enforcing those claims if granted. However, our owned pending patent applications, and any patent
applications that we may in the future file or license from third parties may not result in the issuance of patents. We also cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents. Any issued patents that we may
receive in the future may be challenged, invalidated, narrowed, held unenforceable, infringed or circumvented. In addition, because of the extensive time required for clinical development and regulatory review of a product candidate we may
develop, it is possible that, before any of our product candidates can be commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby limiting the protection such patent would
afford the respective product and any competitive advantage such patent may provide. See “Item 3.D Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Trade secrets
Furthermore, we rely upon trade secrets and know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. However, trade secrets and
know-how can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, using confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees and consultants and invention assignment agreements with our employees. We also have
confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with our collaborators and consultants. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the invention assignment agreements, to grant us
ownership of technologies that are developed through a relationship with a third party. We cannot guarantee, however, that we have executed such agreements with all applicable counterparties. Furthermore, these agreements may be breached, and we
may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors and other third parties. To the extent that our collaborators, employees and consultants use
intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions. For more information, please see “Item 3.D Risk Factors — Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Third-party rights
Our commercial success will also depend in part on not infringing upon the proprietary rights of third parties. It is uncertain whether the issuance of any third-party patent
would require us to alter our development or commercial strategies, or our product candidates or processes, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. Our breach of any license agreements or failure to obtain a license to proprietary rights
that we may require to develop or commercialize our current or future product candidates may have an adverse impact on us. For more information, please see “Item 3.D Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Trademarks
As of December 31, 2021, our trademark portfolio contains registrations or registration applications including for
Immunocore, ImmTAC, ImmTAX and ImmTAV in the United States and in certain foreign jurisdictions.
Our Collaborations and License Agreements
Genentech Collaboration
In June 2013, we entered into a research collaboration and license agreement, or the 2013 Genentech Agreement, with Genentech, Inc., or Genentech, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Ltd, or Roche, pursuant to which we along with Genentech and Roche agreed to collaborate in the development, manufacture and ultimately, commercialization of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds. Under the 2013 Genentech
Agreement, Genentech paid us an initial upfront payment of $20 million in exchange for exclusive licenses to two of our targets, MAGE-A4 as well as an undisclosed target.
In September 2016, following achievement of formal nomination of the pre-clinical candidate compound, we and Genentech amended the 2013 Genentech Agreement. The 2016
Genentech Amendment provided that we regained control of the initial two programs, and Genentech granted us an exclusive worldwide license to use its background intellectual property rights to advance such programs. We had sole responsibility for
the development, manufacture and commercialization of the soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds of the targets at our own expense, and were required to use diligent efforts to achieve commercialization of at least one therapeutic compound
for each of the programs. In exchange for the rights granted to us, Genentech would be able to earn future development and commercial milestones of up to approximately $167 million and tiered royalty payments between a mid-single-digit and
low-teens percentage on net sales of such compounds. Genentech also obtained a right of first negotiation in respect of the programs, should we seek to license the rights to develop and/or commercialize either program to a third party.
In November 2018, Genentech exercised its right of first negotiation with respect to our IMC-C103C program. We received an aggregate of $100 million from Genentech,
consisting of an initial upfront payment of $50 million and $50 million paid upon an IND filing for the first clinical trial of the product candidate compound, in exchange for granting Genentech rights to co-develop/co-promote our IMC-C103C
program.
In November 2018, in response to Genentech’s exercise of its right of first negotiation in regards to our IMC-C103C program, we entered into a new license and collaboration
agreement, or the 2018 Genentech Agreement, pursuant to which we and Genentech agreed to collaborate in the development and commercialization of certain compounds targeting MAGE-A4, specifically pHLA-A2. Under the 2018 Genentech Agreement, we
granted Genentech a co-exclusive worldwide license to our intellectual property rights in MAGE-A4 soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds to advance the development and commercialization of such compounds as contemplated under the
2018 Genentech Agreement. We are responsible for development of the IMC-C103C program through the completion of the Phase 1 clinical trial, with costs being shared equally with Genentech, and are required to use diligent efforts with respect to
our development and commercialization obligations. After completion of the Phase 1 clinical trial, we have a limited time period in which to decide to either continue co-development (including co-funding) of our IMC-C103C program or withdraw from
our co-funding commitment and thereby convert our co-exclusive license to a full out-license to Genentech of the program, in exchange for future milestone and royalty payments to us. Unless we decide to withdraw co-funding and co-development of
our IMC-C103C program following completion of the Phase 1 clinical trial, we and Genentech would be jointly responsible for further clinical development of the asset, with costs shared equally between us. We would retain co-exclusive rights and
joint responsibility for commercialization of our IMC-C103C program; although Genentech would have sole rights to book sales. We have already agreed to an equal sharing of funding and profits in regards to our IMC-C103C program. Within six months
of starting the first Phase 3 registrational trial of our IMC-C103C program, we are obligated to negotiate a co-promotion agreement with Genentech to define the remaining co-promotion activities.
If we elect to withdraw from co-funding of our IMC-C103C program after completion of the Phase 1 clinical trial, then Genentech shall acquire an exclusive worldwide license
to the MAGE-A4 soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds and shall be fully responsible for all further development and commercialization of such candidate compounds, at its expense. These licenses, if granted, do not include any
rights to affinity-enhanced TCRs or TCR therapeutic compounds directed to different target peptides. From the point of co-funding withdrawal, we will be eligible to receive over $700 million in aggregated development and commercial milestone
payments plus royalties from Genentech on all sales of products arising from our IMC-C103C program under the 2018 Genentech Agreement, with a rate varying between a high single-digit percentage and a low-teens percentage of net sales, subject to
certain agreed reductions, dependent on the cumulative annual net sales for each calendar year. Royalties are payable while there is a jointly owned or solely owned valid patent claim covering the soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic product in the
country in which the relevant TCR therapeutic product is being sold, which, if applicable patent applications are granted, is expected to be at least 2037 for IMC-C103C, and, in each case, for a minimum of 10 years from the first commercial sale
of the relevant soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic product. We are required to notify Genentech as soon as reasonably practicable in the event that we experience a change of control prior to the completion of the first Phase 1 clinical trial, and
Genentech could treat such a change of control as a co-funding withdrawal notice.
Under the 2018 Genentech Agreement, Genentech also obtained a right of first negotiation in respect of other TCR therapeutic candidate compounds that target MAGE-A4 by
binding to an antigen other than pHLA-A2, should we discover any such therapeutic candidate compounds and seek to license the rights to a third party during the term of the 2018 Genentech Agreement.
The 2018 Genentech Agreement is effective until all payment obligations expire. Both parties have rights to terminate the 2018 Genentech Agreement for uncured material breach
upon 90 days’ written notice or immediately upon insolvency of the other party. Genentech has additional rights to terminate the 2018 Genentech Agreement for convenience on provision of 90 days’ notice to us. We also have rights to terminate any
license where Genentech ceases development or withdraws from the market any licensed compound in specified circumstances. Following termination of the 2018 Genentech Agreement by either party, a formal negotiation process exists under which we
can agree to commercially reasonable terms with Genentech for us to continue development and commercialization of the terminated assets.
GSK Collaboration
In June 2013, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement, or the GSK Agreement, with GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd, or GSK, pursuant to
which we and GSK agreed to collaborate in the development of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds.
We received an upfront payment upon execution and one additional payment in connection with GSK’s nomination of the second collaboration target. As of December 31, 2021, we
had received payments totaling £22.9 million in upfront payments and early development milestones.
Under the GSK Agreement, we granted GSK the right to nominate up to four targets as being exclusive to GSK under our collaboration. The first target, GSK01/NY-ESO, was
nominated at the time of execution of the GSK Agreement. Following a portfolio review, we, in collaboration with GSK, jointly elected not to proceed further with the first target. Consequently, GSK relinquished its option to acquire an exclusive
license to the NY-ESO program and we retained ownership of the asset.
A second target was nominated in July 2017. Following a portfolio review in 2021, we, in collaboration with GSK, elected not to proceed further with this second target.
Under the terms of the GSK Agreement, GSK does not have an option to nominate any further targets, and the GSK Agreement was subsequently terminated in January 2022.
Lilly Collaboration
In July 2014, we entered into a development and license agreement, referred to, as subsequently amended, as the Lilly Collaboration, with Eli Lilly and Company, or Lilly,
pursuant to which we and Lilly agreed to collaborate in the development, manufacture and commercialization of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds.
Under the Lilly Collaboration, Lilly paid us an initial upfront fee payment of $45 million in exchange for options to three targets. Lilly no longer has the ability to
nominate any further targets under the initial agreement. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the parties agreed not to proceed with the first target under the agreement, and no further obligations remain with respect to this target. In
September 2017, we and Lilly agreed to swap a second antigen target, selected by Lilly, for another neo-antigen target. No further obligations remain with respect to the initial second target that was replaced. The focus of the programs
associated with Lilly’s second and third nominated targets under the agreement is currently under review and there were no significant changes to the Lilly Collaboration in the year ended December 31, 2021.
From the designation of each selected target until the expiration or termination of any exclusive license Lilly may obtain by exercising its option rights, we are prohibited
from directly or indirectly conducting any development or commercialization activities relating to such target selected under the Lilly Collaboration or epitopes derived from such target or any compounds directed to such target, other than as
provided under the Lilly Collaboration.
Under the Lilly Collaboration, we are responsible for developing soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic pre-clinical candidates to each target with Lilly being responsible for
GMP manufacture of Phase 1 material at its expense. On a collaboration target-by-collaboration target basis, at the point of clinical candidate nomination, Lilly has the option to pay a $10 million option fee to gain exclusive
co-development/co-promotion rights to the target program. Following exercise of its option, Lilly will provide to us a clinical development plan and budget plan for the advancement of the selected candidate through clinical Phase 1 development.
Upon receipt of the proposed development plan and Phase 1 budget, we have a limited time period in which to elect to contribute either 25% or 50% costs to reach the next clinical phase or to opt-out of further development. Similar provisions are
available at the start of Phase 2 clinical trials and registrational clinical trials. Should we elect to contribute towards registrational trials, then, within six months of the start of the first registrational trial, we would agree with Lilly
on the terms of a co-promotion agreement that establishes how co-promotion activities would be divided and receive either a 25:75 or 50:50 profit split that aligns with the funding contributions established in development. Should we opt-out of
co-development on a collaboration target-by-collaboration target basis, Lilly would obtain an exclusive worldwide license to develop and commercialize the compound at its sole expense.
We are eligible to receive differing development milestones, commercial milestones and royalties dependent on whether we exercise our opt-out right at the time when a product
is Phase 1-ready, Phase 2-ready or registrational trial-ready and if we have contributed either 0%, 25% or 50% of clinical expenses prior to the point of opt-out. The maximum aggregate amount of milestone payments we are eligible to receive for a
product (in the case of such product treating a single indication) is $336 million and the tiered royalties we are eligible to receive range from a mid-single-digit to a mid-teens percentage. Royalties are payable while there is a jointly owned
or solely owned valid patent claim covering the licensed product in the country in which the relevant product is sold, which, if applicable patent application are granted, is expected to be at least 2041 for the first neoantigen program, and, in
each case, for a minimum of 10 years from first commercial sale of the relevant licensed product.
The Lilly Collaboration is effective until all payment obligations expire, including any ongoing royalty payments due in relation to Lilly’s sale of any licensed product. The
Lilly Collaboration can also be terminated on a program-by-program basis by Lilly if a selected target or any product or selected candidate is not viable or will not otherwise obtain regulatory approval. Both parties have rights to terminate the
Lilly Collaboration in whole or in part for uncured material breach upon 90 days’ written notice or immediately upon insolvency of the other party. Lilly has additional rights to terminate either the Lilly Collaboration or any specific program
for convenience on provision of 90 days’ notice to us. We also have rights to terminate any license where Lilly ceases development on any compound or withdraws any licensed product in specified circumstances. Where we continue any development of
any compound resulting from a terminated collaboration program where Lilly has exercised its option to obtain an exclusive license, we would agree with Lilly on a royalty that reflects the value to the program contributed by Lilly prior to the
date of termination.
Gates Collaboration
In September 2017, we entered into a $40 million convertible loan agreement and a global access agreement with the Gates Foundation, pursuant to which we agreed to develop,
manufacture and commercialize soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates targeted to neglected diseases, primarily tuberculosis and HIV, with the potential to treat people at an affordable price in developing countries. In March 2020, we and
the Gates Foundation amended and restated the global access agreement, or the Gates Agreement, pursuant to which we are required to take certain actions to support the mission of the Gates Foundation. The Gates Agreement was further amended in
February 2021. The initial tranche of $25 million was directed to the development of product candidates for the treatment of tuberculosis or HIV, and converted into equity as part of our series B preferred share financing. In connection with our
entry into a subscription agreement with the Gates Foundation, we terminated the outstanding convertible loan note purchase agreement with the Gates Foundation by deed of termination, as the Gates Foundation instead subscribed for the remaining
amount of the loan ($15 million) as part of a concurrent private placement in connection with our initial public offering.
Pursuant to the terms of the Gates Agreement, the Gates Foundation has the ability to request additional product development work for the development of product candidates
for the treatment of malaria and human papillomavirus, with the terms of any such work to be negotiated in good faith between us and the Gates Foundation.
We are required to use diligent efforts to complete agreed upon research plans for tuberculosis and HIV. While we delivered a potential product candidate for the treatment of
tuberculosis, under a program within the Gates Agreement, leveraging our universal HLA-E capabilities, the governing committee selected instead a potential HIV product candidate for GMP manufacture and for evaluation in a Phase 1 clinical trial.
If requested by the Gates Foundation, we will be required to continue further development of the HIV program through commercialization of a final product with the terms of any such work to be negotiated in good faith between us and the Gates
Foundation.
In the event of certain defaults by us under the Gates Agreement, the Gates Foundation has a right to sell (or require a buy-back by us of) any of the equity securities held
by the Gates Foundation. In such an event, if within 12 months after such redemption or sale, we experience a change in control or an initial public offering at a valuation of more than 150% of the valuation used for the redemption or the sale of
the shares, we have agreed to pay the Gates Foundation compensation equal to the excess of what it would have received in such transaction if it still held its shares at the time of such initial public offering or a change of control over what it
received in the sale or redemption of its shares.
Under the terms of the Gates Agreement, we have full control over the development, commercialization and pricing of the Gates Foundation funded programs in developed
countries. Within a defined list of developing countries, we have an obligation to abide by the Gates Foundation global access principles, which includes pricing restrictions and a requirement that we use diligent efforts to make funded products
available in such countries. We also grant the Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free licenses under our intellectual property and products developed using funds from the Gates Foundation for the benefit of people in
identified developing countries. These licenses would only be exercised in certain defined default events, including where we are unwilling or unable to continue with the development of a program or where we are in breach of certain obligations
under the Gates Agreement (including the global access commitments). Under the terms of the Gates Agreement, the Gates Foundation can request that we work on further neglected diseases (excluding hepatitis, oncology or autoimmune diseases)
provided acceptable terms can be reached. We also have an obligation to make available certain research tools on a royalty-free basis to certain entities supported by the Gates Foundation and other third parties and certain obligations relating
to publishing of scientific results of our work.
Assignment and Exclusive License Agreement with Adaptimmune Limited
In May 2013, we entered into an assignment and exclusive license agreement with Adaptimmune Limited, or Adaptimmune, which relates to the joint ownership and licensing of
certain patents, patent applications, rights in know-how and other intellectual property rights, or the Adaptimmune License. Pursuant to the Adaptimmune License, we and Adaptimmune jointly own certain identified patents, patent applications,
rights in know-how and other intellectual property rights in equal shares. We each grant the other party an exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license, with the right to sub-license, under those jointly owned intellectual property rights in
separate fields. Adaptimmune’s exclusive field relates to treatment of patients with engineered TCR therapeutic candidates and our exclusive field relates to the treatment of patients with soluble TCRs. There is no royalty payable under the
Adaptimmune License but we share equally in the costs associated with the filing, maintenance and prosecution of the jointly owned patents and patent applications covered by the Adaptimmune License.
The Adaptimmune License is effective until the later of the expiration of the last to expire jointly owned patent under the Adaptimmune License or the jointly owned know-how
ceasing to be confidential. The Adaptimmune License cannot be terminated by either party. Upon the insolvency of either party, the other party has the right to take over patent prosecution of the licensed patents and to request assignment of the
insolvent party’s interest in all the licensed patents, know-how and results on commercially reasonable terms.
Government Regulation
Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in the European Union and other countries and jurisdictions, extensively regulate,
among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacturing, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing and export and
import of pharmaceutical products, including biological products. The processes for obtaining marketing approvals in the United States and in foreign countries and jurisdictions, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and
regulations and other regulatory authorities, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.
Data Privacy and Security Laws
We also are or may become subject to privacy laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate, have partners, or sell or market our products or run clinical trials. For example,
we are or may become subject to privacy and data protection laws, such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, (“EU GDPR”), the United Kingdom’s equivalent law (“UK GDPR”), and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act,
HIPAA in the United States, among many others. Our regulatory obligations in foreign jurisdictions could harm the use or cost of our solution in international locations as data protection and privacy laws and regulations around the world continue
to evolve.
Certain aspects of our business, including those for which we rely upon collaborators, service providers, contractors or others, are or may become subject to HIPAA and its
implementing regulations, which establish standards for covered entities (healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses) governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protecting the security and
privacy of protected health information, including, among other requirements, mandatory contractual terms and technical safeguards designed to protect the privacy, security and transmission of protected health information and notification to
affected individuals and regulatory authorities in the event of certain breaches of security of protected health information. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, commonly referred to as the economic stimulus package, included
sweeping expansion of HIPAA’s privacy and security standards called the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, which became effective on February 17, 2010. Among other things, the HITECH makes HIPAA’s
privacy and security standards directly applicable to business associates, or independent contractors or agents of covered entities, that receive or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service on behalf of a covered
entity. HITECH also increased the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates and possibly other persons, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or
injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.
Even when HIPAA does not apply, failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure can constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting
commerce and be construed as a violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, or the FTCA, 15 U.S.C § 45(a). The FTC expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and
volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities.
In Europe, we are subject to the EU GDPR, in relation to our processing and other use of personal data. We may in the future process personal data in relation to participants
in our clinical trials in the EEA, including the health and medical information of these participants. The EU GDPR imposes a multitude of obligations on us as part of its mandated privacy governance framework. For example, these obligations
include, to be transparent and disclose to individuals how their personal information will be used; to retain personal data only as necessary; to provide data breach notifications; and to demonstrate valid consent for certain data processing
activities.
EU Member States may introduce further restrictions on personal data processing, including limitations which could limit our ability to collect, use and share personal data
(including health and medical information), or could cause our compliance costs to increase. In addition, the EU GDPR includes restrictions on cross-border data transfers. Certain aspects of cross-border data transfers under the EU GDPR are
uncertain as the result of legal proceedings in the EU, including the efficacy and legality of using standard contractual clauses. This may increase the complexity of transferring personal data across borders out of the EEA.
Fines for certain breaches of the EU GDPR are significant: up to the greater of €20 million or 4% of total global annual turnover. In addition to the foregoing, a breach of
the EU GDPR or other applicable privacy and data protection laws and regulations could result in regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders change our use of data, enforcement notices, or potential civil claims including class action
type litigation.
Further, Brexit, and ongoing developments in the United Kingdom have created uncertainty with regard to data protection regulation in the United Kingdom. Following the United
Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU, the data protection obligations of the GDPR continue to apply to United Kingdom-related processing of personal data in substantially unvaried form and fashion under the so-called ‘UK GDPR’ (i.e., the GDPR as it continues to form part of United Kingdom law by virtue of section 3 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, as amended (including by the various Data Protection, Privacy and
Electronic Communications (Amendments etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations)). However, going forward, there will be increasing scope for divergence in application, interpretation and enforcement of data protection laws as between the United Kingdom and
the EU. In addition, the relationship between the United Kingdom and the EU in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains unclear. For example, it is still unclear whether the transfer of data from the EU to the United Kingdom
will in the future remain lawful under the EU GDPR. Additionally, as noted above, the United Kingdom has transposed the EU GDPR into domestic law by way of the UK GDPR, which exposes us to two parallel regimes, each of which potentially
authorizes similar fines and other potentially divergent enforcement actions for certain violations. In addition to such parallel United Kingdom and EU regimes, following the expiry of the post-Brexit transitional arrangements agreed between the
United Kingdom and EU, the United Kingdom Information Commissioner’s Office is not able to be our ‘lead supervisory authority’ in respect of any ‘‘cross border processing’’ for the purposes of the EU GDPR. Because we did not designate a lead
supervisory authority in an EU member state with effect from January 1, 2021, we are not able to benefit from the GDPR’s ‘‘one stop shop’’ mechanism. Among other things, this means that, in the event of a violation of the applicable data
protection laws affecting individuals across the United Kingdom and the EU, we could be investigated and ultimately fined by, the United Kingdom Information Commissioner’s Office and the supervisory authority in each and every EU member state
where data subjects have been affected by such violation.
In the United States, state laws may be more stringent, broader in scope and offer greater individual rights with respect to health information than HIPAA, and state laws may
differ from each other, which may complicate compliance efforts. By way of example, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, creates individual privacy rights for California residents and places increased privacy and security obligations on
entities that are subject to the law and which handle certain personal data of such residents. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide new disclosures to California residents about such covered businesses’ data collection, use and sharing
practices and provide such residents new ways to opt out of certain disclosures of personal information and provides such residents with additional causes of action. The CCPA became effective on January 1, 2020, and (a) allows enforcement by the
California Attorney General, with fines set at $2,500 per non-intentional violation or $7,500 per intentional violation and (b) authorizes private lawsuits to recover statutory damages for certain data breaches. Additionally, a new privacy law,
the California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, was recently approved by California voters in November 2020. The CPRA significantly modifies the CCPA, resulting in further uncertainty and requiring us to incur additional costs and expenses to comply.
Patent Term Restoration and Extension
Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of product candidates, some of a sponsor’s U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension
under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term
restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term restoration period generally is one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date
of a BLA less any time the sponsor did not act with due diligence during the period, plus the time between the submission date of a BLA and the approval of that application less any time the sponsor did not act with due diligence during the
period. Only one patent applicable to an approved biologic product is eligible for the extension, only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended, and the application for the
extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent. Moreover, a given patent may only be extended once based on a single product. The USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term
extension or restoration. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. In the future, if and when our products receive FDA approval, we expect to apply for
patent term extensions on patents covering those products, however there is no guarantee that the applicable authorities, including the FDA in the United States, will agree with our assessment of whether such extensions should be granted, and if
granted, the length of such extensions. For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, see “Item 3.D — Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Licensure and Regulation of Biologics in the United States
In the United States, biological products are subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and the Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, and
their implementing regulations. Product candidates must be approved by the FDA before they may be legally marketed in the United States.
An applicant seeking approval to market and distribute a new biologic in the United States generally must satisfactorily complete each of the following steps:
|
• |
nonclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies all performed in accordance with the FDA’s good laboratory practices, or GLP, regulations;
|
|
• |
submission to the FDA of an IND application for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
|
|
• |
approval by an institutional review board, or IRB, representing each clinical site before each clinical trial may be initiated;
|
|
• |
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety, potency and purity of the product candidate for each proposed indication, in accordance with Good Clinical
Practices, or GCP;
|
|
• |
preparation and submission to the FDA of a BLA for a biological product requesting marketing for one or more proposed indications, including submission of detailed information on the manufacture and
composition of the product in clinical development and proposed labeling;
|
|
• |
review of the product by an FDA advisory committee, if applicable;
|
|
• |
one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities, including those of third parties, at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with current Good
Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
|
|
• |
FDA audits of the clinical study sites to assure compliance with GCPs, and the integrity of clinical data in support of the BLA;
|
|
• |
payment of user fees and securing FDA approval of the BLA and licensure of the new biological product; and
|
|
• |
compliance with any post-approval requirements, including the potential requirement to implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, and any post-approval studies required by the FDA.
|
Nonclinical Studies and Investigational New Drug Application
Before testing any biological product candidate in humans, the product candidate must undergo nonclinical testing. Nonclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product
formulation and stability, as well as animal studies to evaluate the potential for activity and toxicity. The results of the nonclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, are submitted to the FDA as part of an
IND application. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions about the product or conduct of the proposed clinical trial, including concerns that human
research subjects will be exposed to unreasonable health risks. In that case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding FDA concerns before the clinical trial can begin.
As a result, submission of the IND may result in the FDA not allowing the trial to commence or on the terms originally specified by the sponsor in the IND. If the FDA raises
concerns or questions either during this initial 30-day period, or at any time during the IND process, it may choose to impose a partial or complete clinical hold. This order issued by the FDA would delay either a proposed clinical study or cause
suspension of an ongoing study, or in the case of a partial clinical hold place limitations on the conduct of the study such as duration of treatment, until all outstanding concerns have been adequately addressed and the FDA has notified the
company that investigation may proceed and then only under terms authorized by the FDA. This could cause significant delays or difficulties in completing planned clinical trials in a timely manner. The FDA may impose clinical holds on a
biological product candidate at any time before or during clinical trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance.
Human Clinical Trials in Support of a BLA
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product candidate to healthy volunteers or patients with the disease to be treated under the supervision of
a qualified principal investigator in accordance with GCP requirements. Clinical trials are conducted under study protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, the parameters to be used in
monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND.
A sponsor who wishes to conduct a clinical trial outside the United States may, but need not, obtain FDA authorization to conduct the clinical trial under an IND. If a
foreign clinical trial is not conducted under an IND, the sponsor may submit data from the clinical trial to the FDA in support of the BLA so long as the clinical trial is well-designed and well-conducted in accordance with GCP, including review
and approval by an independent ethics committee, and the FDA is able to validate the study data through an onsite inspection, if necessary.
Further, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board, or IRB, either centrally or individually at each institution at which the
clinical trial will be conducted. The IRB will consider, among other things, clinical trial design, patient informed consent, ethical factors and the safety of human subjects. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA regulations. The FDA, IRB,
or the clinical trial sponsor may suspend or discontinue a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a finding that the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with FDA requirements or the subjects or patients are
being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Clinical testing also must satisfy extensive GCP rules and the requirements for informed consent. Additionally, some clinical trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized
by the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board or committee. This group may recommend continuation of the study as planned, changes in study conduct, or cessation of the study at designated check points based on access to
certain data from the study. Information about certain clinical studies must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination.
Clinical trials typically are conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap or be combined. Additional studies may be required after approval.
Phase 1 clinical trials are initially conducted in a limited population to test the product candidate for safety, including adverse effects, dose tolerance, absorption,
metabolism, distribution, excretion and pharmacodynamics in healthy humans or, on occasion, in patients, such as cancer patients.
Phase 2 clinical trials are generally conducted in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, evaluate the efficacy of the product
candidate for specific targeted indications and determine dose tolerance and optimal dosage. Multiple Phase 2 clinical trials may be conducted by the sponsor to obtain information prior to beginning larger Phase 3 clinical trials.
Phase 3 clinical trials proceed if the Phase 2 clinical trials demonstrate that a dose range of the product candidate is potentially effective and has an acceptable safety
profile. Phase 3 clinical trials are undertaken within an expanded patient population to gather additional information about safety and effectiveness necessary to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug and to provide an
adequate basis for physician labeling.
In some cases, the FDA may approve a BLA for a product candidate but require the sponsor to conduct additional clinical trials to further assess the product candidate’s
safety and effectiveness after approval. Such post-approval trials are typically referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials. These studies are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication
and to document a clinical benefit in the case of biologics approved under accelerated approval regulations. If the FDA approves a product while a company has ongoing clinical trials that were not necessary for approval, a company may be able to
use the data from these clinical trials to meet all or part of any Phase 4 clinical trial requirement or to request a change in the product labeling. Failure to exhibit due diligence with regard to conducting required Phase 4 clinical trials
could result in withdrawal of approval for products.
Compliance with cGMP Requirements
Before approving a BLA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it
determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in full compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. The PHSA emphasizes the importance of
manufacturing control for products like biologics whose attributes cannot be precisely defined. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, the sponsor must
develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency and purity of the final biological product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the
biological product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
Manufacturers and others involved in the manufacture and distribution of products must also register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies. Both
domestic and foreign manufacturing establishments must register and provide additional information to the FDA upon their initial participation in the manufacturing process. Any product manufactured by or imported from a facility that has not
registered, whether foreign or domestic, is deemed misbranded under the FDCA. Establishments may be subject to periodic unannounced inspections by government authorities to ensure compliance with cGMPs and other laws. Manufacturers may have to
provide, on request, electronic or physical records regarding their establishments. Delaying, denying, limiting or refusing inspection by the FDA may lead to a product being deemed to be adulterated.
Review and Approval of a BLA
The results of product candidate development, nonclinical testing and clinical trials, including negative or ambiguous results as well as positive findings, are submitted to
the FDA as part of a BLA requesting a license to market the product. The BLA must contain extensive manufacturing information and detailed information on the composition of the product and proposed labeling as well as payment of a user fee.
The FDA has 60 days after submission of the application to conduct an initial review to determine whether the BLA is sufficient to accept for filing based on the agency’s
threshold determination that it is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. Once the submission has been accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the application. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under
the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or the PDUFA, the FDA has ten months in which to complete its initial review of a standard application and respond to the applicant, and six months for a priority review of an application. The FDA does not
always meet its PDUFA goal dates for standard and priority BLAs. The review process may often be significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification. The review process and the PDUFA goal date may be extended by
three months if the FDA requests or if the applicant otherwise provides additional information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission within the last three months before the PDUFA goal date.
On the basis of the FDA’s evaluation of the application and accompanying information, including the results of the inspection of the manufacturing facilities and any FDA
audits of clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCPs, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the product with specific prescribing information for
specific indications. Under the PHSA, the FDA may approve a BLA if it determines that the product is safe, pure and potent and the facility where the product will be manufactured meets standards designed to ensure that it continues to be safe,
pure and potent. If the application is not approved, the FDA may issue a complete response letter, which will contain the conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the application, and when possible will outline recommended
actions the sponsor might take to obtain approval of the application. Sponsors that receive a complete response letter may submit to the FDA information that represents a complete response to the issues identified by the FDA or withdraw the
application or request a hearing. The FDA will not approve an application until issues identified in the complete response letter have been addressed.
The FDA may also refer the application to an advisory committee for review, evaluation and recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. In particular, the
FDA may refer applications for novel biological products or biological products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee. Typically, an advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including
clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but
it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
If the FDA approves a new product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product. It may also require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be
included in the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may call for post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, to further assess the product’s safety after approval. The agency may also require testing and surveillance programs to
monitor the product after commercialization or impose other conditions, including distribution restrictions or other risk management mechanisms, including REMS, to help ensure that the benefits of the product outweigh the potential risks. REMS
can include medication guides, communication plans for healthcare professionals, and elements to assure safe use, or ETASU. ETASU can include, but are not limited to, special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing
only under certain circumstances, special monitoring and the use of patent registries. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-market studies or surveillance programs. After approval, many types of
changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.
Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy and Priority Review Designations
The FDA is authorized to designate certain products for expedited review if they are intended to address an unmet medical need in the treatment of a serious or
life-threatening disease or condition. These programs are referred to as fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation and priority review designation.
The FDA may designate a product for fast track review if it is intended, whether alone or in combination with one or more other products, for the treatment of a serious or
life-threatening disease or condition, and it demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition. For fast track products, sponsors may have greater interactions with the FDA and the FDA may initiate review
of sections of a fast track product’s application before the application is complete. This rolling review may be available if the FDA determines, after preliminary evaluation of clinical data submitted by the sponsor, that a fast track product
may be effective. The sponsor must also provide, and the FDA must approve, a schedule for the submission of the remaining information and the sponsor must pay applicable user fees. However, the FDA’s time period goal for reviewing a fast track
application does not begin until the last section of the application is submitted. Fast track designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if the FDA believes that the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the clinical trial process.
A product may be designated as a breakthrough therapy if it is intended, either alone or in combination with one or more other products, to treat a serious or
life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment
effects observed early in clinical development. The FDA may take certain actions with respect to breakthrough therapies, including holding meetings with the sponsor throughout the development process; providing timely advice to the product
sponsor regarding development and approval; involving more senior staff in the review process; assigning a cross-disciplinary project lead for the review team; and taking other steps to design the clinical trials in an efficient manner.
The FDA may designate a product for priority review if it is a product that treats a serious condition and, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness. The FDA determines, on a case-by-case basis, whether the proposed product represents a significant improvement when compared with other available therapies. Significant improvement may be illustrated by evidence of increased
effectiveness in the treatment of a condition, elimination or substantial reduction of a treatment-limiting product reaction, documented enhancement of patient compliance that may lead to improvement in serious outcomes and evidence of safety and
effectiveness in a new subpopulation. A priority designation is intended to direct overall attention and resources to the evaluation of such applications, and to shorten the FDA’s goal for taking action on a marketing application from ten months
to six months.
Accelerated Approval Pathway
The FDA may grant accelerated approval to a product for a serious or life-threatening condition that provides meaningful therapeutic advantage to patients over existing
treatments based upon a determination that the product has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. The FDA may also grant accelerated approval for such a condition when the product has an effect on
an intermediate clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, and that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity,
rarity or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. Products granted accelerated approval must meet the same statutory standards for safety and effectiveness as those granted traditional approval.
For the purposes of accelerated approval, a surrogate endpoint is a marker, such as a laboratory measurement, radiographic image, physical sign or other measure that is
thought to predict clinical benefit but is not itself a measure of clinical benefit. Surrogate endpoints can often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. An intermediate clinical endpoint is a measurement of a
therapeutic effect that is considered reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of a product, such as an effect on IMM. The FDA has limited experience with accelerated approvals based on intermediate clinical endpoints, but has indicated
that such endpoints generally may support accelerated approval where the therapeutic effect measured by the endpoint is not itself a clinical benefit and basis for traditional approval, if there is a basis for concluding that the therapeutic
effect is reasonably likely to predict the ultimate clinical benefit of a product.
The accelerated approval pathway is most often used in settings in which the course of a disease is long and an extended period of time is required to measure the intended
clinical benefit of a product, even if the effect on the surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint occurs rapidly. Thus, accelerated approval has been used extensively in the development and approval of products for treatment of a variety of
cancers in which the goal of therapy is generally to improve survival or decrease morbidity and the duration of the typical disease course requires lengthy and sometimes large trials to demonstrate a clinical or survival benefit.
The accelerated approval pathway is usually contingent on a sponsor’s agreement to conduct, in a diligent manner, additional post-approval confirmatory studies to verify and
describe the product’s clinical benefit. As a result, a product candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the
effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, would allow the FDA to withdraw the product from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional
materials for product candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
Post-Approval Regulation
If regulatory approval for marketing of a product or new indication for an existing product is obtained, the sponsor will be required to comply with all post-approval
regulatory requirements as well as any post-approval requirements that the FDA has imposed as part of the approval process. The sponsor will be required to report certain adverse reactions and production problems to the FDA, provide updated
safety and efficacy information and comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotional labeling. Manufacturers and certain of their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies,
and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with ongoing regulatory requirements, including cGMP regulations, which impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon
manufacturers. Accordingly, the sponsor and its third-party manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas of production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMP regulations and other regulatory
requirements.
A biological product may also be subject to official lot release, meaning that the manufacturer is required to perform certain tests on each lot of the product before it is
released for distribution. If the product is subject to official lot release, the manufacturer must submit samples of each lot, together with a release protocol showing a summary of the history of manufacture of the lot and the results of all of
the manufacturer’s tests performed on the lot, to the FDA. The FDA may in addition perform certain confirmatory tests on lots of some products before releasing the lots for distribution. Finally, the FDA will conduct laboratory research related
to the safety, purity, potency and effectiveness of pharmaceutical products.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the
product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may
result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. FDA also has
authority to require post-market studies, in certain circumstances, on reduced effectiveness of a product and may require labeling changes related to new reduced effectiveness information. Other potential consequences for a failure to maintain
regulatory compliance include, among other things:
|
• |
restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls;
|
|
• |
fines, untitled letters or warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials;
|
|
• |
refusal of the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, or suspension or revocation of product license approvals;
|
|
• |
product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or
|
|
• |
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
|
The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Pharmaceutical products may be promoted only for the
approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly
promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.
Orphan Drug Designation
Orphan Drug Designation in the United States is designed to encourage sponsors to develop products intended for rare diseases or conditions. In the United States, a rare
disease or condition is statutorily defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States or that affects 200,000 or more individuals in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the
cost of developing and making available the product for the disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product in the United States.
Orphan Drug Designation qualifies a company for tax credits and market exclusivity for seven years following the date of the product’s marketing approval if granted by the
FDA. An application for designation as an orphan product can be made any time prior to the filing of an application for approval to market the product. A product becomes an orphan when it receives Orphan Drug Designation from the Office of Orphan
Products Development, or OOPD, at the FDA based on an acceptable confidential request made under the regulatory provisions. The product must then go through the review and approval process like any other product in order to be marketed.
A sponsor may request Orphan Drug Designation of a previously unapproved product or new orphan indication for an already marketed product. In addition, a sponsor of a product
that is otherwise the same product as an already approved orphan drug may seek and obtain Orphan Drug Designation for the subsequent product for the same rare disease or condition if it can present a plausible hypothesis that its product may be
clinically superior to the first drug. More than one sponsor may receive Orphan Drug Designation for the same product for the same rare disease or condition, but each sponsor seeking Orphan Drug Designation must file a complete request for
designation.
The period of exclusivity begins on the date that the marketing application is approved by the FDA and applies only to the indication for which the product has been
designated. The FDA may approve a second application for the same product for a different use or a second application for a clinically superior version of the product for the same use. The FDA cannot, however, approve the same product made by
another manufacturer for the same indication during the market exclusivity period unless it has the consent of the sponsor or the sponsor is unable to provide sufficient quantities.
Pediatric Studies and Exclusivity
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, as amended, a BLA or supplement thereto must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the
product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. Sponsors must also submit pediatric study plans
prior to the assessment data. Those plans must contain an outline of the proposed pediatric study or studies the applicant plans to conduct, including study objectives and design, any deferral or waiver requests and other information required by
regulation. The applicant, the FDA, and the FDA’s internal review committee must then review the information submitted, consult with each other and agree upon a final plan. The FDA or the applicant may request an amendment to the plan at any
time.
The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for
use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements. Generally, the pediatric data requirements do not apply to products with orphan designation.
Pediatric exclusivity is another type of non-patent marketing exclusivity in the United States and, if granted, provides for the attachment of an additional six months of
marketing protection to the term of any existing regulatory exclusivity, including the non-patent and orphan exclusivity. This six-month exclusivity may be granted if a BLA sponsor submits pediatric data that fairly respond to a written request
from the FDA for such data. The data do not need to show the product to be effective in the pediatric population studied; rather, if the clinical trial is deemed to fairly respond to the FDA’s request, the additional protection is granted. If
reports of requested pediatric studies are submitted to and accepted by the FDA within the statutory time limits, whatever statutory or regulatory periods of exclusivity or patent protection cover the product are extended by six months. This is
not a patent term extension, but it effectively extends the regulatory period during which the FDA cannot approve another application.
Biosimilars and Exclusivity
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, or BPCIA, established a regulatory scheme authorizing the FDA to approve biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars. To
date, while biosimilar products have been approved by the FDA for use in the United States, no interchangeable biosimilars have been approved.
Under the BPCIA, a manufacturer may submit an application for licensure of a biologic product that is “biosimilar to” or “interchangeable with” a previously approved
biological product or “reference product.” For the FDA to approve a biosimilar product, it must find that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the reference product and proposed biosimilar product in terms of safety, purity and
potency. For the FDA to approve a biosimilar product as interchangeable with a reference product, the agency must find that the biosimilar product can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product, and (for products
administered multiple times) that the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference
biologic.
Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date of approval of the reference product. The FDA may
not approve a biosimilar product until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was approved. Even if a product is considered to be a reference product eligible for exclusivity, another company could market a competing version of
that product if the FDA approves a full BLA for such product containing the sponsor’s own nonclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product. However, to rely
on such exclusivities for establishing or protecting a manufacturer’s market position is not without risk, as such laws are subject to changes by the legislature. The BPCIA also created certain exclusivity periods for biosimilars approved as
interchangeable products. At this juncture, it is unclear whether products deemed “interchangeable” by the FDA will, in fact, be readily substituted by pharmacies, which are governed by state pharmacy law.
Regulation and Procedures Governing Approval of Medicinal Products in the European Union
In order to market any product outside of the United States, a company also must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions
regarding quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of products. Whether or not it obtains FDA approval for a product, an applicant will need to
obtain the necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory authorities before it can initiate clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries or jurisdictions. Specifically, the process governing approval of medicinal
products in the European Union generally follows the same lines as in the United States. It entails satisfactory completion of pharmaceutical development, nonclinical studies and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the
safety and efficacy of the medicinal product for each proposed indication. It also requires the submission to relevant competent authorities for clinical trials authorization and to the EMA or to competent authorities in European Union Member
States for a marketing authorization application, or MAA, and granting of a marketing authorization by these authorities before the product can be marketed and sold in the European Union.
Clinical Trial Approval
Pursuant to the currently applicable Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC and the Directive 2005/28/EC on GCP, a system for the approval of clinical trials in the European
Union has been implemented through national legislation of the member states. Under this system, an applicant must obtain approval from the competent national authority of a European Union member state in which the clinical trial is to be
conducted or in multiple member states if the clinical trial is to be conducted in a number of member states. Furthermore, the applicant may only start a clinical trial at a specific study site after the independent ethics committee has issued a
favorable opinion. The CTA, must be accompanied by an investigational medicinal product dossier with supporting information prescribed by Directive 2001/20/EC and Directive 2005/28/EC and corresponding national laws of the member states and
further detailed in applicable guidance documents.
In April 2014, the European Union adopted a new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, which came into application on January 31, 2022, replacing the Clinical Trials
Directive 2001/20/EC, with a three-year transition period for trials authorised under the Directive and relevant legislation implementing the Directive into the national law of member states. The Clinical Trials Regulation provides that, a
clinical trial application, or CTA, must be submitted to via the European Medicine Agency's, or EMA's, Clinical Trials Information System, which will cover all regulatory and ethics assessments from the member states concerned. Once the CTA is
approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, clinical trial development may proceed. Approval and monitoring of clinical trials in the European Union is the responsibility of individual member states, but compared to the position prior
to the applicability of the Clinical Trials Regulation there is likely to be more collaboration, information-sharing, and decision-making between member states.
Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
Regulation (EC) No. 141/2000 and Regulation (EC) No. 847/2000 provide that a product can be designated as an orphan drug by the European Commission if its sponsor can
establish: that the product is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of (1) a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition affecting not more than five in ten thousand persons in the European Union when the application is
made, or (2) a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the European Union and that without incentives it is unlikely that the marketing of the drug in the European Union would generate sufficient return to
justify the necessary investment. For either of these conditions, the applicant must demonstrate that there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of the condition in question that has been authorized in the European
Union or, if such method exists, the drug has to be of significant benefit compared to products available for the condition.
An Orphan Drug Designation provides a number of benefits, including fee reductions, regulatory assistance and the possibility to apply for a centralized European Union
marketing authorization. Marketing authorization for an orphan drug leads to a ten-year period of market exclusivity. During this market exclusivity period, neither the EMA nor the European Commission or the member states can accept an
application or grant a marketing authorization for a “similar medicinal product.” A “similar medicinal product” is defined as a medicinal product containing a similar active substance or substances as contained in an authorized orphan medicinal
product, and which is intended for the same therapeutic indication. The market exclusivity period for the authorized therapeutic indication may, however, be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product
no longer meets the criteria for Orphan Drug Designation because, for example, the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify market exclusivity.
Marketing Authorization
To obtain a marketing authorization for a product under the European Union regulatory system, an applicant must submit an MAA, either to EMA using the centralized procedure
or to competent authorities in European Union Member States using the other procedures (decentralized procedure, national procedure, or mutual recognition procedure). A marketing authorization may be granted only to an applicant established in
the European Union. Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 provides that prior to obtaining a marketing authorization in the European Union, an applicant must demonstrate compliance with all measures included in an EMA-approved Pediatric Investigation
Plan, or PIP, covering all subsets of the pediatric population, unless the EMA has granted a product-specific waiver, class waiver or a deferral for one or more of the measures included in the PIP.
The centralized procedure provides for the grant of a single marketing authorization by the European Commission that is valid for all European Union member states. Pursuant
to Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004, the centralized procedure is compulsory for specific products, including for medicines produced by certain biotechnological processes, products designated as orphan medicinal products, advanced therapy products
and products with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of certain diseases, including products for the treatment of cancer and auto-immune diseases. For products with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of other
diseases and products that are highly innovative or for which the centralized procedure is in the interest of public health, the centralized procedure may be optional.
Under the centralized procedure, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or the CHMP, established at the EMA is responsible for conducting the assessment of a
product to define its risk/benefit profile. Under the centralized procedure, the maximum timeframe for the evaluation of an MAA is 210 days, excluding clock stops when additional information or written or oral explanation is to be provided by the
applicant in response to questions of the CHMP. Accelerated evaluation may be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is of major interest from the point of view of public health and, in particular, from the viewpoint
of therapeutic innovation. If the CHMP accepts such a request, the time limit of 210 days will be reduced to 150 days, but it is possible that the CHMP may revert to the standard time limit for the centralized procedure if it determines that it
is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment.
Periods of Authorization and Renewals
A marketing authorization is valid for five years, in principle, and it may be renewed after five years on the basis of a reevaluation of the risk benefit balance by the EMA
or by the competent authority of the authorizing member state. To that end, the marketing authorization holder must provide the EMA or the competent authority with a consolidated version of the file in respect of quality, safety and efficacy,
including all variations introduced since the marketing authorization was granted, at least six months before the marketing authorization ceases to be valid. Once renewed, the marketing authorization is valid for an unlimited period, unless the
European Commission or the competent authority decides, on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance, to proceed with one additional five-year renewal period. Any authorization that is not followed by the placement of the drug on the
European Union market (in the case of the centralized procedure) or on the market of the authorizing member state within three years after authorization ceases to be valid.
Regulatory Requirements after Marketing Authorization
Following approval, the holder of the marketing authorization is required to comply with a range of requirements applicable to the manufacturing, marketing, promotion and
sale of the medicinal product. These include compliance with the European Union’s stringent pharmacovigilance or safety reporting rules, pursuant to which post-authorization studies and additional monitoring obligations can be imposed. In
addition, the manufacturing of authorized products, for which a separate manufacturer’s license is mandatory, must also be conducted in strict compliance with the EMA’s GMP requirements and comparable requirements of other regulatory bodies in
the European Union, which mandate the methods, facilities and controls used in manufacturing, processing and packing of drugs to assure their safety and identity. Finally, the marketing and promotion of authorized products, including
industry-sponsored continuing medical education and advertising directed toward the prescribers of drugs and/or the general public, are strictly regulated in the European Union under Directive 2001/83EC, as amended.
Regulation in the United Kingdom
Brexit may influence the attractiveness of the United Kingdom as a place to conduct clinical trials. Clinical trials that take place in the United Kingdom are seen as trials
that have taken place in a “third country” and will only be considered during the course of a marketing authorization application if they are carried out on a basis that is in line with the regulations governing clinical trials in the EU.
Clinical trials in the EU must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the EU Clinical Trials Regulation (although some ongoing trials are still governed by the requirements of the EU Clinical Trials Directive, as implemented in
national law by individual member states), and applicable good clinical practice standards. Clinical trials in the United Kingdom must be conducted in accordance with the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, which implement
the provisions of the EU Clinical Trials Directive into United Kingdom law. There has, therefore, been divergence between the rules governing clinical trials in the EU and those that govern trials that take place in the United Kingdom law.
In the short term, there will be few changes to clinical trials that only have sites in the United Kingdom. The MHRA have confirmed that the sponsor of a clinical trial can
be based in the EEA for an initial period following Brexit. Further investigational medicinal products can be supplied directly from the EU/EEA to either a trial site or a distribution hub in Great Britain. Such products will require oversight by
the holder of a UK Manufacturing and Import Authorisation but do currently require recertification.
As the United Kingdom is now a “third country” for the purpose of clinical trials that have sites in the EEA, the sponsor/legal representative for such trials can no longer
be based in the United Kingdom.
Other Healthcare Laws and Regulations
Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and use of pharmaceutical products that are granted marketing approval.
Arrangements with third-party payors, existing or potential customers and referral sources, including healthcare providers, are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse, and these laws and regulations may constrain the business or financial
arrangements and relationships through which manufacturers conduct research, market, sell and distribute the products for which they obtain marketing approval. Such restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations
include the following:
|
• |
the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in
cash or kind, in exchange for, or to induce, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs
such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers, on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers and other individuals and
entities on the other. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the ACA, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute such that
a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it in order to commit a violation;
|
|
• |
the federal civil and criminal false claims, including the civil False Claims Act, or the FCA, and civil monetary penalties laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly
presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false record or statement material to a false or
fraudulent claim to avoid, decrease, or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, also may implicate the FCA. In addition, the ACA codified case law that a
claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA.
|
|
• |
HIPAA imposes criminal and civil liability, among other things, for executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare
matters;
|
|
• |
the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s
Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to payments and other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include
doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physicians assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and
their immediate family members;
|
|
• |
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, and their implementing regulations, which imposes certain obligations, including mandatory contractual terms,
with respect to safeguarding the transmission, security and privacy of individually identifiable health information on covered entities, such as health plans, health care clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, and their
respective business associates that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, and their subcontractors that use, disclose, access, or otherwise process
individually identifiable protected health information; and
|
|
• |
state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including
commercial insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government that otherwise
restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other
healthcare providers, drug pricing and/or marketing expenditures; state and local laws requiring the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain
circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts.
|
Violation of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and regulations may result in significant penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal
penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of operations, the exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, disgorgement, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings,
imprisonment, and additional reporting requirements and oversight if a person becomes subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws. Furthermore, efforts to ensure that
business activities and business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations can be costly.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of KIMMTRAK or any other products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. In the United
States, sales of any product candidates for which regulatory approval for commercial sale is obtained will depend in part on the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. Third-party payors include government
authorities and health programs in the United States such as Medicare and Medicaid, managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. These third-party payors are increasingly reducing reimbursements for medical products
and services. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a drug product may be separate from the process for setting the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the drug product. Third-party payors may limit
coverage to specific drug products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. Additionally, the containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal and state
governments, and the prices of drugs have been a focus in this effort. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls,
restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing
controls and measures, could further limit our net revenue and results.
A payor’s decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, coverage and reimbursement for drug
products can differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to
each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.
Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their
safety and efficacy. New metrics frequently are used as the basis for reimbursement rates, such as average sales price, average manufacturer price and actual acquisition cost. In order to obtain coverage and reimbursement for any product that
might be approved for sale, it may be necessary to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of the products, in addition to the costs required to obtain regulatory approvals.
If third-party payors do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to
allow a company to sell its products at a profit. Additionally, any companion diagnostic test that we develop will be required to obtain coverage and reimbursement separate and apart from the coverage and reimbursement we seek for our product
candidates, if approved. If any companion diagnostic is unable to obtain reimbursement or is inadequately reimbursed, that may limit the availability of such companion diagnostic, which would negatively impact prescriptions for our product
candidates, if approved.
The marketability of any product candidates for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payors fail to provide
adequate coverage and reimbursement. In addition, emphasis on managed care in the United States has increased and we expect will continue to increase the pressure on pharmaceutical pricing. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates
may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we or our collaborators receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be
implemented in the future.
In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some countries provide that products may be marketed only after a reimbursement
price has been agreed. Some countries may require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies. European Union member states may approve a specific
price for a product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the product on the market. Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for products, but monitor and
control company profits. The downward pressure on health care costs has become intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products. In addition, in some countries, cross-border imports from low-priced
markets exert competitive pressure that may reduce pricing within a country. Any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations may not allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements.
Health Reform
The United States and some foreign jurisdictions are considering or have enacted a number of reform proposals to change the healthcare system. There is significant interest
in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been
significantly affected by federal and state legislative initiatives, including those designed to limit the pricing, coverage, and reimbursement of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products, especially under government-funded health care
programs, and increased governmental control of drug pricing.
By way of example, in March 2010, the ACA was signed into law, intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance
remedies against fraud and abuse, add transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose taxes and fees on the healthcare industry and impose additional health policy reforms. Among the provisions of the ACA of
importance to our business are:
|
• |
an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or imports specified branded prescription drugs and biologic agents, apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain
government healthcare programs;
|
|
• |
an increase in the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to 23.1% and 13.0% of the average manufacturer price for most branded and generic drugs,
respectively;
|
|
• |
a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected;
|
|
• |
extension of a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability to covered drugs dispensed to individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations;
|
|
• |
expansion of eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid coverage to certain individuals with income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level,
thereby potentially increasing a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability;
|
|
• |
a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must now agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries
during their coverage gap period, as a condition for a manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;
|
|
• |
expansion of the entities eligible for discounts under the Public Health Service pharmaceutical pricing program; and
|
|
• |
a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research.
|
There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. While Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, it has enacted
laws that modify certain provisions of the ACA such as removing penalties, effective January 1, 2019, for not complying with the ACA’s individual mandate to carry health insurance and delaying the implementation of certain ACA-mandated fees. In
addition, the 2020 federal spending package permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the ACA-mandated “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage and medical device tax and, effective January 1, 2021, also eliminated
the health insurer tax. On June 17, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Thus, the ACA will
remain in effect in its current form. Further, prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order to initiate a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage
through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructs certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration
projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. It is unclear how such efforts to repeal and replace the ACA
and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the ACA and our business.
Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. For example, in August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 was
signed into law, which, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2012
through 2021, was unable to reach its target goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which
went into effect in April 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect through 2031 unless additional Congressional action is taken. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act,
and other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation suspended the 2% Medicare sequester from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022. Under current legislation, the actual reduction in Medicare payments will vary from 1% in 2022 to up to 3% in the final
fiscal year of this sequester. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to certain providers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover
overpayments to providers from three to five years.
There also has been heightened governmental scrutiny in the United States of pharmaceutical pricing practices in light of the rising cost of prescription drugs and biologics.
Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and
manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products. At the federal level, the Trump administration used several means to propose or implement drug pricing reform, including through federal budget
proposals, executive orders and policy initiatives. For example, on July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the
administration’s proposals. As a result, the FDA released a final rule and guidance on September 24, 2020 providing pathways for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020, the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Medicare Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers,
unless the price reduction is required by law. The implementation of the rule has been delayed by the Biden administration from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 in response to ongoing litigation. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for
price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a new safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers, the implementation of which have also been delayed pending review by the Biden
administration until January 1, 2023. On November 20, 2020, CMS issued an interim final rule implementing the Trump administration’s Most Favored Nation executive order, which would tie Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered
drugs to the lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries, effective January 1, 2021. As a result of litigation challenging the Most Favored Nation model, on December 27, 2021, CMS published a final rule that rescinded the Most
Favored Nation model interim final rule. In July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive
order, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue to advance these
principles. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles. In addition, Congress is considering drug pricing as part of other reform initiatives. At the state level, individual states in the United
States have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and
marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
We expect that these initiatives, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and lower
reimbursement, and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. It is also possible that additional governmental action is taken to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, any reduction in reimbursement
from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue,
attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates.
Further, additional healthcare reform initiatives may arise from future legislation or administrative action, particularly as a result of the most recent U.S. presidential
election.
Additional Regulation
In addition to the foregoing, provincial, state and federal U.S. and European Union laws regarding environmental protection and hazardous substances affect our business.
These and other laws govern our use, handling and disposal of various biological, chemical and radioactive substances used in, and wastes generated by, our operations. If our operations result in contamination of the environment or expose
individuals to hazardous substances, we could be liable for damages and governmental fines. We believe that we are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws and that continued compliance therewith will not have a material adverse
effect on our business. We cannot predict, however, how changes in these laws may affect our future operations.
Anti-Corruption Laws
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel
Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, the UK Bribery Act 2010 and the UK Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and possibly other state and national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct activities, collectively, Anti-Corruption
Laws. Among other matters, such Anti-Corruption Laws prohibit corporations and individuals from directly or indirectly paying, offering to pay or authorizing the payment of money or anything of value to any foreign government official, government
staff member, political party or political candidate, or certain other persons, in order to obtain, retain or direct business, regulatory approvals or some other advantage in an improper manner. We can also be held liable for the acts of our
third-party agents under the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act 2010 and possibly other Anti-Corruption Laws. In the healthcare sector, anti-corruption risk can also arise in the context of improper interactions with doctors, key opinion leaders and other
healthcare professionals who work for state-affiliated hospitals, research institutions or other organizations.
Government Regulation Outside of the United States and the European Union
In addition to regulations in the United States and European Union, we may be subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things,
clinical studies and any commercial sales and distribution of their products. Whether or not we obtain FDA or EU approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the
commencement of clinical studies or marketing of the product in those countries. Certain countries outside of the United States and the European Union have a similar process that requires the submission of a clinical study application much like
the IND prior to the commencement of human clinical studies. The requirements and process governing the conduct of clinical studies, product licensing, coverage, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country. In all cases, the clinical
studies are conducted in accordance with GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.
C. |
Organizational structure.
|
The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure:
Immunocore Holdings Plc, Immunocore Limited and Immunocore Nominees Limited are incorporated in the United Kingdom. Immunocore LLC and Immunocore Commercial LLC are
incorporated in the United States. Immunocore Ireland Limited is incorporated in Ireland.
D. |
Property, plant and equipment.
|
Our corporate headquarters are located in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, where we currently lease facilities containing our research and development, laboratory and office
space, which consists of approximately 102,000 square feet. Our leases expire between 2037 and 2040, although there are points at which we may terminate the leases prior to the termination date under certain conditions. In addition, we lease
approximately 15,000 and 4,000 square feet of office space serving as our U.S. headquarters, in Conshocken, Pennsylvania, and Rockville, Maryland, respectively.
We also lease approximately 240 square feet of office space in Dublin, Ireland.
We anticipate leasing additional office and manufacturing space as we add employees and continue to grow as a commercial-stage organization. We believe that suitable
additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any such expansion of our operations.
Item 4A. |
Unresolved Staff Comments.
|
Not applicable.
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
|
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion is based on our financial information prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by
the IASB, which may differ in material respects from generally accepted accounting principles in other jurisdictions, including U.S. GAAP. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual
Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the section titled “Risk Factors” for a discussion of important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis, as well as the section titled “Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.”
We maintain our books and records in pounds sterling. For the convenience of the reader, we have translated pound sterling amounts as of and
for the period ended December 31, 2021 into U.S. dollars on
December 31, 2021, which was £1.00 to $1.3500. These translations should not be
considered representations that any such amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at that or any other exchange rate as of that or any other date.
We have historically conducted our business through Immunocore Limited, and therefore our historical consolidated financial statements previously
presented the consolidated results of operations of Immunocore Limited. Following the completion of our initial public offering in February 2021, our consolidated financial statements present the consolidated results of operations of Immunocore
Holdings plc.
For a discussion related to our financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations for 2019, and a comparison of results of
operations for 2020 compared to 2019, you should review Part I, Item 5 'Operating and Financial Review and Prospects', in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on March 25,
2021.
Overview
We are a commercial-stage biotechnology company pioneering the development of a novel class of TCR bispecific immunotherapies called ImmTAX – Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against
X disease – designed to treat a broad range of diseases, including cancer, infectious and autoimmune. Leveraging our proprietary, flexible, off-the-shelf ImmTAX platform, we are developing a deep
pipeline in multiple therapeutic areas, including five clinical stage programs in oncology and infectious disease, advanced pre-clinical programs in autoimmune disease and multiple earlier pre-clinical programs.
On January 26, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, approved KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic
uveal melanoma, or mUM. KIMMTRAK is the first TCR therapeutic to receive regulatory approval from the FDA, the first bispecific T cell engager to receive regulatory approval from the FDA to treat a solid tumor, and the first and only therapy for
the treatment of unresectable or mUM to be approved by the FDA.
We have three clinical stage programs within our ImmTAC (Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against Cancer) platform, including KIMMTRAK. Our clinical programs are
being conducted with patients with a broad range of cancers including melanoma, lung, gastric, head and neck and ovarian, among others. As of December 31, 2021, we have dosed over 700 cancer patients with our ImmTAX product candidates, which we
believe is the largest clinical data set of any bispecific in a solid tumor and any TCR therapeutic. Our other ImmTAX product candidates have the potential to address other tumor types with larger addressable patient populations and significant
unmet need, and we are studying the application of our ImmTAX platform to infectious diseases and autoimmune conditions.
Since our inception, we have focused on organizing and staffing our company, raising capital and performing research and development activities to advance our research,
development and technology. We have not yet generated revenue from any marketed products. We may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable product. Our ability to develop product revenue depends on the successful development and
regulatory approval of one or more of our product candidates and our ability to finance operations. Since inception, we have raised an aggregate of $1,135.1 million through private placements of our ordinary and preferred shares, debt financing,
payments from our collaboration partners, and most recently, borrowings under our debt facility with Oxford Finance Luxembourg S.A.R.L., or Oxford Finance, the sale of our Series C preferred shares, and the completion of our initial public
offering where we listed our ADSs on the Nasdaq Global Select Market in February 2021. These funds have and are being used to fund operations and invest in activities for technology creation, drug discovery and clinical development programs,
infrastructure, creation of portfolio of intellectual property and administrative support. We have assembled a team of over 250 employees. We have also established relationships with three pharmaceutical collaborators, Genentech, Inc., or
Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd, or GSK, and Eli Lilly and Company, or Lilly.
We
have incurred significant operating losses and expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the near future. Losses were £131.5 million, £74.1 million and £103.9 million, for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020
and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, our accumulated deficit was £481.4 million. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, as we advance our product candidates
through preclinical and clinical development and seek regulatory approvals, manufacture drug product and drug supply, maintain and expand our intellectual property portfolio, as well as hire additional personnel, pay for accounting, audit, legal,
regulatory and consulting services, and pay costs associated with maintaining compliance with Nasdaq listing rules and the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, director and officer liability insurance, investor and
public relations activities and other expenses associated with operating as a public company.
While we have received regulatory approval for KIMMTRAK in the United States, we have only recently commenced the sale of KIMMTRAK. Further, we do not expect to generate
revenue from the sale of our other product candidates unless and until we successfully complete clinical development of and obtain regulatory approval for such product candidates. As a result, we will need substantial additional funding to
support our continued operations and pursue our clinical development and growth strategy. Until we can generate sufficient revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private equity
offerings, debt financings, government funding arrangements, collaborations and marketing, distribution and licensing arrangements. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other arrangements on favorable terms, or at all. If
we fail to raise capital or enter into such arrangements as, and when, needed, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and commercialization of one or more of our programs.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if
we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and may be forced to reduce our
operations.
Recent Developments
Commercialization of KIMMTRAK
KIMMTRAK is manufactured at facilities located in Denmark and Germany. We are supporting the appropriate use of KIMMTRAK in the
United States through a well-equipped and fit-for-purpose commercial team that includes medical, sales, and value access team members. We utilize a hybrid model that includes in-house and contracted resources in the United States and Europe. To
support our commercial efforts, we have entered into an exclusive multi-regional agreement with Medison Pharma to help seek regulatory authorization and commercialize Immunocore’s KIMMTRAK in Canada, twenty markets across Central Eastern Europe
and Israel. After FDA approval in the United States on January 26, 2022, KIMMTRAK commercial supply was made available shortly after the approval for the treatment of patients with unresectable or mUM. KIMMTRAKConnect was launched within three
days of FDA approval with the goal to help ensure patients in the United States have access to KIMMTRAK, including financial assistance, personalized support and education, and site of care coordination for eligible patients.
On February 25, 2022, following an accelerated review and one month after the regulatory approval of KIMMTRAK by the FDA, KIMMTRAK
received a positive CHMP opinion for the treatment of unresectable or mUM. The CHMP positive opinion is one of the final steps before marketing
authorisation is granted by the European Commission, which has the authority to approve medicines for use throughout the European Union. Subject to regulatory approval from the European Commission, we anticipate launching KIMMTRAK in Europe
in the second quarter of 2022. We plan to pursue regulatory approval for the marketing authorization of KIMMTRAK in all 28-member states of the European Union.
The United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Health Canada, and the Australian Government Department of
Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) have each accepted the submission of the Company’s Marketing Authorisation Application.
COVID-19 Business Update
To date, the coronavirus 2019, or COVID-19, pandemic has resulted in periodic short-term delays in progressing our early-stage pipeline programs.
In addition, our current and planned clinical trials have been and may in the future be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including (i) patients becoming exposed to COVID-19
or having to interrupt treatment, (ii) delays in accessing patients during surges of COVID-19, which can adversely impact enrolment, ongoing treatment, dosing, and protocol-mandated assessments and other procedures (iii) delays or difficulties in
enrolling and retaining patients in our clinical trials, including patients that may not be able or willing to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services; (iv) delays or
difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical site investigators and clinical site staff; (v) diversion or prioritization of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials and
towards the COVID-19 pandemic, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials and, because as healthcare providers, may also have a heightened exposure to
COVID-19 and adversely impact our clinical trial operations; (vi) interruption of our future clinical supply chain or key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel imposed or recommended by
federal, state/provincial or municipal governments, employers and others; and (vii) limitations in employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our planned clinical trials, including because of sickness of employees or
their families or the desire of employees to avoid contact with large groups of people, which can impact enrollment, data entry, timely responses to queries, study timelines and operational milestones.
The COVID-19 pandemic remains a rapidly evolving situation and we will continue to closely monitor, assess and mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.
Our Key Collaboration Agreements
Genentech Collaboration
In June 2013, we entered into a research collaboration and license agreement, or the 2013 Genentech Agreement, with Genentech, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, or Roche,
pursuant to which we along with Genentech and Roche agreed to collaborate in the development, manufacture and ultimately, commercialization of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds. Under the 2013 Genentech Agreement, Genentech
paid us an initial upfront payment of $20 million in exchange for exclusive licenses to two of our targets, MAGE-A4 and as well as an undisclosed target. We refer to these two initial targets as the Negotiated Targets. For each of the Negotiated
Targets, we were responsible for developing a soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic pre-clinical candidate compound, and Genentech was responsible for all GMP manufacture, clinical development and commercialization of those compounds, upon which we
would be entitled to receive future milestone and royalty payments.
The first pre-clinical program nominated under the 2013 Genentech Agreement was target MAGE-A4, which we refer to as our IMC-C103C program.
In September 2016, following achievement of formal nomination of the pre-clinical candidate compound, we and Genentech amended the 2013 Genentech Agreement. We refer to this
amendment as the 2016 Genentech Amendment. The 2016 Genentech Amendment provided that the Negotiated Targets, including MAGE-A4, ceased to be considered eligible targets under the 2013 Genentech Agreement. On the same day, we entered into a
license agreement with Genentech, or the 2016 Genentech Agreement. Pursuant to the 2016 Genentech Agreement, we regained control of the initial two programs covering the Negotiated Targets in existence at the time of execution, including MAGE-A4,
and Genentech granted us an exclusive worldwide license to use its background intellectual property rights to advance such programs. Under the 2016 Genentech Agreement, we had sole responsibility for the development, manufacture and
commercialization of the soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds of the Negotiated Targets at our own expense, and are required to use diligent efforts to achieve commercialization of at least one therapeutic compound for each of the
programs. In exchange for the rights granted to us under the 2016 Genentech Agreement, Genentech would be able to earn future development and commercial milestones of up to approximately $167 million and tiered royalty payments between a
mid-single-digit and low-teens percentage on net sales of such compounds. Genentech also obtained a right of first negotiation in respect of the programs of the Negotiated Targets, should we seek to license the rights to develop and/or
commercialize either program to a third party. The 2016 Genentech Agreement is effective on a country-by-country basis, and shall expire on the later of (i) the expiration of the last to expire patent containing a valid claim which covers the
sale of the applicable soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds of the Negotiated Targets and (ii) the tenth anniversary of the date of the first commercial sale of such compounds. Either party is entitled to terminate the 2016 Genentech
Agreement for an uncured material breach of the other party upon 90 days’ written notice, or 30 days’ written notice, in the case of payment defaults, or immediately upon insolvency of the other party.
In November 2018, Genentech exercised its right of first negotiation with respect to our IMC-C103C program. We received an aggregate of $100 million from Genentech,
consisting of an initial upfront payment of $50 million and $50 million paid upon an IND filing for the first clinical trial of the product candidate compound, in exchange for granting Genentech rights to co-develop/co-promote our IMC-C103C
program. In November 2018, in response to Genentech’s exercise of its right of first negotiation in regards to our IMC-C103C program, we entered into a new license and collaboration agreement, or the 2018 Genentech Agreement, pursuant to which we
and Genentech agreed to collaborate in the development and commercialization of certain compounds targeting MAGE-A4, specifically pHLA-A2. Under the 2018 Genentech Agreement, we granted Genentech a co-exclusive worldwide license to our
intellectual property rights in MAGE-A4 soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds to advance the development and commercialization of such compounds as contemplated under the 2018 Genentech Agreement. We are responsible for
development of the IMC-C103C program through the completion of the Phase 1 clinical trial, with costs being shared equally with Genentech, and are required to use diligent efforts with respect to our development and commercialization obligations.
For more information, please see “Item 4B. Business overview—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—Genentech Collaboration.”
GSK Collaboration
In June 2013, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement, or the GSK Agreement, with GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd, or GSK, pursuant to
which we and GSK agreed to collaborate in the development of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds.
Under the GSK Agreement, we received an upfront payment upon execution and one additional payment in connection with GSK’s nomination of the second collaboration target. As
of December 31, 2021 we had received payments totaling £22.9 million in upfront payments and early development milestones. For more information, please see “Item 4.B Business
overview—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—GSK Collaboration.”
Under the GSK Agreement, we granted GSK the right to nominate up to four targets as being exclusive to GSK under our collaboration. The first target, GSK01/NY-ESO, was
nominated at the time of execution of the GSK Agreement. Following a portfolio review, we, in collaboration with GSK, jointly elected not to proceed further with the first target. Consequently, GSK relinquished its option to acquire an exclusive
license to the NY-ESO program and we retained ownership of the asset.
A second target was nominated in July 2017. Following a portfolio review in 2021, we, in collaboration with GSK, elected not to proceed further with this second target.
Under the terms of the GSK Agreement, GSK does not have an option to nominate any further targets, and the GSK Agreement was subsequently terminated in January 2022. No further payments or revenue are expected from the GSK Agreement as a result.
Lilly Collaboration
In July 2014, we entered into a development and license agreement with Lilly, referred to, as subsequently amended, as the Lilly Collaboration, pursuant to which we and Lilly
agreed to collaborate in the development, manufacture and commercialization of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds.
Under the Lilly Collaboration, Lilly paid us an initial upfront fee payment of $45 million in exchange for options to three targets. Lilly no longer has the ability to
nominate any further targets under the initial agreement with Lilly. In December 2016, we and Lilly agreed to swap an existing antigen target, selected by Lilly, for a new, well-known neo-antigen target. Lilly has no further obligations with
respect to the initial target that was replaced. In September 2017, we and Lilly agreed to swap a second antigen target, selected by Lilly, for a second neo-antigen target. Similarly, Lilly has no further obligations with respect to the initial
target that was replaced. From the designation of each selected target until the expiration or termination of any exclusive license Lilly may obtain by exercising its option rights, we are prohibited from directly or indirectly conducting any
development or commercialization activities relating to such target selected under the Lilly Collaboration or epitopes derived from such target or any compounds directed to such target, other than as provided under the Lilly Collaboration. For
more information, please see “Item 4B. Business overview—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—Lilly Collaboration.”
Components of Results of Operations
Revenue
To date, we have generated revenue primarily from our collaboration agreements. In 2021, we made sales of tebentafusp for the
treatment of mUM under a compassionate use program in France. In 2022, following FDA approval in January 2022, we will sell KIMMTRAK for the treatment of mUM in the United States.
Collaboration Revenue
Collaboration revenue is primarily derived from our collaboration agreements with Genentech, GSK and Lilly, and previously pursuant to our collaboration agreement with
MedImmune plc (now known as AstraZeneca plc), or MedImmune, which terminated during 2019. Our revenue from collaboration agreements consists of non-refundable upfront payments, development milestones as well as reimbursement of research and
development expenses. To the extent that existing or potential future collaborations generate revenue, such revenue may vary due to many uncertainties in the development of our product candidates and other factors.
As of December 31, 2021, we have received a total of $216.8 million in collaboration revenue consisting of upfront
and milestone payments, intended to fund the research and development activities under each contract. As part of the agreements, we contribute our ImmTAC technology and commit to participate in joint research activities. In addition, we agree to
license or option certain target rights and the possible product candidates developed under the collaboration. The agreements provide for future payments if development, regulatory or sales milestones are achieved. In addition, we are entitled to
future royalties. The uncertainty of achieving these certain milestones significantly impacts our ability to project collaboration revenue.
Upfront payments and development milestones are initially recorded on our statement of financial position as deferred revenue and are subsequently recognized as revenue as
the underlying programs progress through research and development using an estimate of the percentage completion of each program in accordance with our revenue recognition policy as described further in “Critical Accounting Estimates” and the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Pre-Product Revenue
Pre-product revenue relates to the sale of tebentafusp under a compassionate use program in France. We did not generate any revenue from the sale of marketed pharmaceutical products prior to
December 31, 2021.
Product Revenue
We will recognize product revenue in the year ended December 31, 2022 following approval from the FDA for KIMMTRAK for the treatment of mUM on January 26, 2022. We began selling KIMMTRAK in the United States
in February 2022. If tebentafusp receives marketing approval to be sold in Europe, following the receipt of a positive CHMP opinion in February 2022, we will also recognize product revenue for sales in Europe in the
year ended December 31, 2022.
Operating Expenses
Costs of Product Revenue
We will recognize costs of product revenue in the year ended December 31, 2022 following regulatory approval of KIMMTRAK in the United States in January 2022.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for current or planned investigations undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or
technical knowledge and understanding and consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries and share-based compensation expense, for the various research and development departments, costs associated with clinical trial activities
undertaken by contract research organizations, or CROs, and external manufacturing costs undertaken by contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, research and development laboratory consumables, internal clinical trial expenses, costs
associated with maintaining laboratory equipment, and pre-launch inventory provision costs. All research and development expenses are expensed as incurred due to scientific uncertainty. Research and development expenses incurred with external
organizations typically relate to clinical programs and are assigned to the individual programs, however for pre-clinical programs and other research spend incurred externally, such spend is typically not assigned to individual programs. Internal
research and development expenses typically relate to personnel-related costs and research and development laboratory consumables and due to the cross functional expertise of our people it is not possible to provide a breakdown of internal costs
by program.
We expect our research and development expenses to remain significant in the future as we advance existing and future product candidates into and through clinical studies and
pursue regulatory approval. The process of conducting the necessary clinical studies to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time-consuming. We maintain our headcount at a level required to support our continued research activities and
development of our product candidates. Clinical trials generally become larger and more costly to conduct as they advance into later stages. We cannot determine with certainty the timing of initiation, the duration or the completion costs of
current or future preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates due to the inherently unpredictable nature of preclinical and clinical development. Clinical and preclinical development timelines, the probability of success and
development costs can differ materially from expectations. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the development of any product candidates that
we develop from our programs. As a result, our research and development expenses may vary substantially from period to period based on the timing of our research and development activities. Several of our research and development programs are at
an early stage. We must demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans through extensive clinical testing. We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the testing process that could delay or
prevent commercialization of our products, including but not limited to the following:
|
• |
after reviewing trial results, our collaboration partners may abandon projects that might previously have been believed to be promising;
|
|
• |
we, our collaboration partners, or regulators may suspend or terminate clinical trials if the participating subjects or patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;
|
|
• |
our potential products may not have the desired effects or may include undesirable side effects or other characteristics that preclude regulatory approval or limit their commercial use if approved;
|
|
• |
manufacturers may not meet the necessary standards for the production of the product candidates or may not be able to supply the product candidates in a sufficient quantity;
|
|
• |
regulatory authorities may find that our clinical trial design or conduct does not meet the applicable approval requirements; and
|
|
• |
safety and efficacy results in various human clinical trials reported in scientific and medical literature may not be indicative of results we obtain in our clinical trials.
|
Any changes in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of our product candidates in preclinical and clinical development could mean a
significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of these product candidates. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. We may obtain unexpected results from our clinical
trials. We may elect to discontinue, delay or modify clinical trials of some product candidates or focus on other product candidates. For example, if the FDA, EMA or another regulatory authority were to delay our planned start of clinical trials
or require us to conduct clinical trials or other testing beyond those that we currently expect or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our planned clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional
financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development of that product candidate.
Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries and share-based compensation expense, for corporate and other administrative and
operational functions including finance, legal, human resources, pre-commercial expenses and information technology, as well as facility-related costs. These costs relate to the operation of the business, unrelated to the research and development
function or any individual program.
Due to our substantial increase in planned research and development expenses, as explained above, we also expect that our administrative expenses will increase. We expect
that we will continue to incur increased accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, compliance, director, and officer insurance costs as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with being a public company. We anticipate that the
additional costs for these services will substantially increase our administrative expenses. Additionally, we have seen an increase in expenses as a result of our preparation for the U.S. commercial launch of KIMMTRAK and our transition to a
commercial-stage company, and expect further costs as we look to launch in other countries.
Net Other Operating (Loss) / Income
Net other operating (loss) / income and consist primarily of profit on derecognition of leases, loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and sublease income.
Finance Income
Finance income arises primarily from interest income on cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits and gains on entering into sub-lease arrangements on leasehold
properties and gains arising on changes in the fair value of a derivative liability.
Finance Costs
Finance costs consist of the movement in fair value of an embedded derivative asset and derivative liability and interest expenses related to financial liabilities and lease
liabilities.
Income Tax Credit
Our income tax balance largely comprises research and development tax credits. Research and development credits are obtained at a maximum rate of 33.35% of our qualifying
research and development expenses.
We are subject to corporate taxation in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries, Immunocore LLC and Immunocore Commercial LLC, are subject to
corporate taxation in the United States. Due to the nature of our business, we have generated losses since inception. Our income tax credit recognized represents the sum of the research and development tax credits recoverable in the United
Kingdom and income tax payable in the United States.
As a company that carries out extensive research and development activities, we benefit from the U.K. research and development tax regime. As a Small and Medium-sized
Enterprise, or SME, we are able to surrender some of our losses for a cash rebate of up to 33.35% of expenditures related to eligible research and development projects. Qualifying expenditures largely comprise clinical trial and manufacturing
costs, employment costs for relevant staff and consumables incurred as part of research and development projects. Certain subcontracted qualifying research and development expenditures are eligible for a cash rebate of up to 21.68%. A large
portion of costs relating to our research and development, clinical trials and manufacturing activities are eligible for inclusion within these tax credit cash rebate claims.
We may not be able to continue to claim research and development tax credits, under the SME Program in the future, if we cease to qualify as an SME, based on size criteria
concerning employee headcount, turnover and gross assets. Where we cease to qualify as an SME and whilst we continue to generate losses and do not pay any U.K. corporation tax, we may be able to generate a cash rebate under the large company
scheme, or RDEC Program. The cash rebate under the RDEC Program is up to 10.53% of such qualifying research and development expenditures.
Un-surrendered tax losses are carried forward to be offset against future taxable profits. After accounting for tax credits receivable, there were accumulated tax losses for
carry forward in the United Kingdom of £232.4 million as of December 31, 2021. No deferred tax asset is recognized in respect of accumulated tax losses in the United Kingdom because
future profits are not sufficiently certain. A deferred tax asset is recognized in respect of the unused tax credits for the subsidiary in the United States.
In future, we may benefit from the U.K.’s “patent box” regime, which allows profits attributable to revenues from patents or patented products to be taxed at a lower rate
than other revenue. The rate of tax for relevant streams of revenue for companies receiving this relief will be 10%.
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
The following table summarizes our consolidated statement of loss for each period presented:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
$
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
35,802
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
|
|
30,114
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(98,855
|
)
|
|
|
(73,226
|
)
|
|
|
(74,809
|
)
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
(119,339
|
)
|
|
|
(88,399
|
)
|
|
|
(45,740
|
)
|
Net other operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
4,242
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(182,469
|
)
|
|
|
(135,162
|
)
|
|
|
(86,193
|
)
|
Finance income
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
(7,848
|
)
|
|
|
(5,813
|
)
|
|
|
(3,375
|
)
|
Non-operating expense
|
|
|
(7,785
|
)
|
|
|
(5,766
|
)
|
|
|
(1,167
|
)
|
Loss before taxes
|
|
|
(190,254
|
)
|
|
|
(140,928
|
)
|
|
|
(87,360
|
)
|
Income tax credit
|
|
|
12,697
|
|
|
|
9,405
|
|
|
|
13,267
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
(177,557
|
)
|
|
|
(131,523
|
)
|
|
|
(74,093
|
)
|
Revenue
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
$
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSK
|
|
|
8,212
|
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
6,356
|
|
Eli Lilly
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
Genentech
|
|
|
23,526
|
|
|
|
17,427
|
|
|
|
20,236
|
|
Total collaboration revenue
|
|
|
31,738
|
|
|
|
23,510
|
|
|
|
30,114
|
|
Pre-product revenue
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
35,802
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
|
|
30,114
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
2021, collaboration revenue decreased to £23.5 million from £30.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily driven by the Lilly Collaboration, for which no revenue has been recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2021 while a portfolio review was undertaken of the two ongoing programs. In addition, revenue under the Genentech
collaboration decreased by £2.8 million due to a reduction in reimbursable costs incurred under the respective cost sharing arrangements.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we also elected with GSK not to progress the remaining programs under the GSK Agreement, and
recognized in full the balance of deferred revenue, representing the final revenue expected from GSK pursuant to the GSK Agreement. The GSK agreement was subsequently terminated in January 2022.
The decrease in collaboration revenue was partially offset by pre-product revenue relating to the sale of tebentafusp under a compassionate use program in France during the year ended December 31, 2021, which
provides patients with access to tebentafusp prior to receipt of regulatory marketing approval. Pre-product revenue is recognized net and includes deductions for both an estimate of government rebates payable and an estimate of returns in the
case of expiry, damage or other instances.
Research and Development Expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
$
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
External research and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tebentafusp
|
|
|
33,724
|
|
|
|
24,981
|
|
|
|
31,373
|
|
IMC-F106C (PRAME)
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
IMC-C103C (MAGE-A4)
|
|
|
6,376
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
|
|
4,519
|
|
IMC-I109V (HBV)
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
10,323
|
|
|
|
7,647
|
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
Research expenses
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
Total external research and development expenses
|
|
|
60,141
|
|
|
|
44,549
|
|
|
|
49,287
|
|
Internal research and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount related expenses
|
|
|
30,610
|
|
|
|
22,674
|
|
|
|
19,539
|
|
Laboratory consumables
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
4,129
|
|
|
|
4,331
|
|
Laboratory equipment expenses
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
Other
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Total internal research and development expenses
|
|
|
38,714
|
|
|
|
28,677
|
|
|
|
25,522
|
|
Total research and development expenses
|
|
|
98,855
|
|
|
|
73,226
|
|
|
|
74,809
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2021, our research and development expenses were £73.2 million, as compared to £74.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2020. This decrease of £1.6 million was attributable to a decrease in external research and development expenses of £4.7 million, partially offset by an increase in internal research and development expenses of £3.2 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, our external research and development expenses decreased by £4.7 million. This was driven by a reduction in spend of £6.4 million incurred for our
tebentafusp program due to a reduction in clinical trial activity as we instead focused on plans for anticipated regulatory approval in the United States and preparations for commercial launch in the United States as well as plans to pursue
regulatory approval in Europe. In addition, there was a decrease of £1.6 million of costs incurred in connection with activity on our IMC-I109V program due to both clinical study initiation costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020,
and a reduction in clinical trial activity in the current period partly due to the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and completion of manufacturing work earlier in the year ended December 31, 2021. These decreases were partially offset by
an increase of £2.7 million in expenses incurred for our IMC-F106C program due to a higher level of clinical trial activity.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, our internal research and development expenses increased by £3.2 million. This was primarily due to an increase of £3.1 million in headcount related expenses
comprising £3.9 million of share-based payment charge partially offset by a decrease of £0.8 million in other employee-related costs.
We expect our research and development expenses to increase in future periods as we advance our trials and further develop our clinical and preclinical pipeline.
Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2021, administrative expenses were £88.4 million, compared to £45.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of £42.7 million. The administrative
expenses for year ended December 31, 2021, of £88.4 million, comprised the following:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Administrative expenses:
|
|
$
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
Share-based payment charge
|
|
|
43,120
|
|
|
|
31,941
|
|
|
|
8,162
|
|
Other employee related expenses
|
|
|
19,061
|
|
|
|
14,119
|
|
|
|
14,935
|
|
Pre-commercial costs
|
|
|
25,831
|
|
|
|
19,134
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
Depreciation expenses
|
|
|
9,466
|
|
|
|
7,012
|
|
|
|
9,007
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
12,485
|
|
|
|
9,248
|
|
|
|
7,959
|
|
Foreign exchange gains
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Total administrative expenses
|
|
|
119,339
|
|
|
|
88,399
|
|
|
|
45,740
|
|
Administrative expenses increased by £42.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to an increase in the share-based payment charge of £23.8 million to
£31.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase was a result of the options granted in 2021 in connection with our IPO. In addition, in the year ended December 31, 2021, there was pre-commercial expenditure related to
tebentafusp of £19.1 million, an increase of £17.4 million, reflecting preparations undertaken and costs incurred in 2021 ahead of our commercial launch. In the year ended December 31, 2021, there were also legal and professional fees of £7.4
million, an increase of £3.5 million from the prior year, primarily attributable to the IPO and additional costs incurred as a result of becoming a public company. Other costs increased by £1.3 million, reflecting higher IT and other corporate
costs in the year ended December 31, 2021.
These increases were partially offset by a reduction in depreciation of property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets of £2.0 million. The depreciation expense
reduced in the year ended December 31, 2021, following the termination of two leasehold property agreements during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Disregarding the impact of the non-cash share payment charge, we expect our administrative expenses to increase in future periods as we expand our commercial and corporate
operations.
Net Other Operating (Loss) / Income
For the year ended December 31, 2021, net other operating loss totaled £0.1 million, compared to net other operating income of £4.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2020. The movement of £4.3 million reflects the termination of two leasehold properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, giving rise to a profit on disposal of £3.7 million (which included £1.4 million received as an incentive for exiting
one of the leasehold agreements). A further £0.8 million of other operating income arose in the year ended December 31, 2020, from the settlement agreement reached with a former employee and third-party vendors. Sub-lease income also decreased by
£0.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, and there was a reduction in the loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment of £0.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Finance Income
For the year ended December 31, 2021, finance income was £47,000 compared to £2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This decrease of £2.2 million reflects the
movement in fair value of the derivative liability for £1.3 million, a foreign exchange call option over certain series B preferred shares which was settled in full on March 2, 2020. In addition, there was a decrease of £0.6 million in bank and
other interest receivable in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Finance Costs
For the year ended December 31, 2021, finance costs amounted to £5.8 million, compared to £3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase of £2.4
million is primarily due to an increase in interest expenses on financial liabilities measured at amortized cost of £3.4 million reflecting our loan from Oxford Finance of $50 million which was drawn down on November 6, 2020, including £0.5
million relating to a fee arising on completion of the IPO, that was paid to Oxford Finance in the year ended December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, there were interest expenses on financial liabilities of £0.2 million
reflecting our outstanding loan from the Gates Foundation, which converted into series B preferred shares on March 2, 2020. This increase is partially offset by a £0.5 million decrease in interest on lease liabilities reflecting the termination
of two leasehold properties in the year ended December 31, 2020, and a £0.3 million decrease in the loss from a change in the fair value of the embedded derivative asset also following the conversion of our outstanding loan from the Gates
Foundation.
Income Tax Credit
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the income tax credit amounted to £9.4 million compared to £13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This
decrease of £3.9 million relates to reduction in the proportion of operating and research and development costs in the period that are eligible for the U.K. R&D tax credit regime (such as the non-cash share-based payment charge
and pre-commercial expenses incurred in the period).
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements besides a contingent liability in relation to a leasehold property under which we are obligated to take on the lease should the
property become vacant at a specified date in the future. We have assessed this contingent event as at December 31, 2021 and have classified this as a contingent liability totaling £1.1
million. Further details of our lease commitments and liabilities can be found in Notes 12 and 22 to the Consolidated financial statements.
B. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
Sources of Liquidity
Up to December 31, 2021, while we had recorded pre-product revenue for sales of tebentafusp under a compassionate use program
in France, we had not recorded product revenues from the sales of any marketed pharmaceutical products. For periods up to and including the year ended December 31, 2021, we have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from our operations since our inception. In January 2022, the FDA approved KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn) for the treatment of patients with
unresectable or mUM.
We expect to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue to
commercialize KIMMTRAK, continue research and development and the advancement of our product candidates through preclinical and clinical development, and seek regulatory approval and pursue commercialization of any approved product candidates.
We expect that our research and development and general and administrative costs will increase in connection with our planned clinical and commercial activities. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending
on numerous factors, including the progress of our development programs, the status of, and results from, clinical trials, the potential need to conduct additional clinical trials to obtain approval of our product candidates for all intended
indications, the timing and outcome of regulatory filings and actions, commercialization of approved products, as well as any technology acquisitions or additional collaborations into which we may enter with third parties for our product
candidates and any unforeseen cash needs. As a result, we will need additional capital to fund our operations until such time as we can generate sufficient revenue from product sales.
We have funded our operations to date primarily with proceeds from sales of equity securities, debt financing and collaboration agreements. Through December 31, 2021, we
have raised an aggregate of $1,135.1 million through private placements of our ordinary and preferred shares, payments from our collaboration partners, debt financing and most recently, the completion of our IPO where we listed our ADSs on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market and raised gross proceeds of $297.1 million. In addition to the ADSs sold in the IPO, we completed the concurrent sale of an additional 576,923 ADSs at the IPO price of $26.00 per ADS, for gross proceeds of
approximately $15.0 million, in a private placement to the Gates Foundation.
As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, we had cash and
cash equivalents of £237.9 million and £129.7 million, respectively.
Other than our Loan Agreement with Oxford Finance described below, we currently have no ongoing material financing commitments, such as lines of credit or guarantees, that
are expected to affect our liquidity, other than our lease obligations and supplier purchase commitments described below.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes the primary sources and uses of cash for each period presented:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
$
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
|
|
175,117
|
|
|
|
129,716
|
|
|
|
73,966
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities
|
|
|
(129,749
|
)
|
|
|
(96,110
|
)
|
|
|
(61,250
|
)
|
Net cash flows from / (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
276,252
|
|
|
|
204,631
|
|
|
|
115,941
|
|
Net foreign exchange difference on cash held
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
|
|
|
321,147
|
|
|
|
237,886
|
|
|
|
129,716
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities increased to £96.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, from £61.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase of £34.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, is primarily due to a £40.3 million net income tax credit received
during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to £12.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2021. Tax credits received in 2020 related to both 2018 and 2019. Excluding the non-cash increase of £27.7 million in the share-based payment
charge, operating losses were £21.3 million higher in the year ended December 31, 2021. In addition, working capital movements in the year ended December 31, 2021 were £11.9 million more favourable when compared to the year ended December 31,
2020. This was largely as a result of an increase in trade and other payables of £9.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to a decrease of £3.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. This payables increase was partially
offset by an increase in trade receivables of £5.1 million compared to an increase of £0.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. Trade receivables increased largely as a result of amounts billed under a compassionate use program in France,
which we received in January 2022.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was £0.4 million compared to net
cash generated from investing activities of £1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The change was primarily related to a decrease in capital expenditure on property, plant
and equipment of £2.1 million offset by a £1.0 million lease capital contribution and a £0.2 million increase in sub-lease proceeds.
Financing Activities
Net cash from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2021, was £204.6 million primarily
reflecting the net proceeds we received of £211.0 million from the IPO which closed in February 2021. These inflows were partially offset by £7.3 million of lease payments and interest payments related to our debt facility with Oxford Finance. We
also received £1.0 million from the exercise of share options in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Net cash from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2020, was £115.9 million. This resulted from funding of £37.5 million from the Oxford Finance facility
in November 2020 and £83.0 million from the second and final closing of the series B preferred share financing in March 2020 and series C preferred share financing in December 2020 This was partially offset by the repayment of lease liabilities
of £4.4 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses due to our substantial research and development expenses. We have an accumulated deficit of £481.4 million as of
December 31, 2021. We expect to continue to incur significant losses in the foreseeable future and expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly
as we commercialize KIMMTRAK and continue research and development and clinical activities for our product candidates. In addition, due to our initial public offering in February 2021, we have and expect to continue to incur additional costs
associated with operating as a public company. Our expenses will also increase if, and as, we:
|
• |
pursue further approval and commercialization of tebentafusp outside the United States.;
|
|
• |
continue to advance the development of our clinical trials and pre-clinical programs;
|
|
• |
continue to invest in our soluble TCR platforms to conduct research to identify novel technologies;
|
|
• |
change or add additional suppliers;
|
|
• |
add additional infrastructure to our quality control, quality assurance, legal, compliance and other groups to support our operations as we progress product candidates toward commercialization;
|
|
• |
seek to attract and retain skilled personnel;
|
|
• |
create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company listed in the United States and our product development and planned future commercialization efforts;
|
|
• |
seek marketing approvals and reimbursement for our other product candidates;
|
|
• |
further develop a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to further commercialize any products for which we may obtain marketing approval;
|
|
• |
seek to identify and validate additional product candidates;
|
|
• |
acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies;
|
|
• |
maintain, protect, defend, enforce and expand our intellectual property portfolio; and
|
|
• |
experience any delays, interruptions or encounter issues with any of the above, including any delays or other impacts as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
Lease and manufacturing obligations
As part of our ongoing operations, we have material contractual lease obligations over expected lease terms of several years and expiry dates extending to 2040 under our
largest leases in the United Kingdom. These obligations and potential obligations could result in payments of up to £44.9 million. The majority of such payments represent longer-term commitments as outlined in Note 12 to our consolidated
financial statements. The lease agreements are cancellable at certain break-points prior to expiry. We expect to continue to incur expenses for such leases for the foreseeable future. If the company continues to grow, launches further products or
expands its operations in other countries, we may determine that it is necessary to enter into further lease agreements, which would further increase our cash outflows.
We have a number of existing manufacturing obligations, primarily related to the manufacture of KIMMTRAK in the United States following FDA approval in January 2022. We also
anticipate tebentafusp will receive marketing approval to be sold in Europe, based upon the receipt of a positive CHMP opinion in February 2022. While we have already incurred costs in preparation for commercial launches in the United States and
beyond, additional manufacturing obligations may arise in future in relation to product sales in these territories. We have also entered into third-party agreements relating to marketing and distribution. The majority of such obligations have
standard payment terms, and our level of non-cancellable commitments with such parties is not considered material. To meet demand, we may amend or enter into further agreements with CMOs or other parties which could cause our cash requirements to
increase. While receipts from the sale of products may fund our ongoing manufacturing and sales efforts, there can be no assurance that we will earn such revenues. In the longer term, if we received regulatory approval for our other product
candidates, we would expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution, depending on where we choose to commercialize. We may also require additional capital to pursue
in-licenses or acquisitions of other product candidates.
Financing obligations and capital requirements
From a financing perspective, we are required to make interest payments, and, from 2023 onward, repayments of principal borrowings under our facility with Oxford Finance,
until at least 2025. The loan liability at December 31, 2021, was £37.2 million, and further details are provided in Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements. We have the option to draw down a further $25 million under our facility with
Oxford Finance. We may also have the option to draw down an additional $25 million; however, this is contingent on future events. If we determine that further borrowing is required, we could enter into new or amended agreements.
Since inception, we have raised an aggregate of $1,135.1 million through private placements of our ordinary and preferred shares, payments from our collaboration partners,
debt financing and most recently, the completion of our IPO where we listed our ADSs on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and raised gross proceeds of $297.1 million. Our net cash used in operations for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and
2019 was £96.1 million, £61.3 million and £102.9 million, respectively. In order to maintain such levels of expenditure and our anticipated expenditure, we expect to raise further funds by exploring debt or equity financing, or potentially
further collaborations, in the future. The amount we are able to raise from these options can vary with market conditions, and our longer term strategy as a company is dependent on our ability to successfully raise such funding. Moreover, we have
based our estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.
Under the terms of our agreement with the Gates Foundation, we are required to develop, manufacture and commercialize soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates
targeted to mutually agreed neglected diseases, currently HIV, with the potential to treat people at an affordable price in developing countries. In the event of certain defaults by us under the agreement, the Gates Foundation has the right to
sell, or require us to buy-back, any of the shareholdings in the Group held by the Gates Foundation. In such an event, if within 12 months after such redemption or sale, we experience a change in control at a valuation of more than 150% of the
valuation used for the redemption or the sale of the shares, we have agreed to pay the Gates Foundation compensation equal to the excess of what it would have received in such transaction if it still held its shares at the time of such change
of control over what it received in the sale or redemption of its shares.
Further obligations and commitments
Further obligations or commitments in the near term relate to our capital expenditure requirements for the purpose of improving our leased facilities. If we continue to grow,
such commitments may become significant in value.
In addition to the above obligations, commitments and potential future cash outflows, we enter into a variety of agreements and financial commitments in the normal course of
business. The terms generally provide us the option to cancel, reschedule and adjust our requirements based on our business needs, prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services. However, it is not possible to predict the amount of
future payments under these agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.
Our cash and working capital expectations
We held cash and cash equivalents of £237.9 million as at December 31, 2021. Having considered downside scenarios incorporating the impact of a delay or failure in successfully commercializing KIMMTRAK in the United States and in receiving regulatory
approval for tebentafusp outside the United States, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents is sufficient to enable us to fund our planned operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements until at least the third quarter
of 2023. With the inclusion of expected revenue for KIMMTRAK in the United States and pre-product revenue for sales of KIMMTRAK pursuant to the compassionate use program in France, we believe that we will have sufficient funds to continue to
meet our liabilities as they fall due into 2024. This estimation of funding requirements includes a rigorous assessment of the forecasts and identified reasonable risks and mitigating actions referred to elsewhere in the Annual Report,
including the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We have based this estimation of capital requirements on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In
addition, while we have received approval from the FDA for the sale of KIMMTRAK in the United States for the treatment of mUM, our efforts to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK could materially differ to our estimates, and it is possible that
we may not successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK in the United States or expand as planned to other jurisidictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development and commercialization of pharmaceutical product candidates, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of
our working capital requirements. Our future funding requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a result of many factors, including:
|
• |
the progress, timing, scope and costs of our clinical trials, including the ability to timely initiate clinical sites, enroll subjects and manufacture soluble bispecific TCR product candidates for our
ongoing, planned and potential future clinical trials;
|
|
• |
the time and costs required to perform research and development to identify and characterize new product candidates from our research programs;
|
|
• |
the time and cost necessary to obtain regulatory authorizations and approvals that may be required by regulatory authorities to execute clinical trials or commercialize our products;
|
|
• |
our ability to successfully commercialize KIMMTRAK in the U.S. and to obtain approval for the product outside the U.S.
|
|
• |
our ability to successfully commercialize our other product candidates;
|
|
• |
our ability to have clinical and commercial products successfully manufactured consistent with FDA, EMA and other authorities’ regulations;
|
|
• |
the amount of sales and other revenues from product candidates that we may commercialize, if any, including the selling prices for such potential products and the availability of adequate third-party
coverage and reimbursement for patients;
|
|
• |
the sales and marketing costs associated with commercializing our products, if approved, including the cost and timing of building our marketing and sales capabilities;
|
|
• |
the cost of building, staffing and validating our manufacturing processes, which may include capital expenditure;
|
|
• |
the terms and timing of any revenue from our existing collaborations;
|
|
• |
the costs of operating as a public company;
|
|
• |
the time and cost necessary to respond to technological, regulatory, political and market developments;
|
|
• |
the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
|
|
• |
the costs, associated with, and terms and timing of, any future any potential acquisitions, strategic collaborations, licensing agreements or other arrangements that we may establish; and
|
|
• |
the inability of clinical sites to enroll patients as healthcare capacities are required to cope with natural disasters, epidemics or other health system emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
A change in the outcome of any of these or other variables with respect to the development of any of our current and future product candidates could significantly change the
costs and timing associated with the development and commercialization of that product candidate. Furthermore, our operating plans may change in the future, and we may need additional funds to meet operational needs and capital requirements
associated with such operating plans.
Until we can generate sufficient product and royalty revenue to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we expect to finance our future cash needs through a
combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements and other marketing or distribution arrangements as well as grant funding. If we raise additional capital through
marketing and distribution arrangements or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish certain valuable rights to our product candidates, technologies, future revenue streams
or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings, the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely
affect our shareholders’ rights. Further, to the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, our shareholders’ ownership interest will be diluted. If we
raise additional capital through debt financing, it would be subject to fixed payment obligations and may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital
expenditures or declaring dividends. If we are unable to obtain additional funding on favorable terms when needed, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or terminate one or more of our research and development programs or clinical trials.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In the summer and fall of 2020, we conducted an internal investigation as a result of receiving a whistle blower complaint alleging employee misconduct and other improper
activities related to a kick-back scheme involving an employee and two third-party vendors between 2018 and 2020. Our audit committee led the investigation utilizing outside counsel, during which the named employee resigned. After the
investigation, we terminated the one remaining open contract with the third-party vendors and issued proceedings in October 2020 against the involved parties. We recovered our estimated losses of £1.8 million from the employee and third-party
vendors in December 2020. In the course of auditing our 2019 financial statements for our initial public offering, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to our procurement processes and
application of delegation of authority approval limits due to insufficient risk assessment procedures. Since then, we enhanced our overall control environment, including adding finance and accounting personnel to drive and implement required
additional processes and procurement controls, implementing improvements in software relating to approvals of purchase orders and contracts, adding additional layers of review of contracts and journal entries and delegation of contract authority
limits. We also further developed and documented our accounting policies and financial reporting procedures, including ongoing executive management review and audit committee oversight. We remediated the material weakness as of December 31, 2020.
However, we cannot assure you that these measures will be sufficient to prevent future material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial
reporting from occurring. See “Item 3.D Risk Factors—We previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and may identify material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain proper and
effective internal controls, which may impair our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or prevent fraud. If we are unable to establish and maintain effective internal controls, shareholders could lose confidence in our
financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our ADSs.”
JOBS Act
On April 5, 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act, was enacted. The JOBS Act provides that, among other things, an emerging growth company can take
advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As an emerging growth company, we have irrevocably elected not to take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the JOBS Act for
implementation of new or revised accounting standards and, as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth public companies.
In addition, we intend to rely on the other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act,
we are entitled to rely on certain exemptions as an “emerging growth company,” we are not required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section
404(b), (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis), and (iv)
disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the chief executive officer’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will
apply for a period of five years following the completion of our initial public offering, or December 2026, or until we no longer meet the requirements of being an emerging growth company, whichever is earlier.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
For information on the standards applied for the first time as of January 1, 2021 and 2020, please refer to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2021 elsewhere in this Annual Report.
C. |
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
|
For a discussion of our research and development activities, see “Item 4.B — Business Overview” and “Item 5.A — Operating Results.”
For a discussion of trends, see “Item 4.B — Business Overview,” “Item 5.A — Operating Results” and “Item 5.B — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
E. |
Critical Accounting Estimates
|
Our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires us to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the value of assets and liabilities—as well as contingent assets and liabilities—as reported on the statement of
financial position date, and revenues and expenses arising during the fiscal year.
The estimates and associated assumptions are based on information available when the consolidated financial statements are prepared, historical experience and various other
factors which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Existing
circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising that are beyond the Group’s control. Hence, estimates may vary from the actual values.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if
the revision affects only that period or the period of revision and future periods if this revision affects both current and future periods.
Percentage of completion for performance obligations satisfied over time
Revenue arising on performance obligations satisfied over time are recognized by estimating the percentage of completion which takes into consideration the estimated timelines required to
satisfy these obligations and the time since program nomination. The timeline for a project is determined using historical data from previous arrangements and through discussions about each project’s plan and progress with project teams and joint
steering committees. The measure of progress is therefore based on judgmental assumptions, which could be subject to adjustment in future periods. The Group believes these assumptions to be materially appropriate and to faithfully depict the
level of progress for each project; however, assumptions concerning estimated tasks and timelines can change and it is possible that other factors may arise which cause estimates in future periods to significantly differ to both current and
previous estimates.
Deferred revenue, relating to performance obligations satisfied over time, is £30.9 million as at December 31, 2021. If the
assessed life of the project was underestimated by six months, equating to approximately 10% of the weighted average life of projects under collaboration, the deferred revenue would have been £5.3 million higher (and the cumulative revenue
recognized correspondingly lower).
Valuation of share options
We operate equity-settled, share-based payment plans whereby certain of our employees and directors are granted awards over the shares in our company. The grant date fair
value of awards granted under these plans is calculated using the Black Scholes valuation model for awards following our IPO, which closed on February 9, 2021. From this point, the Company’s share price has been publicly available as an input to
the Black Scholes model. For awards prior to our IPO, both the Black Scholes and the Back Solve valuations models were used.
The valuations models used require the input of subjective assumptions, including judgements about the expected life of share-based awards and share price volatility, which
are used to determine the fair value of our ordinary shares. The assumptions represent our best estimates at the time of grant, but such estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of our judgment. The expected life assumption is
based on the Group’s assessment of the time within which participants are expected to exercise options, which requires consideration of employee groups, expected employee service, and other internal factors, and the degree to which these are
expected to shorten the life of options in comparison to contractual expiry dates. The volatility assumption is based on the historical data of a comparator group of companies. While the Group has assessed that these estimates result in
share-based payment accounting that is materially appropriate within a reasonable range of sensitivities, applying different assumptions could result in a significantly different expense being recognised in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Loss.
Prior to our IPO, there was no public market for the ordinary shares, and the estimated fair value of the ordinary shares was determined as of the date of each grant
considering the most recently available third-party valuations of the Group’s ordinary shares, and the assessment of additional objective and subjective factors that we believed were relevant. The ordinary share valuations were prepared using a
probability weighting expected return and a current value method. The probability weighted expected return method estimated the fair value of the common stock based on an analysis of future values for
the enterprise assuming various future outcomes. Share value was based on the probability-weighted present value of the expected future investment returns, considering each of the possible outcomes available to the enterprise, as well as the
rights of each share class. Although we do not expect the estimated fair value of the ordinary shares to generate material differences within a reasonable range of sensitivities, judgement was involved in selecting the inputs into the
valuations and the movement in the determined fair value had an impact on the share-based payment charge recognized in the statement of loss.
Further judgments, including periodic estimates of options expected to vest and estimates relating to option modifications, also significantly impact the share-based
compensation charge associated with granted options.
Following our IPO and the award of a total of 4.7 million options under our Equity Incentive Plan, the share-based payment expense has materially increased. We recognized a
total charge of £35.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to a charge of £8.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2020.
Item 6. |
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|
A. |
Directors and senior management.
|
The following table sets forth information regarding members of our executive officers and our directors, including their ages as of December 31, 2021.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Bahija Jallal, Ph.D.
|
|
60
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Brian Di Donato
|
|
55
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Head of Strategy
|
David Berman, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
51
|
|
Head of Research and Development
|
Tina St Leger
|
|
53
|
|
Chief Human Resources Officer
|
Non-Executive Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Professor Sir John Bell
|
|
69
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Travis Coy
|
|
41
|
|
Director
|
Roy S. Herbst, M.D., Ph.D
|
|
58
|
|
Director
|
Robert Perez
|
|
57
|
|
Director
|
Kristine Peterson
|
|
62
|
|
Director
|
Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
Executive Officers
Bahija Jallal, Ph.D. has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2019. Previously, she served as President of MedImmune,
LLC, at AstraZeneca plc’s global biologics research and development unit, and Executive Vice President of AstraZeneca plc and a member of its senior executive team, where she worked from 2008 to 2019. Prior to joining MedImmune, Dr. Jallal was
vice president, drug assessment and development, at Chiron Corporation. Dr. Jallal currently serves on the boards of directors of Anthem, Inc. and Guardant Health, Inc. She is also a member of the Board of Trustees of the Johns Hopkins University
and the board of directors of the University of Maryland Health Sciences Research Park Corporation. Dr. Jallal is also a Council Member of the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering
and Medicine, and the immediate past president of the Association of Women in Science. Dr. Jallal received her Ph.D. in Physiology from Université de Paris VI, France and conducted her post-doctorate work in molecular biology and oncology at the
Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry in Germany. We believe Dr. Jallal’s extensive experience in the biotechnology industry, leading drug research and development efforts, her educational background and her knowledge of our company as our Chief
Executive Officer, qualify her to serve on our board of directors.
Brian Di Donato has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 2020. He joined us from Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., where
he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from August 2018 to May 2020. Prior to joining Achillion, Mr. Di Donato was a private investor and a full-time student at Pennsylvania State University from May 2015 to May 2018.
Previously, Mr. Di Donato held positions as Managing Director and Co-Portfolio Manager at Sorin Capital Management, where he worked from 2008 to 2014, and President and Chief Investment Officer at Capmark Investments, where he worked from 2002 to
2008. Mr. Di Donato also serves on the board of directors of iECURE. Mr. Di Donato holds an M.B.A. from New York University’s Stern School of Business and B.S. degrees in biology from Penn State University and in mechanical engineering from
Villanova University. Prior to business school, he was an aerospace engineering officer in the U.S. Navy.
David Berman, M.D., Ph.D. has served as our Head of Research and Development since January 2019, after initially joining us in
September 2018. Previously, Dr. Berman served as Senior Vice President and Head of AstraZeneca plc’s Immuno-oncology Franchise from 2017 to 2018. Prior to that, from 2015 to 2017, he was head of the early stage oncology program at MedImmune, LLC
(now known as AstraZeneca plc). Dr. Berman has also held senior development roles at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, where he worked from 2005 to 2015, including as Head of the Immuno-oncology exploratory development team. Dr. Berman received a
B.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a M.D. and Ph.D. from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. He trained in pathology at the National Cancer Institute followed by a fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Tina St. Leger
has served as our Chief Human Resources Officer since February 3, 2022. Previously, she served as Chief Human Resources at GW Pharmaceuticals from July 2019 to December 2021. Prior to joining GW Pharmaceuticals, Ms. St. Leger served in various
human resources positions at GlaxoSmithKline, where she worked from 2005 to 2019. Ms. St. Leger holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of St. Andrews.
Non-Executive Directors
Professor Sir John Bell has served on our board of directors since March 2015. Professor Sir John Bell has been the Regius Professor
of Medicine at Oxford University since 2002. He is a distinguished scientist in the fields of genomic and genetic research and immunology, and has been a founding director at three biotechnology companies: Avidex Ltd (acquired by MediGene AG in
2006), Oxagen Ltd. and PowderJect Pharmaceuticals plc (acquired by Chiron Corporation in 2003). He also previously served on the boards of Roche Holding AG, Sensyne Health plc, and Genentech, Inc., and the scientific advisory board at AstraZeneca
plc. Professor Sir John Bell was involved in the founding of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics at Oxford University, now chairs the Global Health Scientific Advisory Board of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and is the Life
Science Champion for the United Kingdom, advising the government on the life sciences industry. We believe his extensive scientific background and experience in the healthcare industry qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
Travis Coy has served on our board of directors since September 2019. Mr. Coy is currently Vice President, Head of Transactions and
M&A, Corporate Business Development at Eli Lilly and Company, a position he has held since October 2019. Prior to this role, Mr. Coy had a variety of finance and business development experiences at Lilly, where he has worked since 2003,
including positions as Vice President, Transactions - Oncology and Diagnostics; Vice President, Transactions - Cardiometabolic Diseases, Drug Delivery and Devices; Finance Director of the Oncology Business Unit; Director of Investor Relations;
Director of Corporate Finance and Investment Banking; and other financial controllership roles. Before transitioning to finance and business development, he was a chemist in Lilly’s research laboratories and a production manager for Milliken
& Company. We believe that Mr. Coy’s experience in finance and business development qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
Roy Herbst, M.D., Ph.D. has served on our board of directors since January 2021. He currently serves as Ensign Professor of Medicine
(Medical Oncology), Professor of Pharmacology, Chief of Medical Oncology and Associate Cancer Center Director for Translational Research at Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital. Previously, Dr. Herbst served as the Barnhart Distinguished
Professor and Chief of the Section of Thoracic Medical Oncology in the Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1991 to 2011. He also served as Professor in the Department
of Cancer Biology and Co-Director of the Phase I Clinical Trials Program from 2002 to 2011. In 2020, Dr. Herbst was awarded the Distinguished Public Service Award for Exceptional Leadership in Cancer Science Policy by the American Association for
Cancer Research. He is also a member of the board of directors of the American Association for Cancer Research, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd. and the Thoracic Malignancy Steering
Committee at the National Cancer Institute. We believe Dr. Herbst’s extensive scientific background and expertise in cancer treatment and research qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.
Robert Perez has served on our board of directors since September 2019. Mr. Perez is an Operating Partner and part of General
Atlantic’s Operations Group, with a particular focus on the biopharma and life sciences sectors. Before joining General Atlantic in 2019, he served as Managing Director of Vineyard Sound Advisors, LLC, an advisory practice focused on growth
companies in the biopharmaceutical industry, from March 2015 to January 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Perez was with Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., where he held various positions of increasing responsibility, including most recently as its President
and Chief Executive Officer from 2003 until its sale to Merck & Co. in 2015. Mr. Perez currently serves on the board of directors of Vir Biotechnology, Inc., and he previously served on the board of directors of AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Zafgen,
Inc., Spark Therapeutics, Inc., Unum Therapeutics and Cidara Therapeutics. We believe Mr. Perez’s breadth of experience in investing and serving on boards of other companies in the biopharma and life sciences industries and his extensive
management experience qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
Kristine Peterson has served on our board of directors since November 2017. Ms. Peterson most recently served as Chief Executive
Officer for Valeritas, Inc. from 2009 to 2016. Prior to joining Valeritas, Ms. Peterson was Company Group Chair of the biotechnology group at Johnson & Johnson from 2006 until 2009, where she was responsible for Commercial, Research &
Development, and biologics manufacturing for oncology, immunology and cell therapy, and was Executive Vice President of Pharmaceutical Group Strategic Marketing from 2004 to 2006. Previously, she served as President and Senior Vice President,
Commercial Operations for Biovail Corporation. Earlier in her career, Kristine spent 20 years at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in a variety of senior roles across multiple disease areas, including running their cardiovascular and metabolics
business unit. Ms. Peterson currently serves on the board of directors of Amarin Corporation plc, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Enanta Pharmaceuticals and ImmunoGen, Inc. She was previously on the board of directors for EyePoint Pharmaceuticals from
2017 to 2020, a senior advisor to the Healthcare Businesswomen’s Association and a Member of the Biotechnology Industry Organization Board. Ms. Peterson has a B.S. and an M.B.A. from the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. We believe Ms. Peterson’s operational knowledge of, and executive-level experience in, the global pharmaceutical and biotech industry qualify her to serve on our board of directors.
Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe has served on our board of directors since November 2020. Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe currently
serves as the Director of Clinical Research at The Francis Crick Institute in London and Director for the Target Discovery Institute and Distinguished Scholar of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research within the Nuffield Department of Medicine
at the University of Oxford. Previously, Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe served as Nuffield Professor and Head of the Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine from 2004 to 2016. In 2019, Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe was awarded the Nobel Prize for
Physiology or Medicine alongside William G Kaelin, Jr. of Harvard University and Gregg L. Semenza of Johns Hopkins University. In 2002, Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe was elected to the Fellowship of the Royal Society and to the Academy of Medical
Sciences. He is also a member of European Molecular Biology Organization, a foreign honorary member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Fellow of the American Association for Cancer Research Academy. We believe Professor
Ratcliffe’s extensive scientific background qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.
Diversity of the Board of Directors
The table below provides certain information regarding the diversity of our board of directors as of the date of this Annual Report.
Board Diversity Matrix (As of December 31, 2021)
|
|
Country of Principal Executive Offices
|
United Kingdom
|
Foreign Private Issuer
|
Yes
|
Disclosure Prohibited under Home Country Law
|
No
|
Total Number of Directors
|
7
|
|
Female
|
Male
|
Non-Binary
|
Did Not Disclose Gender
|
Part I: Gender Identity
|
Directors
|
2
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
Part II: Demographic Background
|
Underrepresented Individual in Home Country Jurisdiction
|
1
|
LGBTQ+
|
-
|
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background
|
1
|
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.
Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the aggregate compensation paid to the members of our board of directors and
our executive officers for services in all capacities, including retirement and similar benefits, was £2.0 million (2020: £1.5 million). In 2021, our highest paid director was Dr Bahija Jallal, our Chief Executive Officer, received compensation
of £0.7 million (2020: £1.0 million).
We maintain performance-based bonus arrangements with our executives pursuant to the terms of their services agreements (or otherwise pursuant to our discretionary annual
bonus arrangements). The compensation amounts above include bonus amounts in respect of the year ended December 31, 2021 payable to members of our board of directors and our executive
officers of £0.8 million ($1.0 million), of which £0.4 million ($0.5 million) is payable to Dr Jallal (being the only director eligible to receive such a bonus). We do not set aside or accrue any amounts to provide pension, retirement or similar
benefits to members of our board of directors or executive officers, although we made defined contribution pension contributions to a 401(k) plan on behalf of our directors or executive officers in an aggregate amount of £29,423 ($39,721) during
the year ended December 31, 2021, which amount is included in the foregoing aggregate compensation figure.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the table below outlines the compensation payable to each of our directors and the rest of our executive officers (other than Dr Jallal)
as a group. In the case of Dr Jallal, our chief executive officer, the table below sets forth the compensation paid to her for services as a member of our senior management. She does not receive any compensation for serving as an executive
director. For executive compensation not paid in U.S. dollars, amounts in pounds sterling have been translated for convenience to U.S. dollars at a rate of 1.35.
Name
|
|
Salary and
Fees
$
|
|
|
Benefits
$
|
|
|
Pension
(401(k))
$
|
|
|
Total Fixed
Remuneration
$
|
|
|
Annual
Bonus
$
|
|
|
Total
Remuneration
$
|
|
|
Share-Based
Awards
Number (1)
|
|
Executive Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bahija Jallal, Ph.D.
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
30,914
|
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
745,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270,414
|
|
|
|
2,076,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professor Sir John Bell
|
|
|
70,559
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
70,559
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
70,559
|
|
|
|
33,985
|
|
Travis Coy(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Roy Herbst, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
46,890
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,890
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,890
|
|
|
|
10,620
|
|
Robert Perez(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Kristine Peterson
|
|
|
44,658
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44,658
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44,658
|
|
|
|
13,778
|
|
Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe
|
|
|
60,370
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60,370
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60,370
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Executive Officers
|
|
|
905,000
|
|
|
|
59,088
|
|
|
|
25,221
|
|
|
|
989,309
|
|
|
|
518,100
|
|
|
|
1,507,409
|
|
|
|
875,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation
|
|
|
1,827,477
|
|
|
|
90,002
|
|
|
|
39,721
|
|
|
|
1,957,200
|
|
|
|
1,043,100
|
|
|
|
3,000,300
|
|
|
|
3,009,970
|
|
Notes to the compensation table:
|
1. |
Represents number of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2021. Further information regarding these awards including date of grant, exercise price and expiration date is
disclosed in the table below. See Note 19 to our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for a discussion of the assumptions made by us in determining the share-based payment expense calculated in accordance
with IFRS 2.
|
|
2. |
Represents a performance-based cash bonus awarded to Dr. Jallal in connection with the achievement of 2021 annual performance milestones (paid in 2022) pursuant to the terms of her
amended and restated employment agreement. Dr. Jallal was assigned a target bonus expressed as a percentage of her base salary, and the target bonus amount for Dr. Jallal for 2021 was set 75%. For 2021, the Board determined to award Dr.
Jallal an annual bonus of $525,000 (reflecting an achievement level of 100%), as reflected in the “Annual Bonus” column of the table above.
|
|
3. |
Robert Perez and Travis Coy were originally nominated to our board of directors by Eli Lilly S.A. and General Atlantic, respectively, pursuant to our Series C Shareholders’ Agreement,
which granted a right to each of Eli Lilly S.A. and General Atlantic to appoint an individual to our board. Both directors elected to forgo remuneration in respect of their services as non-executive directors.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards, Grants and Option Exercises
The following table summarizes the options granted to our executive director and our non-executive directors and executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Name
|
|
Ordinary Share
Underlying
Option Award
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Executive Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bahija Jallal, Ph.D.(2)(3)
|
|
|
2,076,080
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
February 4, 2021
|
|
|
February 4, 2031
|
|
|
|
|
28,345
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
October 30, 2020
|
|
|
October 30, 2030
|
|
|
|
|
2,079,470
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
January 7, 2019
|
|
|
January 7, 2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professor Sir John Bell(4)
|
|
|
33,985
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
February 4, 2021
|
|
|
February 4, 2031
|
|
|
|
|
18,215
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
November 16, 2020
|
|
|
November 16, 2030
|
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
40.93
|
|
|
December 13, 2016
|
|
|
December 12, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
40.93
|
|
|
September 9, 2016
|
|
|
September 8, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
6,915
|
|
|
|
11.83
|
|
|
June 12, 2015
|
|
|
June 11, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Herbst, M.D., Ph.D.(4)
|
|
|
10,620
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
February 4, 2021
|
|
|
February 4, 2031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kristine Peterson(4)
|
|
|
13,778
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
February 4, 2021
|
|
|
February 4, 2031
|
|
|
|
|
11,520
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
November 16, 2020
|
|
|
November 16, 2030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Executive Officers
|
|
|
875,507
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
February 4, 2021
|
|
|
February 4, 2031
|
|
|
|
|
831,790
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
July 16, 2020
|
|
|
July 16, 2030
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
April 30, 2020
|
|
|
April 30, 2030
|
|
Notes to the options table:
|
1. |
Options granted during 2021 were granted at the time of our IPO. The exercise price of $26.00 is equal to the price per ADS sold in the IPO, and the awards have no performance conditions attached.
|
|
2. |
Options granted to Dr. Jallal on February 4, 2021 and October 30, 2020 vest over a four-year period from the date of grant. Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the February 4, 2021 award vested on
the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and the remaining shares vest in quarterly installments thereafter, subject to the officer’s continued service through each vesting date. The options granted on October 30, 2020 have
a vesting commencement date of April 1, 2020. Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the October 30, 2020 award vest on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date (April 1, 2021), and the remaining shares vest in
quarterly installments thereafter, subject to the officer’s continued service through each vesting date.
|
|
3. |
The options granted to Dr. Jallal on January 7, 2019 vesting over a five-year period were modified during 2020 and immediately prior to the IPO. The incremental fair values arising on these modifications
for accounting purposes were $3.84 and $5.19, respectively.
|
|
4. |
All option awards granted to our non-executive directors vest over a four-year period from the date of grant, with 25% of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the
remaining shares vesting in quarterly installments thereafter, subject to the director’s continued service through each vesting date.
|
|
5. |
Robert Perez and Travis Coy were originally nominated to our board of directors by Eli Lilly S.A. and General Atlantic, respectively, pursuant to our Series C Shareholders’ Agreement, which granted a right
to each of Eli Lilly S.A. and General Atlantic to appoint an individual to our board. Both directors elected to forgo remuneration in respect of their services as non-executive directors.
|
As of December 31, 2021, our officers and directors collectively held options to purchase an aggregate of 6,288,895 ordinary shares. No options were exercised by these
persons during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Equity Incentives
Option arrangements are in place to involve directors and executive officers in the capital of the Company. The following policy is in place for Executive Directors and employees:
Element, purpose and link to strategy
|
The Company adopted the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”) to enhance the Group’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Group by
providing these individuals with equity ownership opportunities.
The EIP facilitates share ownership to provide further alignment with shareholders.
Executive Directors may also hold awards granted under the predecessor plans to the EIP and may also participate in any future discretionary equity incentive plan that may be adopted from time to time to
replace the EIP.
|
|
|
How it operates
|
The EIP provides for the grant of market value options, share appreciation rights, restricted stock unit awards, dividend equivalents, performance awards (subject to performance conditions) and other
share-based awards. Awards vest at such times and as specified in the Award Agreement. If the participant violates the non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality or other similar restrictive covenant provisions of any employment
contract, the right of the participant to receive these shares on vesting shall terminate immediately. The Committee maintains discretion over the type and terms of equity awards granted. The EIP is administered by the Administrator.
EIP awards are not subject to any holding period.
All awards may be subject to malus and/or clawback under any malus and/or clawback policy that may be adopted in
the future.
Any share-based entitlements granted to an Executive Director under the Company’s share plans will be treated in accordance with the relevant plan rules or any applicable agreement. Under the good leaver
provisions unvested options lapse, but vested options can be exercised within a period as set out in the plan rules. The Committee retains the discretion to vest awards (and measure performance accordingly) on cessation and disapply time
prorating; however, it is envisaged that this would only be applied in exceptional circumstances.
|
|
|
Maximum opportunity
|
There is no maximum opportunity under the EIP. However, the Company’s Remuneration Committee will ensure that annual awards that are granted are guided by the market. The Committee will look at the position
at similar sized comparators to help inform its decision.
|
|
|
Performance-related framework
|
The Committee has the discretion to choose the form of EIP awards for each year, as well as each individual grant. Currently, awards are granted subject to time-based vesting only, but the Committee may
decide to introduce performance conditions for future awards and will be guided by the market in making any such decision.
|
The following policy is in place for Non-Executive Directors:
Element, purpose and link to strategy
|
To facilitate share ownership by Non-Executive Directors in the Company and provide alignment with shareholders.
|
|
|
How it operates
|
The EIP provides for the grant of market value options, share appreciation rights, restricted stock unit awards, dividend equivalents, performance awards (subject to performance conditions) and other
share-based awards. Further, subject to the terms of the award agreement, awards can be granted in respect of ordinary shares, ADSs, cash or a combination thereof. However, performance awards (subject to performance conditions) are not
intended to be issued to Non-Executive Directors.
Awards vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set for the relevant award in its award agreement. The Committee maintains discretion over the type and terms of equity awards granted.
Non-Executive Directors usually receive options on joining the Board and annually as part of their remuneration with phased vesting. Under normal circumstances, initial share awards vest monthly over three
years and options awarded annually will usually vest upon the first anniversary of the date of grant.
Non-Executive Directors may also hold awards granted under the predecessor plans to the EIP and may also participate in any future discretionary equity incentive plan that may be adopted from time to time
to replace the EIP.
|
|
|
Maximum opportunity
|
There is no maximum number of equity incentive awards that may be awarded to individuals each year. However, when reviewing award levels, account is taken of market movements in equity incentive awards,
Board committee responsibilities, ongoing time commitments and the general economic environment.
|
|
|
Performance-related framework
|
Non-Executive Directors do not participate in performance based equity incentives.
|
Insurance and Indemnification
To the extent permitted by the Companies Act 2006, we are permitted to indemnify our directors against any liability they incur by reason of their directorship. We maintain
directors’ and officers’ insurance to insure such persons against certain liabilities and have entered into deeds of indemnity with each of our directors and executive officers.
Insofar as indemnification of liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, executive officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Composition of Our Board of Directors
Our board of directors is currently composed of seven members. As a foreign private issuer, under the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq, we are not required to have
independent directors on our board of directors, except that our audit committee is required to consist fully of independent directors, subject to certain phase-in schedules. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Coy, Dr. Herbst, Mr.
Perez, Ms. Peterson, Professor Sir John Bell and Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe, representing six of our seven directors, do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under Nasdaq rules.
In accordance with our articles of association, one-third of our directors will retire from office at each annual general meeting of shareholders. At each annual general
meeting, the directors whose terms expire will retire and are eligible for re-appointment by ordinary resolution at such annual general meeting. At each annual general meeting, the successors to directors whose terms then expire or the directors
who have been re-appointed will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:
|
• |
Class I consists of Travis Coy, Peter Ratcliffe and Roy S. Herbst, whose terms will expire at our first annual general meeting which will be held in May 2022;
|
|
• |
Class II consists of Robert Perez and Kristine Peterson, whose terms will expire at our second annual general meeting held in 2023; and
|
|
• |
Class III consists of John Bell and Bahija Jallal, whose terms will expire at our third annual general meeting held in 2024.
|
Each director shall serve until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. None of our directors’ service
contracts provide for benefits upon termination of employment.
Non-Executive Director Appointment Letters
Non-executive directors are engaged on letters of appointment that set out their duties and responsibilities. The non-executive directors do not receive benefits upon
termination or resignation from their respective positions as directors. We intend to enter into new appointment letters with our non-executive directors prior to the closing of this offering, and a new appointment letter with our non-executive
chairman, Professor Sir John Bell. Under the non-executive director appointment letters, our non-executive directors are entitled to receive annual fees in accordance with our non-executive director remuneration policy, and in each case inclusive
of fees payable for all duties.
Committees of our Board of Directors
Our board of directors has three standing committees: an audit committee, a remuneration committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The board has adopted
a written charter for each of the committees below that is available to shareholders on our website at https://ir.immunocore.com/corporate-governance/document-charters.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee is composed of Mr. Coy, Mr. Perez, Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe and Dr. Roy S Herbst, and assists the board of directors in overseeing our accounting and
financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. Mr. Coy serves as chairman of the audit committee. The audit committee consists exclusively of members of our board who are financially literate, and Mr. Coy is considered
an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations. Our audit committee is composed solely of independent directors
under the requirements of the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, subject to the phase-in periods available to newly-listed companies.
The audit committee’s responsibilities include:
|
• |
determining whether to appoint, reappoint or remove any auditors, and making recommendations to the board of directors to be put to the shareholders for approval at the annual general meeting;
|
|
• |
reviewing audit plans, the adequacy of staffing and fees, whilst overseeing the negotiation and execution of any engagement letters on our behalf;
|
|
• |
at least annually, assessing the qualifications, performance, and independence of the auditors, or in the case of prospective auditors, before they are engaged;
|
|
• |
overseeing the policies and procedures governing how we may employ individuals who are or once were employed by the auditors;
|
|
• |
reviewing results of the annual audit, audited financial statements, periodic and annual reports, earnings announcements, proxy report, accounting principles and policies;
|
|
• |
evaluating management’s cooperation with the auditors during their audit examination;
|
|
• |
reviewing and reporting on policies on financial risk management and assessment;
|
|
• |
reviewing the audit plan of any internal audit team;
|
|
• |
reviewing the scope, design, adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls;
|
|
• |
reviewing correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies that raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies;
|
|
• |
overseeing procedures for receiving, retaining and investigating complaints;
|
|
• |
monitoring compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and related party transactions rules; and
|
|
• |
reviewing with management legal and regulatory compliance and any actual, pending, or threatened legal or financial matters that could significantly affect our business or financial statements or as
otherwise deemed appropriate by the audit committee.
|
Remuneration Committee
Our remuneration committee is composed of Mr. Coy, Ms. Peterson, Professor Sir John Bell, Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe and Dr. Roy S Herbst and assists the board of
directors in determining executive officer compensation. Ms. Peterson serves as chairman of the remuneration committee.
The remuneration committee’s responsibilities include:
|
• |
reviewing, modifying and overseeing the company’s overall compensation strategy and policies;
|
|
• |
reviewing and approving the compensation and other terms of employment of our Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
• |
reviewing and approving all elements of the compensation and other terms of employment of the executive officers and other senior management reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
• |
reviewing and recommending to the board of directors for its approval the type and amount of compensation to be paid or awarded to members of the board of directors;
|
|
• |
undertaking sole responsibility for the appointment, authority to select, retain, and terminate any compensation and oversight of the work of compensation consultants, legal counsel, or any other advisors
engaged for the purpose of advising the remuneration committee;
|
|
• |
exercising full power and authority to adopt, amend, terminate, and administer our equity award, pension, and profit sharing plans, incentive plans, bonus plans, executive benefit plans, stock purchase
plans, deferred compensation plans and other similar programs;
|
|
• |
when required, reviewing and discussing with management our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of our annual reports, registration statements, proxy statements, or information statements filed
with the SEC;
|
|
• |
reviewing and discussing with management any conflicts of interest raised; and
|
|
• |
overseeing the preparation of any report required by applicable U.S. and U.K. rules and regulations to be included in our public filings relating to compensation policy and practices, including but not
limited to the directors’ remuneration report required under the Companies Act.
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee is composed of Mr. Perez, Professor Sir John Bell and Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe, and assists our board of directors in
identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board and executive officers consistent with criteria established by our board and in developing our corporate governance principles. Mr. Perez serves as chairman of the nominating and
corporate governance committee.
The nominating and corporate governance committee’s responsibilities include:
|
• |
identifying and evaluating candidates, including nomination of incumbent directors for re-election and nominees recommended by shareholders to serve on the board of directors;
|
|
• |
making recommendations to the board of directors regarding nominees for directors at the next annual general meeting;
|
|
• |
periodically reviewing the performance of the board of directors, including committees of the board of directors and management;
|
|
• |
overseeing the board of directors’ committee structure and operations, including authority to delegate to subcommittees and committee reporting to the board of directors;
|
|
• |
reviewing with the Chief Executive Officer the succession plans for our executive officers;
|
|
• |
instituting plans or programs for the continuing education of directors and orientation of new directors, as it deems appropriate; and
|
|
• |
periodically reviewing the processes and procedures to provide information to the board of directors and its committees.
|
As of December 31, 2021, we had 324 full-time employees, 126 (39%) of whom hold Ph.D. or M.D. degrees. Of these
employees, 247 are engaged in research and development activities and 77 are engaged in commercial, business development, finance, information systems, facilities, human resources or administrative support. None of our employees are subject to
collective bargaining agreements. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Total
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
European Union
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
United States
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Total
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
As a result of the corporate restructuring, which was completed in the second quarter of 2020, our overall headcount was reduced by 78.
Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and additional employees. The
principal purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and motivate selected employees, consultants and directors through the granting of equity-based compensation awards.
For information regarding the share ownership of our directors and executive officers, see “Item 6.B Compensation” and “Item 7.A Major Shareholders.”
Item 7. |
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our voting ordinary shares and non-voting ordinary shares as of December 31, 2021 for:
|
• |
each beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares and non-voting ordinary shares;
|
|
• |
each of our directors and executive officers; and
|
|
• |
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power
or investment power with respect to those securities and include ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2021. Percentage ownership calculations are
based on 43,862,850 ordinary shares outstanding (including ordinary shares in the form of ADSs) as of December 31, 2021, of which 831,627 shares are non-voting ordinary shares.
Except as otherwise indicated, all of the shares reflected in the table are ordinary shares and all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to
the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.
Except as otherwise indicated, the addresses of the persons listed in the table is c/o Immunocore Holdings plc, 92 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4RY,
United Kingdom.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of
Ordinary Shares
Beneficially
Owned (#)
|
|
|
Percent of
Ordinary Shares
Beneficially
Owned (%)
|
|
5% or Greater Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with General Atlantic (1)
|
|
|
4,922,575
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Baker Brothers (2)
|
|
|
3,352,357
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
Eli Lilly S.A. (3)
|
|
|
2,548,145
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Rock Springs Capital (4)
|
|
|
2,471,555
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Malin Life Sciences Holdings Limited (5)
|
|
|
2,389,979
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Ian Laing (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Executive Officers and Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bahija Jallal, Ph.D. (7)
|
|
|
1,571,156
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Brian Di Donato (8)
|
|
|
233,451
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David Berman, M.D., Ph.D. (9)
|
|
|
792,991
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Tina St. Leger
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Professor Sir John Bell (10)
|
|
|
49,748
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Travis Coy
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Roy Herbst (11)
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert Perez
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Kristine Peterson (12)
|
|
|
14,965
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
* |
Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent.
|
(1) |
Consists of 4,922,575 ADSs held by GA IMC Holding, L.P. The limited partners that share beneficial ownership of the shares held by GA IMC Holding are the following General Atlantic investment funds: General
Atlantic Partners (Bermuda) EU, L.P. (“GAP EU”), General Atlantic Partners (Bermuda) IV, L.P. (“GAP IV”) , GAP Coinvestments III, LLC (“GAPCO III”), GAP Coinvestments IV, LLC (“GAPCO IV”), GAP Coinvestments V, LLC (“GAPCO V”) and GAP
Coinvestments CDA, LLC (“GAPCO CDA”). The general partner of GAP EU and GAP IV is General Atlantic GenPar (Bermuda), L.P. (“GenPar Bermuda”). GAP (Bermuda) Limited (“GAP (Bermuda) Limited”) is the general partner of GenPar Bermuda.
General Atlantic’s address is c/o Conyers Client Services (Bermuda) Limited, Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton MM II, Bermuda.
|
(2) |
The information shown is based, in part, upon disclosures filed on a Schedule 13D on May 20, 2021 filed jointly by Baker Bros. Advisors LP (the “Adviser”), Baker Bros. Advisors (GP) LLC (the “Adviser GP”),
Felix J. Baker and Julian C. Baker (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”). The number reported consists of 2,520,730 ADSs and 831,627 ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of 831,627 non-voting ordinary shares directly held by the
funds. 3,104,143 ADSs are held by Baker Brothers Life Sciences, L.P. and 248,214 ADSs are held by 667,L.P.The address of Baker Bros. Advisors LP is 860 Washington Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10014, United States.
|
(3) |
Consists of 2,548,145 ADSs held by Eli Lilly S.A. Eli Lilly S.A.’s address is 16, Chemin des Coquelicots, 12 Geneva, Switzerland.
|
(4) |
Consists of 2,455,155 ADSs held by Rock Springs Capital Management LP (“RSCM”), Rock Springs Capital LLC (“RSC”), and Rock Springs Capital Management LP (“Master Fund”)The address of Rock Springs Capital
Management LP and Rock Springs Capital LLC is 650 South Exeter, Suite 1070, Baltimore, MD 21202.
|
(5) |
Consists of 2,389,979 ADSs held by Malin Life Sciences Holdings Limited. Malin Life Sciences Holdings Limited’s address is The Lennox Building, 50 Richmond Street South, Dublin D02 FK02, Ireland.
|
(6) |
Consists of 2,358,650 ADSs held by Ian Michael Laing and Caroline Elizabeth Laing.
|
(7) |
Consists of 1,571,156 ordinary shares underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2021 held by Dr. Jallal.
|
(8) |
Consists of (a) 19,230 ADSs held by Mr. Di Donato and (b) 214,221 ordinary shares underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2021 held by Mr Di Donato.
|
(9) |
Consists of 792,991 ordinary shares underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2021 held by Dr. Berman.
|
(10) |
Consists of (a) 13,452 ADSs and (b) options to purchase 36,296 ordinary shares that are or will be immediately exercisable
within 60 days of December 31, 2021 held by Professor Sir John Bell.
|
(11) |
Consists of 2,655 ordinary shares underlying options that are or will be immediately exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2021 held by Dr.
Herbst.
|
(12) |
Consists of 14,965 ordinary shares underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2021 held by Ms. Peterson.
|
(13) |
Consists of (a) 32,682 ADSs and (b) options to purchase 2,632,284 ordinary shares that are or will be immediately exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2021.
|
In February 2021, we completed our initial public offering and listed our ADSs on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. In the initial public offering, we issued and sold
11,426,280 ADSs, which included the full exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase an additional 1,490,384 ADSs representing 11,426,280 ordinary shares. Upon the completion of our initial public offering and the concurrent private
placement of 576,923 ADSs to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 43,786,088 ordinary shares were outstanding (including shares in the form of ADSs). While none of our existing shareholders sold ordinary shares in the initial public offering,
the percentage ownership held by certain shareholders decreased as a result of the issuance of the ADSs sold by us in the initial public offering.
To our knowledge, other than as provided in the table above, our other filings with the SEC and this Annual Report, the significant changes in the percentage ownership held
by our principal shareholders since January 1, 2019 are as a result of the transactions described in the final prospectus related to our initial public offering dated February 4, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 8, 2021 pursuant to Rule
424(b), under the heading “Related Party Transactions—Transactions with Our Principal Shareholders” and the dilution resulting from our initial public offering.
As of June 30, 2021, assuming that all of our ordinary shares represented by ADSs are held by residents of the
United States other than ADSs held by the entities set forth in the table above and certain other holders that we know to be non-residents of the United States, we estimate that approximately 30% of our outstanding ordinary shares (including
ordinary shares underlying ADSs) were held in the United States by 32 holders of record. The actual number of holders is greater than these numbers of record holders, and includes beneficial owners whose ordinary shares are held in street name
by brokers and other nominees. This number of holders of record also does not include holders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.
B. |
Related Party Transactions
|
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions
We have adopted a related person transaction policy that sets forth our procedures for the identification, review, consideration and approval or ratification of related
person transactions. For purposes of our policy only, a related person transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which we or any of our subsidiaries and any
related person are, were or will be participants in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 or which is unusual in its nature or conditions. Transactions involving compensation for services provided to us as an employee or director are not
covered by this policy. A related person is any executive officer, director or beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such
persons.
Under the policy, if a transaction has been identified as a related person transaction, including any transaction that was not a related person transaction when originally
consummated or any transaction that was not initially identified as a related person transaction prior to consummation, our management must present information regarding the related person transaction to our Audit Committee, or, if Audit
Committee approval would be inappropriate, to another independent body of our board of directors for review, consideration and approval or ratification. The presentation must include a description of, among other things, the material facts, the
interests, direct and indirect, of the related persons, the benefits to us of the transaction and whether the transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to or from, as the case may be, an unrelated third- party or to or
from employees generally. Under the policy, we will collect information that we deem reasonably necessary from each director, executive officer and, to the extent feasible, significant shareholder to enable us to identify any existing or
potential related person transactions and to effectuate the terms of the policy. In addition, under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our employees and directors have an affirmative responsibility to disclose any transaction or
relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest.
Transactions with Our Principal Shareholders, Directors and Executive Officers
The following is a description of related party transactions we and Immunocore Holdings Plc have entered into since January 1, 2021 with our directors, executive officers and
holders of more than 5% of our outstanding voting securities and their affiliates, whom we refer to as our related persons, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and that are material to us, other than the compensation arrangements we
describe in “Item 6.B. Compensation—Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors.” All of the historical share numbers in this section are as of dates prior to and do not reflect the conversion of each separate class of ordinary shares of
Immunocore Holdings plc into a single class of ordinary shares, as described under Note 15 in our audited financial statements.
Participation in Initial Public Offering
In our initial public offering, certain of our existing principal shareholders and their affiliates purchased an aggregate of 3,989,102 ADSs. Each of those purchases was made
through the underwriters at the initial public offering price. The following table sets forth the aggregate number of ADSs that these principal shareholders and their affiliates purchased in our initial public offering:
Purchaser
|
|
Number of ADSs
|
|
Entities affiliated with General Atlantic
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
Entities affiliated with Baker Brothers
|
|
|
1,689,102
|
|
Entities affiliated with Fidelity
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
Agreements with Our Executive Officers and Directors
We have entered into service agreements with our executive officers and a direct services agreement with Dr. Bahija Jallal, our executive director. See “Item 6.B
Compensation—Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors.” These agreements contain customary provisions and representations, including confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation and inventions assignment undertakings by our
executive officers. However, the enforceability of the non-competition provisions may be limited under applicable law.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into deeds of indemnity with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements and our articles of association require us to indemnify our
directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. See “Item 6.B Compensation—Insurance and Indemnification.”
Registration Rights Agreement
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of our existing shareholders pursuant to which we have granted them customary registration rights for the
resale of the common shares held by certain of our existing shareholders.
C. |
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
Not applicable.
Item 8. |
Financial Information.
|
A. |
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
Our consolidated financial statements are appended at the end of this Annual Report, starting at page F-1.
Dividend Distribution Policy
Since our incorporation, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our issued share capital. We intend to retain any earnings for use in our business and do not currently
intend to pay dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs. The declaration and payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of operations, cash requirements, financial
condition, contractual restrictions, any future debt agreements or applicable laws and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
Under the laws of England and Wales, among other things, we may only pay dividends if we have sufficient distributable reserves (on a non-consolidated basis), which are our
accumulated realized profits that have not been previously distributed or capitalized less our accumulated realized losses, so far as such losses have not been previously written off in a reduction or reorganization of capital.
Legal Proceedings
We consider it in the ordinary course of our business that our patents and trademarks may become subject to interference or opposition proceedings. There is currently one
patent opposition proceeding ongoing at the European Patent Office relating to a non-core aspect of our ImmTAX platform technology and which challenges the validity of European patent no. EP3116901. At a Hearing, which took place on February 17,
2022, the opposition division decided to maintain the patent as granted. The opponent may appeal the decision. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of this existing matter would have a material adverse effect on our business or financial
condition and will also have no material adverse effect on our development of our product candidates. Our U.S. trademark application for IMMTAX is currently subject to an opposition filed by Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, or Immatics, and we have
brought counterclaims against three of Immatics’s U.S. registered trademarks for IMMATICS. In addition, Immatics have filed invalidation actions against UK and EU trademark registration for IMMTAX. If we are unsuccessful in defending one or more
of these actions, we may be required to change our branding for our ImmTAX platform which could cause us to incur substantial costs and impede our ability to build and sustain name recognition for such platform.
There can be no assurance that pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents, that patents issued to or licensed by us will not be challenged or
circumvented by competitors, or that these patents will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect our technology or to provide us with a competitive advantage. However, we believe that no single patent, technology, trademark,
intellectual property asset or license is material in relation to our business as a whole. For more information on risks associated with the European patent opposition proceedings and trademark opposition proceeding, see “Item 3.D Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
In the summer and fall of 2020, we conducted an internal investigation as a result of receiving a whistleblower complaint alleging employee misconduct and other improper
activities related to a kickback scheme involving an employee and two third-party vendors between 2018 and 2020. Our audit committee led the investigation utilizing outside counsel, during which the named employee resigned. The investigation led
to the identification of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. See “Item 3.D Risk Factors—We previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which has since been
remediated. We may identify or discover additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, which may impair our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or prevent
fraud. If we are unable to establish and maintain effective internal controls, shareholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our ADSs.” After the
investigation, we terminated the one remaining open contract with the third-party vendors and issued proceedings in October 2020 against the involved parties. We recovered our estimated losses of £1.8 million from the employee and third-party
vendors in December 2020.
From time to time, we may become involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We do not have any pending litigation that, separately or
in the aggregate, would, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Not applicable.
Item 9. |
The Offer and Listing.
|
A. |
Offer and Listing Details
|
Our ADS have been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “IMCR” since February 5, 2021. Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for ADSs or
ordinary shares. Our ordinary shares are not listed on any exchange.
Not applicable.
Our ADSs have been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “IMCR” since February 5, 2021. Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for ADSs
or ordinary shares. Our ordinary shares are not listed on any exchange.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Item 10. |
Additional Information.
|
Not applicable.
B. |
Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
The information set forth under the heading “Description of Share Capital and Articles of Association” is incorporated by reference from our final prospectus dated February
4, 2021 as part of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-252166), declared effective by the SEC on February 4, 2021.
In addition to the contracts described elsewhere in this Annual Report, the following are summaries of each material contract to which we are a party for the two years
preceding the date of this Annual Report.
Underwriting Agreement
We entered into an underwriting agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Jefferies LLC as representatives of the underwriters, on February
4, 2021, with respect to the ADSs sold in our initial public offering. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to payments the underwriters may be
required to make in respect of such liabilities.
For additional information on our material contracts, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company,” “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees,” and “Item 7.B
Related Party Transactions” of this Annual Report.
There are no governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in the United Kingdom that may affect the import or export of capital, including the availability of
cash and cash equivalents for use by us, or that may affect the remittance of dividends, interest, or other payments by us to non-resident holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs, other than withholding tax requirements. There is no limitation
imposed by the laws of England and Wales or our articles of association on the right of non-residents to hold or vote shares.
The following summary contains a description of material U.K. and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of
our ADSs. This summary should not be considered a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to beneficial owners of ADSs.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders
The following is a description of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to the U.S. Holders described below of owning and disposing of our ordinary shares or
ADSs. It is not a comprehensive description of all tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to acquire securities. This discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder that holds our ordinary shares or ADSs as a capital
asset for tax purposes (generally, property held for investment). In addition, it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant in light of a U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including state, local and non-U.S. tax
consequences, estate tax consequences, alternative minimum tax consequences, the potential application of the Medicare contribution tax, and tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such as:
|
• |
banks, insurance companies, and certain other financial institutions;
|
|
• |
U.S. expatriates and certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States;
|
|
• |
dealers or traders in securities who use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;
|
|
• |
persons holding ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a hedging transaction, “straddle,” wash sale, conversion transaction or integrated transaction or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to
ordinary shares or ADSs;
|
|
• |
persons whose “functional currency” for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
• |
brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies;
|
|
• |
tax-exempt entities or government organizations;
|
|
• |
S corporations, partnerships, or other entities or arrangements classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and investors therein);
|
|
• |
regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts;
|
|
• |
persons who acquired our ordinary shares or ADSs pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
• |
persons holding shares or ADSs in connection with a trade or business outside the United States;
|
|
• |
persons that own or are deemed to own ten percent or more of our shares (by vote or value); and
|
|
• |
persons holding our ordinary shares or ADSs in connection with a trade or business, permanent establishment, or fixed base outside the United States.
|
If an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds ordinary shares or ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will
generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding ordinary shares or ADSs and partners in such partnerships are encouraged to consult their tax advisors as to the particular U.S. federal
income tax consequences of holding and disposing of ordinary shares or ADSs.
The discussion is based on the Code, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions, final, temporary and proposed Treasury Regulations, and the income tax treaty between
the United Kingdom and the United States, the Treaty, all as of the date hereof, changes to any of which may affect the tax consequences described herein — possibly with retroactive effect.
A “U.S. Holder” is a holder who, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs who is:
|
(1) |
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
(2) |
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia;
|
|
(3) |
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
(4) |
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2)
the trust has a valid election to be treated as a U.S. person under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations.
|
U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of owning and disposing of ordinary shares
or ADSs in their particular circumstances.
The discussion below assumes that the representations contained in the deposit agreement are true and that the obligations in the deposit agreement and any related agreement
will be complied with in accordance with their terms. Generally, a holder of an ADS should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as holding the ordinary shares represented by the ADS. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized upon
an exchange of ADSs for ordinary shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company rules
Under the Code, we will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which (1) 75% or more of our gross income consists of passive income or (2) 50% or more of the value of our assets
(generally determined on the basis of a weighted quarterly average) consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income (including cash). For purposes of these tests, passive income includes dividends, interest,
gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and certain rents and royalties. Cash and cash-equivalents are passive assets for these purposes. In addition, for purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or
indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as holding and receiving directly its proportionate share of assets and income of such corporation. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S.
Holder holds our shares, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse tax consequences regardless of whether we continue to qualify as a PFIC, including ineligibility for any preferred tax rates on capital gains or on actual or deemed dividends,
interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred and additional reporting requirements.
Based on our analysis of our activities and our income and assets, we believe that we were not a PFIC for our taxable year ending December 31, 2021. However, the determination of whether we are a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis applying principles and methodologies that in some circumstances are unclear and subject to varying
interpretation. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will not be treated as a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. In addition, for our current and future taxable years, the total value of our assets for PFIC testing
purposes (including goodwill) may be determined in part by reference to the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs from time to time, which may fluctuate considerably. Accordingly, if our market capitalization declines while we hold a
substantial amount of cash and cash-equivalents for any taxable year we may be a PFIC for that taxable year. Under the income test, our status as a PFIC depends on the composition of our income for the relevant taxable year which will depend on
the transactions we enter into in the future and our corporate structure. The composition of our income and assets is also affected by how we spend the cash we raise in any offering. We currently do not generate product revenues and therefore we
may be a PFIC for any taxable year in which we do not generate sufficient amounts of active income to offset our passive financing income. Therefore, we cannot express an expectation regarding our PFIC status for the current or any future taxable
year. Even if we determine that we are not a PFIC for a taxable year, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with our conclusion and that the IRS would not successfully challenge our position. Accordingly, our U.S. counsel expresses no
opinion with respect to our PFIC status for any prior, current or future taxable year.
If we are classified as a PFIC in any year with respect to which a U.S. Holder owns the ordinary shares or ADSs, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such
U.S. Holder in all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder owns the ordinary shares or ADSs, regardless of whether we continue to meet the tests described above unless we cease to be a PFIC and the U.S. Holder has made a “deemed sale”
election under the PFIC rules. If such a deemed sale election is made, a U.S. Holder will be deemed to have sold the ordinary shares or ADSs the U.S. Holder holds at their fair market value and any gain from such deemed sale would be subject to
the rules described below. After the deemed sale election, so long as we do not become a PFIC in a subsequent taxable year, the U.S. Holder’s ordinary shares or ADSs with respect to which such election was made will not be treated as shares in a
PFIC and the U.S. Holder will not be subject to the rules described below with respect to any “excess distribution” the U.S. Holder receives from us or any gain from an actual sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs. U.S. Holders
should consult their tax advisors as to the possibility and consequences of making a deemed sale election if we are a PFIC and cease to be a PFIC and such election becomes available.
For each taxable year that we are treated as a PFIC with respect to U.S. Holders, U.S. Holders will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution”
such U.S. Holder receives and any gain such U.S. Holder recognizes from a sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of ordinary shares or ADSs, unless (i) such U.S. Holder makes a “qualified electing fund” election, or QEF Election, with
respect to all taxable years during such U.S. Holder’s holding period in which we are a PFIC, or (ii) our ordinary shares or ADSs constitute “marketable stock” and such U.S. Holder makes a mark-to-market election (as discussed below).
Distributions a U.S. Holder receives in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions a U.S. Holder received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the
ordinary shares or ADSs will be treated as an excess distribution. Under these special tax rules:
|
• |
the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over a U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares or ADSs;
|
|
• |
the amount allocated to the taxable year of the disposition or distribution (as applicable), and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we became a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary
income; and
|
|
• |
the amount allocated to each other year will be subject to the highest tax rate in effect for that year and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting
tax attributable to each such year.
|
The tax liability for amounts allocated to years prior to the year of disposition or “excess distribution” cannot be offset by any net operating losses for such years, and
gains (but not losses) realized on the sale of the ordinary shares or ADSs cannot be treated as capital, even if a U.S. Holder holds the ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets.
If we are a PFIC, a U.S. Holder will generally be subject to similar rules with respect to distributions we receive from, and our dispositions of the stock of, any of our
direct or indirect subsidiaries or any other entities in which we hold equity interests that also are PFICs (“lower-tier PFICs”), as if such distributions were indirectly received by, and/or dispositions were indirectly carried out by, such U.S.
Holder. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to lower-tier PFICs.
If a U.S. Holder makes an effective QEF election, the U.S. Holder will be required to include in gross income for each year in which we are a PFIC, whether or not we make
distributions, as capital gains, such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of our net capital gains and, as ordinary income, such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of our earnings in excess of our net capital gains. An electing U.S. Holder’s basis in our
ordinary shares or ADSs will be increased to reflect the amount of any taxed but undistributed income. Distributions of income that had previously been taxed will result in a corresponding reduction of basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs and
generally will not be taxed again as distributions to the U.S. Holder. In addition, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF election will be taxed on the disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs as described in “Sale or other taxable disposition of ordinary
shares and ADSs” below. In order to apply the QEF regime in lieu of the general PFIC rules described above, a U.S. Holder generally must make the QEF election for the first taxable year during a U.S. Holder’s holding period in which we are
treated as a PFIC.
A U.S. Holder can only make a QEF election with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs in a PFIC if the Company agrees to furnish such U.S. Holder with certain information
annually. If we determine that the Company is a PFIC in any taxable year, we intend to make available to U.S. Holders, upon request and in accordance with applicable procedures and confidentiality requirements, a “PFIC Annual Information
Statement” with respect to the Company for such taxable year. The “PFIC Annual Information Statement” may be used by U.S. Holders for purposes of complying with the reporting requirements applicable to a QEF election with respect to the Company.
A QEF election with respect to the Company will not apply to any of our lower-tier PFICs. If we determine that any of our current subsidiaries is a lower-tier PFIC for any
taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, we currently expect that we will provide the information necessary for U.S. Holders to make a QEF election with respect to such lower-tier PFIC, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to
provide such information.
U.S. Holders should note that if they make a QEF election with respect to us, they may be required to pay U.S. federal income tax with respect to their ordinary shares or
ADSs for any taxable year significantly in excess of any cash distributions (which are currently expected to be zero) received on the ordinary shares or ADSs for such taxable year. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding PFIC
investments and making QEF elections based on their particular circumstances.
U.S. Holders can avoid the interest charge on excess distributions or gain relating to the ordinary shares or ADSs by making a mark-to-market election with respect to the
ordinary shares or ADSs, provided that the ordinary shares or ADSs are “marketable stock.” Ordinary shares or ADSs will be marketable stock if they are “regularly traded” on certain U.S. stock exchanges or on a non-U.S. stock exchange that meets
certain conditions. For these purposes, the ordinary shares or ADSs will be considered regularly traded during any calendar year during which they are traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter.
Any trades that have as their principal purpose meeting this requirement will be disregarded. Our ADSs (but not ordinary shares) will be listed on the Nasdaq, which is a qualified exchange for these purposes. Consequently, if our ADSs remain
listed on the Nasdaq and are regularly traded, we expect the mark-to-market election would be available to U.S. Holders of our ADSs if we are a PFIC. Each U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor as to the whether a mark-to-market election is
available or advisable with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs.
A U.S. Holder that makes a mark-to-market election must include in ordinary income for each year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the
ordinary shares or ADSs at the close of the taxable year over the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs. An electing U.S. Holder may also claim an ordinary loss deduction for the excess, if any, of the U.S. Holder’s
adjusted basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs over the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs at the close of the taxable year, but this deduction is allowable only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains for prior years. Gains
from an actual sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs in any year in which we are a PFIC will be treated as ordinary income, and any losses incurred on a sale or other disposition of the shares will be treated as an ordinary
loss to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains for prior years. Once made, the election cannot be revoked without the consent of the IRS unless the ordinary shares or ADSs cease to be marketable stock.
However, a mark-to-market election generally cannot be made for equity interests in any lower-tier PFICs that we own, unless shares of such lower-tier PFIC are themselves
“marketable stock.” As a result, even if a U.S. Holder validly makes a mark-to-market election with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs, the U.S. Holder may continue to be subject to the PFIC rules (described above) with respect to its
indirect interest in any of our investments that are treated as an equity interest in a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors as to the availability and desirability of a mark-to-market
election, as well as the impact of such election on interests in any lower-tier PFICs.
Unless otherwise provided by the U.S. Treasury, each U.S. shareholder of a PFIC is required to file an annual report containing such information as the U.S. Treasury may
require. A U.S. Holder’s failure to file the annual report may result in substantial penalties and extend the statute of limitations with respect to the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax return. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors
regarding the requirements of filing such information returns under these rules.
WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE IMPACT OF OUR PFIC STATUS ON YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE ORDINARY SHARES OR ADSs AS WELL AS THE APPLICATION OF THE
PFIC RULES TO YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE ORDINARY SHARES OR ADSs.
Taxation of distributions
Subject to the discussion above under “Passive Foreign Investment Company rules,” distributions paid on ordinary shares or ADSs, other than certain pro rata distributions of
ordinary shares or ADSs, will generally be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because we may not calculate our earnings and
profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, we expect that distributions generally will be reported to U.S. Holders as dividends. Subject to applicable limitations, dividends paid to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxable at
preferential rates applicable to “qualified dividend income.” However, the qualified dividend income treatment will not apply if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to the U.S. Holder for our taxable year of the distribution or the preceding
taxable year. The amount of the dividend will be treated as foreign-source dividend income to U.S. Holders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally available to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will
generally be included in a U.S. Holder’s income on the date of the U.S. Holder’s receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend income paid in foreign currency will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in
effect on the date of actual or constructive receipt, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder should not be required to
recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt. Such gain or loss would generally be treated
as U.S.-source ordinary income or loss. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash (and other than certain pro rata distributions of ordinary shares or ADSs or rights to acquire ordinary shares or ADSs) will be the fair market
value of such property on the date of distribution. For foreign tax credit purposes, our dividends will generally be treated as passive category income.
Sale or other taxable disposition of ordinary shares and ADSs
Subject to the discussion above under “Passive Foreign Investment Company rules,” gain or loss realized on the sale or other taxable disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs
will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held the ordinary shares or ADSs for more than one year. The amount of the gain or loss will equal the difference between the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in
the ordinary shares or ADSs disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. This gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations.
If the consideration received by a U.S. Holder is not paid in U.S. dollars, the amount realized will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined by reference
to the spot rate of exchange on the date of the sale or other disposition. However, if the ordinary shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market” and you are either a cash basis taxpayer or an accrual basis taxpayer
that has made a special election (which must be applied consistently from year to year and cannot be changed without the consent of the IRS), you will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized in a non-U.S. dollar currency by
translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale. If you are an accrual basis taxpayer that is not eligible to or does not elect to determine the amount realized using the spot rate on the settlement
date, you will recognize foreign currency gain or loss to the extent of any difference between the U.S. dollar amount realized on the date of sale or disposition and the U.S. dollar value of the currency received at the spot rate on the
settlement date.
Information reporting and backup withholding
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information
reporting, and may be subject to backup withholding, unless (i) the U.S. Holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies
that it is not subject to backup withholding.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the holder’s U.S.
federal income tax liability and may entitle it to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Information with respect to foreign financial assets
Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals and certain closely-held entities may be required to report information relating to the ordinary shares or ADSs, subject to certain
exceptions (including an exception for ordinary shares or ADSs held in accounts maintained by financial institutions, in which case the accounts themselves may have to be reported if maintained by non-U.S. financial institutions). U.S. Holders
should consult their tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations with respect to their ownership and disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs.
U.K. Taxation
The following is intended as a general guide to current U.K. tax law and HM Revenue & Customs, or HMRC, practice applying as at the date of this Annual Report (both of
which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retrospective effect) relating to the holding of ADSs. It does not constitute legal or tax advice and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all U.K. tax considerations relating to the
holding of ADSs, or all of the circumstances in which holders of ADSs may benefit from an exemption or relief from U.K. taxation. It is written on the basis that the company does not (and will not) directly or indirectly derive 75% or more of its
qualifying asset value from U.K. land, and that the company is and remains solely resident in the United Kingdom for tax purposes and will therefore be subject to the U.K. tax regime and not the U.S. tax regime save as set out above under “U.S.
Federal Income Taxation.”
Except to the extent that the position of non-U.K. resident persons is expressly referred to, this guide relates only to persons who are resident (and, in the case of
individuals, domiciled or deemed domiciled and to whom split year treatment does not apply) for tax purposes solely in the United Kingdom and do not have a permanent establishment, branch, agency (or equivalent) or fixed base in any other
jurisdiction with which the holding of the ADSs is connected, or U.K. Holders, who are absolute beneficial owners of the ADSs (where the ADSs are not held through an Individual Savings Account or a Self-Invested Personal Pension) and who hold the
ADSs as investments.
This guide may not relate to certain classes of U.K. Holders, such as (but not limited to):
|
• |
persons who are connected with the company;
|
|
• |
financial institutions;
|
|
• |
charities or tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
• |
collective investment schemes;
|
|
• |
market makers, intermediaries, brokers or dealers in securities;
|
|
• |
persons who have (or are deemed to have) acquired their ADSs by virtue of an office or employment or who are or have been officers or employees of the company or any of its affiliates; and
|
|
• |
individuals who are subject to U.K. taxation on a remittance basis
|
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) in HSBC Holdings PLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation v HMRC (2012) cast some doubt on whether a holder of a
depositary receipt is the beneficial owner of the underlying shares. However, based on published HMRC guidance we would expect that HMRC will regard a holder of ADSs as holding the beneficial interest in the underlying shares and therefore these
paragraphs assume that a holder of ADSs is the beneficial owner of the underlying ordinary shares and any dividends paid in respect of the underlying ordinary shares (where the dividends are regarded for U.K. purposes as that person’s own income)
for U.K. direct tax purposes.
THESE PARAGRAPHS ARE A SUMMARY OF CERTAIN U.K. TAX CONSIDERATIONS AND ARE INTENDED AS A GENERAL GUIDE ONLY. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ALL HOLDERS OF ADSs
OBTAIN ADVICE AS TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL OF THE ADSs IN THEIR OWN SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES FROM THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS. IN PARTICULAR, NON-U.K. RESIDENT OR DOMICILED PERSONS ARE ADVISED TO CONSIDER THE
POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ANY RELEVANT DOUBLE TAXATION AGREEMENTS.
Dividends
Withholding Tax
Dividends paid by the company should not be subject to any withholding or deduction for or on account of U.K. tax.
Income Tax
An individual U.K. Holder may, depending on his or her particular circumstances, be subject to U.K. tax on dividends received from the company. An individual holder of ADSs
who is not resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom should not be chargeable to U.K. income tax on dividends received from the company unless he or she carries on (whether solely or in partnership) a trade, profession or vocation in the
United Kingdom through a branch or agency to which the ADSs are attributable. There are certain exceptions for trading in the United Kingdom through independent agents, such as some brokers and investment managers.
All dividends received by an individual U.K. Holder from us or from other sources will form part of that U.K. Holder’s total income for income tax purposes and
will constitute the top slice of that income. A nil rate of income tax will apply to the first £2,000 of taxable dividend income received by the individual U.K. Holder in a tax year. Income within the nil rate band will be taken into account in
determining whether income in excess of the £2,000 tax-free allowance falls within the basic rate, higher rate or additional rate tax bands. Dividend income in excess of the tax-free allowance will (subject to the availability of any income tax
personal allowance) be taxed at 7.5% to the extent that the excess amount falls within the basic rate tax band, 32.5% to the extent that the excess amount falls within the higher rate tax band and 38.1% to the extent that the excess amount
falls within the additional rate tax band. It has been announced that the current tax rates of 7.5%, 32.5% and 38.1%, respectively, referred to above will respectively be increased to 8.75%, 33.75% and
39.35%, respectively, with effect from April 6, 2022.
Corporation Tax
A corporate holder of ADSs who is not resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom should not be chargeable to U.K. corporation tax on dividends received from the company
unless it carries on (whether solely or in partnership) a trade in the United Kingdom through a permanent establishment to which the ADSs are attributable.
Corporate U.K. Holders should not be subject to U.K. corporation tax on any dividend received from the company so long as the dividends qualify for exemption, which should be
the case, although certain conditions must be met. If the conditions for the exemption are not satisfied, or such U.K. Holder elects for an otherwise exempt dividend to be taxable, U.K. corporation tax will be chargeable on the amount of any
dividends (at the current rate of 19%, but with the main rate announced to increase to 25% with effect from April 1, 2023).
Chargeable Gains
A disposal or deemed disposal of ADSs by a U.K. Holder may, depending on the U.K. Holder’s circumstances and subject to any available exemptions or reliefs (such as the
annual exemption), give rise to a chargeable gain or an allowable loss for the purposes of U.K. capital gains tax and corporation tax on chargeable gains.
If an individual U.K. Holder who is subject to U.K. income tax at either the higher or the additional rate is liable to U.K. capital gains tax on the disposal of ADSs, the
current applicable rate will be 20%. For an individual U.K. Holder who is subject to U.K. income tax at the basic rate and liable to U.K. capital gains tax on such disposal, the current applicable rate would be 10%, save to the extent that any
capital gains when aggregated with the U.K. Holder’s other taxable income and gains in the relevant tax year exceed the unused basic rate tax band. In that case, the rate currently applicable to the excess would be 20%.
If a corporate U.K. Holder becomes liable to U.K. corporation tax on the disposal (or deemed disposal) of ADSs, the main rate of U.K. corporation tax (currently 19%, but
announced to increase to 25% with effect from April 1, 2023) would apply.
A holder of ADSs which is not resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom should not normally be liable to U.K. capital gains tax or corporation tax on chargeable gains
on a disposal (or deemed disposal) of ADSs unless the person is carrying on (whether solely or in partnership) a trade, profession or vocation in the United Kingdom through a branch or agency (or, in the case of a corporate holder of ADSs,
through a permanent establishment) to which the ADSs are attributable. However, an individual holder of ADSs who has ceased to be resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom for a period of less than five years and who disposes of ADSs during
that period may be liable on his or her return to the United Kingdom to U.K. tax on any capital gain realized (subject to any available exemption or relief).
Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax
The discussion below relates to the holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs wherever resident; however, it should be noted that special rules may apply to
certain persons such as market makers, brokers, dealers or intermediaries.
Issue of Shares
No U.K. stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax, or SDRT, is generally payable upon the issue of the underlying ordinary shares in the Company.
Transfers of Shares
A document which acts to transfer ordinary shares will normally give rise to a charge to stamp duty at the rate of 0.5% (rounded up to the next £5.00) of the amount or value
of the consideration payable for the transfer. However, where there is a transfer to a connected company market value deeming rules may apply in certain circumstances. Stamp duty is normally paid by the purchaser. An unconditional agreement to
transfer ordinary shares will also give rise to a charge to SDRT at the rate of 0.5% on any consideration given in money or moneys worth. However, where there is a transfer to a connected company market value deeming rules may apply in certain
circumstances. The purchaser of the shares is liable for the SDRT. Notwithstanding this, the charge to SDRT will be cancelled or, if already paid, repaid (generally with interest), where a transfer instrument is executed in pursuance of the
agreement that gave rise to SDRT and the instrument is duly stamped within six years of the charge arising (either by paying the stamp duty or by claiming an appropriate relief) or if the instrument is otherwise exempt from being stamped.
The issue or transfer (or unconditional agreement to transfer) ordinary shares to, or to a nominee or agent for, a person whose business is or includes the issue of
depositary receipts or the provision of clearance services will generally be subject to stamp and/or SDRT at a higher rate of 1.5% of the amount or value of the consideration given for the transfer unless the clearance service has made and
maintained an election under section 97A of the U.K. Finance Act 1986 (a “97A Election”). It is understood that HMRC regards the facilities of DTC as a clearance service for these purposes and we are not aware of any 97A Election having been made
by DTC. However, no stamp duty or SDRT is generally payable where there is an issue or transfer of ordinary shares to a clearance service or depositary receipt system which is an integral part of raising new capital.
Any stamp duty or SDRT payable on an issue or transfer of ordinary shares to a depositary receipt system or clearance service (which has not made a 97A Election) will in
practice generally be paid by the transferors or participants in the clearance service or depositary receipt system.
Issue of ADSs
No U.K. stamp duty or SDRT is payable on the issue of our ADSs, except that stamp duty or SDRT may apply where shares are issued or transferred to the depositary receipt
issuer (see above).
Transfers of ADSs
No stamp duty or SDRT should be payable on the transfer of, or agreement to transfer, ADS’s as an ADS should be outside the scope of both taxes.
F. |
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We are subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to foreign private issuers and under those requirements will file reports with the
SEC. Those reports may be inspected without charge at the locations described below. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers,
directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and
financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. Nevertheless, we will file with the SEC an Annual Report on Form 20-F containing financial
statements that have been examined and reported on, with and opinion expressed by an independent registered public accounting firm.
We maintain a corporate website at www.immunocore.com. We intend to post our Annual Report on our website promptly following it being filed with the SEC. Information
contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report. We have included our website address in this Annual Report solely as an inactive textual reference.
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants,
such as us, that file electronically with the SEC.
With respect to references made in this Annual Report to any contract or other document of our company, such references are not necessarily complete and you should refer to
the exhibits attached or incorporated by reference to this Annual Report for copies of the actual contract or document.
I. |
Subsidiary Information
|
Not applicable.
Item 11. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
We are exposed to interest rate, currency, credit and liquidity risks. Our executive board oversees the management of these risks supported by a financial risk committee that
advises on financial risks and the appropriate financial risk governance framework for us. The financial risk committee provides assurance to our executive board that our financial risk activities are governed by appropriate policies and
procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with our policies and risk objectives. The most significant financial risks to which we are exposed include the risks discussed below.
Our principal financial assets include trade and other receivables and cash and security deposits that derive directly from our operations. Our principal financial
liabilities comprise our Loan Agreement with Oxford Finance, a derivative liability, lease liabilities and trade and other payables. The main purpose of these financial liabilities is to finance our operations. In connection with our entry into a
subscription agreement with the Gates Foundation, we terminated the outstanding note purchase agreement by deed of termination as the terms of the subscription agreement provide that the Gates Foundation would instead subscribe for the remaining
amount of the loan as part of a concurrent private placement in connection with our initial public offering in February 2021.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates relates to investments in deposits and to changes in the interest for overnight deposits. Changes in the general level of interest
rates may lead to an increase or decrease in the fair value of these investments. As a result of entering into the Loan Agreement with Oxford Finance, we are exposed to interest rate risk as a variable rate of interest are applied within a
defined cap and collar over the term of the debt. A hypothetical 10% change in interest rates during any of the periods presented would not have had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We are currently not subject to interest rate risks related to any liabilities shown in the statement of financial position, outside of the Loan Agreement.
Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. Our exposure
to the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates relates primarily to our operating activities in the United States and outsourced supplier agreements denominated in currencies other than pound sterling.
Our cash and cash equivalents were £237.8 million and £129.7 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. As of December 31, 2021, 98% of our cash and cash equivalents were held in United Kingdom, of which 44% were denominated in pounds sterling, 54% were denominated in U.S.
dollars and 2% were denominated in euros. The significant remainder of our cash and cash equivalents (2%) are held in the United States and denominated in U.S. dollars. A hypothetical 10% change in exchange rates during any of the periods
presented would not have had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
A five percentage point increase in exchange rates would reduce the carrying value of net financial assets and liabilities held in foreign currencies at December 31, 2021, by £2.6 million and as at December 31, 2020, by £2.3 million. A five percentage point decrease in exchange rates would increase the carrying value of net financial assets and
liabilities held in foreign currencies at December 31, 2021, by £2.6 million and as at December 31, 2020, by £2.3 million.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk from our operating activities, primarily trade receivables, and cash, cash equivalents and deposits held with banks and financial institutions.
Cash, cash equivalents and deposits are maintained with high-quality financial institutions in the United Kingdom and United States. We are also potentially subject to concentrations of credit risk in our trade receivables. Concentrations of
credit risk are with respect to trade receivables owed by a limited number of companies comprising our customer base. Our exposure to credit losses is low, however, owing largely to the credit quality of our collaboration partners which are
significantly larger than us.
We continually monitor our positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions and corporations, which are counterparts to our financial instruments and do
not anticipate non-performance. The maximum default risk corresponds to the carrying amount of the financial assets shown in the statement of financial positions. We monitor the risk of a liquidity shortage. The main factors considered here are
the maturities of financial assets as well as expected cash flows from equity measures.
Item 12. |
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities.
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
D. |
American Depositary Shares
|
Citibank, N.A., as depositary bank, registers and delivers our American Depositary Shares, also referred to as ADSs. Each ADS represents one ordinary share (or a right to
receive one ordinary share) deposited with Citibank, N.A., London Branch, or any successor, as custodian for the depositary. Each ADS will also represent any other securities, cash or other property which may be held by the depositary in respect
of the depositary facility. The depositary’s corporate office at which the ADSs are administered is located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. A deposit agreement among us, the depositary and the ADS holders sets out ADS holder
rights as well as the rights and obligations of the depositary. A form of the deposit agreement is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to this Annual Report.
Fees and Charges
As an ADS holder, you will be required to pay the following fees under the terms of the deposit agreement:
Service
|
|
Fee
|
Issuance of ADSs (e.g., an issuance of ADS upon a deposit of ordinary shares or upon a change in the ADS(s)-to-ordinary shares ratio, or for any other reason),
excluding ADS issuances as a result of distributions of ordinary shares
|
|
Up to $0.05 per ADS issued
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of ADSs (e.g., a cancellation of ADSs for delivery of deposited property or upon a change in the ADS(s)-to-ordinary shares ratio, or for any other
reason)
|
|
Up to $0.05 per ADS cancelled
|
|
|
|
Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions (e.g., upon a sale of rights and other entitlements)
|
|
Up to $0.05 per ADS held
|
|
|
|
Distribution of ADSs pursuant to (i) share dividends or other distributions, or (ii) exercise of rights to purchase additional ADSs
|
|
Up to $0.05 per ADS held
|
|
|
|
Distribution of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs (e.g., upon a spin-off)
|
|
Up to $0.05 per ADS held
|
|
|
|
ADS services
|
|
Up to $0.05 per ADS held on the applicable record date(s) established by the depositary
|
As an ADS holder, you will also be responsible to pay certain charges such as:
|
• |
taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) and other governmental charges;
|
|
• |
the registration fees as may from time to time be in effect for the registration of ordinary shares on the share register and applicable to transfers of ordinary shares to or from the name of the custodian,
the depositary or any nominees upon the making of deposits and withdrawals, respectively;
|
|
• |
certain cable, telex and facsimile transmission and delivery expenses;
|
|
• |
the expenses and charges incurred by the depositary in the conversion of foreign currency;
|
|
• |
the fees and expenses incurred by the depositary in connection with compliance with exchange control regulations and other regulatory requirements applicable to ordinary shares, ADSs and ADRs; and
|
|
•
|
the fees and expenses incurred by the depositary, the custodian, or any nominee in connection with the servicing or delivery of deposited property.
|
ADS fees and charges payable upon (i) the issuance of ADSs, and (ii) the cancellation of ADSs are charged to the person to whom the ADSs are issued (in the case of ADS issuances) and to
the person whose ADSs are cancelled (in the case of ADS cancellations). In the case of ADSs issued by the depositary into DTC, the ADS issuance and cancellation fees and charges may be deducted from distributions made through DTC, and may be
charged to the DTC participant(s) receiving the ADSs being issued or the DTC participant(s) holding the ADSs being cancelled, as the case may be, on behalf of the beneficial owner(s) and will be charged by the DTC participant(s) to the account of
the applicable beneficial owner(s) in accordance with the procedures and practices of the DTC participants as in effect at the time. ADS fees and charges in respect of distributions and the ADS service fee are charged to the holders as of the
applicable ADS record date. In the case of distributions of cash, the amount of the applicable ADS fees and charges is deducted from the funds being distributed. In the case of (i) distributions other than cash and (ii) the ADS service fee,
holders as of the ADS record date will be invoiced for the amount of the ADS fees and charges and such ADS fees and charges may be deducted from distributions made to holders of ADSs. For ADSs held through DTC, the ADS fees and charges for
distributions other than cash and the ADS service fee may be deducted from distributions made through DTC, and may be charged to the DTC participants in accordance with the procedures and practices prescribed by DTC and the DTC participants in
turn charge the amount of such ADS fees and charges to the beneficial owners for whom they hold ADSs.
In the event of refusal to pay the depositary fees or charges, the depositary may, under the terms of the Deposit Agreement, refuse the requested service until payment is received or may
set off the amount of the depositary fees and charges from any distribution to be made to the ADS holder. Note that the fees and charges holders may be required to pay may vary over time and may be changed by us and by the depositary. Holders
will receive prior notice of such changes. The depositary may reimburse us for certain expenses incurred by us in respect of the ADSs, by making available a portion of the ADS fees charged in respect of the ADSs or otherwise, upon such terms and
conditions as we and the depositary agree from time to time.
Item 13. |
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.
|
Not applicable.
Item 14. |
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.
|
Not applicable.
Item 15. |
Controls and Procedures.
|
A. |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
We
maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2021. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as
of December 31, 2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
B. |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f ) and 15d-15(f ) define this as
a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s chief executive and financial officers and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (as adopted by the IASB).
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not detect all misstatements. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness
of internal controls to future periods may prove invalid due to changes in the Company's circumstances and the risk that compliance with policies, procedures and controls is not sustained.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) 2013. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, was effective.
C. |
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm since we are an emerging growth company.
D. |
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this
Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 15T. |
Controls and Procedures.
|
Not applicable.
Item 16A. |
Audit Committee Financial Expert.
|
Our Board has determined that Mr. Coy is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication under the applicable
rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. Coy is independent as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Item 16B. |
Code of Ethics.
|
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all of our employees, officers and directors and is available on our website at
https://ir.immunocore.com/corporate-governance/document-charters. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this report and is not incorporated by reference herein. If we make any
amendment to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grant any waivers, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website to the extent required by the
rules and regulations of the SEC. Under Item 16B of Form 20-F, if a waiver or amendment of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller
and relates to standards promoting any of the values described in Item 16B(b) of Form 20-F, we are required to disclose such waiver or amendment on our website in accordance with the requirements of Instruction 4 to such Item 16B.
Item 16C. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
|
KPMG LLP has served as our independent registered public accountant since 2009 and has audited our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The following table shows the aggregate fees for services rendered by KPMG LLP to us and our subsidiaries, in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
|
£
|
’000
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Total
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
Audit fees. Audit fees consisted of fees for the audit of our annual financial statements and other professional services provided in
connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including fees for the review of our interim financial information.
Audit-related fees. Audit-related fees included fees for assurance reporting on our current and historical financial information
included in our SEC registration statements in connection with our initial public offering, including services that generally only the independent accountant can reasonably provide such as comfort letters.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee reviews and pre-approves the scope and the cost of audit services related to us and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent auditors.
All of the services related to us provided by KPMG LLP during the last fiscal year have been pre-approved by the audit committee.
Item 16D. |
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees.
|
Not applicable.
Item 16E. |
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.
|
Not applicable.
Item 16F. |
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.
|
Not applicable.
Item 16G. |
Corporate Governance.
|
We are a “foreign private issuer,” as defined by the SEC. As a result, in accordance with Nasdaq rules, we comply with home country governance requirements and certain
exemptions thereunder rather than complying with Nasdaq corporate governance standards. We voluntarily follow most Nasdaq corporate governance rules, but choose to take advantage of the following limited exemptions:
|
• |
Exemption from filing quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information or current reports on Form 8-K upon the occurrence of specified significant events;
|
|
• |
Exemption from Section 16 rules requiring insiders to file public reports of their securities ownership and trading activities and providing for liability for insiders who profit from trades in a short
period of time;
|
|
• |
Exemption from quorum requirements for shareholder meetings. In accordance with usual practice in England and Wales, our articles of association will provide alternative quorum requirements that are
generally applicable to shareholder meetings;
|
|
• |
Exemption from the Nasdaq rules applicable to domestic issuers requiring disclosure within four business days of any determination to grant a waiver of the code of business conduct and ethics to directors
and officers;
|
|
• |
Exemption from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval for certain issuances of securities, including shareholder approval of share option plans;
|
|
• |
Exemption from the requirement that our audit committee have review and oversight responsibilities over all “related party transactions,” as defined in Item 7.B of Form 20-F;
|
|
• |
Exemption from the requirement that our board have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;
and
|
|
• |
Exemption from the requirements that director nominees are selected, or recommended for selection by our board, either by (1) independent directors constituting a majority of our board’s independent
directors in a vote in which only independent directors participate, or (2) a committee comprised solely of independent directors, and that a formal written charter or board resolution, as applicable, addressing the nominations process is
adopted.
|
Furthermore, Nasdaq Rule 5615(a)(3) provides that a foreign private issuer, such as we, may rely on home country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain of the
rules in the Nasdaq Rule 5600 Series and Rule 5250(d), provided that we nevertheless comply with Nasdaq’s Notification of Noncompliance requirement (Rule 5625), the Voting Rights requirement (Rule 5640) and that we have an audit committee that
satisfies Rule 5605(c)(3), consisting of committee members that meet the independence requirements of Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(ii). Although we are permitted to follow certain corporate governance rules that conform to U.K. requirements in lieu of many
of the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, we comply with the Nasdaq corporate governance rules applicable to foreign private issuers.
Accordingly, our shareholders do not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of
Nasdaq. We may utilize these exemptions for as long as we continue to qualify as a foreign private issuer.
Item 16H. |
Mine Safety Disclosure.
|
Not applicable.
Item 16I.
|
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
|
Not applicable.
Item 17. |
Financial Statements.
|
See pages F-1 through F-47 of this Annual Report.
Item 18. |
Financial Statements.
|
Not applicable
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
Incorporation by Reference
|
Schedule/
Form
|
|
File
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
File Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Association of Immunocore Holdings plc.
|
|
20-F
|
|
001-39992
|
|
1.1
|
|
03/25/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit Agreement.
|
|
20-F
|
|
001-39992
|
|
2.2
|
|
03/25/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of American Depositary Receipt (included in Exhibit 2.2).
|
|
20-F
|
|
001-39992
|
|
2.3
|
|
03/25/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Securities.
|
|
20-F
|
|
001-39992
|
|
2.4
|
|
03/25/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription Agreement between the Registrant and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, dated February 3, 2021.
|
|
F-1/A
|
|
333-252166
|
|
4.3
|
|
02/03/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research Collaboration and License Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2013, by and among the Registrant, Genentech, Inc. and F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, as amended on September 27, 2016.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.5
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration and License Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2013, between the Registrant and GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.6
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and License Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2014, between the Registrant and Eli Lilly and Company, as amended on December 21, 2016, September 20, 2017 and December 19, 2018.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.7
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2016, between the Registrant and Genentech, Inc.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.8
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
License and Collaboration Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2018, by and among the Registrant, Genentech, Inc. and F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.9
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Loan Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2017, between the Registrant and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.10
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Global Access Commitments Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2020, between the Registrant and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.11
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Global Access Commitments Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2021, between the Registrant and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
|
|
F-1/A
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.12
|
|
02/03/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease, dated as of March 28, 2017, between the Registrant and MEPC MILTON PARK NO. 1 LIMITED and MEPC MILTON PARK NO. 2 LIMITED, on behalf of MEPC Milton LP.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.13
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease, dated as of December 28, 2017, between the Registrant and MEPC MILTON PARK NO. 1 LIMITED and MEPC MILTON PARK NO. 2 LIMITED, on behalf of MEPC Milton LP.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.14
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease, dated as of March 28, 2017, between the Registrant and MEPC MILTON PARK NO. 1 LIMITED and MEPC MILTON PARK NO. 2 LIMITED, on behalf of MEPC Milton LP.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.15
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment and Exclusive License, dated as of January 28, 2015, between the Registrant and Adaptimmune Limited.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.16
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2020, among the Registrant, Oxford Finance Luxembourg S.a r.l., and the
lenders listed on Schedule 1.1 thereof.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.17
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Bahija Jallal, Ph.D., dated January 29, 2021.
|
|
F-1/A
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.18
|
|
02/01/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deed of Termination of Convertible Loan Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2021, between the Registrant and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
|
|
F-1/A
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.19
|
|
02/03/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Deed of Indemnity between the Registrant and each of its directors.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.1
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Deed of Indemnity between the Registrant and each of its executive officers.
|
|
F-1
|
|
333-252166
|
|
10.2
|
|
01/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immunocore Holdings plc 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. and
Non-Employee Sub Plan to the Immunocore Holdings plc 2021 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
20-F
|
|
001-39992
|
|
4.20
|
|
03/25/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Termination Letter from GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd. to the Registrant with respect to NY-ESO,
dated February 8, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 22, 2021, among the Registrant, Oxford Finance Luxembourg S.à r.l.,
and the lenders listed on Schedule 1.1 thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 10, 2021, among the Registrant, Oxford Finance Luxembourg S.à
r.l., and the lenders listed on Schedule 1.1 thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.24*† |
|
Notice of Termination Letter from GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd. to the Registrant with respect to the Collaboration and License Agreement,
dated October 8, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
20-F
|
|
001-39992
|
|
8.1
|
|
03/25/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1*
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
|
|
† |
Certain portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been redacted in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(10).
|
# |
Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
|
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual
report on its behalf.
|
|
IMMUNOCORE HOLDINGS PLC
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Bahija Jallal
|
|
|
Bahija Jallal, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: March 3, 2022
|
|
|